Author(s)

Hideko Shibasaki^1*, Shingo Tokimoto², Yuichi Ono³, Tsugio Inoue⁴, Katsuo Tamaoka⁵

¹General Studies and Education Development, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan.
²Foreign Language Studies, Mejiro University, Shinjuku, Japan.
³Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
⁴Cultural Studies, University of Kochi, Kochi, Japan.
⁵Graduate School of Languages and Cultures, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

The present study aims to build a model of second language (L2) reading, taking into account working memory capacity and first language (L1) literacy as variables within structural equation modeling (SEM). In this study, a total of 120 Japanese L1 high school students were given a series of tests: 1) English reading span tests, 2) English vocabulary size tests, 3) English grammar tests, 4) Japanese literacy tests, and 5) two kinds of English reading tests. One of the English reading tests was on a general topic, and the other required specific background knowledge to control for the effects of topic familiarity. SEM revealed that L2 working memory, L2 grammatical knowledge, and L2 vocabulary knowledge significantly predicted general L2 reading, while general L2 reading, along with L1 literacy, was the significant predictor of L2 reading on a specific topic. Furthermore, L1 literacy predicted L2 vocabulary knowledge, and skilled L1 readers excelled at creating situation model for L2 reading comprehension, even when they lacked topical knowledge. The present study presents a more refined model of L2 reading comprehension, which accounts for L1 literacy and working memory more comprehensively than previous research has.

L2 English Reading Comprehension, Working Memory, L1 Japanese Literacy, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Acquisition of Knowledge

Shibasaki, H. , Tokimoto, S. , Ono, Y. , Inoue, T. and Tamaoka, K. (2015) English Reading Comprehension by Japanese High School Students: Structural Equation Modeling including Working Memory and L1 Literacy. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 443-458. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2015.55039.