ding with those determined by EVS 835: 2003, EN 806-3 and recorded values in school buildings.

to 2 times smaller than those calculated by the EVS standard and about 5 times smaller than those determined by the EN standard.

The big difference in DHW actual consumption and the same by standards due to the fact that standards are based on decades ago the situation. Thus, according to standards obtained the probability consumption does not meet the current situation.

Figure 6 shows the comparison of design flow rates determined for schools by the empiric formula, the standard EVS 835 and recorded values. It can be seen that in about 50% of schools the design flow rates determined by the empiric Formula (3) the flow rates are considerably smaller, in about 30% of the schools they are somewhat smaller and in 20% of the schools they are equal or somewhat bigger comparing with standard EVS 835.

At a same time the association with the actual design flow rates is better as the calculation depended on the

Figure 6. Comparison of the design flow rates determined for schools by the empiric Formula (3), the standard EVS 835 and recorded values.

number of water outlet devices only slightly, the majority of which are used marginally.

Variation graph of DHW consumption is presented in Figure 7. As can be seen in ordinary school there is no DHW consumption at weekend. Maximum consumption on weekdays takes place at lunchtime.

3.2. Kindergartens

The design flow rates recorded in kindergartens and those determined by the standard EVS 825:2003, and design flow rates calculated by Formula (4) are presented in Table 3.

In Table 3, we can see that the design flow rates determined by EVS 835: 2003 are bigger than the actual ones, which fact results in over dimensioning the DHW instantaneous heat exchangers and the control devices.

As the design flow rates determined by the EVS standard are up to 1.8 times bigger than the measured ones in kindergartens, a new empirical formula is presented for determining them in selecting water heating devices (4)

(4)

where q—design flow rate l/s; N1 is the number of showers, N2 is the number of children, N3 is number of water outlet devises.

Table 3 shows that the design flow rates determined by Formula (4) are up to 1.7 times smaller than the ones determined by the EVS standard.

Variability graph of DHW consumption in kindergarten is presented in Figure 8. Maximum consumption in kindergartens can take place in the morning, at lunch time as well as in the afternoon. On most days the top maximum consumption occurs at lunchtime.

3.3. Office Buildings

Table 4 presents the design flow rates recorded in office buildings and those determined by EVS 835: 2003,

Figure 7. Weekly variability graph of DHW consumption in the educational building.

Figure 8. Weekly variability graph of DHW consumption in kindergarten.

Table 3. Comparison of the design flow rates determined by the results of recording with those determined by EVS 835: 2003 and Formula (4).

Table 4. Comparison of the design flow rates determined by the results of recording with those determined by EVS 835:2003 and EN 806-3 in office buildings.

EN 806-3 and building parameters. A comparison of these standards values with the results of recording is given in Table 4

A new empirical Formula (5) for determining the design flow rates in dimensioning the water heating devices was recommended

(5)

where q—design flow rate l/s; N1—number of showers; N2—number of people; N3—number of water outlet devises.

Table 4 shows that the use of EVS 835: 2003 leads to a most considerable over dimensioning of the DHW instantaneous heat exchangers and the control devices. In Table 4, it can be seen that the design flow rates of office buildings determined by the Euro standard are not suitable for Estonia, because the results obtained are more than 10 times bigger than the measured consumption in office buildings. The reason is that the probability consumption does not meet the current situation.

Table 4 shows that the design flow rates in office buildings determined by the standard EVS 835 are about 4 and even more times bigger than the maximum flow rates measured. The results obtained by determining the flow rates by the Euro standard are even up to 15 times bigger than the maximum flow rates measured. For that reason a new empiric formula has been worked out for determining the design flow rates for office and public buildings (5).

Table 4 shows that the design flow rates determined by Formula (5) are up to 2 times smaller than those determined by the standard EVS and up to 8 times smaller than the design flow rates determined by the Euro standard.

Figure 9 presents a comparison of the design flow rates determined for office buildings by the empiric Formula (5), the standard EVS 835 and recorded values. We can see that design flow rates determined by the Formula

Figure 9. Comparison of the design flow rates determined for office buildings by the empiric formula (5), the standard EVS 835 and recorded values.

(5) are more close to recorded values.

The weekly variability graph of DHW consumption in the office building is presented in . The graph given in is typical of smaller office buildings that have no sauna. Characteristic of such office buildings is the DHW consumption only on workdays with the top consumption only at lunchtime.

3.4. Shopping Centers

Table 5 gives a comparison of the recorded maximum flow rates, design flow rates determined by the standard EVS 835 and the Formula (6) and the values that affect the water consumption.

Table 5 shows that the DHW design flow rates determined for trade centers by the standard EVS 835 are at least 3 times bigger than the actual maximum consumption. Such a situation made it necessary to work out a new calculation formula for determining the DHW design flow rates for trade centers.

One of the reasons for the great difference between the actual DHW maximum consumption and the design flow rates determined by the standard EVS is the fact that the preparation of semi-fabricated food on the spot has been finished.

Below we present a recommendable calculation Formula (6)

(6)

Where q is design flow rate l/s; N1 is number of showers; N2 is number of visitors; N3 is number of water outlets.

4. Conclusions

With drastically decreased DHW consumption rising a need for new calculation formulas for determining the DHW design flow rates for instantaneous heat exchangers, the new calculation methodology of dimensioning

. Weekly variability graph of DHW consumption in office building.

Table 5. Comparison of the recorded maximum flow rates, design flow rates determined by the standard EVS 835 and the formula (6).

instantaneous heat exchangers for DHW systems is of particular importance. In the papers of several investigators, it has also been pointed out that for heating DHW it would be suitable to use instantaneous heat exchangers instead of tank type water heaters. This would at the same time decrease the risk of Legionella disease.

The DHW design flow rates determined for office buildings and shopping centers by the recommended empiric formulas are about two times lower than those determined by the still used method EVS 835.

5. Acknowledgements

Publication of this article was supported by the ESF measure 1.2.4, Development of cooperation and innovation of universities, the sub-measure “Doctoral Schools” that finances the project “Construction and Environmental Engineering PhD School”—project code 1.2.0401.09-0080.

REFERENCES

1. A. V. Hludov, “Supply of Domestic Hot Water,” Edition of Construction, Moscow, 1957.
2. E. Г. Бродский, Горячее водоснабжение при теплo- фикaции. Л., 1961. (Supply of domestic hot water with district heating)
3. J. D. Borodkin and N. G. Dvoretskov, “Modes of Hot Water Supply of Residential Buildings and Their Effect on the Regulation Heat Supply,” Proceedings of Heat Supply of Cities, Vol. 95, Scientific Papers of AKH, Moscow, 1973, pp. 49-52.
4. J. G. Brodski, “Investigation of Modes of Hot Water Systems in Open District Heating Network,” Proceedings of Heat Supply of Cities, Vol. 38, Scientific Papers of AKH, Moscow, 1965, pp. 65-79.
5. T.-A. Koiv, “Experimental Study of Modes of Hot Water Consumption by the Residents of Tallinn,” Scientific Papers of TPI, Vol. 420, Tallinn, 1977, pp. 35-42.
6. S. Deng, “Energy and Water Uses and Their Performance Explanatory Indicators in Hotels in Hong Kong,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2003, pp. 775-784. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00238-4
7. C.-L. Cheng, “Study of the Inter-Relationship between Water Use and Energy Conservation for a Building,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, pp. 261-266. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00097-4
8. R. M. Willis, R. A. Stewart, K. Panuwatwanich, S. Jones and A. Kyriakides, “Alarming Visual Display Monitors Affecting Shower End Use Water and Energy Conservation in Australian Residential Households,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 54, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1117-1127. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.004
9. R. M. Willis, R. A. Stewart, D. P. Giurco, M. R. Talebpour and A. Mousavinejad, “End Use Water Consumption in Households: Impact of Socio-Demographic Factors and Efficient Devices,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, in Press. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.006
10. C. G. Carrington, D. M. Warrington and Y. C. Yak, “Structure of Domestic Hot Water Consumption,” Energy Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007, pp. 65-75.
11. J. P. Meyer and M. Tshimankinda, “Domestic Hot Water Consumption in South African Houses for Developed and Developing Communities,” Energy Research, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1997, pp. 667-673. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(19970610)21:7<667::AID-ER286>3.0.CO;2-2
12. R. Rankin and P. G. Rousseau, “Sanitary Hot Water Consumption Patterns in Commercial and Industrial Sectors in South Africa: Impact on Heating System Design,” Energy Conversion Management, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2006, pp. 687-701. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.002
13. J. P. Meyer, “Domestic Hot Water Consumption of the Developed and Developing Communities in South Africa,” ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 105, 1999.
14. J. P. Meyer, “A Review of Domestic Hot Water Consumption in South Africa,” R & D Journal, Vol. 16, 2000, pp. 55-61.
15. J. E. Calmeyer and G. J. Delport, “The Modelling and Control of Hot Water Consumption in Residential Hostells,” Africon IEEE, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 825-830.
16. B. Ndoye and M. Sarr, “Influence of Domestic Hot Water Parameters on the Energy Consumption of Large Buildings in Senegal,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 44, No. 16, 2003, pp. 2635-2649. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00023-2
17. A. A. Hegazy, “Effect of Inlet Design on the Performance of Storage-Type Domestic Electrical Energy,” Water Heaters,” Vol. 84, No. 12, 2007, pp. 1338-1355.
18. R. T. A Prado and O. M. Gonçalves, “Water Heating through Electric Shower and Energy Demand,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1998, pp. 77-82. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00034-6
19. B. Nemethi and Z. Szantho, “The Role of Pipe-Diameters in Operating the Non-balanced Domestic Hot Water Circulation Systems,” WSEAS Transactions on Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 1, No. 6, 2006, pp. 660-665.
20. B. Nemethi and Z. Szantho, “Measurement Study on Demand of Domestic Hot Water in Residential Buildings”, 2nd IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Energy and Environment, Portoroz, 15-17 May 2007.
21. J. Bujak, “Heat Consumption for Preparing Domestic Hot Water in Hospitals,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1047-1055.
22. T. Cholewa and A. Siuta-Olcha, “Experimental Investigations of a Decentralized System for Heating and Hot Water Generation in a Residential Building,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2010, pp. 183-188. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.013
23. B. Bøhm and P. O. Danig, “Monitoring the Energy Consumption in a District Heated Apartment Building in Copenhagen, with Specific Interest in the Thermodynamic Performance,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2004, pp. 229-236. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.11.006
24. K. Yliniemi, J. Delsing and J. van Deventer, “Experimental Verification of a Method for Estimating Energy for Domestic Hot Water Production in a 2-Stage District Heating Substation,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2009, pp. 169-174. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.08.008
25. R. Savickas, “Efficiency of Hot Water Supply Systems in Buildings,” Ph.D. Thesis, Vilnius University of Technology, Vilnius, 2006.
26. “Estimates of Hot Water Consumption from the 1998 EFUS, Implications for the Modeling of Fuel Poverty in England,” 2005. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68232849/Estimates-of-hot-water-consumption-from-the-1998-EFUS 2
27. F. S. Goldner, “Try These on for Size: New Guidelines for Multifamily Water Heating,” Home Energy Magazine, 1996.
28. P. Fairey and D. S. Parker, “A Review of Hot Water Draw Profiles Used in Performance Analysis of Residential Domestic Hot Water Systems,” Research Report, University of Central Florida, Florida, 2004.
29. E. Vine, R. Diamond and R. Szydlowski, “Domestic Hot Water Consumption in Four Low-Income Apartment Buildings,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley. doi:10.1016/0360-5442(87)90005-3
30. R. Hendron and J. Burch, “Development of Standardized Domestic Hot Water Event Schedules for Residential Buildings.” http://www.osti.gov/bridge
31. C. Aguilar, D. J. White and D. L. Ryan, “Domestic Water Heating and Water Heater Energy Consumption in Canada,” CBEEDAC 2005-RP-02.
32. M. Alary and J. R. Joly, “Risk Factors for Contamination of Domestic Hot Water Systems by Legionella,” Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 57, No. 8, 1991, pp. 2360- 2367.
33. H. Y. Buse, M. E. Schoen and N. J. Ashbolt, “Legionella in Engineered Systems and Use of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment to Predict Exposure,” Water Research, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2012, pp. 921-933. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.022
35. D. Ocipova, Z. Vranayova and O. Sikula, “Experimental Analysis of a Hot Water Tank from the View Point of Microbiological Risk,” 10th Rehva World Congress on Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings, 2010.
36. T.-A. Koiv and A. Toode, “Calculation of Load of the DHW Heat Exchanger in Residential Buildings,” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy Engneering, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2000, pp. 278-283.
37. T.-A. Koiv and A. Toode, “Trends in Domestic Hot Water consumption in Estonia Apartement Buildings,” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy Engneering, Vol. 12, No 1, 2006, pp.72-80.
38. A. Toode and T. -A. Koiv, “Domestic Hot Water Consumption Investigation in Apartment Buildings,” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2005, pp. 207-214.
39. A. Toode, “DHW Consumption, Consumption Profiles and Their Influence on Dimensioning of a District Heating Network,” Ph.D. Thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 2008.
40. T. -A. Koiv and A. Toode, “Energy Consumption Trends in Estonian Apartment Buildings,” Proceedings of the 1th Scientific-Technical Conference “Heating and ventilation in agriculture and industry” in Tlen, Poland, 7-9 September 2006, pp. 39-46.
41. M. Lahe, “Investigation of DHW Consumption in Trade, Residential and Public Buildings,” Master’s thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 2010.
42. EVS 835, “Kinnistu veevärgi projekteerimine,” Eesti standard, Tallinn, 2003. (Designing Water Supply Systems for Buildings. Estonian Standard).
43. EN 806-3, “Specifications for Installations inside Buildings Conveying Water for Human Consumption—Pipe sizing,” European Standard, Brussels, 2006.
44. K. T. Papakostas, N. E. Papageorgiou and B. A. Sotiropoulos, “Residential Hot Water Use Patterns in Greece,” Process Equipment Design (PED) Laboratory, Energy Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 1995. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(95)00014-I
45. H. Aki, Y. Taniguchi, I. Tamura, A. Kegasa, H. Hayakawa, Y. Ishikawa, S. Yamamoto and I. Sugimoto, “Fuel Cells and Energy Networks of Electricity, Heat, and Hydrogen: A Demonstration in Hydrogen-Fueled Apartments,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1204-1213. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.021
46. T.-A. Koiv, A. Toode and A. Hani, “The Influence of Domestic Hot Water Maximum Consumption on the District Heating Network Dimensioning,” Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, pp. 104-108.