Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology
Vol.5 No.3(2014), Article ID:42619,7 pages DOI:10.4236/abb.2014.53022

Comparison of ASBR and CSTR reactor for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

Jiravut Seengenyoung1, Sompong O-Thong2,3, Poonsuk Prasertsan1,4

1Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University, Phatthalung, Thailand

3Microbial Resource Management Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University, Phatthalung, Thailand

4Palm Oil Products and Technology Research Center (POPTEC), Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

Email: poonsuk918@yahoo.com

Copyright © 2014 Jiravut Seengenyoung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Jiravut Seengenyoung et al. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian.

Received 28 November 2013; revised 31 December 2013; accepted 21 January 2014

KEYWORDS: Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2; Hydrogen Production; Palm Oil Mill Effluent; Thermophilic Fermentation

ABSTRACT

Hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 was investigated both in batch and continuous reactors using anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) and continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The hydrogen production determined from batch experiment of POME at an inoculum size of 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% (v/v) was 161, 201, 246 and 296 mL H2/g-COD with COD removal efficiency of 21%, 23%, 23% and 23%, respectively. Continuous hydrogen production was start-up with 30% (v/v) inoculum in both ASBR and CSTR reactors and more than 30% COD removal could be obtained at HRT of 4 days, corresponding to OLR of 11.3 g COD/ L·day. Similar hydrogen production rates of 2.05 and 2.16 L H2/L. day were obtained from ASBR and CSTR, respectively. COD removal efficiency of ASBR was 37.7%, while it was 44.8% for CSTR. However, ASBR was stable in term of alkalinity, while the CSTR was stable in term of hydrogen production, soluble metabolites concentration and alkalinity. Therefore, the CSTR was found to be more stable in hydrogen production than ASBR under the same OLR. Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2; Hydrogen Production; Palm Oil Mill Effluent; Thermophilic Fermentation

1. INTRODUCTION

Hydrogen (H2) is a clean and promising fuel when it is ultimately derived from renewable energy sources. It has high energy content, and water is the sole end product after combustion [1]. Hydrogen production by microorganisms can be divided into two main categories: one involves the use of photosynthetic bacteria and algae under light condition and the other, anaerobic fermentative bacteria under dark condition. Dark fermentative production of hydrogen can convert often negative valued organic wastes into hydrogen-rich gas [2-5]. Thermophilic bacteria are therefore considered as most promising microorganisms than mesophilic bacteria for H2 production. A strict anaerobic thermophilic bacterial strain with high production rate and yield of H2, named Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2, was isolated from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by O-Thong et al. [1]. The microbial community during hydrogen production from POME using anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) at high temperature was dominated by Thermoanaerobacterium spp. that included close relatives of T. thermosaccharolyticum, T. aotearoense and uncultured Thermoanaerobacterium [1]. C/N ratio and iron concentration have a significant interactive effect on the hydrogen production ability of the Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge [2]. One of the factors affecting the yield and the rate of hydrogen formation by dark fermentation is the composition of the bacterial culture. The use of pure cultures in dark fermentation of carbohydrates for hydrogen production is expensive and technically difficult requiring sterile conditions and strict control of environmental conditions [6]. Among the various approaches to increasing hydrogen production yield from organic wastes, the nutrient supplementation appears promising. Nutrient supplementation improved simultaneous hydrogen production and pollution reduction from POME using thermophilic fermentation. T. thermosaccharolyticum was the dominant hydrogen producing microorganisms in this fermentation [7]. Bioaugmentation is the practice of adding specific microorganisms to a system to enhance a desired activity [8]. This increases the population of bacteria after upsets from uncontrolled biomass loss, fluctuations in pH, toxic events, or temperature decrease [8] and degradation of specific substrates [9]. For anaerobic fermentation, bioaugmentation has been investigated at laboratory scale to improve start-up of new digesters [10]. The economics value as a result of this study was the optimum inoculums concentration for start-up culture. Output from the by-product was acid metabolism, such as acetic acid and butyric acid. ASBR was employed for fermentation of hydrogen from palm oil mill effluent (POME) and nutrient-supplemented POME for substrate gave the hydrogen production rate of 4.4 ± 0.38 LL−1∙d−1 and 6.1 ± 0.03 LL−1∙d−1, respectively [7]. Moreover, biohydrogen production is usually conducted via continuous flow stirred tank reactors (CSTR) because they are easy to operate and can provide a good substrate-biomass contact by vigorous mixing [11]. Of all information, there is a possibility to use POME for hydrogen production by using T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 as start-up inoculums (bioaugmentation) and used ASBR and CSTR for operation in the experiment.

In this study, batch experiment focused on finding the optimum inoculums size for hydrogen production potential and COD removal and compared the performance of ASBR and CSTR operation on hydrogen production stability and COD removal for long time operation. In addition, the metabolite characteristics from hydrogen production was also determined.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Inoculum and POME

The thermophilic fermentative bacterium Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2, previously isolated by O-Thong et al. [3], was used for the inoculums preparation in this experiment. The basal anaerobic medium (BA medium) was prepared as previously described [12]. The medium was flushed with nitrogen gas for 20 min to obtain completely anaerobic conditions. The pH of medium was adjusted to 5.5 by adding 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. Cell suspension of 10 ml from cultivation at 60˚C at exponential growth phase (OD660 0:5) [1] was transferred into 90 mL supplemented BA medium and cultured another round, After that, the microbial suspension was used as the experiment inoculums. The culture was stored in a refrigerator and subcultured once a month. The purity of this culture was routinely checked under the microscope.

POME was collected from the receiving tank of Labtavee Palm Oil Co., Ltd. in southern Thailand. It had the following characteristics: high temperature (60˚C - 85˚C), 4.6 g oil L−1, 39.2 g total solids L−1, 6 g suspended solids L−1, 56.3 g COD L−1, 1.5 g total nitrogen L−1, 125 mg total phosphorus L−1, 8.3 g total carbohydrate L−1, 589 mg glucose L−1, 657 mg arabinose L−1, 2.1 g xylose L−1.

2.2. Reactor Operation and Monitoring on ASBR

The experiment using ASBR was setup. The reactor tank was made from a glass bottle with a total volume of 1 L. The operating volume was 800 mL. The reactor was run by intermittent mixed feeding at 200 rpm and with 24 h cycles. Each cycle consisted of 30 min fill, 22 h 40 min reaction, 30 min settlement, 10 min draw and 10 min idle [7]. ASBR was operated at 60 ± 1˚C, pH of 5.5 ± 0.2, 4-day HRT [3] and 11.5 ± 0.2 gL−1∙d−1 OLR. The inoculums T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 of 240 mL (30% v/v), 160 mL (20% v/v) and 80 mL (10% v/v) were fed into the ASBR using no addition of inoculums (0% v/v) for control and fulfill nutrient-supplemented POME to 800 ml. The incubation was conducted for 4 days (batch experiment). After that, POME was then fed into the reactor at 0.2 l cycle−1∙day−1 to achieve a 4-day HRT. The steady-state condition was reached when hydrogen gas content, biogas volume and the volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration in the effluent were stable (less than 10% variation) for a week [7]. The pH was maintained at 5.5 by adding 2 M HCl or 2 M NaOH. The ASBR was routinely monitored for pH, gas production and composition, total carbohydrate utilization, total alkalinity, COD removal, total solids, volatile solids and volatile organic acids.

2.3. Reactor Operation and Monitoring on CSTR

The experiment was carried out in a 4 L reactor with 2.5 L working volume of POME was used as substrate for the experiment. The reactor was operated at 60˚C with a HRT of 4 days. The reactor was fed three times per day using a peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow). Inoculum from ASBR was used as start-up culture and operation was conducted for 30 days. The pH was maintained at 5.5 by adding 2 M HCl or 2 M NaOH. The ASBR was routinely monitored for pH, gas production and composition, total carbohydrate utilization, total alkalinity, COD reduction, total solids, volatile solids and volatile organic acids.

2.4. Analytical Methods

The volume of biogas was measured with a wet syringe and the composition was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC-8APT) with thermal conductivity detector (TCD), Shimadzu, Japan. The temperatures of the injection port, oven and detector were 100˚C, 50˚C and 100˚C, respectively. Argon as a carrier gas and the activated charcoal packed column were used for the analysis of biogas composition [13]. Liquid samples were taken from the culture at designated time intervals to analyze for the composition of soluble metabolites including pH and reducing sugar. The reducing sugar was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Aligent 1100. The hydrogen effluent was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min, then, the supernatant was filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane with 0.2-µL pores. The apparatus of HPLC including a quaternary pump, a manual injector, a refractive index detector, an online vacuum degasser, a thermostatted column compartment, an Aminex HPX-87H ion exclusion column (300 mm × 7.8 mm) (Bio-Rad, USA) and a ChemStation Software. Operation conditions were: 20 µL sample volume; 5 mM H2SO4 as a mobile phase; flow rate of 0.7 mL/min and a column temperature of 65˚C. The total carbohydrate content was analyzed by the Anthrone method [10] Chemical oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), and ammonium nitrogen and alkalinity were measured according to standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [14]. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), volatile organic acids, total phosphorus and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) were determined in accordance with the procedures described in the Standard Methods [15]. The total carbohydrate content was analyzed by the anthrone method [16].

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Effects of Inoculum Size on Hydrogen Production in Batch Fermentation

The reactor in first batch reached stop produce hydrogen after 5 days. It was found that the inoculation of T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 at 30% gave the maximum hydrogen yield (Yp/s) of 296.14 mL/g-COD (Table 1) while inoculation at 10% and 20% gave the hydrogen yield of 201 and 246 mL/g-COD, respectively. The experiments followed by heat-treated inoculums and no inoculums addition methods which gave the hydrogen yield of 269 and 258 mL/g-COD, respectively. The hydrogen content was 41%, 42%, 39%, 40% and 44%, respectively. COD was reduced by 23% in all methods. However, the inoculation of T. thermosaccharolyticum

Table 1. Comparative hydrogen production performance from various methods for preparing thermophilic hydrogen production seed in batch operation system (4 days).

*HT = Heat treatment inoculum, TS = Total suspended solids, VS = Volatile solids, TSU = Total sugar utilization, TCU = Total carbohydrate utilization and COD removal = Chemical oxygen demand reduction.

PSU-2 at 30% was not cost effective for practical use in industry, although it gave acetic acid and butyric acid (4.4 and 3.8 g/L, respectively) as a major soluble metabolites. In addition, this experiment gave the total alkalinity, total suspended solids, volatile solids of 2.1 mg/L, 33.8 g/L, 17.9 g/L, respectively, with 60% total sugar utilization and 84% total carbohydrate utilization. The characteristics of the fermentation broth was similar to all other treatments.

3.2. Hydrogen Production on ASBR Semi Continuous Operation

The reactor in the first batch stopped producing hydrogen after 5 days cultivation. After that the system was operated steadily for a month in continuous operation at 4-day HRT. Before reaching steady state, fluctuations were observed in hydrogen production and other parameters. In the follow-up on long-term operation for hydrogen production, the experimental results showed the inconsistency of hydrogen production, because of the adaptation of culture process from batch system to semicontinuous mode. The addition of starter culture T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 at 30% (v/v) resulted in the production rate (average) of 2.1 LL1∙d1 (Figure 1). However, in the follow-up long-term operation, hydrogen production was efficient during 5 - 11 days fermentation and decreased thereafter. This may be caused by the inhibition of by-products (product inhibition) of acetic acid and butyric acid [17]. These soluble metabolites (Figure 2) caused the decrease of pH during the high rate of hydrogen production. The amount of volatile acids formed in fermentation broth inhibited the microbial growth because it blocked the electron transfer processes of the cell [17], so that the hydrogen production rate was not stable. When monitoring the composition of the gas on long time operation, the hydrogen and carbon dioxide ratio was in the range of 45% - 50% and 50% - 55%, respectively. The experiment did not produce methane. Hydrogen content was lower than that reported by O-Thong et al. [2] at 60%.

3.3. Hydrogen Production on CSTR Semi Continuous Operation

The addition of starter culture T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 at 30% (v/v) in CSTR operation resulted in the production rate in the range of 2.0 - 2.3 LL−1∙d−1 with the average of 2.16 LL−1∙d−1. The production rate and other characteristics such as alkalinity and pH were rather stable throughout the long-term experiment (Figure 3), at 4.31 gL−1 and 5.46 (average), respectively. The pH remained in the neutral range during the whole process due to the strong buffer capacity of the fermentation broth and suitable alkalinity. These pH and alkalinity values were in the same range as in previous reports [13,18].

Figure 1. Time course of hydrogen production, pH and alkalinity during ASBR operation using 30% (v/v) Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum as a start-up inoculum for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent.

Figure 2. Time course of VFAs production during ASBR operation 30% (v/v) Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum as a start-up inoculum for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent.

Increased VFA production was observed and acetate was accumulated as the main product. Butyrate production was relative high, while lactic acid, formic acid and propionic acid production was low. At the 5th day of operation, the acetate, and butyrate production was further increased and decreased afterwards (Figure 4), their concentration (average) was kept stable at the level of 7.44, 4.36, 0.33, 0 and 0.87 gL1 respectively, during the periods after 12th day. VFAs values were higher than the previous reports [13,17]. VFAs production could lead to severe inhibition on hydrogen fermentation because the VFAs can stimulate, inhibit or become toxic to the fermentative bacteria [17]. These results indicated that the thermophilic temperature had a positive effect on the acidification of organic wastes and lead in an increased acetic acid and butyric acid production. Similar results were previously reported by O-Thong et al. [13,19] and Thomas et al. [20]. It has been reported that the formation of acetate and butyrate resulted in higher biohydrogen production which was evident in this study.

4. CONCLUSION

Bioaugmentation by adding T. thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 at 30% (v/v) can improve the hydrogen yields from 258.63 to 296.14 mLH2∙g−1 COD. But the COD removal did not change when compared with the control and the other inoculation concentration. The ASBR operation was not stable in the long-term operation that was consistent with the inconsistent of pH in the fermentation broth. Acetic acid and butyric acid were accumulated in the fermentation broth and may result in the inhibition of hydrogen production. For thermophilic hydrogen fermentation of palm oil mill effluent, CSTR operation gave

Figure 3. Time course of hydrogen production, pH and alkalinity during CSTR operation 30%(v/v)Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum as a start-up inoculum for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent.

Figure 4. Time course of VFAs production during CSTR operation 30% (v/v) Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum as a start-up inoculum for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent.

the maximum hydrogen production rate of 2.16 LL−1∙d−1 and 44.7% COD removal. Characteristic of fermentation broth were relatively constant throughout the experiment such as pH, alkalinity, acetic acid and butyric acid. All this indicated that the CSTR operation was suitable for themophilic hydrogen fermentation by palm oil mill effluent.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The work was under MEXT-ARDA Collaborative Project and financially supported by Agricultural Research Development Agency (ARDA) and Asia-Africa Science and Technology Strategic Cooperation Promotion Program. The authors would like to thank Palm Oil Products and Technology Research Center (POPTEC) for giving the scholarship to Mr. Jiravut Seengenyoung.

REFERENCES

  1. O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P., Karakashev, D. and Angelidaki, I. (2008) Thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 1204-1214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.015
  2. O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P., Intrasungkha, N., Dhamwichukorn, S. and Birkeland, N.K. (2008) Optimization of simultaneous thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production and COD reduction from palm oil mill effluent by Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 1221-1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.017
  3. O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P. and Birkeland, N.K. (2009) Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresource Technology, 100, 909-918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.036
  4. Nielsen, A.T., Amandusson, H., Bjorklud, R., Dannetun, H., Ejlertsson, J. and Ekedahl, L.G. (2001) Hydrogen production from organic waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 26, 547-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00125-7
  5. Angenent, L.T, Karim, K., Al-Dahhan, K., Wrenn, B.A. and Espinosa, R.D. (2004) Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Trends in Biotechnology, 22, 476-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.001
  6. Argun, H. and Kargi, F. (2009) Effects of sludge pretreatment method on bio-hydrogen production by dark fermentation of waste ground wheat. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 8543-8548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.049
  7. O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P., Intrasungkha, N., Dhamwichukorn, S. and Birkeland, N.K. (2007) Improvement of biohydrogen production and pollution reduction from palm oil mill effluent with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41, 583- 590.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.05.002
  8. Schauer-Gimenez, E.A., Zitomer, D.H., Maki, J.S. and Struble, A.C. (2010) Bioaugmentation for improved recovery of anaerobic digesters after toxicant exposure. Water Research, 44, 3555-3564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.037
  9. Van Limbergen, H., Top, E.M. and Verstraete, W. (1998) Bioaugmentation in activated sludge: Current features and future perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 50, 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530051250
  10. Saravanane, R., Murthy, D.V.S. and Krishnaiah, K. (2001) Bioaugmentation and anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical effluent in fluidized bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 35, 779-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00121-8
  11. Arriaga, S., Rosas, I., Alatriste-Mondragón, F. and Razo-Flores, E. (2011) Continuous production of hydrogen from oat straw hydrolysate in a biotrickling filter. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 3442-3449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.019
  12. Angelidaki, I. and Sanders, W. (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 3, 117-129. http://dx.doi.10.1007/s11157-004-2502-3
  13. Hasyim, R., Imai, T., Reungsang, A. and O-Thong, S. (2011) Extreme-thermophilic biohydrogen production by an anaerobic heat treated digested sewage sludge culture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 8727- 8734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.079
  14. O-Thong, S., Hniman, A., Praser tsan, P. and Imai, T. (2011) Biohydrogen production from cassava starch processing wastewater by thermophilic mixed cultures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 3409-3416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.053
  15. APHA. (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 19th Edition, Edited by American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
  16. Morris, D.L. (1984) Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with Dreywood’s anthrone reagent. Science, 107, 254-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.107.2775.254
  17. Kotsopoulos, T.A., Fotidis, I.A., Tsolakis. N. and Martzopoulos, G.G. (2009) Biohydrogen production from pig slurry in a CSTR reactor system with mixed cultures under hyper-thermophilic temperature (70˚C). Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 1168-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.001
  18. Shina, H.S., Younb, J.H. and Kima, S.H. (2004) Hydrogen production from food waste in anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenesis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 1355-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.011
  19. Rasdi, Z., Mumtaz, T., Rahman, N.A.A. and Hassan, M.A. (2012) Kinetic analysis of biohydrogen production from anaerobically treated POME in bioreactor under optimized condition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17724-17730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.095
  20. van Niel, E.W., Claassen, P.A. and Stams, A.J. (2003) Substrate and product inhibition of hydrogen production by the extreme thermophile, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 81, 254-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.10463