Impact of Early Food Diversification on the Composition of the Gut Microbiota in Infants during the First 200 Days of Life from Three Municipalities in the District of Abidjan
Abo Kouadio Jerome Mouroufie1,2*, Adidjatou Ouattara1, Fatogoma Etienne Silué3, Muriel Thomas4, Fréderic Pepke4, Véronique Coxam5, Folquet Madeleine Ama Amorissani5,6, Hortense Faye-Kette1,2, Séraphin Kati-Coulibaly1
1Laboratory of Nutrition and Pharmacology, Faculty of Biosciences, University Felix Houphouet-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.
2Pasteur Institute of Côte d’Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.
3Training and Research Unit, Agriculture Fisheries Resources and Agro-Industry, University of San-Pedro, San-Pedro, Côte d’Ivoire.
4Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, Micalis, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
5Unité de Nutrition Humaine, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UNH, Clermont Ferrand, France.
6Pediatrics Department, Hospital and University Center of Cocody, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.
DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2025.133008   PDF    HTML   XML   30 Downloads   142 Views  

Abstract

The gastrointestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in host health by modulating nutrition and disease processes. Although gut microbial composition is known to vary with diet, few studies have explored how specific infant diets influence the gut microbiota. This study compares the fecal microbiota profiles of three groups of infants: those exclusively breastfed with complementary food (BF + FD), formula-fed with complementary food (FF + FD), and infants receiving a combination of breast milk, formula, and complementary food (BF + FF + FD). Fecal microbiota was analyzed through Illumina high-throughput sequencing. The results reveal that Actinobacteria and Bacteroides are the dominant phyla across all groups. However, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are underrepresented in infants fed with FF + FD. Among infants on the BF + FD diet, Bifidobacterium (17.84%), Escherichia-Shigella (9.37%), and Streptococcus (7.4%) were the most prevalent. In the FF + FD group, Bifidobacterium (24.33%) and Escherichia-Shigella (14.35%) dominated. The BF + FF + FD group showed similar trends, with Bifidobacterium (14.99%), Escherichia-Shigella (9.17%), and Streptococcus (7.68%) prevailing (p = 0.05). Age also influenced microbial composition. Between 0 - 119 days, Bifidobacterium (15.70%) and Enterobacteriaceae (11.28%) predominated, while at 120 - 179 days, these proportions shifted to 20.62% and 8.95%, respectively. By 200 days, Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae were still present but in lower proportions (14% and 9.31%).

Share and Cite:

Mouroufie, A.K.J., Ouattara, A., Silué, F.E., Thomas, M., Pepke, F., Coxam, V., Amorissani, F.M.A., FayeKette, H. and Kati-Coulibaly, S. (2025) Impact of Early Food Diversification on the Composition of the Gut Microbiota in Infants during the First 200 Days of Life from Three Municipalities in the District of Abidjan. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 13, 87-105. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2025.133008.

1. Introduction

The infant gut microbiota undergoes significant changes during the first years of life, both in terms of taxonomic composition and diversity. As the infant is exposed to new foods and environments, the microbial diversity within the gut increases (referred to as alpha diversity). The establishment and development of this intestinal flora are complex, influenced by various factors such as mode of delivery, feeding practices, and environmental bacterial exposure. At birth, the intestinal tract is sterile, and initial colonization by maternal vaginal or dermal flora begins within hours, achieving an initial microbial balance within 1 to 2 weeks.

The composition of the infant gut microbiota is highly susceptible to modulation by external factors, including delivery mode (vaginal vs. Cesarean), antibiotic exposure, genetics, home environment, geographic location, and whether the child is raised in an urban or rural setting. Feeding practices also play a crucial role, with breast milk, formula, or mixed feeding patterns influencing microbial composition. While the infant microbiota differs significantly from that of adults, it tends to converge toward an adult-like microbial community between 2 to 3 years of age [1]-[3].

Among these influencing factors, diet stands out as a key determinant in shaping the gut microbiota during early life [4] [5]. Numerous studies in Europe [6] [7] and Asia [8] have examined how breastfeeding, formula feeding, and early dietary diversification affect the microbial composition of infants. However, there is limited research on how early dietary patterns impact the gut microbiota in developing countries, including Côte d’Ivoire.

Given the profound influence of diet on microbial composition and its implications for health [9], it is essential to better understand the effects of dietary practices on the gut microbiota during infancy. This period is particularly critical, as the first 200 days of life coincide with the rapid development and stabilization of the intestinal flora. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of the early introduction of foods on the gut microbiota of infants in three districts of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Infant Enrollment

We enrolled 26 healthy infants from three communes in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: Abobo, Cocody, and Marcory (Table 1). The infants were divided into six groups: BF: Breastfed only; BF + FD: Breastfed + Food Diversification; FF: Formula-fed only; FF + FD: Formula-fed + Food Diversification; BF + FF: Breastfed + Formula-fed; BF + FF + FD: Breastfed + Formula-fed + Food Diversification. All infants were 0 - 200 days of age; exclusive breast-feeding, formula-feeding, mixed-feeding and infants received additional foods were established throughout the research period. In addition to the feeding pattern, there were no significant differences in gestational age and there was no use of antibiotics for infants in the six groups. The infants did not have any gastrointestinal diseases. Infants were not born by caesarean section. We grouped the infant based on the different diet categories identified during the surveys. The infants were divided into six feeding groups based on their feeding practices:

1) BF: Breastfed only

2) BF + FD: Breastfed + Food Diversification

3) FF: Formula-fed only

4) FF + FD: Formula-fed + Food Diversification

5) BF + FF: Breastfed + Formula-fed

6) BF + FF + FD: Breastfed + Formula-fed + Food Diversification

The infants were also categorized into three age groups:

  • 0 - 119 days

  • 120 - 179 days

  • 180 - 200 days

Table 1 provides an overview of the characteristics of the studied samples.

Table 1. Characteristics of the studied samples.

Sample Name

Commune

Age

Sex

Feeding Practice

Infant 1

Cocody

119 days

M

BF + FD

Infant 2

Cocody

120 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 3

Marcory

119 days

F

BF + FF + FD

Infant 4

Abobo

119 days

M

BF + FD

Infant 5

Marcory

60 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 6

Abobo

119 days

M

BF + FF + FD

Infant 7

Abobo

180 days

M

BF + FF + FD

Infant 8

Abobo

180 days

F

BF + FF + FD

Infant 9

Abobo

180 days

M

BF + FD

Infant 10

Abobo

30 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 11

Abobo

180 days

F

FF + FD

Infant 12

Marcory

180 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 13

Abobo

30 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 14

Abobo

180 days

M

BF + FF + FD

Infant 15

Abobo

150 days

M

BF + FF + DA

Infant 16

Cocody

120 days

M

BF + FF + DA

Infant 17

Abobo

90 days

M

BF + FF + DA

Infant 18

Marcory

120 days

F

BF + FF + DA

Infant 19

Abobo

180 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 20

Marcory

180 days

F

BF + FF + DA

Infant 21

Abobo

90 days

F

BF + FF + DA

Infant 22

Marcory

90 days

F

BF + FF + DA

Infant 23

Abobo

120 days

F

BF + FD

Infant 24

Marcory

150 days

M

BF + FD

Infant 25

Marcory

120 days

M

FF + FD

Infant 26

Abobo

150 days

M

BF + FD

Legend: M: Male; F: Female.

2.2. Faecal Sample

Collection and DNA Extraction

In all populations, fecal samples were collected from each individual in the morning and kept at −80˚C until extraction. DNA was extracted according to the protocol described by the manufacturer of the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA KIT. The extracted DNA was stored at −20˚C until processed. To access the faecal microbiota, the V3 - V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers (V3 - V4): 341F->CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG 805R->GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC [10]. The PCR was done in two (2) steps, with Illumina Nextera adapters. The conditions of the first PCR: Enzyme Phusion (Thermofisher) Concentration of the primers: 0.4 μM final. The first PCR amplification was carried by 33 cycles at 55˚C for 30 s. The use of positive (+) and negative (−) controls for the PCR was carried out and the PCR products were visualized on an agarose gel. The amplicons are diluted to 1/50 and used as a template for the 2nd PCR (also called barcoding or indexing since this step is used to attach the indexes and the Illumina adapters necessary for Miseq sequencing).

2.3. Visualization of PCR Products on Agarose Gel

Amplicons were pooled (5 µL each) to generate the library. The pooled amplicons were subsequently purified using Ampure beads (Beckman) at a 0.7 ratio. Quality control of the library was conducted using Qubit HS dsDNA (Invitrogen) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) with the NEBNext® Library Quant Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs). The library profile was analyzed on a Bioanalyzer using a DNA HS chip (Agilent Technologies). The library was sequenced on a MiSeq (Illumina) using a MiSeq V3 kit, PE300, with a 12% Phix spike-in. The sequencing reads were processed by the MiSeq, and the resulting FASTQ files were analyzed using the bioinformatics platform at CERMOFC (Montreal, Quebec, Canada).

2.4. Data Processing and Analysis

Raw sequences from all analyzed samples were demultiplexed, and adapters and barcodes were removed. The quality of the sequences was then assessed using FastQC, following a previously established protocol [11] [12]. The resulting data files were imported and processed within the R environment using various scripts and built-in functions available in different R packages. The sequences were subsequently trimmed using Trimmomatic [13]. Quality control post-trimming was performed with FastQC [11] and MultiQC [12]. Finally, the filtered and trimmed files were processed using the “filterAndTrim” function from the DADA2 package [14].

Low-quality bases were discarded prior to analysis. The DADA2 (Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm) pipeline was employed to process the filtered data files. Steps including dereplication, core denoising algorithm application, and base pair fusion were performed to obtain fully denoised sequences. The “removeBimeraDenovo” function from the DADA2 package was then utilized to eliminate chimeric sequences. Data cleaning was conducted through decontamination, denoising, and rarefaction, employing the decontam [15] [16] and vegan [17] packages. Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) sequences were assigned taxonomy using the Silva database (Silva_nr_v132) [18] with the “assignTaxonomy” function from the DADA2 package, and a phyloseq data object was created. A phylogenetic tree for taxa was constructed using the R package ape, leveraging the prune_taxa functions from the phyloseq package [15]. Differential analyses were conducted to identify differentially abundant taxa for each parameter using DESeq2 [19].

2.5. Structure and Diversity of the Intestinal Microbiota across Different Diets

Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing of the V3 - V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted to characterize the bacterial lineages present in the fecal microbiota of 26 infants. A total of 1,564,001 filtered taxonomic 16S rRNA gene sequences were generated, yielding a mean (±SD) of 62.55 ± 8.35 sequences per sample. The Chao1, ACE, Simpson, and Shannon diversity indices were employed to assess species richness and evenness of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) distribution within the bacterial community. The richness and diversity indices of the observed bacterial community are reported. The ACE index ranged from 174 to 580, while Chao1 richness varied between 174 and 590.

The Shannon and Simpson indices ranged from 1.49 to 4.55 and from 2.77 to 60.35, respectively. Notably, the fecal samples, particularly sample A24, exhibited the highest values compared to the others. The analysis of alpha diversity, as indicated by the Shannon species richness, revealed a significant microbial diversity in relation to dietary types (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.05) and the age of the infants (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). The majority of tag sequences had a length of approximately 50 bp, which aligns with the expected length of most bacterial V3 - V4 regions.

2.6. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Côte d’Ivoire. Informed consent was obtained from the mothers of all enrolled infants.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Differences between populations were analyzed using both parametric (ANOVA) and nonparametric statistical methods. All results are presented as mean values (± SE), and differences between groups were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, we characterized the fecal microbiota of 26 healthy infants from three districts: Abobo, Cocody, and Marcory. The children were selected based on their dietary habits, encompassing three distinct food typologies constituting the infants’ diets. Food diversification included porridge made from millet, rice, maize, infant cereal, as well as anagobaka, honey, and orange juice.

The study you describe focuses on characterizing the bacterial lineages present in the intestinal microbiota of infants using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Here’s a breakdown of the main points:

Sequencing Method: Pyrosequencing of the V3 - V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted using Illumina MiSeq technology. This high-throughput sequencing generated 1,564,001 filtered sequences, with a mean of 62.55 ± 8.35 sequences per sample.

Alpha Diversity: The alpha diversity indices used in this analysis include:

  • ACE (Abundance-based Coverage Estimator): Values range from 174 to 580.

  • Chao1: Values range from 174 to 590.

  • Shannon Index: Varies between 1.49 and 4.55.

  • Simpson Index: Varies between 2.77 and 60.35.

Infant 7 exhibits the highest alpha diversity, based on all the indices, suggesting a higher richness and evenness of bacterial species in their fecal sample.

Influence of Diet and Age:

  • There is a significant difference in microbial diversity depending on the type of diet (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.05).

  • Age also influences microbial diversity (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05).

Primer Information: The primers used for this sequencing are around 50 bp in length, which is consistent with the size of most bacterial V3 - V4 regions.

This type of study is essential for understanding how different feeding practices (such as breastfeeding, formula feeding, or mixed diets) and age influence the development of the gut microbiota in infants. The data suggest that diet plays a key role in shaping microbial diversity, which could have long-term implications for infant health.

3.1. Microbial Richness and Diversity

To estimate microbial richness based on observed Amplicon Sequence Variants, the Chao1 index was used, while biodiversity was assessed using the Shannon index across the three groups. Significance was determined at a threshold of 0.05 (Table 2). No significant differences in richness or biodiversity were observed between the BF + FD, FF + DA, and BF + FF + FD samples at this threshold.

Table 2. Richness and diversity indices for each fecal sample.

Sample Name

Read

ASV

Ace

Chao1

Shannon

Simpson

Infant 1

74.9

39

282

271

2.28

4.94

Infant 2

72

39

378

408

2.08

3.62

Infant 3

67

40

466

473

2.35

3.90

Infant 4

65.6

39

559

563

3.23

7.84

Infant 5

70.1

39

359

361

2.18

3.64

Infant 6

42.2

39

392

470

4.55

60.35

Infant 7

56.8

39

580

590

3.63

13.41

Infant 8

67.2

39

243

230

3.17

13.74

Infant 9

75.5

39

431

433

2.19

4.25

Infant 10

52.7

39

248

236

3.15

13.12

Infant 11

71.1

40

220

207

2.53

5.34

Infant 12

62.2

39

326

324

2.73

7.49

Infant 13

52.8

40

494

511

3.96

22.90

Infant 14

62.9

39

299

307

2.57

5.34

Infant 15

64.7

39

293

292

2.51

6.01

Infant 16

54.8

39

475

467

3.49

13.82

Infant 17

70.7

39

386

374

2.69

7.49

Infant 18

56

39

418

420

3.67

16.01

Infant 19

57

39

496

509

3.82

20.24

Infant 20

70.2

39

417

385

2.20

4.07

Infant 21

56.5

40

337

343

3.99

31.74

Infant 22

74

39

352

345

1.91

3.20

Infant 23

76.2

39

201

191

1.85

3.25

Infant 24

47.4

40

433

414

3.69

17.85

Infant 25

79.7

40

296

555

1.90

3.12

Infant 26

86.87

39

302

294

1.63

2.77

3.2. Taxonomic Composition of the Bacterial Community

The results indicate that sequences from all samples belonged to four bacterial phyla: Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes. These findings align with previous studies, which identify these phyla as the primary contributors to the establishment of the intestinal microbiota in infants [20]-[22]. This concordance may be due to the focus on infants of a similar age group as those in the referenced studies.

In general, among infants who received complementary foods (BF + FD, FF + FD, BF + FF + FD), Actinobacteria was the most dominant phylum (55%), followed closely by Bacteroidetes (54%). Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio as an Indicator of Gut Microbiota State. Since Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are the dominant phyla in the intestine, the ratio between these groups is often considered an informative indicator of the overall state of the intestinal microbiota. Studies have shown that the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio is lower in the elderly compared to young adults [23]. In this study, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was similarly low, which may be attributed to the early introduction of complementary foods. The intake of these foods produced a gut microbiota profile closer to that of adults, as the addition of complementary foods in infant diets reduced the abundance of Firmicutes.

Diet and Gut Microbiota Composition

These results indicate that the composition of an individual’s gut microbiota is influenced by their diet. Numerous studies have examined the timing of complementary food introduction during the first year of life [24]. Findings from these studies often show a dominance of Firmicutes, followed by Actinobacteria, after food diversification. However, in the present study, diversification resulted in a dominance of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. This difference may be due to the varied ages at which diversification occurred and the specific diets introduced in this study. Additionally, infants in this study received only semiliquid foods, which may have had a milder impact on the gut microbiota compared to more solid or varied diets.

3.3. Actinobacteria Dominance in Different Diets

In the FF + FD diet, Actinobacteria is the dominant phylum at 7%, highlighting its prevalence as diet-dependent. Although these infants began dietary diversification early and were never breastfed, it appears that foods rich in Bifidobacterium are frequently provided to them.

In the BF + FD diets, Actinobacteria dominates at 23%, followed closely by Bacteroidetes (22%) and Firmicutes (21%). The predominance of Actinobacteria suggests that, despite the introduction of complementary foods, the intestinal microbiota of these infants was not profoundly altered. This may be due to the semi-liquid nature of these early foods, their irregular introduction, and the continued practice of breastfeeding.

In the BF + FF + FD diets, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes predominate with 28% each, followed by Actinobacteria at 25%. This balance indicates a notable shift in the gut microbiota composition, likely due to the combined effects of mixed feeding practices and diverse dietary inputs.

3.4. Intestinal Flora Composition by Diet

The four phyla—Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria—are more prevalent in infants on a milk-based diet combined with complementary foods.

A comparative study of infants who began early food introduction (FF + FD, BF + FD, BF + FF + FD) reveals a diverse range of bacterial families. In BF + FD diets, the dominant gut microbiota families are Bifidobacteriaceae (17.38%) and Enterobacteriaceae (9.13%). This dominance is likely due to breastfeeding, as breast milk supplies oligosaccharides to the intestine, promoting the growth of Bifidobacterium species in the ecosystem as long as breastfeeding remains the primary food source. Additionally, breast milk intake is associated with Bifidobacterium presence [25]-[27].

Another possible reason for this composition is that complementary foods had a limited impact on the gut microbiota in BF + FD infants, likely due to the types of foods introduced and their infrequent administration.

3.5. Microbiota Diversity in Different Diets

In the BF + FD diet, Streptococcaceae represents 7.21%. However, in the feces of infants on this diet, the families Bacteroidaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Lactobacillaceae show higher prevalence than others. The presence of this diverse microbiota suggests a high level of diversity and complexity in infants receiving both breast milk and complementary foods, likely due to the added dietary variety. This complementary feeding appears to reduce the bifidogenic population, and early complementary feeding has been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections [28].

In the FF + FD diet, the proportions of these bacteria decrease, except for Bifidobacteriaceae (23.83%) and Enterobacteriaceae (14.06%), which show an increase. Notably, in the feces of infants on the FF + FD diet, Bacteroidaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Lactobacillaceae are less dominant. These infants, who have not been breastfed, may be consuming formula containing probiotics, explaining the prevalence of the bifidogenic population despite the absence of breast milk.

3.6. Microbiota Composition in BF + FF + FD Diets

In the feces of infants on BF + FF + FD diets, families such as Akkermansiaceae, Atopobiaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Veillonellaceae, Streptococcaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, and Lachnospiraceae are more dominant. This composition reflects the diversity and complexity of the gut microbiota when supplementary foods are introduced, resembling an adult-like microbiota profile.

The abundance of Lachnospiraceae, in particular, is a predictive factor for overweight risk, especially following early dietary diversification between three and four months [29] [30]. Early introduction of complementary foods accelerates the maturation of the gut microbiota in children, aligning it more closely with an adult microbiota profile [31] [32]. However, inadequate microbiota maturation during this period is linked to suboptimal growth and development in early life [33].

Moreover, early food introduction is associated with a higher relative abundance of Akkermansiaceae in infants’ stools. While a greater presence of Akkermansiaceae has been linked to improved metabolic health in adults [34] [35], this bacterial family could potentially have adverse effects in infants.

3.7. Microbiota Composition in Various Diets

Furthermore, the families Desulfovibrionaceae and Eggerthellaceae are nearly absent in the feces of children subjected to the different diets (BF + FD, FF + FD, BF + FF + FD). Infants receiving complementary foods exhibit a more complex and diverse intestinal microbiota. Notably, the microbiota of infants on the BF + FF + FD diet is more complex and diverse compared to those on the BF + FD and FF + FD diets.

In each diet group (BF + FD, FF + FD, and BF + FF + FD), 19 bacterial genera were detected, with each representing less than 1% abundance. The genus Escherichia-Shigella is more prevalent in the feces of infants on the FF + FD diet (14.35%) compared to those on the BF + FD (9.37%) and BF + FF + FD diets (9.17%). This indicates a higher presence of pathogenic flora in infants receiving diets supplemented with complementary foods.

The genus Lactobacillus is more abundant in infants on the BF + FD diet (6.63%) than in those on the BF + FF + FD (6.55%) and FF + FD (5.59%) diets. In contrast, the genus Streptococcus is more prevalent in infants on the BF + FF + FD diet (7.68%) compared to BF + FD (7.4%) and FF + FD (6.4%).

Additionally, new bacterial genera, such as Aquamonas, Libanicoccus, Megasphaera, and Eggerthella, were identified, though they are less well-known. The analysis of the intestinal microbiota composition in infants who received different diets revealed a higher abundance of Bifidobacterium in FF + FD infants (24.33%) compared to BF + FD infants (17.84%) and BF + FF + FD infants (14.99%). Moreover, Escherichia-Shigella is significantly more abundant in FF + FD infants (14.35%) than in BF + FD (9.37%) and BF + FF + FD (9.17%) infants. The presence of this pathogenic flora may be linked to the intake of complementary foods and the use of infant formula, particularly in unsanitary conditions (Figures 1-3).

Figure 1. Relative abundance of intestinal flora at the genus level in infants on BF + FD diets.

This figure illustrates the relative abundance of various genera of intestinal flora in infants subjected to and BF + FD diets. The data highlights the differences in microbiota composition between the two dietary groups, showcasing specific genera that are more prevalent in each diet. This comparative analysis provides insights into how dietary choices influence the gut microbiota of infants.

Figure 2. Relative abundance of intestinal flora at the genus level in infants on FF + FD diets.

This figure illustrates the relative abundance of various genera of intestinal flora in infants subjected to and FF + FD diets.

Figure 3. Relative abundance of intestinal flora at the genus level in infants on the BF + FF + FD diet.

This figure presents the relative abundance of various genera of intestinal flora in infants following the BF + FF + FD diet. It illustrates the composition of the gut microbiota within this dietary group, highlighting the specific genera that are predominant. The data provides valuable insights into how the BF + FF + FD diet influences the diversity and richness of the intestinal microbiota in infants.

3.8. Link between the Composition of the Gut Microbiota and the Age of Children

Infants were classified into three age groups: 0 - 119 days, 120 - 179 days, and 180 - 200 days. The analysis of intestinal microbiota composition reveals that Bifidobacterium is more dominant in infants aged 120 - 179 days (20.62%) compared to those aged 0 - 119 days (15.7%) and 180 - 200 days (14%). These results suggest that the frequency of breastfeeding may decrease as complementary foods are introduced, leading to a reduction in Bifidobacterium abundance.

Enterobacteriaceae levels were highest in infants aged 0 - 119 days, followed by those aged 180 - 200 days, and lowest in the 120 - 179 days group. This variation in abundance is linked to dietary differences among the age groups, aligning with findings from previous studies indicating higher Enterobacteriaceae presence in infants at three months of age 0 - 119 days age group, the intestinal microbiota was characterized by a richness of Bacteroidaceae (6.81%), Bifidobacteriaceae (15.7%), Enterobacteriaceae (11.28%), Enterococcaceae (6.09%), Lactobacillaceae (6.63%), and Streptococcaceae (7.32%). In contrast, less abundant families included Veillonellaceae (4.62%), Ruminococcaceae (2.67%), Prevotellaceae (3.02%), Desulfovibrionaceae (0.1%), and Akkermansiaceae (2.16%). This microbiota composition indicates that early diversification may influence the gut microbiota of infants in this age range.

Breastfed infants typically exhibit a microbiota rich in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, with lower levels of Escherichia coli and Clostridium difficile. However the study found that 60% of infants in the 0 - 119 days age group received complementary foods, suggesting that early food introduction can complicate the expected milk-only microbiota, leading to similarities with an adult-like microbiota.

In the 120 - 179 days age group, the intestinal microbiota showed increased levels of Bifidobacteriaceae (20.62%), Enterobacteriaceae (8.95%), and Streptococcaceae (7.15%), but decreased abundance of Veillonellaceae (4.3%), Enterococcaceae (5.41%), and Clostridiaceae (5.34%). These findings confirm that early introduction of complementary foods is more prevalent among infants aged 0 - 119 days.

Age Groups: A1: 0 - 119 days; A2: 120 - 179 days; A3: 180 - 200 days; *Indicates significantly different (*p < 0.05).

Figure 4. Indexes of infant age diversity.

The Lactobacillaceae family was predominant in infants aged 180 - 200 days (6.69%) compared to those aged 0 - 119 days (6.63%) and 120 - 179 days (5.6%). The presence of Lactobacillus in this age group suggests an association with formula feeding. The higher prevalence of Lactobacillus could also indicate increased consumption of probiotic-rich foods or a return to exclusive breastfeeding practices by mothers. Overall, the gut microbiota of infants receiving early complementary foods tends to resemble that of adults, characterized by a dominance of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes (including Enterococcus and Streptococcus), Actinobacteria (primarily Bifidobacterium), and Proteobacteria. This microbiota exhibits considerable interpersonal and intrapersonal variability. The relationship between microbiota composition and age is complex, with studies showing an increase in facultative anaerobes such as Enterococcus and Streptococcus with aging. Conversely, some studies report a decline with age, while others show no significant reduction until the elderly population. A significant difference in gut microbiota composition was observed across age groups (Wallis test, p < 0.05).

Figure 4 visually represents the diversity indexes of the gut microbiota across different infant age groups, highlighting significant variations in microbial composition based on age.

3.9. Long-Term Impacts of Early Microbiota on Immune Development

The early period is crucial for establishing a diverse and balanced gut microbiota, which plays a central role in the maturation of the immune system. Early alterations in microbiota composition (e.g., due to inadequate nutrition or excessive antibiotic use) can increase the risk of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma, allergies, and autoimmune disorders. Metabolism and Obesity: An imbalanced gut microbiota (dysbiosis) in young children has been linked to an increased risk of obesity and metabolic syndrome in adulthood. Specific bacteria influence nutrient absorption and fat storage. Mental Health: The gut-brain axis indicates that the gut microbiota influences neurological and behavioral development. Early disruptions could be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism or mood disorders. Predisposition to Chronic Diseases: Altered gut microbiota can affect susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and even certain cancers.

This study could not only contribute to a better understanding of the impacts of early dietary diversification on the gut microbiota but also inform concrete interventions to improve public health.

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated significant differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota based on the various diets provided to infants (p = 0.05). Additionally, there was a notable difference in the gut microbiota composition across different age groups (p < 0.05). The analysis revealed that Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the most dominant phyla in all three dietary groups: BF + FD, FF + FD, and BF + FF + FD. Conversely, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were less represented in infants on FF + FD diets. There is variability in the composition of the intestinal flora among children who consumed foods other than milk. In terms of age-related findings, Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae were the predominant bacteria in infants aged 0 - 119 days. This dominance continued in the 120 - 179 days group, albeit with reduced proportions. By the age of 180 - 200 days, both Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae were present in even lower amounts.

Overall, the composition of the microbial community in the feces of each infant reflected slight variations according to diet, indicating that the provided foods had some impact on the intestinal microbiota, although this impact was less profound due to the semi-liquid nature of the foods. In contrast, the gut microbiota composition was significantly influenced by the age of the infants, highlighting its age-dependent nature.

This study contributes valuable insights into the composition of the intestinal microbiota in infants who received early complementary foods within the Ivorian context. Future research should further explore the impact of solid foods on gut microbiota composition and address issues related to early dietary diversification and child malnutrition in Côte d’Ivoire.

5. Limits of the Study

Below are potential limitations relevant to studies investigating the impacts of early dietary diversification on the gut microbiota:

1) Sample Size and Diversity

  • Limited sample size: A small number of participants might reduce the statistical power and generalizability of the findings.

  • Population homogeneity: If the study participants come from similar geographic, socioeconomic, or cultural backgrounds, the findings may not be representative of broader populations.

2) Methodological Constraints

  • Cross-sectional design: Studies capturing data at a single point in time may not establish causal relationships. A longitudinal approach would provide better insights into changes over time.

  • Self-reported dietary data: Reliance on caregivers’ recall or reporting for dietary habits might introduce reporting bias or inaccuracies.

3) Microbiota Analysis Techniques

  • Resolution of sequencing methods: Some microbiota analysis methods (e.g., 16S rRNA sequencing) may lack the resolution to differentiate closely related bacterial species or to identify functional attributes.

  • Storage and handling of samples: Variability in sample collection, storage, or processing might affect microbiota composition and introduce biases.

4) Environmental and Confounding Factors

  • Antibiotic use: Variations in antibiotic exposure among participants could influence microbiota composition independently of dietary factors.

  • Breastfeeding practices: Differences in breastfeeding duration or exclusivity may confound the relationship between dietary diversification and gut microbiota changes.

5) Lack of Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Without follow-up into later childhood or adulthood, the study may not capture the long-term implications of early dietary impacts on health outcomes.

6) Geographical and Cultural Specificity

  • The study’s findings may reflect unique dietary or environmental conditions of the population studied, limiting their applicability to other settings with different food practices or healthcare access.

Funding

The research reported in this publication has been supported by grants from the OLGA TRIBALAT Institute, referred to as the UNICEF-WHO project since 2019.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no financial conflict of interest related to the work described in this study.

References

[1] Lozupone, C.A., Stombaugh, J.I., Gordon, J.I., Jansson, J.K. and Knight, R. (2012) Diversity, Stability and Resilience of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nature, 489, 220-30.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11550
[2] Rodríguez, J.M., Murphy, K., Stanton, C., Ross, R.P., Kober, O.I., Judge, N., et al. (2015) The Composition of the Gut Microbiota throughout Life, with an Emphasis on Early Life. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 26, Article 26050.
[3] Milani, C., Duranti, S., Bottacini, F., Casey, E., Turroni, F. and Mahony, J. (2017) Early Microbial Colonizers of the Human Gut: Composition, Activities, and Health Implications of Infant Gut Microbiota. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 81, e00036-17.
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00036-17
[4] Stewart, C.J., Ajami, N.J., O’Brien, J.L., Hutchinson, D.S., Smith, D.P. and Wong, M.C. (2018) Temporal Development of the Gut Microbiome in Infancy from the TEDDY Study. Nature, 562, 583-588.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0617-x
[5] Galazzo, G., van Best, N., Bervoets, L., Dapaah, I.O., Savelkoul, P.H. and Hornef, M.W. (2020) Development of the Microbiota and Associations with Mode of Birth, Diet and Atopic Disorders in a Longitudinal Analysis of Stool Samples, Collected from Infancy to Early Childhood. Gastroenterology, 158, 1584-1596.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.024
[6] Sokol, H., Pigneur, B., Watterlot, L., Lakhdari, O., Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G., Gratadoux, J.J., Blugeon, S., Bridonneau, C., Furet, J.P., Corthier, G., Grangette, C., Vasquez, N., Pochart, P., Trugnan, G., Thomas, G., Blottière, H.M., Doré, J., Marteau, P., Seksik, P. and Langella, P. (2008) Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii is a Commensal Anti-Inflammatory Bacterium Identified by Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiota of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 16731-16736.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804812105
[7] Penders, J., Thijs, C., Vink, C., Stelma, F.F., Snijders, B., Kummeling, I., van den Brandt, P.A. and Stobberingh, E.E. (2006) Factors Influencing Gut Microbiota Composition in Early Childhood. Pediatrics, 118, 511-521.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2824
[8] Fan, W.G., Huo, G.C., Li, X.M., Yang, L.J. and Duan, C.C. (2014) Impact of Diet in Shaping Gut Microbiota Revealed by a Comparative Study in Infants during the Six Months of Life. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 133-143.
https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1309.09029
[9] Marchesi, J.R., Adams, D.H., Fava, F., Hermes, G.D., Hirschfield, G.M., Hold, G. (2016) Gut Microbiota and Host Health: A New Clinical Frontier. Gut, 65, 330-339.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990
[10] Liu, P.-Y., Wu, W.-K., Chen, C.-C., Panyod, S., Sheen, L.-Y. and Wu, M.S. (2020) Evaluation of Compatibility of 16S rRNA V3V4 and V4 Amplicon Libraries for Clinical Microbiome Profiling. 40 p.
[11] Andrews, S.A. (2017) FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data.
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
[12] Ewels, P.A. (2026) MultiQC: Summarize Analysis Results for Multiple Tools and Samples in a Single Report. Bioinformatics, 32, 3047-3048.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
[13] Bolger, A.M. (2014) Trimmomatic: A Flexible Trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics, 30, 2114-2120.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
[14] Callahan, B.J., McMurdie, P.J., Han, A.W., et al. (2016) DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data. Nature Methods, 13, 581-583.
https://doi.org/10.1101/024034
[15] McMurdie, P.J. and Holmes, S. (2013) Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLOS ONE, 8, e61217.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
[16] Davis, N.M. (2018) Simple Statistical Identification and Removal of Contaminant Sequences in Markergene and Metagenomics Data. Microbiome, 6, Article No. 226.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2
[17] Dixon, P. (2003) VEGAN, a Package of R Functions for Community Ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 927-930.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x
[18] Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., et al. (2012) The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web-Based Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 41, D590-D596.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219
[19] Love, M.I., Huber, W. and Anders, S. (2014) Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15, Article No. 550.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
[20] Bäckhed, F., Ley, R.E., Sonnenburg, J.L. Peterson, D.A. and Gordon, J.I. (2005) Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine. Science, 307, 1915-1920.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104816
[21] Wopereis, H., Oozeer, R., Knipping, K., Belzer, C. and Knol, J. (2014) The First Thousand Days—Intestinal Microbiology of Early Life: Establishing a Symbiosis. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 25, 428-438.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12232
[22] Freyssinet, L. (2017) Involvement of the Intestinal Microbiota in Health and Therapeutic Issues. Thesis for the State Diploma of Doctor of Pharmacy, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier France.
[23] Differding, M.K., Benjamin-Neelon, S.E. and Hoyo, C. (2020) Timing of Complementary Feeding Is Associated with Gut Microbiota Diversity and Composition and Short Chain Fatty Acid Concentrations over the First Year of Life. BMC Microbiology, 20, Article No. 56.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01723-9
[24] Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jiminez, E., Marín, M.L. and Xaus, J. (2003) Human Milk Is a Source of Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Infant Gut. The Journal of Pediatrics, 143, 754-758.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028
[25] Martín, R., Heilig, G.H.J., Zoetendal, E.G., Smidt, H. and Rodriguez, J.M. (2007) Diversity of the Lactobacillus Group in Breast Milk and Vagina of Healthy Women and Potential Role in the Colonization of the Infant Gut. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, 2638-2644.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03497.x
[26] Moore, T.A., Hanson, C.K. and Anderson-Berry, A. (2011) Colonization of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Neonates: A Review. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition, 3, 291-295.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941406411421629
[27] Przyrembel, H. (2012) Timing of Introduction of Complementary Food: Short-and Long-Term Health Consequences. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 60, 8-20.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000336287
[28] Forbes, J.D., Chen, C.Y., Knox, N.C., Marrie, R.A., El-Gabalawy, H. and de Kievit, T. (2018) A Comparative Study of the Gut Microbiota in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases—Does a Common Dysbiosis Exist? Microbiome, 6, Article No. 221.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0603-4
[29] Singh, S., Karagas, M.R. and Mueller, N.T. (2017) Charting the Maternal and Infant Microbiome: What Is the Role of Diabetes and Obesity in Pregnancy? Current Diabetes Reports, 17, Article No. 11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0836-9
[30] Moira, M., Cattaneo, A., Mirabelli, P., Festari, C., Lopizzo, N., Nicolosi, V., Mombelli, E., Mazzelli, M., Luongo, D., Naviglio, D., Coppola, L., Salvatore, M. and Frisoni, G.B. (2020) Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Lipopolysaccharide as Mediators between Gut Dysbiosis and Amyloid Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, 78, 683-697.
https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200306
[31] Pluznick, J.L. (2017) Microbial Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Blood Pressure Regulation. Current Hypertension Reports, 19, Article No. 25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-017-0722-5
[32] Laursen, M.F. (2021) Gut Microbiota Development: Influence of Diet from Infancy to Toddlerhood. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 77, 21-34.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000517912
[33] Dao, M.C., Everard, A., Aron-Wisnewsky, J., Sokolovska, N., Prifti, E., Verger, E.O., Kayser, B.D., Levenez, F., Chilloux, J. and Hoyles, L. Consortium, M.-O., Dumas M.E., Rizkalla, S.W., Doré, J., Cani, P.D. and Clément, K. (2016) Akkermansia muciniphila and Improved Metabolic Health during a Dietary Intervention in Obesity: Relationship with Gut Microbiome Richness and Ecology. Gut Microbiota, 65, 426-36.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778
[34] Depommier, C., Everard, A., Druart, C., Plovier, H., Van Hul, M., Vieira-Silva, S., Falony, G., Raes, J., Maiter, D., Delzenne, N.M., de Barsy, M., Loumaye, A., Hermans, M.P., Thissen, J.P., de Vos, W.M. and Cani, P.D. (2019) Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in Overweight and Obese Human Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Exploratory Study. Nature Medicine, 25, 1096-1103.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2
[35] Koenig, J.E., Spor, A., Scalfone, N., Fricker, A.D., Stombaugh, J. and Knight, R., Angenent, L.T. and Ley, R.E. (2011) Succession of Microbial Consortia in the Developing Infant Gut Microbiome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 4578-4585.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000081107

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.