Ludwig, C., Borella, E., Tettamanti, M., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2010). Adult Age Differences in the Color Stroop Test: A Comparison between an Item-by-Item and a Blocked Version. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, 135-142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.040

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Stroop-Like Interference in the Fruit Stroop Test in Typical Development

  AUTHORS: Hideyuki Okuzumi, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Nao Otsuka, Ryotaro Saito, Yuhei Oi, Shogo Hirata, Koichi Haishi, Mitsuru Kokubun

  KEYWORDS: Inhibitory Control, Executive Function, Children

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.6 No.5, April 23, 2015

  ABSTRACT: This study examined Stroop-like interference in the fruit Stroop test among 271 5 - 12-year-old children and young adults divided into five age groups: 64 5 - 6-year-olds, 65 7 - 8-year-olds, 60 9 - 10-year-olds, 46 11 - 12-year-olds, and 36 young adults (18 - 23-year-olds). Participants were ad-ministered a paper-and-pencil version of the fruit Stroop test, which includes the canonical color task, the superficial color task, and the fruit name task. In these tasks, participants were presented with line-drawings of fruits having strongly associated colors (e.g., yellow banana) and were asked to name the ink colors of the fruits, name the colors the fruit “should be”, or read the fruit name. The results indicated robust interference in the canonical color task of the fruit Stroop test, suggesting that this task is useful to assess individual differences of inhibitory control in typical development.