World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering
Vol.3 No.1(2013), Article ID:29620,6 pages DOI:10.4236/wjnse.2013.31003

Threshold Voltage Sensitivity to Metal Gate Work-Function Based Performance Evaluation of Double-Gate n-FinFET Structures for LSTP Technology

M. Mustafa1, Tawseef A. Bhat2*, M. R. Beigh2

1Guru Nanak Institute of Engineering and Management, Naushera Hoshiarpur, Punjab, India

2Department of Electronics & Instrumentation Technology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India

Email: *tawseef.syed@gmail.com

Received February 2, 2013; revised March 8, 2013; accepted March 16, 2013

Keywords: FinFET; DIBL; SS; Threshold Voltage; SCE’s

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the threshold voltage sensitivity to metal gate work-function for n-channel double gate fin field-effect transistor (FinFET) structures and evaluates the short channel performance of the device using threshold voltage dependence on metal gate work-function analysis. We carried out the study for a double gate n-channel fin field-effect transistor (n-FinFET) with parameters as per the projection report of International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, ITRS-2011 for low standby power (LSTP) 20 nm gate length technology node. In the present study device simulation have been carried out using PADRE simulator from MuGFET, which is based on the drift-diffusion theory. Our results show the accuracy and validity of classical drift-diffusion simulation results for transistor structures with lateral dimensions 10nm and above. The subthreshold behavior of device improves with increased metal gate work-function. The results also show that a higher gate work-function (≥5 eV) can fulfill the tolerable off-current as projected in ITRS 2011 report. The SCE in FinFET can reasonably be controlled and improved by proper adjustment of the metal gate work-function. DIBL is reduced with the increase in gate work function.

1. Introduction

The continuous downscaling of MOS device has remained imperative need for the aggressive increase in transistor density and performance, leading to efficient chip functionality at higher speeds. As the conventional single gate planar transistor dimensions are scaled down in order to meet the requirements of International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) projections [1] for semiconductor device scaling, various SCE’s become too severe, fabrication cost increases and process of the devices becomes increasingly difficult. The challenges of continuous device scaling have been solved by incorporating advanced multi-gate MOS device structures such as fin field-effect transistors (FinFETs) [2,3], which utilize two or more gate electrodes and an ultrathin body. These devices have shown excellent device performance at aggressively scaled device parameters. FinFET technology has became very much attractive for device designers and researchers to look for efficient structural and process parameters in these devices, leading to a diversified research in such novel device structures.

A very important aspect regarding the FinFET structures is the threshold voltage tuning and its sensitivity to different device parameters. A study was carried out on the sensitivity of threshold voltage to channel doping density in extremely scaled MOSFET structures [4]. In the study it has been found that threshold voltage is, in fact, insensitive to doping variation over a wide range of doping density and such insensitivity is further extended by bandgap narrowing in nanoscale MOSFET structures. Device simulations carried out by S. Xiong et al. in [5] has shown that threshold voltage is insensitive to channel doping below 1 × 1019 cm3. A higher channel doping requirement for the adjustment of threshold voltage may affect the channel mobility of carriers. Further, due to random and discrete nature of dopant atoms, the same macroscopic doping profiles differ microscopically. Thus, engineering the work function of gate materials and maintaining a nearly intrinsic channel has been found more desirable. A method to suppress the earlier conduction of the corners in the bulk-FinFETs and to achieve a reasonable threshold voltage control with low leakage currents, without increasing the body doping has been proposed by K.-R. Han, et al. [6]. It has been observed that by increasing the top gate work-function at a fixed side gate work-function of bulk FinFET, threshold voltage increases and off-state leakage current (Ioff) reduces significantly without increasing doping concentration of fin body. Classical device simulations carried out using Silvaco PISCES in [7] suggest that the optimal gate work-function is such that the gate Fermi level is 0.2 eV below (above) the conduction (valence) band edge. Midgap gates have been found inefficient because of severe SCE’s. Among the logic technology of MOSFET devices, the low standby power (LSTP) logic technology refers to chips of lower-performance, lower-cost consumer type applications, such as consumer cellular telephones, with lower battery capacity and an emphasis on the lowest possible static power dissipation, i.e., the lowest possible leakage or off-current (highest threshold voltage, Vt). There are difficult challenges to keep the leakage current within tolerable range as predicted by ITRS, while at the same time maintaining a higher threshold voltage requirement in these device structures. Adjustment of threshold voltage through gate work function engineering rather than through channel doping is very efficient because of the limitations imposed on the current drive and mobility in short channel and ultrathin MOS devices. Controlling and improving the SCE’s in FinFET by adjustment of the metal gate work-function provides an alternative method over controlling it either by reduction in fin height and fin thickness.

Both poly-silicon and metals have been utilized as gate materials since the evolution of MOS transistor device structures. The aggressive scaling of metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) devices requires the implementation of a metal gate in place of conventional polycrystalline silicon. It is because poly-gate devices show a high gate resistance, dopant penetration to channel region and an increase in equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) due to poly-Si depletion [8]. Metal gates have been found attractive compared to poly-silicon gates since early 1990’s due to their chemical stability with the high-k gate dielectric materials. Furthermore, it is possible to maintain higher threshold voltages by tuning to a suitable higher metal gate work function while at the same time acquiring high gate stack stability [9-12]. The authors in this paper reported about the sensitivity of threshold voltage in case of n-channel double gate FinFET structures to metal gate work-function and investigates the effect of various SCE’s on the device performance while at the same time takes care of the required tolerable limit of leakage current (Ioff) value as predicted by ITRS [1]. A detailed and systematic study of the performance evaluation of the FinFET devices based on the metal gate work-function dependence of the threshold voltage as to exploit these devices to highest application has been the main aim of the present work and presented in this paper.

2. Threshold Voltage Variation and Gate Work-Function Engineering

The threshold voltage expression in case of a MuGFET device structure can be expressed as [13]

(1)

where Qss represents charge in the gate dielectric, Cox is the gate capacitance, QD is the depletion charge in the channel, fms represents metal-semiconductor work-func tion difference between the gate electrode and the semiconductor, ff is the fermi potential which for P-type silicon is given by

(2)

where NA is acceptor concentration and ni is intrinsic carrier concentration.

For ultrathin body and lightly doped devices the effect of QD and Qss on threshold voltage, Vt in equation (1) is negligible compared to ff. Further Vin is the additional surface potential to 2ff that is needed for ultrathin body devices to bring enough inversion charges in to the channel region of the transistor to reach threshold point. Therefore, the work-function of gate electrode is the main parameter for threshold voltage determination in case of MuGFET devices.

3. Device Structure and Simulation Strategy

A 2-D view of device structure of FinFET used in the present simulation work is as shown in Figure 1, specifying various device parameters undertaken for simulation study.

The critical geometrical parameters of the FinFET are defined as below:

1) Lg: the channel length or gate length is the final as etched length at the bottom of the gate electrode.

2) Wch: the channel width is defined as the separation between the two side wall or lateral gates on either side of the fin. Other nomenclatures used for channel width are fin width or fin thickness.

Figure 1. Two dimensional double-gate n-finFET structure.

3) tox1, tox2: thickness of the oxide material placed on the either side walls of fin before a gate contact is made.

4) Ls, Ld: extension lengths to source and drain and determine the critical source/drain resistance and capacitance of device.

The various parameter values of the device structure undertaken for the present study are as per the projection report of ITRS-2011 update for LSTP technology, anticipated for the year 2015 [1]. Some of the parameters are also user defined. These parameters of FinFET structure are as listed in the Table 1.

In the present study, device simulations have been carried out using PADRE simulator from MuGFET [14], which is based on the drift-diffusion simulation. The drift-diffusion is being utilized for the device simulation, because of the fact that subthreshold characteristics of device are still diffusion dominated and reflect device characteristics in the subthreshold region and other results are reasonably well in consonance with the experimental results [15,16]. The drift-diffusion simulator is way faster than the quantum transport simulator that provides physical insight of the device. The quantum mechanical effects become negligible while simulating the transistor structures with lateral dimensions greater than 10nm. A comparison of experimental results obtained in [17] for the subthreshold Id-Vg characteristics with the simulation results using MuGFET simulator has been given in [15], which clearly indicates the accuracy and validity of classical drift diffusion simulation results.

4. Simulation Results

4.1. Threshold Voltage Variation with Metal Gate Work Function

Since the work function of the metal gate can be tuned to meet a given threshold voltage requirement, the choice of the material to be used for the metal gate in such devices

Table 1. Device parameters undertaken for the simulation study.

aUser defined values.

will depend on that which of the metal provides the work function suited for given threshold voltage accomplishment. MOS transistors fabricated using Mo (Molebidinum) gate have been reported to have a gate work-function value of 5 eV [11]. We investigated the variation of threshold voltage, Vt for the gate work function ranging from 4.291 to 5.2 eV in the present simulation study. It has been found that by increasing the gate work-function of FinFET, the corresponding threshold voltage increases to a desired value as depicted in Figure 2 The metal gate work-function dependence of the threshold voltage comes out to be linear relation, which can be also verified through the Equation (1). The results as depicted in this figure have been obtained for a device having Lg = 20 nm, Wch = 12.5 nm, EOT = 1.2 nm and Vdd = 0.86 V. Maintaining higher threshold voltage is a key requirement for LSTP logic technologies and hence can be achieved more efficiently by increasing work-function of the metal gate material.

4.2. Transfer Characteristics

Figure 3 shows the variation of drain current, Ids versus gate voltage, Vgs characteristics of FinFET for different values of gate work-function. The metal gate work-

Figure 2. Threshold voltage versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

Figure 3. Transfer characteristics of n-FinFET for different values of gate work-function.

function has been varied from 4.392 eV to 5.2 eV. The results depict that the subthreshold behaviour of device improves as the metal gate work-function is increased to higher values. It is because of the fact that as the increase in metal gate work-function increases the corresponding threshold voltage, which in turn reduces the off-state leakage current and results in the improvement in the device performance. This is very enviable characteristics of the device for LSTP applications.

4.3. On-Current

The device on-current behaviour as a function of gate work-function has been illustrated in Figure 4. It is clear that device on-current is sacrificed for increased threshold voltage with increase in metal gate work-function of FinFET structure.

4.4. Off-Current

For LSTP technology logic application, the off-state leakage current requirement as projected by the ITRS 2011 report is of the order of 10 p A/µm at room temperature. It is clear from the off-state device characteristics shown in Figure 5 that a higher gate work-

Figure 4. On-current versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

Figure 5. Off-current versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

function approximately 5 eV can fulfil this tolerable offcurrent projection of the given FinFET structure.

4.5. On-Off Current Ratio

As shown in Figure 6, the on/off current ratio obtained from the device simulations has been found to improve significantly with the increase in metal gate work-function of FinFET. Although the device on current reduces to some extent with an increase in gate work-function, but an increase in on-off current ratio is a clear indication of overall improvement in drive current with a required low off-state leakage current for LSTP logic technology.

4.6. Drain Induced Barrier Lowering (DIBL)

DIBL is one of the critical short channel effect parameter of nanoscale device structures, since it estimates the overall gate control of the device on the channel electrostatics of the device. The effect of DIBL is to reduce the threshold voltage in nanoscale MOS devices due to a modulation of the source to drain channel potential barrier by the drain voltage to make the conduction of device channel possible for smaller gate voltages. From Figure 7, it is clear that DIBL gets reduced with the

Figure 6. On-off current ratio versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

Figure 7. DIBL versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

Figure 8. Subthreshold slope versus gate work-function of n-FinFET.

increase in gate work function. It is because with increase in threshold voltage due to increased gate workfunction, barrier lowering effect is reduced for a given drain source voltage in short channel FinFET devices.

4.7. Subthreshold Slope

The plot of subthreshold slope versus gate work-function of FinFET is as shown in Figure 8. It is clear that subthreshold slope of given FinFET structure improves with the increase in gate work-function of the device. The improved SS characteristic is as a result of increased device threshold voltage.

5. Conclusion

The study presents the effectiveness of gate work-function engineering for the adjustment of threshold voltage in nanoscale FinFET structures. Utilization of metal gates have been proposed for nanoscale FinFET devices due to their capability to withstand high-k gate dielectric materials that are very much essential for the continuous downscaling of device structures. The efficiency of utilizing metal gates has been presented by studying the threshold voltage in FinFETs with respect to metal gate work-function. An analysis based on the evaluation of corresponding SCE’s and device performance has been presented that supports utilization of metal gate workfunction performance for such devices to be used for LSTP logic technology applications. During the simulation study, it has been observed that engineering threshold voltage through variation of metal gate work-function of FinFET can produce FinFETs that may have reduced SCE’s and higher device performance. Varying the device gate work-function is found effective in adjusting the threshold voltage to a desired value. The SCE in FinFET can reasonably be controlled and improved by proper adjustment of the metal gate work-function. The increased gate work-function improves the DIBL, SS, Off-current, On/Off current ratio, but causes a reduction in device On-current.

REFERENCES

  1. “International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors,” 2011. http://www.itrs.net
  2. D. Hisamoto, T. Kaga, Y. Kawamo and E. Takeda, “A Fully Depleted Lean-Channel Transistor (DELTA)—A Novel Vertical Ultra Thin SOI MOSFET,” Technical Digest of IEDM, Washington DC, 3-6 December 1989, pp. 833-836
  3. D. Hisamoto, W. C. Lee, J. Kedzierski, H. Takeuchi, K. Asano, C. Kuo, E. Anderson, T. J. King, J. Bokor and C. M. Hu, “FinFET—A Self-Aligned Double-Gate MOSFET Scalable to 20 nm,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 47, No. 12, 2000, pp. 2320-2325. doi:10.1109/16.887014
  4. M.-H. Chiang, C.-N. Lin and G.-S. Lin, “Threshold Voltage Sensitivity to Doping Density in Extremely Scaled MOSFETs,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2006, pp. 190-193. doi:10.1088/0268-1242/21/2/017
  5. S. Xiong and J. Bokor, “Sensitivity of Double-Gate and FinFET Devices to Process Variations,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 50, No. 11, 2003, pp. 2255-2260. doi:10.1109/TED.2003.818594
  6. K.-R. Han, B.-K. Choi, H.-I. Kwoni and J.-H. Lee, “Design of Bulk Fin-Type Field-Effect Transistor Considering Gate Work-Function,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2008, pp. 4385-4391. doi:10.1143/JJAP.47.4385
  7. I. De, D. Johri, A. Srivastava and C. M. Osburn, “Impact of Gate Workfunction on Device Perfor­­mance at the 50 nm Technology Node,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1077-1080. doi:10.1016/S0038-1101(99)00323-8
  8. C. J. Choi, M. Y. Jang, Y. Y. Kim, M. S. Jun, T. Y. Kim, B. C. Park, S. J. Lee, H. D. Yang, R. J. Jung, M. Chang, and H. S. Hwang, “Effective Metal Work Function of High-Pressure Hydrogen Postannealed Pt-Er Alloy Metal Gate on HfO2 Film,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2007, pp. 125-127. doi:10.1143/JJAP.46.125
  9. R. J. P. Lander, J. C. Hooker, J. P. van Zijl, F. Roozeboom, M. P. M. Maas, Y. Tamminga and R. A. M. Wolters, “A Tuneable Metal Gate Work Function Using Solid State Diffusion of Nitrogen,” ESSDERC, Florence, 24-26 September 2002, pp. 103-106.
  10. M. C. Lemme, J. K. Efavi, H. D. B. Gottlob, T. Mollenhauer, T. Wahlbrink and H. Kurz, “Comparison of Metal Gate Electrodes on MOCVD HfO2,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 45, No. 5-6, 2005, pp. 953-956. doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2004.11.018
  11. R. Lin, Q. Lu, P. Ranade, T.-J. King and C. M. Hu, “An Adjustable Work Function Technology Using Mo Gate for CMOS Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2002, pp. 49-51. doi:10.1109/55.974809
  12. G. Sjoblom, “Metal Gate Technology for Advanced CMOS Devices,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2006.
  13. J.-P. Collinge, “FinFET and Other Multi-Gate Transistors,” Springer, Berlin, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71752-4
  14. “MuGFET v 1.1, Simulation tool for Nanoscale Multigate-FET Structures (FinFET and Nanowire).” http://www.nanohub.org
  15. “First Time User Guide (FTUG) to MuGFET v 1.1.” https://nanohub.org/tools/MuGFET/FTUG
  16. T.-S. Park, E. J. Yoon and J.-H. Lee, “A 40 nm BodyTied FinFET (OMEGA MOSFET) Using Bulk Si Wafer,” Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, Vol. 19, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 6-12.
  17. Y.-K. Choi, T.-J. King and C. M. Hu, “Nanoscale CMOS Spacer FinFET for the Terabit Era,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2002. pp. 25-27. doi:10.1109/55.974801

NOTES

*Corresponding author.