Conesa, B.A., Madrigal, P., Tarazona, S., Gomez-Cabrero, D., Cervera, A., McPherson, A., Szczesniak, M.W., Gaffney, D.J., Elo, L.L., Zhang, X. and Mortazavi, A. (2016) A Survey of Best Practices for RNA-seq Data Analysis. Genome Biology, 17, 13.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Extractive Summarization Using Structural Syntax, Term Expansion and Refinement

  AUTHORS: Mohamed Taybe Elhadi

  KEYWORDS: Data Extractive Summarization, Syntactical Structures, Sentence Similarity, Longest Common Subsequence, Term Expansion, WordNet, Local Thesaurus

  JOURNAL NAME: International Journal of Intelligence Science, Vol.7 No.3, July 31, 2017

  ABSTRACT: This paper investigates a procedure developed and reports on experiments performed to studying the utility of applying a combined structural property of a text’s sentences and term expansion using WordNet [1] and a local thesaurus [2] in the selection of the most appropriate extractive text summarization for a particular document. Sentences were tagged and normalized then subjected to the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) algorithm [3] [4] for the selection of the most similar subset of sentences. Calculated similarity was based on LCS of pairs of sentences that make up the document. A normalized score was calculated and used to rank sentences. A selected top subset of the most similar sentences was then tokenized to produce a set of important keywords or terms. The produced terms were further expanded into two subsets using 1) WorldNet; and 2) a local electronic dictionary/thesaurus. The three sets obtained (the original and the expanded two) were then re-cycled to further refine and expand the list of selected sentences from the original document. The process was repeated a number of times in order to find the best representative set of sentences. A final set of the top (best) sentences was selected as candidate sentences for summarization. In order to verify the utility of the procedure, a number of experiments were conducted using an email corpus. The results were compared to those produced by human annotators as well as to results produced using some basic sentences similarity calculation method. Produced results were very encouraging and compared well to those of human annotators and Jacquard sentences similarity.