Erratum to “Regardless of the Puncture Angle, a Tuohy Needle with Sand-Blasted Steel at the Tip of the Bevel Is a Valid Needle on the Ultrasonic Images”, [Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 2016, 6, 101-104] ()
Abstract
The original online version of this article (Ichikawa Yuki, Ueshima Hironobu, Hiroshi Otake, Akira Kitamura (2016) Regardless of the Puncture Angle, a Tuohy Needle with Sand-Blasted Steel at the Tip of the Bevel Is a Valid Needle on the Ultrasonic Images, 2016, 6, 101-104,
https://file.scirp.org/Html/1-1920418_68780.htm) unfortunately contains some mistakes. The authors wish to correct the errors in co-authors, Table 1, and Table 2.
Share and Cite:
Yuki, I. , Ueshima, H. and Kitamura, A. (2021) Erratum to “Regardless of the Puncture Angle, a Tuohy Needle with Sand-Blasted Steel at the Tip of the Bevel Is a Valid Needle on the Ultrasonic Images”, [Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 2016, 6, 101-104].
Open Journal of Anesthesiology,
11, 219-220. doi:
10.4236/ojanes.2021.117021.
The followings are the list of errata and correct tables
List of Errata
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.