Numerical Solution of MHD Boundary Layer Flow of Non-Newtonian Casson Fluid on a Moving Wedge with Heat and Mass Transfer and Induced Magnetic Field ()
1. Introduction
The induced magnetic field is arisen due to a strong magnetic field. The problems with induced magnetic field play an important role in a number of industrial applications such as fiber or granular insulation, liquid-metals, electrolytes, ionized gases as well as the geothermal systems. The study of the boundary layer flow under the influence of a magnetic field with the induced magnetic field was considered by a few authors. For example, Raptis and Perdikis [1] studied the MHD free convection boundary layer flow past an infinite vertical porous plate. Very little attention has been paid to the boundary layer flow and heat transfer taking the effect of the induced magnetic field and thermal radiation into consideration. For example, Kumari et al. [2] considered the MHD flow and heat transfer over a stretching surface by considering the effect of the induced magnetic field. On the other hand, Takhar et al. [3] investigated the unsteady free convection flow at the stagnation point in the presence of a magnetic field. Recently Ali et al. [4] studied MHD stagnation-point flow and heat transfer towards stretching sheet with induced magnetic field. Khamisah Jafar et al. [5] studied viscous dissipation and radiation effects in MHD stagnation point flow towards a stretching sheet with induced magnetic field. The thermal reversal in MHD stagnation point flow towards a stretching sheet with induced magnetic field and viscous dissipation effects have been investigated by Kashif Ali and Muhammad Ashraf [6] . The MHD mixed convection boundary layer flow toward a stagnation point on a vertical surface with induced magnetic field was studied by Ali et al. [7] . Khamisah Jafar et al. [8] discussed the MHD boundary layer flow due to a moving wedge in a parallel stream with the induced magnetic field.
The analysis of non-Newtonian fluids has many applications in industrials such as ground water hydrology, petroleum reservoir, nuclear waste disposal, geothermal energy production, transpiration cooling, design of solid matrix heat exchange and paced bed chemical catalytic reactors. Also, there are some models of non-Newtonian fluids such as Casson model which concerned one of the most important applications of theoretical fluid mechanics to problems arising in physiology, mainly in describing the flow of the blood. Casson [9] proposed a model to describe the flow curves of suspensions of pigments in lithographic varnishes used for the preparation of printing inks. Eldabe et al. studied some problems of non-Newtonian fluids such as ( [10] - [14] ).
In the present work, we extend and generalize the work of [8] to include the boundary layer motion of non- Newtonian fluid obeying Casson model with heat and mass transfer in the presence of radiation and mixed diffusion. The main objective of the present work is to obtain the numerical solutions of the MHD boundary layer flow of Casson fluid on a moving wedge with heat and mass transfer. The effects of thermal diffusion and diffusion thermo with induced magnetic field are taken into consideration. The governing equations of motion with the boundary conditions are solved numerically by using (FDM) and analytically by using (DTM). The solutions are obtained as a function of the physical parameters of the problem; then the effects of these various parameters of the problem on these solutions have been computed and discussed in detail and illustrated through some figures. The special cases of our problem are compared with the previous published works. This showed that there is a good agreement between them.
2. Mathematical Formulation
Let us consider a steady, laminar, hydromagnetic coupled heat and mass transfer by mixed convection flow on a wedge plate in a parallel free stream with a variable induced magnetic field applied parallel to the wedge walls outside the boundary layer. The equations governing the steady motion of an incompressible non-Newtonian electrically conducting fluid in presence of a magnetic field are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
where V is the fluid velocity vector, H is the induced magnetic field vector,
is the magnetohy-
drodynamic pressure, p is the fluid pressure,
is the magnetic permeability,
is the stress tensor,
is the electrical conductivity, T is the temperature, k is the thermal conductivity,
is the specific heat at constant
pressure,
is the density of the fluid,
is the magnetic diffusivity,
is the radiative heat flux, C
is the species concentration,
is the concentration susceptibility,
is thermal diffusion ratio,
is mean fluid temperature and
is the coefficient of chemical molecular diffusivity.
The rheological equation of state for an isotropic flow of a Casson fluid can be expressed as [9] :
(6)
In the above equation
and
denotes the
component of the deformation rate,
is the product of the component of deformation rate with itself,
is the a critical value of this product based on the non-Newtonian model,
is the plastic dynamic viscosity of the non-Newtonian fluid and
is the yield stress of the fluid.
We take the Cartesian coordinates x measured along the surface of the wedge and y normal to it, respectively. If
and
are the velocity and magnetic components in (x, y) directions, respectively, subject to the boundary layer approximations, Equations (5) and (6) for the problem under consideration can be reduced to:
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
The boundary conditions are as follows:
(13)
where
is the non-Newtonian Casson parameter,
is the kinematic viscosity,
and
are the x-velocity and magnetic field at the edge of the boundary layer, respectively and
is the thermal diffusivity.
We assume here that
and
,
is the constant velocity at the outer edge of the boundary layer and
is the value of
at x = 0. Further, m is also a constant, which varies in the range
,
is a positive or a negative constant [8] .
By using the Rosseland approximation, the radiative heat flux
is given by given by
(14)
where
is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and
is the mean absorption coefficient. It should be noted that by using the Rosseland approximation, the present analysis is limited to optically thick fluids. If temperature differences within the flow are sufficiently small, then Equation (14) can be linearized by expanding
into the Taylor series abo
, which after neglecting higher order terms takes the form
(15)
In view of Equations (14) and (15), Equation (11) reduces to
(16)
3. Method of Solutions
To solve system of Equations (7)-(13), we will consider the following similarity transformations:
(17)
where
is the independent similarity variable,
the dimensionless stream function,
the dimensionless Induced magnetic field,
the dimensionless temperature and
the dimensionless concen-
tration. Further,
is the stream function which is defined in the usual way as
and
and
is the magnetic stream function which is defined in the usual way as
and
.
By using Equation (17) in the Equations (9)-(12) and Equation (16), we get the following ordinary differential equations in dimensionless form
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
where
is the wedge parameter,
is the magnetic parameter,
is the reciprocal magnetic Prandtl number,
is the Eckert number,
is the Prandtl number,
is the radiation parameter,
is the Schmidt number,
is the Dufour number and
is the Soret number.
Also, the subjected boundary conditions Equation (13) will now take the form:
(22)
where
is the moving parameter.
3.1. The Differential Transform Method (DTM)
The differential transformation of an analytical function
for one variable is defined as [15] .
(23)
where
is the original function and
is the transformed function. The differential inverse transformation of
is defined as:
(24)
Combining Equations (23) and (24), we obtain
(25)
From Equations (23)-(25), it can be seen that the differential transformation method is derived from Taylor’s series expansion, but the method does not calculate the derivatives representatively. However, the relative derivatives are calculated by an iterative way which is described by the transformed equations of the original function. For implementation purposes, the function
is expressed by a finite series and Equation (24) can be written as
(26)
By Equation (23), the following theorems can be deduced:
Theorem 3.1.1 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.2 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.3 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.4 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.5 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.6 If
then ![]()
Theorem 3.1.7 If
then ![]()
3.2. Basic Concepts of the Multi-Step Differential Transform Method (MDTM)
When the DTM is used for solving differential equations with the boundary condition at infinity or problems that have highly non-linear behavior, the obtained results were found to be incorrect (when the boundary-layer variable go to infinity, the obtained series solutions are divergent). Besides that, power series are not useful for large values of the independent variable.
To overcome this shortcoming, the MDTM that has been developed for the analytical solution of the differential equations is presented in this section. For this purpose, the following non-linear initial-value problem is considered:
(27)
subject to the initial conditions
, for
.
Let [0, T] be the interval over which we want to find the solution of the initial-value problem (27). In actual applications of the DTM, the approximate solution of the initial value problem (27) can be expressed by the following finite series:
(28)
The multi-step approach introduces a new idea for constructing the approximate solution. Assume that the interval [0, T] is divided into M subintervals
,
of equal step size h = (T/M) by using the nodes tm = mh. The main ideas of the MDTM are as follows. First, we apply the DTM to Equation (24) over the interval
, we will obtain the following approximate solution:
(29)
using the initial conditions
. For
and at each subinterval
we will use the initial conditions
and apply the DTM to Equation (27) over the interval
, where ![]()
in Equation (23) is replaced by
. The process is repeated and generates a sequence of approximate solutions
, for the solution
:
(30)
where
. In fact, the MDTM assumes the following solution:
(31)
The new algorithm, MDTM, is simple for computational performance for all values of h. It is easily observed that if the step size h = T, then the MDTM reduces to the classical DTM. As we will see in the next section, the main advantage of the new algorithm is that the obtained series solution converges for wide time regions and can approximate non-chaotic or chaotic solutions.
3.3. Analytical Solution Be the MDTM
By applying the MDTM to Equations (18)-(21), gives the following recursive relations in each sub-domain
,
.
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
where
are the differential transform of ![]()
The differential transformed boundary conditions in Equation (22) to:
(36)
where
are constants. These constants are computed from the boundary condition. Moreover, substituting Equation (36) into Equation (32)-(35) and by using the recursive method, we can calculate other values of
. Hence, substituting all
, into Equation (26), we obtain series solutions.
The velocity, induced magnetic field, temperature and concentration distributes achieved with the aid of MATHAMATICA application software.
3.4. Numerical Solutions by Using the FDM
To solve the ordinary differential Equations (18)-(21), we use a finite difference based numerical algorithm. We reduce the order of Equations (18) and (19) by one with the help of the substitution:
(37)
Equations (18)-(21) in view of Equation (37) can be written as:
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
The boundary conditions:
(42)
Now, we can write Equations (37)-(41) in the following finite difference form
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
The velocity, induced magnetic field, temperature and concentration distributes at all interior nodal points computed by successive applications of the above finite difference equations and these are achieved with the aid of MATLAB application software.
4. Results and Discussion
The system of the equations which describe the motion of Casson fluid in the boundary layer with heat and mass transfer and in the presence of induced magnetic field with radiation are solved analytically by using (DTM) and numerically by using (FDM). The values of the velocity, temperature, concentration and induced magnetic field are obtained as a functions of the physical parameters of the problem such as Casson parameter
, wedge parameter
, magnetic parameter M, magnetic Prandtl number
, radiation parameter Ra, Prandtl number Pr, Eckert number E, Dufour parameter Du, Schmidt number Sc, and Soret number S0. These effects are illustrated graphically through a set of (1 - 18).
Figures 1-5 represent the velocity profiles for the flow parameters. The effect of
on the velocity profiles is presented in Figure 1. It is seen that the velocity increases when
increases. Figure 2 clears the effect of
on the velocity profiles. It is shown that the velocity increases with increasing
. Figure 3 clears the effect of M on the velocity profiles. It is shown that the velocity decreases with increasing M, also it decrease with increasing
as shown in Figure 4. The effect of
on the velocity profiles is presented in Figure 5. It is shown that the velocity increases with increasing
. Figures 6-10 represent the induced magnetic field profiles for the flow parameters. It is observed that the induced magnetic field increases with increasing
, while decreases with increasing M and
. Figures 11-15 represent the temperature profiles for the flow parameters. It is observed that the temperature increases with increasing Ra, E and Du, while decreases with increasing
and Pr. Figures 16-18 represent the concentration profiles for the flow parameters. It is noted that concentration increases with an increases S0, while it decrease with the increases
and Sc.
![]()
Figure 1. Velocity profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 2. Velocity profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 3. Velocity profiles
for some values of M.
![]()
Figure 4. Velocity profiles
for some values of λ.
![]()
Figure 5. Velocity profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 6. Induced magnetic profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 7. Induced magnetic profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 8. Induced magnetic profiles
for some values of M.
![]()
Figure 9. Induced magnetic profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 10. Induced magnetic profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 11. Temperature profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 12. Temperature profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 13. Temperature profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 14. Temperature profiles
for some values of E.
![]()
Figure 15. Temperature profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 16. Concentration profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 17. Concentration profiles
for some values of
.
![]()
Figure 18. Concentration profiles
for some values of
.
In order to verify the accuracy of the numerical solution of present work by using (FDM) we have compared these results for
when
and M = 0 with Rajagopal et al. [16] , Kuo [17] , Ishak et al. [18] , K. Jafar [8] . It is observed that this numerical solution in excellent agreement with the results previous obtained values as shown in Table 1. Finally, Tables 2-4 shows comparison between numerical solution by using (FDM) and the analytical solution using (DTM). It is observed that this approximate numerical solution is in excellent agreement with the results of the analytical solution of by using (DTM).
![]()
Table 1. Comparison between the previous obtained values of
by Rajagopal et al. [16] , Kuo [17] , Ishak et al. [18] , K. Jafar [8] and our results when![]()
![]()
Table 2. Comparison between the previous obtained values of
where ![]()
![]()
Table 3. Comparison between the previous obtained values of
where ![]()
![]()
Table 4. Comparison between the previous obtained values of
where ![]()
5. Conclusions
In this work we have obtained the numerical solution of MHD boundary layer flow of non-Newtonian Casson fluid on a moving wedge with heat and mass transfer and induced magnetic field. The effects of thermal diffusion and diffusion thermo with induced magnetic field are taken into consideration. The resulting partial differential equations which describe the problem are transformed into ordinary differential equations by using a similarity transformation and then solved numerically by using the finite difference method (FDM) and analytically by using (DTM). A representative set of numerical results for velocity, induced magnetic field, temperature and concentration profiles is presented graphically and discussed. The figures and tables clearly show that the results by using (FDM) are in excellent agreement with previously published works and with the results of the analytical solution by using (DTM). The important results for this study summarized as follows:
The velocity distribution decreases with the increase of
, while it increases with an increase of
.
The temperature distribution increases with the increase of Ra, E and Du, while it decreases with the increases of Pr and
.
The induced magnetic field distribution increases with the increase of
, while it decreases with the increases of
.
The concentration distribution increases with increase of S0, while it decreases with the increases of Sc and
.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.