Ballistic Behavior of Heracron®-Based Composites: Effect of the Number Multifilaments on High-Speed Projectiles
Jung Seop Lim
Samsung Electronics, Suwon, South Korea.
DOI: 10.4236/mnsms.2013.33011   PDF    HTML     5,028 Downloads   8,235 Views   Citations

Abstract

In this study, two Heracron? woven fabrics, HT840-1 and HT840-2, were fabricated with different multifilament fibers, and their resistance to ballistic impact was investigated. For the same weight and number of plies, the HT840-2 fabric showed improved ballistic properties, compared with HT840-1; this result is contrary to the fiber and fabric properties. With the exception of the yarn’s physical properties, this behavior can be explained in terms of the number of multifilaments, which strongly influenced the ballistic mechanism, i.e., a greater number of multifilament fibers facilitates energy dissipation from a high-speed ballistic projectile. In summary, establishing this optimal number of multifilaments is the key to optimizing the ballistic properties of any given fabric.

Share and Cite:

J. Lim, "Ballistic Behavior of Heracron®-Based Composites: Effect of the Number Multifilaments on High-Speed Projectiles," Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Material Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 84-89. doi: 10.4236/mnsms.2013.33011.

1. Introduction

Aramid poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) or PPTA consists of relatively rigid polymer chains with linked benzene rings and amide bonds. This structure affords aramid fibers high tenacity, high modulus, and toughness [1-3]. Based on these merits, aramid fibers are used in ballistic armor materials. Figure 1 shows the chemical structure of aramid fibers.

Generally, ballistic materials can be divided into hard and soft armors [4-6]. Unlike traditional structural composites, hard armors, also known as armor-grade composites, contain only 20% by weight matrix, and are made to readily delaminate. Conversely, soft armors consist of multilayered, woven textiles, and are used to protect against various types of bullets.

The ability of a woven fabric to protect against bullets depends primarily on the mechanical properties of the yarn, such as the tenacity, tensile modulus, and toughness. However, Laible [7] demonstrated that “the relationship between the mechanical properties of a yarn and the ballistic resistance of a plied fabric from such yarn has never been established”; i.e., other factors may exist that influence ballistic performance. Generally, the energy absorption mechanism of soft armor depends on several additional factors, such as the weave pattern, the number of fabric plies, and the weave density. Weave patterns used in ballistic applications are usually plain and basket weaves. Fabrics with unbalanced weaves typically yield inferior ballistic performance [8]. Lim et al. [9] investigated ballistic impacts on multiple systems to characterize the reinforcement effect of multiple layers. They concluded that the inter-ply friction inhibited the sideways motion of the yarns, resulting in an increased resistance to ballistic penetration. Weave density, which refers to the number of yarns per unit dimension along the principal yarn directions, affects the areal density of the fabric and the crimp. Shockey et al. [10] concluded that the energy absorbed by a fabric was proportional to the fabric’s areal density.

Our research group previously compared the effect of the weaving density of aramid fabrics on their resistance to ballistic impacts. It was demonstrated that the existence of an optimal weave minimizes damage to both the yarn and fabric. Establishing these optimal conditions can be crucial in implementing better ballistic properties into fabrics [11]. Yarn crimp refers to the degree of yarn undulation, and is a property of the weave. Tan et al. [12] compared two methods of modeling crimp using empirical results. They concluded that accounting for crimp by modeling the linear elements in a zigzag manner yielded more accurate results than trying to account for crimp as a constitutive property.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of aramid.

However, little has been reported regarding correlations between ballistic properties and multifilament aramid woven fabrics. Furthermore, a comparative study of ballistic performance has not been carried out that accounts for both fabric properties and individual yarn properties. In the current study, two types of aramid woven fabrics, each with a different number of multifilaments, were prepared, and the influences of the number of multifilaments on the fabric properties and ballistic behavior were ascertained. This study provides fundamental information on how the number of multifilaments regulates fabric properties and the ballistic behavior of aramid woven fabrics.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Aramid fibers (trademark Heracron®) were produced by Kolon Inc. (Kwach’on, Korea) with a fiber fineness of 840 denier. Table 1 shows some of the basic properties of two Heracron® filament fibers, each composed of 666 and 1000 monofilament fibers, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the two Heracron® yarns had comparable tenacity, elongation, and Young’s modulus. Two types of fabrics, HT840-1 and HT840-2, were woven from the fibers for ballistic tests. The two fabrics had the same weave structure, fiber fineness, and weaving density. The detailed fabric properties are described below. To eliminate finishing oil and surface contamination, the fabrics were washed using an industrial scouring process.

2.2. Analysis

Filament fiber tests were performed in accordance with ASTM Standard D2256-97 (ASTM 2000). Each fiber specimen had an initial length of 50 cm. At the start of the test, the middle 25 cm of the fiber spanned between the instrument grips. The crosshead separation rate was maintained at 2 mm∙s−1, and the specimen was elongated until rupture. All of the specimens were twisted at a rate of 1.2 turns cm−1. The data from 20 independent measurements were expressed as an average with a single standard deviation. Fabric tests were performed in accordance with ISO 13934-1. All sample fabrics were created from the HT840 fabrics using the ravel strip method. Each sample had an initial length of 1.2 m and a width of 50 cm. A 50-mm length at each end of each sample was clamped into place with a fabric grip. The

Table 1. Basic properties of two Heracron® yarns.

sample was then wrapped twice around each grip. During each test, the load frame crosshead moved at constant rate of 2 mm∙s−1. Samples were pulled until rupture. Twelve samples in total were tested. Six were elongated along the warp, with the weft running along the width. The other six were elongated along the weft, with the warp running along the fabric width. Ballistic shooting tests were performed on 32-ply samples of each of the two fabrics (HT840-1 and HT840-2) in accordance with NIJ Standard-0101.06, “Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor, Level 3A Methods”. Tests were performed with 44-Magnum semi-jacketed hollow-point (SJHP) bullets, with a mass of 15.6 g (240 g) impacting the fabrics at a velocity of 436 ± 9 m∙s−1 (1430 ± 30 ft∙s−1). Six bullets were shot into each sample. After shooting, the depth of the puncture and the back deformation signature (BFS) formed on the backing material were measured. All tests were conducted at the H.P. White Laboratory, Inc. (Street, MD, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fiber and Fabric Properties

Aramid fibers consist of highly oriented and ordered crystalline polymer chains, resulting in a rigid structure that does not endure bending. Therefore, aramid yarn is usually composed of one multifilament fiber, in conjunction with a large number of monofilament fibers. Generally, an aramid monofiber may be divided by its skin— core fibril structure. It is known that the skin, in which the fibrils are uniformly axially oriented to the fiber axis, strongly affects the fiber’s physical properties [1]. In contrast, fibril in the fiber core are imperfectly packed and ordered. Both the skin and core properties contribute to the strength and resilience of the fiber. Therefore, it is important to comprehend the various properties of monofilament fibers, as well as multifilament yarns. Table 2 lists the properties of Heracron® monofilament fibers. HT840-1, with a thicker monofilament fiber density, displays superior physical properties, compared with HT840-2. This suggests that the HT840-1 fiber is better suited for skin structure fabrication than that of HT840-2 during the dry-wet jet spinning process. Well oriented skin fibril may prohibit the fiber rupture and improve its physical property.

Table 3 lists the physical properties of the extracted

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] H. H. Yang and K. A. Fiber, “Aramid Fiber,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1993.
[2] P. J. de Lang, P. G. Akker, E. Mäder, S. L. Gao, W. Prasithphol and R. J. Young, “Controlled Interfacial Adhesion of Twaron® Aramid Fibers in Composites by the Finish Formulation,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 67, 2007, pp. 2027-2035. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.018
[3] Y. Rao, A. J. Waddon and R. J. Farris, “The Evaluation of Structure and Properties in Poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) Fibers,” Polymer, Vol. 42, 2001, pp. 5925-5935.
[4] C. Y. Yue and K. Padmanabhan, “Interfacial Studies on Surface Modified Kevlar Fibre/Epoxy Matrix Composites,” Composite Part B, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, pp. 205-217. doi:10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00053-5
[5] T. K. Lin, S. J. Wu, J. S. Lai and S. S. Shyu, “The Effect of Chemical Treatment on Reinforcement/Matrix Interaction in Kevlar-Fiber/Bismaleide Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1873-1878. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00074-9
[6] R. Park and J. S. Jang, “Impact Behavior of Aramid Fiber/Glass Fiber Hybrid Composites: The Effect of Staking Sequence,” Colloid & Polymer, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2001, pp. 80-89.
[7] R. C. Laible, “Fibrous Armor,” In: R. C. Laible, Ed., Ballistic Materials and Penetration Mechanics, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, 1980, pp. 73-115. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-41928-6.50009-0
[8] P. M. Cunniff, “An Analysis of the System Effects in Woven Fabrics under Ballistic Impact,” Textile Research Journal, Vol. 62, No. 9, 1992, pp. 495-509.
[9] C. T. Lim, V. B. C. Tan and C. H. Cheong, “Perforation of High-Strength Double-Ply Fabric System by Varying Shaped Projectiles,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2002, pp. 577-591. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00004-0
[10] D. A. Shockey, D. C. Erlich and J. W. Simons, “Improved Barriers to Turbine Engine Fragments: Interim Report III,” Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-99/8, 2004.
[11] J. S. Lim, B. H. Lee, C. B. Lee and I. S. Han, “Effect of the Weaving Density of Aramid Fabrics on Their Resistance to Ballistic Impacts,” Engineering, Vol. 4, 2012, pp. 944-949. doi:10.4236/eng.2012.412A119
[12] V. C. Tan, V. P. W. Shim and X. Zeng, “Modeling Crimp in Woven Fabrics Subjected to Ballistic Impact,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1-4, 2005, pp. 561-574. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.06.008
[13] P. M. Cunniff, “Dimensionless Parameters for Optimization of Textile-Based Body Armor Systems,” Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Ballistics, San Antonio, 1999, pp. 1303-1310.
[14] S. Bazhennov, “Dissipation of Energy by Bullet Proof Aramid Fabric,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 32, No. 15, 1997, pp. 4167-4173. doi:10.1023/A:1018674528993
[15] H. L. Gower, D. S. Cronin and A. Plumtree, “Ballistic Impact Response of Laminated Composite Panels,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1000-1008. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.007

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.