Predictors of Abnormal Vaginal Discharge among Women of Reproductive Age in Southeast Nigeria ()
1. Introduction
Among women of reproductive age, abnormal vaginal discharge is a common symptom of reproductive tract infections [1]. This issue frequently prompts women in this age group to seek medical care [2] [3]. Most often, infection of the vaginal mucosa is the cause of symptomatic vaginal discharge. However, disruptions in the vaginal flora can lead to vaginitis, which manifests as abnormal vaginal discharge [2]. Among these infections, three of the most prevalent causes are bacterial vaginosis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Candida albicans infections [3] [4]. One critical component of the global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections (STI) is the emphasis on the effective management of STI symptoms, with abnormal vaginal discharge considered one of the symptoms associated with STI [5]. Studies have identified a number of risk factors for abnormal vaginal discharge in women of reproductive age.
These factors include multiple sexual partners [6] [7], use of oral contraceptives [8] [9], douching [10] [11], pregnancy [8] [12], hormone replacement, uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression, use of antibiotics, and intrauterine device [8]. Other reported risk factors were being single, partner infidelity [13], advanced age, childbearing history [14], past history of abortion [7] [15], lower educational level and economic status [14]-[17], history of sexually transmitted infection [7], smoking [18], and elevated level of sex hormones [8] [19]. Abnormal vaginal discharge carries significant implications for women’s well-being. It extends beyond the physical discomfort it can cause, affecting aspects of their lives such as sexual activity and social interactions, often leading to social stigma [20]. Abnormal vaginal discharge can also serve as a warning sign, indicative of potentially severe medical conditions, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [21], and cervical cancer [22]. Furthermore, the underlying infectious causes, STIs and bacterial vaginosis, in addition to causing genital symptoms, pregnancy complications, infertility, HIV transmission, and other psychosocial effects, affect sexual, reproductive, and maternal-child health [23] [24].
In light of this, it becomes evident that understanding the factors that predict abnormal vaginal discharge among women of reproductive age is paramount. Such understanding is vital for the development of targeted interventions aimed at the prevention and management of the condition. Also, this study tends to fill a gap in research by assessing the association between the role of family and relationship dysfunction as a potential risk factor for abnormal vaginal discharge.
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
This study was conducted at the General Outpatient Clinics (GOPC), of the Family Medicine Department, Federal University Teaching Hospital Owerri, in Imo State from May to September 2023. The Hospital is located in the heart of Owerri City and serves as the referral Centre for the secondary care centers in the State and its environs. The General Outpatient Clinics run the primary and secondary services and attend to patients with various complaints including sexual and reproductive health issues.
2.2. Study Design
The study was a cross-sectional hospital-based study.
2.3. Study Population
Women between the ages of 18 and 45 years who presented to the GOPC and gave consent to participate in the study.
2.4. Sample Size and Sampling Technique
The sample size was 368, determined using the formula for calculating single proportion population formula. Respondents who met the inclusion criteria were recruited using a systematic sampling method. Women between 18 years and 45 years who presented at the GOPC between 8 am and 4 pm from Mondays through Fridays were recruited by systematic random sampling method. Available hospital records showed that an average of 200 patients presented at the GOPC daily and about 110 of them were women within the reproductive age group. This translates to 550 patients in five working days of one week and 8800 in 16 weeks (4 months), which was the proposed duration of the study.
The sample frame was 8800. The sample interval (k) was 8800/368 = 24.
The first respondent was the number 10, who was chosen from the first 24 respondents by simple random sampling using balloting technique. All patients within the study population had their cards tagged with a paper tape and numbered serially. If any patient that was chosen did not meet the criteria or refused to participate, the person was dropped and the next person in the sequence was chosen as a replacement, and the sequence continued until the estimated sample size was reached. Structured interviewer-administered questionnaire and validated instruments were used to collect demographic and clinical data respectively.
2.5. Data Collection
Data were collected using a pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire developed after a review of kinds of literature on similar topics. The questionnaire included sections on the socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors of abnormal vaginal discharge such as sexual history, hygiene and history of co-morbidities. Socio-economic class stratification into low/middle/high class is shown in Appendix IV attached. The questionnaire was pre-tested in a cohort of 20 women at the Imo State Specialist, Hospital, Owerri, and showed good validity.
2.6. Data Analysis
Data were entered and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Quantitative variables were summarized using means and standard deviation while categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. In bivariate analysis, associations between abnormal vaginal discharge and independent variables were determined using Chi-square tests. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of abnormal vaginal discharge at 5% level of significance.
2.7. Ethical Clearance
Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research and Ethics Committee of the Federal University Teaching, Hospital, Owerri. Written informed consents were obtained from the respondents after the details of the study and its voluntariness were explained to them. Confidentiality was also ensured throughout the study.
3. Results
3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents
A total of 368 women of reproductive age participated in the study giving a response rate of 100%. The mean (± SD) age of participants was 30 ± 4.5 years. The greater proportion of the participants 154 (41.8%) were in the age group 26 - 35 years and almost all of them had at least primary education with the majority of them, 229 (62.2%), having had tertiary education. More than half of the participants, 201 (54.6%), were married. As regards occupation, most of the respondents, 185 (50.3%), were students while about one-quarter, 98 (26.6%), were civil servants. The majority of the respondents, 270 (73.3%), belonged to the middle socio-economic class as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Age |
|
|
18 - 25 |
120 |
32.6 |
26 - 35 |
154 |
41.8 |
36 - 45 |
94 |
25.6 |
Level of Education |
|
|
No formal |
3 |
0.8 |
Primary |
16 |
4.3 |
Secondary |
120 |
32.6 |
Tertiary |
229 |
62.2 |
Marital status |
|
|
Single |
160 |
43.5 |
Married |
201 |
54.6 |
Divorced |
3 |
0.8 |
Widowed |
4 |
1.1 |
Occupation |
|
|
H/W |
53 |
9.5 |
Student |
185 |
50.3 |
Civil servant |
98 |
26.6 |
Farmer |
13 |
3.5 |
Business |
19 |
5.2 |
Social class |
|
|
Low class |
58 |
15.8 |
Middle class |
270 |
73.3 |
High class |
40 |
10.9 |
3.2. Association between Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Abnormal Vaginal Discharge
The age of the respondent (p = 0.02) and occupation (p = 0.012) were found to have significant associations with abnormal vaginal discharge. Other factors such as level of education, (p = 0.897), marital status (p = 0.143), and social class (0.161) were not found to be significantly associated with abnormal vaginal discharge as shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2. Association of vaginal discharge with socio-demographic characteristics.
Variables |
Without VD (%) |
With VD (%) |
Total (%) |
X2 |
p-Value |
Age in years |
|
|
|
|
|
18 - 25 |
89 (74.2) |
31 (25.8) |
120 (32.6) |
7.8627 |
0.020 |
26 - 35 |
121 (78.6) |
33 (21.4) |
154 (41.9) |
36 - 45 |
84 (89.4) |
10 (10.6) |
94 (25.5) |
Level of Education |
|
|
|
|
|
No formal |
2 (66.7) |
1 (33.3) |
3 (0.8) |
0.5957 |
0.897 |
Primary |
12 (75.0) |
4 (25.0) |
16 (4.3) |
Secondary |
96 (80.0) |
24 (20.0) |
120 (32.6) |
Tertiary |
184 (80.4) |
45 (19.6) |
229 (62.3) |
Marital Status |
|
|
|
|
|
Single |
120 (75.0) |
40 (25.0) |
160 (43.5) |
5.4205 |
0.143 |
Married |
168 (83.6) |
33 (16.4) |
201 (54.6) |
Divorced |
2 (66.7) |
1 (33.3) |
3 (0.8) |
Widowed |
4 (100.0) |
0 |
4 (1.1) |
Occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
Home maker |
40 (75.5) |
13 (24.5) |
53 (14.4) |
12.7657 |
0.012 |
Student |
151 (81.6) |
34 (18.4) |
185 (50.3) |
Civil servant |
84 (85.7) |
14 (14.3) |
98 (26.6) |
Farmer |
9 (69.2) |
4 (30.8) |
13 (3.5) |
Business |
10 (52.6) |
9 (47.4) |
19 (5.2) |
Social Class |
|
|
|
|
|
Low Class |
41 (70.7) |
17 (29.3) |
58 (15.7) |
3.6513 |
0.161 |
Middle Class |
220 (81.5) |
50 (18.5) |
270 (73.4) |
High Class |
33 (82.5) |
7 (17.5) |
40 (10.9) |
3.3. Association between Other Risk Factors and Abnormal Vaginal Discharge
Concerning the association of abnormal vaginal discharge and other risk factors, douching (p = < 0.001) and use of oral contraceptive methods (p = 0.05) were found to be associated with the complaint of abnormal vaginal discharge. Similarly, the hygienic practice after urinating (p = < 0.001) and after passing stool (p = < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with abnormal vaginal discharge. Other significantly associated risk factors include past history of termination of pregnancy (p = < 0.001), recent antibiotic use (within one week) (p < 0.002), and being sexually active (p = 0.001). The type of menstrual hygienic practice was not found to be significantly associated with the complaint of abnormal vaginal discharge (p = 0.750). In addition, retro-viral disease status (p = 0.025) and family function (p = 0.015) were found to be associated with abnormal vaginal discharge, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4 below.
Table 3. Association of abnormal vaginal discharge with other factors.
Variables |
Without VD |
With VD |
Total (%) |
X2 |
p-Value |
Douching |
|
|
|
25.1836 |
< 0.001 |
Yes |
08 (36.4) |
14 (63.6) |
22 (6) |
No |
286 (81.6) |
60 (18.4) |
326 (94) |
Smoking |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
0 |
0 |
0 (0) |
No |
294 (79.9) |
74 (20.1) |
368 (100) |
Contraception |
|
|
|
14.7582 |
0.005 |
None |
198 (80.8) |
47 (19.2) |
245 (66.6) |
Oral |
37 (63.8) |
21 (36.2) |
58 (15.7) |
Condom |
51 (89.5) |
6 (10.5) |
57 (15.5) |
Injection |
3 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
3 (0.8) |
IUCD |
5 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
5 (1.4) |
Toilet structure |
|
|
|
8.5336 |
0.036 |
Pit toilet |
10 (66.7) |
3 (33.3) |
15 (4.1) |
VIP |
28 (66.7) |
14 (33.3) |
42 (11.4) |
WC |
250 (82.2) |
55 (18.0) |
305 (82.9) |
Others |
6 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
6 (1.6) |
After urinating |
|
|
|
15.7115 |
< 0.001 |
FTB |
242 (82.9) |
50 (17.1) |
292 (79.3) |
BTF |
34 (60.7) |
22 (39.3) |
56 (15.2) |
Dabbing |
18 (90.0) |
2 (10.0) |
20 (5.5) |
After stool |
|
|
|
71.9653 |
< 0.001 |
FTB |
270 (86.5) |
42 (13.5) |
312 (89.1) |
BTF |
14 (31.8) |
30 (68.2) |
44 (9.5) |
Washing |
10 (83.3) |
2 (16.7) |
12 (1.4) |
During menses |
|
|
|
0.5758 |
0.750 |
Pads |
280 (79.8) |
71 (20.2) |
351 (95.4) |
Tampons |
0 |
0 |
0 (0) |
Tissue |
8 (88.9) |
1 (11.1) |
9 (2.4) |
Cloth |
6 (75.0) |
2 (25.0) |
8 (2.2) |
T.O.P |
|
|
|
21.2478 |
< 0.001 |
Yes |
90 (67.2) |
44 (32.8) |
134 (37.5) |
No |
204 (87.2) |
30 (12.8) |
244 (62.5) |
Antibiotics |
|
|
|
12.8159 |
0.002 |
None |
182 (85.0) |
32 (15.0) |
214 (58.2) |
1 - 3 |
72 (78.3) |
20 (21.7) |
92 (25) |
> 3 |
40 (64.5) |
22 (35.5) |
62 (16.8) |
Intercourse |
|
|
|
29.1381 |
< 0.001 |
None |
81 (91.0) |
8 (9.0) |
89 (24.2) |
1 - 2 |
134 (85.9) |
22 (14.1) |
156 (42.4) |
> 2 |
79 (79.9) |
44 (35.8) |
123 (33.4) |
Table 4. Association of abnormal vaginal discharge with other co-morbidities.
Variables |
Without VD |
With VD |
Total |
X2 |
P-Value |
BMI |
|
|
|
0.7069 |
0.702 |
Normal |
180 (61.2) |
49 (66.2) |
229 |
Overweight |
72 (24.5) |
15 (20.3) |
87 |
Obesity |
42 (14.3) |
10 (13.5) |
52 |
Blood glucose |
|
|
|
0.5070 |
0.776 |
Normal |
272 (92.5) |
69 (93.2) |
341 |
Impaired |
20 (6.8) |
4 (5.4) |
24 |
Diabetes |
2 (0.7) |
1 (1.4) |
3 |
RVD screening |
|
|
|
5.0209 |
0.025 |
Reactive |
2 (0.7) |
3 (4.1) |
5 |
Non-reactive |
292 (99.3) |
71 (95.6) |
363 |
Family Function |
|
|
|
8.3713 |
0.015 |
Functional |
192 (65.3) |
35 (47.3) |
227 (61.7) |
Mod functional |
82 (27.9) |
30 (40.5) |
112 (30.4) |
Dysfunctional |
20 (6.8) |
9 (12.2) |
29 (7.9) |
3.4. Predictors of Abnormal Vaginal Discharge
Compared to respondents between 18 and 25 years, those between 26 and 35 years had twice the risk of having abnormal discharge (OR = 2.3 CI = 1.534 - 5.233), while those between 36 and 45 years had more than fourfold increased risk (OR = 4.5, CI = 1.023 - 8.967). Students were twice more likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge when compared to businesswomen/ traders. (OR = 2.4, CI = 1.496 - 7.336). Similarly, women who used any form of oral contraceptives were three times more likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge (adjusted OR 3.4 CI 1.068 - 6.932, p = 0.001), and women who used water cistern toilets were more than four times more likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge (adjusted OR 4.7 CI 1.654 - 5.210, p = 0.028). Women who cleaned their anus back to front after passing stool were more than twice as likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge compared to women who practised washing (adjusted OR 2.7 CI 1.142 - 4.809, p = 0.042). Similarly, women who had more than two sexual intercourse in a month were more than twice as likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge compared to those who had less than 1 or none (adjusted OR 2.7 CI 1.032 - 5.309, p = 0.028). Women who were retroviral disease positive were more than two times more likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge. Women who were classified as having dysfunctional families or relationships were nearly three times more likely to have a complaint of abnormal vaginal discharge compared to women who had functional families or relationships (adjusted OR 2.7 CI 1.39 - 7.177, p = 0.036) as shown in Table 5 below.
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors of Vaginal Discharge.
Variable |
Adjusted OR |
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper |
p-Value |
Age |
|
|
|
|
18 - 25 |
1 |
|
|
|
26 - 35 |
2.3 |
1.534 |
5.233 |
0.041* |
36 - 45 |
4.5 |
1.023 |
8.967 |
0.023* |
Occupation |
|
|
|
|
Business/trader |
1 |
|
|
|
Farmer |
1.4 |
0.234 |
3.437 |
0.121 |
Civil servant |
0.9 |
0.743 |
3.649 |
0.095 |
Housewife |
2.1 |
0.312 |
4.550 |
0.598 |
Student |
2.4 |
1.496 |
7.336 |
0.003* |
Douching |
|
|
|
|
No |
1 |
|
|
|
Yes |
2.2 |
0.967 |
5.211 |
0.083 |
Contraception |
|
|
|
|
None |
1 |
|
|
|
Condom |
0.8 |
0.421 |
1.455 |
0.976 |
Oral |
3.4 |
1.068 |
6.932 |
0.010* |
Toilet structure |
|
|
|
|
VIP |
1 |
|
|
|
Pit toilet |
2.3 |
0.753 |
4.321 |
0.654 |
WC |
4.7 |
1.654 |
5.210 |
0.028* |
After urinating |
|
|
|
|
Dabbing |
1 |
|
|
|
FTB |
1.2 |
0.870 |
1.863 |
0.542 |
BTF |
3.7 |
0.542 |
7.432 |
0.074 |
After stooling |
|
|
|
|
Washing |
1 |
|
|
|
FTB |
0.9 |
0.433 |
1.567 |
0.071 |
BTF |
2.7 |
1.142 |
4.809 |
0.042* |
T.O.P |
|
|
|
|
No |
1 |
|
|
|
Yes |
1.6 |
0.395 |
5.002 |
0.201 |
Frequency of Intercourse |
|
|
|
|
None |
1 |
|
|
|
1 - 2 |
1.2 |
0.769 |
2.964 |
0.571 |
> 2 |
2.7 |
1.032 |
5.309 |
0.028* |
RVD |
|
|
|
|
No |
1 |
|
|
|
Yes |
3.8 |
1.392 |
6.642 |
0.010 |
Family function |
|
|
|
|
Functional |
1 |
|
|
|
Mod. Functional |
1.6 |
0.415 |
4.381 |
0.420 |
Dysfunctional |
2.7 |
1.039 |
7.177 |
0.036* |
* = statistically significant.
4. Discussion
It is noteworthy that this study assessed the association between family dysfunction and abnormal vaginal discharge which is an area of gap in most previous studies. It is interesting to note that family dysfunction was found to be a predictor of abnormal vaginal discharge. The reason could be that dysfunctional family or relationships can lead to stress, which can weaken the immune system and upset the normal flora, thus, rendering women more susceptible to STIs and, consequently, vaginal discharge [25]. This finding aligns with a study that identified a significant relationship between psychosocial stress and vaginal discharge [26]. It has been documented that persistent exposure to psychosocial stress can lead to disruption of the vaginal microbiota leading to vaginal dysbiosis which can allow opportunistic organisms to overgrow causing vaginal infections [27] [28]. Another possible explanation could also be that those who experience family dysfunction may develop unhealthy coping mechanisms, such as substance abuse or sexual risk-taking behaviour. These behaviours can increase the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which can cause vaginal discharge.
In this study, respondents between 26 and 45 years old were more likely to have an abnormal discharge than their counterparts. This finding is somewhat consistent with a study that reported a higher prevalence of abnormal vaginal discharge in women within a similar age range (19 - 42 years) [29]. It is possible that the result is due to a change in the pH of the vaginal cavity, since the vaginal pH value is age-dependent and may be slightly higher than 4.5 for women in the perimenopausal stage [30] [31]. This increased vaginal pH has been shown to increase susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections [31]. Also, hormonal changes could account for the age-related difference because as women progress through their reproductive years, hormonal fluctuations can impact the vaginal microbiota, potentially leading to an increased susceptibility to infections and abnormal discharge [32]. Respondents who were students were found to be more likely to have an abnormal vaginal discharge than those in other occupations. This finding could be attributed to their increased likelihood of engaging in sexual activity, and having multiple sexual partners. This finding may also reflect disparities in lifestyle and daily routines between these groups. In addition, students are frequently faced with academic pressures, irregular sleep patterns, and higher levels of stress, which can affect their general health, including their vaginal health. In this study, use of oral contraceptives was also found as a predictor of abnormal vaginal discharge, and this is similar to findings from other studies [8] [9]. One possible explanation for this might be that oral contraceptives can alter the vaginal flora and increase the risk of developing vaginal candidiasis, a common cause of abnormal vaginal discharge [33] [34]. It was also noted that respondents who used water cisterns were more likely to have an abnormal vaginal discharge than respondents who used other types of sanitary facilities. In a study done in Cameroon use of water cistern was reported as a risk factor for vulvovaginal candidiasis [35].
Another predictor of abnormal vaginal discharge was anal hygiene practices of cleaning from back to front. This practice can transfer bacteria from the anus to the vulva and into the vagina, potentially leading to faecal contamination, which is a known endogenous factor that may affect vulvar pH and thus lead to abnormal vaginal discharge [25]. Sexual frequency of more than twice a month was also noted as a predictor of abnormal vaginal discharge. This is in tandem with other reported studies that being sexually active increases the chances of abnormal vaginal discharge [12]. Sexual activity has been linked to disruptions in the vaginal microbiota possibly due to the transmission of infections [27]. The reason might be because bacterial vaginosis which is the most common cause of vaginal discharge among women of reproductive age can spread through sexual contact [36]. In this study, those who are retroviral disease positive were more likely to have abnormal vaginal discharge. HIV infection can increase the risk of developing various vaginal infections, such as bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis, and trichomoniasis [37]. Factors, such as immune deficiency, can disturb the normal vaginal flora and lead to recurrent vaginal infections and discharge [25] [30]. A diminished response to Candida albicans in lymphocytes from HIV-positive women has also been documented, highlighting their heightened susceptibility to candidiasis and underscoring the importance of compromised immunity [30].
5. Conclusion
The findings from the study underscore the importance of age, occupation, contraceptive use, sanitation practices, sexual behaviour, HIV status, and family dynamics in understanding and addressing this prevalent gynaecological concern. Therefore, to improve women’s reproductive health, targeted interventions should be developed based on these identified predictors. These may include comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education on improved genital hygiene and contraceptive choices. Also, counselling and mental health support for dysfunctional families and relationships.
6. Limitation
This study was cross-sectional, which means that it cannot establish causality.
Appendix I: Questionnaire
Participant Serial Number
SECTION A: SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC DATA.
1. Age as at last birthday
18 - 25yrs
26 -35yrs.
36 - 45yrs
2. Level of Education
No formal education
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
3. Marital Status
Single
Married
Widowed
Separated/Divorced
4. Occupation
Student
Home Maker
Civil Servant
Civil Servant Farmer
Civil Servant Business Executive
5. Socio-economic class
I
II
III
IV
V
SECTION B: FEATURES OF VAGINAL DISCHARGE
6a. Have you ever had vaginal discharge?
Yes
No
6b. Do you have vaginal discharge now?
Yes
No
6c. How old do you have the first episode? Less than
1 yr
1 - 5 yrs
more than 5yrs
7. Within the past year, how many times have you had episodes of vaginal discharge?
once
two to three times
four times or more
continuous
8. How will you quantify the disharge?
mild
moderate
severe
9. When is the discharge noticed to be present or become worse?
Just before menses
after menses
during sexual intercourse
at all times
10a. Whats your perception of vaginal discharge?
Normal for women
abnormal
10b. What do you think is the cause of vaginal discharge?
Don’t know
“toilet infection”
sexually transmitted infection
mental stress
SECTION C: ASSOCIATED FEATURES
11. Does the discharge have an odour?
Yes
No
12. What is the colour of the discharge?
milky/white
yellow
brownish
green
13. How would you describe the nature of the discharge?
watery
curd-like
frothy
14. What other symptoms are associated with the discharge?
itching
burning sensation
Pain during urination
pain during intercourse
lower abdominal pain
SECTION D: RISK ASSESSMENT
15a. Do you practice Douching?
Yes
No
15b. If yes, what do you use?
Salt in water
antiseptic in water
herbal preparation
lime
others specify
16a. Do you smoke?
Yes
No
16b. If yes, on the average how many sticks do you smoke per day?
1 - 10 sticks
11 - 20 sticks
20 sticks and above
16c. For how long have you been smoking?
Less than one year
1 - 5 years
more than 5 years
17. Which of the following contraceptive methods do you use?
Oral hormonal
Injection
Condoms
IUCD
Tubal ligation
None
18. What type of toilet facility do you use most of the time?
pit latrine
ventilation improved pit (VIP)
water cistern (WC)
others specify
19. After urinating, how do you clean the vulva?
back to front
front to back
dabbing
20. After passing stool, how do you clean?
back to front
front to back
washing
21. During menses what do you use?
Sanitary pads
Tampoons
Tissue paper
Clothing material
22. Have you had a miscarriage or termination of pregnancy in the past?
Yes
No
23. In the past 6 months how many courses of antibiotics have you used?
None
1 - 3 times
more than three times
24. In the past year how many sexual partners have you had?
None
1
2
> 2
25. In the past month how many sexual exposures have you had?
None
1 - 2
> 2
Section E: Other Co-Morbidities:
26. Body Mass Index (BMI):
Underweight
Normal
Overweight
Obesity
27. Random Blood Glucose:
Normal
Impaired
Diabetes
28. Classification based on Retroviral screening:
Yes
No
29. The vaginal fluid pH:
Less than 4.5
4.5 and above
30. The microscopy and/or culture result:
Candida
B. vaginosis
T vaginalis
31. Others:
None
Appendix II: Socio-Economic Classification Scheme by Oyedeji
FOR OCCUPATION
CLASS—OCCUPATION
I—Senior public servants, professionals, managers, large scale traders, business men, contractors
II—Intermediate grade public servants and senior school teachers
III—Junior school teachers, professional drivers, artisans
IV—Petty traders, laborers, messengers
V—Unemployed, full time house wife, students and subsistence farmers
FOR EDUCATION.
CLASS—EDUCATION.
I—University graduates or equivalent
II—School certificate holders ordinary level (GCE) who also had teaching or other professional training
III—School certificate or grade II teachers certificates holders or equivalent
IV—Modern three and primary six certificate holders
V—Those who could either just read and write or were illiterate
The exact class was gotten by calculating the average of the two classes.
Appendix III: Screening for Family Function Using Family Apgar Score
|
Almost always |
Some of the time |
Hardly ever |
A-ADAPTABILITY I am satisfied that I can turn to my family for help when something is troubling me. |
|
|
|
P-PARNERSHIP I am satisfied with the way my family talks things over with me and shares problems with me. |
|
|
|
G-GROWTH I am satisfied that my family accepts and supports my wishes to take on new activities or directions. |
|
|
|
A-AFFECTION I am satisfied with the way my family expresses affection and responds to my emotions such as anger, sorrow, love. |
|
|
|
R-RESOLVE I am satisfied with the way my family and I share time together. |
|
|
|
Hardly ever = 0, Some of the time = 1, Almost always = 2. Scores of 0 - 3 = dysfunctional, 4 - 7 = moderately dysfunctional, 8 - 10 = functional.