Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.3 No.7(2013), Article ID:38559,4 pages DOI:10.4236/apm.2013.37084
Normality and Its Variants on Fuzzy Isotone Spaces
Department of Mathematics, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya
Email: machariastephen.y31@gmail.com, gichukih2002@yahoo.com, ptooex@yahoo.com, werehezron@gmail.com
Copyright © 2013 Stephen M. Gathigi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received August 7, 2013; revised September 8, 2013; accepted October 6, 2013
Keywords: Fuzzy Sets; Fuzzy Closure Space; Fuzzy Isotone Space; Fuzzy Normality
ABSTRACT
The study of fuzzy sets is specifically designed to mathematically represent uncertainty and vagueness by assigning values of membership to objects that belong to a particular set. This notion has been broadly extended to other areas of topology where various topological concepts have been shown to hold on fuzzy topology. Some notions naturally extend to closure spaces without requiring a lot of modification of the underlying topological ideas. This work investigates the variants of normality on fuzzy isotone spaces.
1. Introduction
The idea of a class of sets with a continuum of grade of membership, ranging between zero and one, was first introduced by Zadeh in 1965. A larger degree of membership of an object reflects a stronger sense of belonging to a set. If A is a set in the ordinary sense of the term, then its membership takes only two values, 0 and 1. The notions of inclusion, union, intersection, complement, relation and convexity can be extended to such sets [1].
Fuzzy closure spaces were introduced by [5] in an attempt to show that fuzzy topological spaces do not constitute a natural boundary for the validity of theorems and results. The axioms used to define fuzzy closure spaces are the modified Kuratowski closure axioms that have previously been used to extend the study of the concepts of topological spaces. The class of isotonic spaces is defined using only two Kuratowski closure axioms, namely the grounded axiom and the isotone axiom
where is the closure operator on a nonempty set
.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Fuzzy Sets
In [2], a fuzzy set in is defined as a function
. Here
represents the degree of membership of
in the fuzzy set
.
2.2. Crisp Fuzzy Sets
Any subset of a set
can be identified with its characteristic function
defined by;
(1)
Such characteristic functions are fuzzy sets in. Thus fuzzy sets generalize ordinary sets [3].
2.3. Definitions on Fuzzy Sets
Let and
be
-valued functions defined on a fixed set, i.e fuzzy sets on
. Then according to [3];
1) implies
for every
.
2) implies
for every
.
3) Maximum function:
.
4) Minimum function:
.
5) Complement function:. These are [0,1]-valued functions.
For two fuzzy sets and
in
;
1) and
are equal if and only if
.
2) is contained in
if and only if
.
3) The union of and
is
.
4) The intersection of and
is
.
5) The complement of is
.
Let be fuzzy sets. Then the union of
is defined by;
(2)
The intersection of is defined by;
(3)
If are crisp, i.e. they are characteristic functions, then these suprema and infima are actually maxima and minima.
2.4. Fuzzy Topology
According to [4], a fuzzy topology on a set is a collection
of fuzzy sets in
satisfying
1), where
is equivalent to the empty set.
2) If and
belong to
, then
.
3) If are fuzzy, then
. The members of
are called open fuzzy sets.
The pair is called a fuzzy topological space. Fuzzy sets of the form
, where
is fuzzy are called closed fuzzy sets.
2.5. Functions and Fuzzy Continuity
Let and
be sets and
be a function. For a fuzzy set
in
, the inverse image of
under
is the fuzzy set
in
defined by;
for. That is
.
For a fuzzy set in
, the image of
under
is the fuzzy set
in
defined for
by;
(4)
2.6. Fuzzy Continuity
Given fuzzy topological spaces and
, then according to [2],
is fuzzy continuous if the inverse image under
of any open fuzzy set
in
is an open fuzzy set in
, i.e
whenever
.
The identity mapping on a fuzzy topological space
is fuzzy continuous.
2.7. Closure and Interior Operation on Fuzzy Sets
Let be a fuzzy topological space. The closure
and interior
of a fuzzy set
in
are defined respectively by [3] as follows;
It is easily seen that is the smallest closed fuzzy set larger than
and that
is the largest open fuzzy set smaller than
. These definitions coincide with their analogous definitions on ordinary sets.
2.8. Fuzzy Closure Spaces
Let be the collection of all mappings from
to the unit interval
, i.e
is the collection of all fuzzy sets on the non-empty set
. Then from [5], an operator
is a fuzzy closure operator if and only if
1) constant.
2) for every
.
3) for every
.
4) for every
.
The closure operator may also be used to characterize closed sets. A set is closed if
. A fuzzy interior operator
is the dual of a closure operator. It is defined by;
1) constant.
2) for every
.
3) for every
.
4) for every
.
Similarly, the interior operator may also be used to characterize open sets. A set is open if
.
A Cech fuzzy closure operator (or CF-closure operator) on a set is a function
satisfying the following three axioms;
1) constant.
2) for every
.
3) for every
.
The pair is called a fuzzy closure space or fcs. Clearly these axioms can easily be seen to be similar to the Kuratowski axioms in [6].
3. Results
The following are the main results of this work.
3.1. Fuzzy Isotone Space
A fuzzy isotone closure operator on a set is a function
satisfying the following two axioms;
1) constant.
2) For every,
.
The pair is called a fuzzy isotone space.
3.2. Semi-Separated and Separated Fuzzy Sets
We would like to modify the definitions of semi-separated and separated sets in order to have their equivalent characterization on fuzzy isotone spaces. This will facilitate the definition of complete normality on fuzzy isotone spaces.
In a fuzzy isotonespace, two fuzzy subsets
and
are called semi-separated if
.
The fuzzy subsets and
are separated if there exists open fuzzy sets
, V with
and
such that
. The openness of fuzzy sets on
is defined using the dual of the closure operator, i.e the interior operator.
Lemma
Let. Then
and
are semi-separated in
if and only if
and
are semi-separated in
, where
is the relativization of
into
.
Proof
Let be a fuzzy isotone space and
be semi-separated fuzzy sets in
. Then
.
But hence
.
Similarly, hence
Therefore, and
are semi-separated in
.
Conversely, let be a subspace of the fuzzy isotone space
and
and
are semi-separated in
. Of course
and
.
.
Similarly,
.
Thus and
are semi-separated in
.
3.3. Normality
A fuzzy isotone space is normal if for every nonempty pair of fuzzy sets
and
in
such that
there exists a fuzzyopen set
such that
and
.
Normality may be characterized via the existence of a fuzzy continuous real-valued function just as in topological spaces.
Let be a normal fuzzy isotone space. Then for each pair of disjoint fuzzy subsets
and Ф, there exists a fuzzy continuous function
such that
on
and
on
. Clearly, this characterization is analogous to the definition of normality via the existence of an Urysohn function on a normal topological space.
3.4. Complete Normality
A fuzzy isotone space is said to be completely normal if every fuzzy subspace of
is normal.
Theorem
A fuzzy isotone space is completely normal if and only if for every pair
and
of fuzzy subsets with
then there exists disjoint fuzzy sets
and
.
Proof
Let be completely normal and
be fuzzy sets with
. Denote
, a subspace of
by
. Then
since
.
Similarly,
.
Clearly and
are closed sets in
such that. Notice
.
Therefore, since is completely normal, then
is normal and hence there exists
and
in
such that
and
.
Conversely, let be a subspace of
and
such that
and
with
. Then
. Similarly,
. Therefore, by the hypothesis of the theorem, there exists disjoint fuzzy sets
and
.
The fuzzy sets and
are disjoint and contained in
and
. Hence
is normal and
is therefore completely normal.
3.5. Perfect Normality
Perfect normality has not been defined in fuzzy closure spaces. Therefore, different characterizations are given under this section as modifications from topological spaces. A few basic concepts have to be carried over from general topological spaces before any meaningful definition of perfectly normal isotonic spaces can be given.
3.5.1. Preliminary Definitions
It is known form point-set topology and from fuzzy topology that though the countable union of closed sets need not be closed, and the countable intersection of open sets need not be open, such sets occur frequently in analysis. The occurrence of such sets guarantees perfect normality on a space.
A fuzzy set is called a
-set if and only if
where
. A set
is called an
-set if
where.
A fuzzy isotone space is perfectly normal if
is normal and for every fuzzy subset
of
,
is a
-set. That is for every closed fuzzy set
in
,
. Equivalently, a normal isotonic space
is perfectly normal if every open fuzysubset of
is an
-set. That is, for every fuzzy set
, then
.
3.5.2. Theorem
The fuzzy isotone space is perfectly normal if for every
such that
,
and
, then
a fuzzy continuous function
that precisely separates
and
. That is
and
3.5.3. Theorem
Every perfectly normal fuzzy isotone space is completely normal.
Proof
Since a fuzzy isotone space is completely normal if and only if every subspace is normal, then in order to show that perfect normality implies complete normality, it suffices to show the heredity of perfect normality. Let be perfectly normal fuzzy isotone space. Then for every closed fuzzy set
there exists a fuzzy continuous function
such that
.
Let be a subspace of
and
be closed. Then there exists a fuzzy closed set
such that
. Since
is closed in
, then there exists a fuzzy continuous function
such that. But
is also fuzzy continuous and
. Therefore
is perfectly normal and hence normal. This implies that X is completely normal and hence perfect normality implies complete normality.
4. Conclusion
The variants of normality naturally extend to the class of fuzzy isotone spaces and to the fuzzy closure spaces generally. Therefore, on fuzzy isotone spaces, perfect normality implies complete normality which implies normality.
REFERENCES
- L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1965, pp. 338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
- C. L. Chang, “Fuzzy Topological Spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1968, pp. 265-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90057-7
- R. Lowen, “Fuzzy Topological Spaces and Fuzzy Compactness,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1976, pp. 621-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(76)90029-9
- T. E. Gantner, R. C. Steinlage and H. R. Warren, “Compactness in Fuzzy Topological Spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1978, pp. 547-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(78)90148-8
- A. S. Mashhour andM. H. Ghanim, “Fuzzy Closure Spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 106, No. 3, 1985, pp. 154-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(85)90138-6
- W. J. Thron, “What Results Are Valid on Cech-Closure Spaces,” Topology Proceedings, Vol. 6, 1981, pp. 135- 158.