American Journal of Plant Sciences

Volume 2, Issue 3 (September 2011)

ISSN Print: 2158-2742   ISSN Online: 2158-2750

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.20  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

The Taxonomic History and Original Literatures Arrangements of Living Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae)

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 1913KB)  PP. 496-506  
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2011.23058    5,005 Downloads   9,011 Views  Citations

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

Living Cephalotaxus (plum yews) occurs mainly in East Asia and North of Indo-China peninsula. The study of original taxonomic literatures found that, in early days, the plum yews had ever been described as palnts of Taxus (Taxaceae). Since after the genus name Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. was firstly cited (from inedited and unpublished Flora Japonica) by Endlicher in 1842, most taxonomist thought which is the earliest time of the genus Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. was set. However, the genus Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. was formally effective and valid published by Sieb. & Zucc. in Flora Japonica in 1870 so that there exists some confusions in chronological order. Originally as a genus, Cephalotaxus was included in family Taxaceae and Neger (1907) separated Cephalotaxus from Taxaceae and set family Cephalotaxaceae. Later, Fu (1984) divided Cephalotaxus up into two sections of Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. sect. Pectinatae L. K. Fu and Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. sect. Cephalotaxus L. K. Fu on the bases of C. oliveri Masters differ significantly from other taxa of Cephalotaxus in morphological characteristics. Although the plum yews was a little genus of conifers, up to now, about 77 taxa have still been published by taxonomist in different countries or regions. Among them, C. tardiva Sieb. ex Endl. (1847), C. umbraculifera Sieb. ex Endl. (1847), C. sumatrana Miq. (1856) and C. celebica Warb. (1900) have been combined to Taxus, and C. argotaenia (Hance) Pilger (1903) has been combined to Amentotaxus. And at the same time, those taxa existing in Cephalotaxus courently which were accepted by most taxonomist in different countries was also cited in acticle. Lastly, the paper thought presently there still exists many debates about binary classification of Cephalotaxus and the nomenclature of this genus still particularly confusing. Based on some controversial problems, we also point out some taxonomically researching directions at creating some order out of the chaos.

Share and Cite:

Lang, X. , Su, J. , Zhang, Z. and Lu, S. (2011) The Taxonomic History and Original Literatures Arrangements of Living Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2, 496-506. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2011.23058.

Cited by

[1] Testing the Complete Plastome for Species Discrimination, Cryptic Species Discovery and Phylogenetic Resolution in Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae).
Frontiers in plant …, 2022
[2] 983. CEPHALOTAXUS HARRINGTONIA VAR. WILSONIANA: Cephalotaxaceae
2021
[3] Revisiting the taxonomy of the names Cephalotaxus mannii and C. griffithii (Taxaceae)
2021
[4] Middle Miocene Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae) from Yunnan, Southwest China, and its implications to taxonomy and evolution of the genus
2019
[5] Cuticle micromorphology and the evolution of characters in leaves of Taxaceae sl
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017
[6] Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Cephalotaxus koreana in South Korea
?????????, 2014
[7] A taxonomic revision of the genus Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae)
Phytotaxa, 2013

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.