Author(s)

Jumei Hu, Yushuang Shi, Mengxiong Li, Cunjian Yi^*

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of ADNEX model in early diagnosis and staging of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Method: 136 cases of ovarian cancer patients treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed using the ADNEX risk model and MRI data. The accuracy of the two diagnostic methods was compared with the results of pathological examination as gold standard. Results: For qualitative assessment, the accuracy and sensitivity of the ADNEX model were 78.70% and 93%, while the accuracy and sensitivity of MRI examination were 80.1%, and 90.7%, respectively. The diagnostic values of the two methods were not statistically different (P > 0.05). For ovarian tumor staging, the ADNEX model was significantly less accurate and specific for staging borderline tumor than MRI examination, although it had significantly higher sensitivity (P < 0.05). For tumors at other stages, there were no diagnostic differences between the methods (P > 0.05). Conclusion: ADNEX risk model has certain diagnostic and predictive value to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian tumors. It is useful to detect and exclude ovarian tumor. However, for early diagnosis, it is not accurate enough and further study is needed to validate this usefulness.

Ovarian Cancer, ADNEX Risk Model, MRI Examination

Hu, J. , Shi, Y. , Li, M. and Yi, C. (2017) Clinical Performance of ADNEX (The Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) Model in Early Diagnosis and Staging of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors. Yangtze Medicine, 1, 148-156. doi: 10.4236/ym.2017.13015.