
A. K. SANG ET AL.
indicated that the situation was managed by hiring part time
teachers, whereas 21.2% of the respondents identified multi-
grade teaching as a solution. 3.0% of the respondents indicated
that trainees were left to learn on their own. The study estab-
lished the T.T.Is resulted to desperate moves in managing staff
shortages which included the hiring of part-time lecturers as the
most commonly used option. Multi-grade teaching was used as
an option where the trainers combined trainees taking similar
units though at different levels into the same classroom, work-
shops or laboratories. Other option that included the giving of
assignments to students, omission of optional units/subjects
from the time tabl e were given as options adapted in an effort to
address the problem of staff inadequacy. In effect the shortage
of staff and the pre-occupation of T.T.Is with part-time instruc-
tors hampers the continuity of programmes and their quality.
The study further sought information on the H.O.Ds’ level of
academic qualifications. Most H.O.Ds (37.5%) were diploma
holders. 29.2% of the H.O.Ds have either higher diploma or
first degree qualifications each. Only 4.2% of the H.O.Ds had a
master’s qualification. The H.O.Ds are expected to serve as the
reference persons in the departments, however, despite this
revelation by the study these departments have majority of the
trainees graduating with the diploma level of qualification. The
findings of the current study are concurring with the revelations
of an inspection in Kenya Polytechnic conducted in 1996 which
found out that, majority of the trainers held an ordinary diploma
(Aduda, 2003).
The study sought to establish the frequency to which trainers
went for industrial attachment. This was meant to assess the
frequency of trainers’ interaction with the industries. Majority
of the respondents (52.1%) indicated that trainers are never
attached in the industries. Approximately 22.9% indicated that
attachment of trainers was not often done while 14.6% and
4.2% indicated that attachments for trainers are often done and
very often taken respectively. The study established that indus-
trial exposure of the trainers through industrial attachments was
minimal. This in itself is a weakness given that T.T.I graduates
require extensive practical exposition through industrial at-
tachments.
Facility Availability
The G.O.K (2005) observes that training facilities are critical
if education in Kenya is to meet the technological market skill
needs and move the country to the vision 2030. The availability
of training facilities is critical to quality teaching and training.
Majority of the H.O.D respondents (83.3%) indicated that
training facilities were not adequate compared to only 16.7% of
respondents who indicated that the physical facilities were
adequate. This implies that the H.O.Ds felt that T.T.Is operated
with inadequate training facilities.
The graduates’ opinion was also sought in reference to the
adequacy of the physical facilities. Majority of the graduate
respondents (63.1%) indicated that the training facilities in
T.T.Is were inadequate while 36.9% indicated that the facilities
were adequate. This implies that majority of the T.T.I graduates
felt that they were trained using inadequate training facilities. A
hypothesis was postulated to determine the significance of dif-
ference in the mean of the opinions held by the H.O.Ds and
graduates on the availability of training facilities in the T.T.Is.
The computed p-value (1.00) is greater the critical p-value
(0.05) the null hypothesis was therefore accepted as true. There
was no significant difference in the opinions of H.O.Ds and the
graduates.
The study sought information on the effects of the availabil-
ity of training facilities to the T.T.I training. Majority of re-
spondents (85.4%) indicated that availability of training facili-
ties did affect the relevance of skills to market skill needs
whereas 14.6% felt that facility availability had no effect on
skill relevance.
The study therefore sought information on the relevance of
the training facilities to facilities used in industries and business
organizations. Respondents were asked to rate the training fa-
cilities in term of relevance to those used in industries. The
H.O.D respondents (45.8%) indicated that the training facilities
were slightly relevant to the facilities used in the industries
whereas 25% of the respondents felt that the facilities were
relevant. About 14.6% of the respondents rated the facilities as
obsolete while 10.4% had no opinion on the relevance of the
T.T.I training facilities to those used in the industries. Only
4.2% of the respondents felt that the facilities were very rele-
vant. The graduates’ opinion on the relevance of training facili-
ties used in T.T.I compared to those used in industries and
business organizations was sought. Respondents (44%) felt that
the training facilities used in T.T.Is were slightly relevant to
those used in the industries while 27.4% rated the facilities as
relevant, 14.9% of the respondents indicated that the facilities
were obsolete whereas 8.9% of the respondents rated the facili-
ties to be very relevant. Only 4.8% of the respondents held no
opinion on the level of relevance of training facilities used by
T.T.Is to facilities used in the industries and business organiza-
tions. The study established that certain courses used facilities
that were completely out of tune with facilities used in indus-
tries and business organizations.
Employers’ opinion on the relevance of T.T.Is’ training fa-
cilities was also sought. 39.9% of the respondents rated the
training facilities as slightly relevant, while 35.7% of respon-
dents felt that the training facilities were obsolete. About 17.9%
of the respondents indicated that the training facilities were
relevant, while 2.4% of the respondents rated the facilities to be
very relevant. 4.2% of the respondents did not give their opin-
ion on this.
The study sought information on the state of training equip-
ments in T.T.Is. The H.O.Ds were asked to rate the training
equipments ranging from obsolete to modern. At 47.9% the
H.O.Ds felt that the training facilities are good, 22.9% were
non-committal on the state of facilities, 14.6% rated the facili-
ties as bad, 12.5% said the facilities were obsolete whereas only
2.1% of respondents rated the facilities as modern. Though a
reasonable proportion of respondents rated the training equip-
ments as good a greater proportion of respondents rated the
equipments obsolete (12.5%) compared to the 2.1% who rated
the equipments as modern. Modern referred to the training
equipments being in tandem with the equipments used in the
industries while obsolete referred to the situation where the
training equipments were absolutely out of tune with the equip-
ments used in industries and business organizations.
The study also sought information on the state of training
equipments from former trainees of T.T.Is. Graduate respon-
dents (28%) rated the training equipments used in T.T.Is as
good, 23.2% rated the equipments as obsolete, 19.6% indicated
the equipments to be bad, 19% held no opinion on the state of
the training equipments whereas 10.1% rated the training
equipments as modern. A larger proportion of the respondents
Copyright © 2012 SciRe s . 111