Open Journal of Psychiatry

Volume 6, Issue 2 (April 2016)

ISSN Print: 2161-7325   ISSN Online: 2161-7333

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.58  Citations  

Comparison of Gluteal Muscle Intramuscular Injection Sites of Japanese Healthy Subjects: Considerations for Optimal Insertion of Injection Needle Length

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 564KB)  PP. 203-212  
DOI: 10.4236/ojpsych.2016.62025    3,159 Downloads   5,674 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Long Acting Injectable (LAI) medications for patients with schizophrenia is commonly administered to relieve their symptoms. Through shared decision-making and clinical evidence-based, psychiatrists should systematically offer LAIs to all patients requiring long-term antipsychotic treatment as a first-line treatment. Gluteal intramuscular (IM) injection requires accurate insertion of needles into the specific muscle area, often the outer upper quadrant of the buttocks, in order to achieve the required blood concentration. The purposes of this study were to compare the “Distance from the Epidermis to the Under-Fascia (DEUF)” and “Distance from the Epidermis to the Iliac Bone (DEB)” of the buttocks IM injection sites at the dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal sites among healthy Japanese volunteer subjects, and to identify the optimal insertion injection needle length. The DEUF and DEB at the gluteal regions were measured by ultrasonography. Welch’s one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the DEUF and the DEB at the gluteal IM injection regions. There was no statistically significant difference observed between the right and left mean values of DEUF for Hochstetter and Clark’s point at the ventrogluteal sites, and the Four and Three-way split or Double Cross point at the dorsogluteal sites. However in the DEB, the Hochstetter’s point (P < 0.01) at ventrogluteal site on the right side, and Clark’s point (P < 0.05) were significantly shorter than the Double Cross point at dorsogluteal sites (F = 4.38). The left buttocks Hochstetter’s point was significantly shorter than the Double Cross point (F = 4.38, P < 0.01). These results, however, did not establish a statistically significant difference in the DEUF among injection sites. It was considered that the difference in the DEB depended on muscle volume and thickness in the gluteal injection sites.

Share and Cite:

Masuda, S. , Yasuhara, Y. , Tanioka, T. , Atsuta, A. , Motoki, K. , Takase, K. and Locsin, R. (2016) Comparison of Gluteal Muscle Intramuscular Injection Sites of Japanese Healthy Subjects: Considerations for Optimal Insertion of Injection Needle Length. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 203-212. doi: 10.4236/ojpsych.2016.62025.

Cited by

[1] Applying Intramuscular Injection to the Ventrogluteal Site; Is There a Difference Between the Two Hips in the Measurement of the Site?
2021
[2] Selection of Site for Administration of Intramuscular Injection to Adult Patients by Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study
Kocaeli üniversitesi Sa?l?k Bilimleri Dergisi, 2019
[3] Efficacy and Safety in Intramuscular Injection Techniques Using Ultrasonographic Data
2018
[4] Evaluations of echogenicity in gluteal muscle in patients with schizophrenia treated with second generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics: risperidone or …
Neurosonology, 2018
[5] creating a change in the use of ventrogluteal site for intramuscular injection
Patient preference and adherence, 2018
[6] Dolor al administrar medicamento por inyección intramuscular: ventroglútea vs dorsoglútea
Revista Enfermería Actual en Costa Rica, 2017
[7] Effects of Depth of Needle Insertion with Risperidone Long-Acting Injectable in Persons with Schizophrenia: A Randomized Double-Blind Study
2017
[8] Drawbacks of Long-Acting Intramuscular Antipsychotic Injections
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND PRACTICAL NURSING, 2017
[9] Pain in the administration of drugs by intramuscular injection: ventrogluteal vs dorsogluteal
2017
[10] Availability of Thickness Estimation of the Subcutaneous Fat by Using the Near-infrared Ray Measuring Device
2016

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.