The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non diabetic patients with a previous history of Bell’s palsy ()
1. INTRODUCTION
Bell’s palsy is a common peripheral facial neuropathy with no apparent cause. The incidence of Bell’s palsy is 20 to 30 cases per 100,000 per year [1-3]. Sir Charles Bell first drew attention to the distribution and function of facial nerve in 1821 and since then his name has been used to describe this idiopathic facial neuropathy.
The most well known pathophysiology of Bell’s palsy is the reactivation of Herpes Simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection. HSV-1 has lived latently in the Geniculate ganglion after primary Varicella-zoster infection [4]. Preceding systemic viral infection, trivial head injuries or dental procedures and psychological stress reactivate the virus to cause facial neuropathy. Ischemic neuropathy has been the other proposed pathogenic mechanism, due to the associated diabetes mellitus and hypertension, though this has gained less interest. Therefore, this disorder may be analogous to other ischemic cranial neuropathies in patients with diabetes.
It is well known that metabolic syndrome is a compound risk factors of atherosclerosis and significantly increase risk for cardiovascular diseases [5]. Moreover, diabetes mellitus has a major impact on the development of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome as well. Many previous studies have found high prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with Bell’s palsy but study showing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in these patients is limited. The authors aimed to explore the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and the prevalence of individual parameter of metabolic syndrome in nondiabetic subjects with a previous history of Bell’s palsy (NDFP) compare with nondiabetic healthy subjects (NDHS) enrolled in another metabolic syndrome screening study in Songklanagarind Hospital.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1. Subject
All the cases with lower motor neuron facial neuropathy from January 2002 to June 2010 were identified from medical records. The inclusion criteria were cases who were fifteen years or older and had no diabetes. Bell’s palsy had been diagnosed for at least three months before enrolment. The diagnosis of Bell’s palsy were reviewed from the recorded clinical information which included an acute, non progressive and isolated lower motor neuron type of facial neuropathy. There had to be no evidences of central nervous system disorders, rhino-otological or systemic infection and malignancy, post-otological or cerebral injury and operation; and normal serological tests for HIV and syphilis were also warranted.
All the cases fit to the inclusion criteria were invited to join the study protocol as study group (NDFP) by telephone calls. The enrolled cases were evaluated in an out-patient setting between January and November 2010.
A group of nondiabetic healthy subjects (NDHS) screened for metabolic syndrome from 2003-2004 were included as control group. They were randomized by R program for matching of sex and age group to make up a ratio between case and control of 1:3. The collected data included general demographic and clinical data; and the measurements needed to diagnose metabolic syndrome such as waist circumference, fasting glucose, triglyceride (TG), HDL-cholesterol and blood pressure (BP).
The criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in this study are based on the International Diabetes Foundation (IDF)’s new criteria released in 2005 [6]. It needs the presence of central obesity (Waist circumference ≥ 90 cm. for Asian men and ≥80 cm. for Asian women) plus any two out of four of the followings [7]:
1) Raised TG level ≥ 150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/L), or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality.
2) Reduced HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl (1.03 mmol/L) in males and < 50 mg/dl (1.29 mmol/L) in females, or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality.
3) Raised blood pressure: systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 130 or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 85 mm Hg, or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension.
4) Raised fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/L), or previously diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes
2.2. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were number and percent and analytic statistics were t-test and Chi-Square test. A pvalue of less than 0.05 was considered statistical significance. R program [8] was used for analysis with package “Commed” [9], “ICE” [10] and “Epicalc” [11]. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethic committee of Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University.
3. RESULTS
There were 454 cases of patients with previous Bell’s palsy identified from the computerized medical records. Ninety cases were able to be called by phone to include in this study with their consents given. There were eighteen patients with diabetes mellitus (20%) excluded earlier. The final number of study samples for evaluation was seventy two cases consisting thirty male (41.7%) and forty two female patients (58.3%). Their mean age was 51 years old (range 39.8 - 63.2) and the majority of them aged more than 60 years old (33.3%).
Among the 895 participants of metabolic syndrome screening project during 2003-2004, sixteen participants (1.7%) of them with diabetes were excluded first. A total number of 879 participants were left for randomization by R program according to sex and age group match in the ratio 1:3 of study to control group. The final number of control group was 216 participants which included 89 males (41.2%) and 127 females (58.8%). The mean age of the cases in this group was 50.5 years old (range 40 - 62) which was not significantly different from the study group. The distribution of cases between study and control group according to age groups and sexes was not significantly different as well (p = 1 and p = 0.945) (Table 1).
The overall prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by IDF in the study group (NDFP) and control group (NDHS) were 22.2% and 21.8% respectively which showed no statistical significant difference (p = 0.93). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome within each age group also showed no significant difference between the two groups. Only the prevalence of hypertension in the study group (NDFP) (62.5%) was significantly higher than the control group (NDHS) (47.7%) (p = 0.04), though there was no significant difference of the prevalence of other parameters of metabolic syndrome between the two groups (Table 2).
4. DISCUSSION
Bell’s palsy is the most common cause of acute lower
Table 2. Comparison of parameters of metabolic syndrome between the nondiabetic patients with a previous history of Bell’s palsy (study group) and the nondiabetic healthy population (control group).
motor neuron facial neuropathy in clinical practice [12, 13]. Though reactivation of herpes viral infection has been widely accepted, atherosclerosis of vasa vasorum of facial nerves has also been proposed [14]. Neither of them has been confirmed scientifically yet. Diabetes mellitus associated with Bell’s palsy had been reported in many previous literatures which ranged from 2.5% to 11% [15-19]. The present study found the higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the patients with a history of Bell’s palsy (20%). This may be due to the more advanced age and the small sample size.
Diabetes mellitus, a major cardiovascular parameter of metabolic syndrome, denoted higher influence for future development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases [7]. Patients who had diabetes mellitus and fulfill the diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome would own a significant higher prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events compare to those who had only metabolic syndrome [20]. The present study was the first study that aimed to demonstrate the association between metabolic syndrome and Bell’s palsy. The difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between the study and the control group was evidenced only when diabetic cases were included. In contrast, it showed no significant difference after excluding diabetes. Therefore, this suggested the strong influence of diabetes mellitus on the development of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis finally. Nevertheless, the prevalence of hypertension (SBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85 mmHg) in NDFP was significantly higher than NDHS. This was correspondent to many previous reports which had revealed that hypertension associated with Bell’s palsy ranged from 8% - 36% [14-16,21-23]. The number seems to be higher than the percentage of diabetes mellitus. This should draw a special attention on cardiovascular risk factors surveillance in patients with Bell’s palsy despite no diabetes.
Several limitations of this study should be noted. Firstly, the study was a cross-sectional analysis and so it was difficult to prove the chronological relationship between Bell’s palsy and metabolic syndrome. Secondly, there might be section bias from the control group since most of them were healthy volunteers in a screening study for metabolic syndrome and this was actually not a representative for general population. Finally, the limited sample size in this certain subgroups of patients (n = 72) possibly undermined the statistical power of significance.
5. CONCLUSION
The present study cannot demonstrate the difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between the patients with a previous history of Bell’s palsy and the healthy subjects when diabetes mellitus was excluded. However, the significant contribution of hypertension to the development of other atherosclerotic risk factors and metabolic syndrome in patients with a previous attack of Bell’s palsy should be explored in a longitudinal natural cohort study.
6. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND FUNDING
There is no conflict of interest. The study was supported by a research grant from Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University.
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Pensri Chongphattararot, research assistant and Visit Pahukoon, hospital medical data registration manager for their assistance in identification and contact with the study cases and the data management.