Performance of a New Method of Multicomponent Images Segmentation in the Presence of Noise
Sié Ouattara, Olivier Asseu, Alain Clément, Bertrand Vigouroux
.
DOI: 10.4236/eng.2011.311134   PDF    HTML   XML   4,558 Downloads   7,324 Views  

Abstract

Any undesirable signal limiting to a degree or another the integrity and the intelligibility of a useful signal can be considered as noise. In the general rule, the good performance of a system is assured only if the level of power of the useful signal exceeds by several orders of magnitude that of the noise (signal to noise of a several tens of decibels). However certain elaborate methods of treatment allow working with very low signal to noise ratio in an optimal way any a priori knowledge available on the signal useful to interpret. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of the noise on a new method of multicomponent image segmentation developed recently. Two types of additional noises are considered, which are the Gaussian noise and the uniform noise, with varying correlation between the different components (or planes) of the image. Quantitative results show the influence of the noise level on the segmentation method.

Share and Cite:

Ouattara, S. , Asseu, O. , Clément, A. and Vigouroux, B. (2011) Performance of a New Method of Multicomponent Images Segmentation in the Presence of Noise. Engineering, 3, 1082-1089. doi: 10.4236/eng.2011.311134.

1. Introduction

Multicomponent images are composed of several plans of images. We can classify them into three main categories [1]: 1) The images of homogeneous components are those consisted of series of images of the same nature, and representing the same scene. The nature of the third dimension depending on the application may be temporal or polarimetric. 2) The images with quasi-homogeneous components are images intrinsically vectorial. Each pixel is characterized by the vector “color” or multispectral. The components are expressed numerically with the same measuring unit, for example energies in different wavebands. The only rigorous approach to treat such images is the vectorial approach. This work interests particularly this category of images. 3) The images with heterogeneous or multiprotocol components are images whose components are not the same nature because the different components of the image are obtained by the use of sources of different nature.

In a multicomponent image, a pixel can be considered as a vector of attributes of n elements (tuple, where n is the number of components of the image) from which each value of the tuple is resulting from a component of the image. Segmenting the images according to their radiometric attributes can be achieved by analyzing multidimensional histogram [2,3]. However, to manipulate a nD histogram (n > = 3) is not easy task because it requires a large memory [4-6]. The difficulty can be overcome by using a compact multidimensional histogram [7-12]. We have recently proposed a segmentation method [3] based on the analysis of compact nD histogram. We report here how this algorithm proves to be robust to additional noise considered as a harmful corrupting signal with the extraction of the useful signal.

In this work, we first make a brief presentation of our segmentation algorithm, for more details refer to the article [3]. Then we present here the additive noises that are likely considered Gaussian, uniform and so correlated. Finally the robustness of the noise is evaluated on a multicomponent synthetic image whose properties are described.

2. Algorithm of Multicomponent Images Segmentation

The classification of “colours” is carried out in two steps [3]: the learning step and the decision step.

The learning step is a hierarchical decomposition of populations in the compact n-D histogram. For each level of population pn, peaks Pi are identified by the FCCL algorithm for a given value of α, which retains the connected components whose populations are greater than or equal to pn. Each peak is then iteratively decomposed into narrower peaks, beginning from population 0. A peak is labelled as significant if it represents a population greater than or equal to a threshold S (expressed in percent of the total population in the histogram). The procedure is illustrated in part (a) of Figure 2 (drawn in one dimension for clarity). We shall name kernels Ki the peaks corresponding to circled leaves in part (b) of Figure 1. In other words, kernels are significant peaks (part a of figure 1) without descendants in the hierarchical decomposition tree (part (b) of Figure 1) (e.g., Figure 1 shows five significant peaks Pi (i = 0 to 4) and three kernels Ki (i = 2, 3, 4)). The number of classes Nc is taken equal to the number of kernels (the class corresponding to kernel Ki is noted Ci). Therefore Nc depends on the threshold S, i.e. on the precision the image colors are analyzed with and the value of α the degree of similarity between the spels.

At the decision step, the mass center µ(Ki) of each kernel Ki is calculated in the feature multidimensional space. Let us denote by ß the color corresponding to the point of coordinates (g1, g2, ∙∙∙, gn) in the feature space. Two cases appear: if (g1, g2, ∙∙∙, gn) belongs to Ki, color ß is attributed to class Ci; if not, let us denote by Pk the peak which belong to (g1, g2, ∙∙∙, gn); color ß is attributed to class Ci corresponding to kernel Ki, son of Pk, knowing that d[µ(Ki), (g1, g2, ∙∙∙, gn)] is minimum, where d[y, z] is the Euclidean distance between y and z.

This method calls HierarchieFuzzy_nD.

Figure 2 shows an example of segmented image of the probe image, inspired by the image Savoise [2,14].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] M. Ciuc, “Multicomponent Images Processing: Applica- tion to Color Imaging and Radar,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univer- sity of Bucarest, Roumanie, 2002.
[2] P. Lambert and L. Macaire, “Filtering and Segmentation: the Specificity of Colour Images,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Color in Graphics and Image Processing (CGIP), Saint-Etienne, France, 2000, pp. 57-71.
[3] S. Ouattara, G. L. Loum and A. Clément, “Unsuper- vised Segmentation Method of Multicomponent Images Based on Fuzzy Connectivity Analysis in Multidimen- sional Histograms,” Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2011, pp. 203-214. doi:10.4236/eng.2011.33024
[4] A. Clément and B. Vigouroux, “A Compact Histogram for the Analysis of Multicomponent Images,” Proceedings of 18th conference GRETSI on Signal Processing, France, Vol. 1, 2001, pp. 305-307.
[5] J. Chanussot, A. Clément, B. Vigouroux and J. Chabod, “Lossless Compact Histogram Representation for Multi- Component Images: Application to Histogram Equalization,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposim, (IGARSS), Proceedings of IEEE International, Vol. 6, 2003, pp. 3940- 3942. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1295321
[6] S. Ouattara and A. Clement, “Labelling of Compact Mul- tidimensional Histograms for Analysis of Multicompo- nent Images,” Proceedings of the 21st Conference GRETSI on the Image Processing, Troyes, 2007, pp. 85-88.
[7] P. Schmid, “Segmentation of Digitized Dermatoscopic Images by Two-Dimensional Color Clustering,” IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1999, pp. 164-171. doi:10.1109/42.759124
[8] F. Kurugollu, B. Sankur and A. C. Harmanci, “Color Image Segmentation Using 2-Diomensional Histogram Multitresholding and Fusion,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Color Graphics and Image Processing, Saint-Etienne, France, 2000, pp. 152-157. doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(01)00052-X
[9] A. Clément and B. Vigouroux, “Unsupervised Classifica- tion of Pixels in Color Images by Hierarchical Analysis of Bi-Dimensional Histograms,” IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Hamma- met, Tunisia, Vol. 2, 2002, pp. 85-89.
[10] O. Lezoray, “Unsupervised 2D Multiband Histogram Clustering and Region for Color Image Segmentation,” Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, 2003, pp. 267-270.
[11] O. Lezoray and C. Charrier, “Color Image Segmentation Using Morphological Clustering and Fusion with Auto- matic Scale Selection,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2009, pp. 397-406. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2008.11.005
[12] R. Furferi, “Colour Classification Method for Recycled Melange Fabrics,” Journal of Applied Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2011, pp. 236-246. doi:10.3923/jas.2011.236.246
[13] S. Yamada and K. Murase, “Effectiveness of Flexible Noise Control Image Processing for Digital Portal Images Using Computed Radiography,” British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 78, 2005, pp. 519-527. doi:10.1259/bjr/26039330
[14] S. H. Lim, “Characterization of Noise in Digital Photo- graphs for Image Processing,” Proceeding in Digital Photography II, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, Vol. 6069, 2008. doi:10.1117/12.655915
[15] J-P. Coquerez and S. Philipp, “Image Analysis: Filtering and Segmentation,” Masson, Paris, 1995.
[16] L. Vinet, “Segmentation and Mapping of Areas of Stereo- scopic Pairs of Images,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris IX Dauphine, Paris, 1991.
[17] M. Borsotti, P. Campadelli and R. Schettini, “Quantita- tive Evaluation of Color Image Segmentation Results,” Pattern Recognition Letters Vol. 19, No. 8, 1998, pp. 741-747. doi:10.1016/S0167-8655(98)00052-X
[18] C. Rosenberger, “Adaptative Evaluation of Image Seg- mentation Results,” Proceeding of 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 399-402. doi:10.1109/ICPR.2006.214
[19] H. Zhang, J. E. Fritts and S. A. Goldman, “Image Segmentation Evaluation: A Survey of Unsupervised Methods,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2008, pp. 260-280. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.08.003

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.