An Adaptive Response Compensation Technique for the Constant-Current Hot-Wire Anemometer

Abstract

An adaptive response compensation technique has been proposed to compensate for the response lag of the constant-current hot-wire anemometer (CCA) by taking advantage of digital signal processing technology. First, we have developed a simple response compensation scheme based on a precise theoretical expression for the frequency response of the CCA (Kaifuku et al. 2010, 2011), and verified its effectiveness experimentally for hot-wires of 5 μm, 10 μm and 20 μm in diameter. Then, another novel technique based on a two-sensor probe technique—originally developed for the response compensation of fine-wire thermocouples (Tagawa and Ohta 1997; Tagawa et al. 1998)—has been proposed for estimating thermal time-constants of hot-wires to realize the in-situ response compensation of the CCA. To demonstrate the usefulness of the CCA, we have applied the response compensation schemes to multipoint velocity measure- ment of a turbulent wake flow formed behind a circular cylinder by using a CCA probe consisting of 16 hot-wires, which were driven simultaneously by a very simple constant-current circuit. As a result, the proposed response compensation techniques for the CCA work quite successfully and are capable of improving the response speed of the CCA to obtain reliable measurements comparable to those by the commercially-available constant-temperature hot-wire anemometer (CTA).

Share and Cite:

Khine, S. , Houra, T. and Tagawa, M. (2013) An Adaptive Response Compensation Technique for the Constant-Current Hot-Wire Anemometer. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 3, 95-108. doi: 10.4236/ojfd.2013.32013.

1. Introduction

In recent years, particle image velocimetry (PIV) has become one of the most popular techniques for measuring velocity fields. The hot-wire anemometry [1-5], on the other hand, has long been used mainly for measuring turbulent gaseous flows because of its simple and highlyreliable measurement systems and wide range of applicability. Thus, the hot-wire anemometry is still frequently utilized as a reliable research tool for statistical and frequency analyses of turbulent flows.

The hot-wire anemometry is generally driven at three operation modes, i.e., the constant temperature, constantcurrent and constant voltage modes. For the application of the hot-wire anemometry, the constant-temperature anemometer (CTA) is commercially available and almost always used as a standard system for driving the hot-wire, while the other two modes are rarely used, primarily due to their response lag during velocity fluctuation measurement. However, the electric circuit of the CTA is not simple, and the measurement system is fairly expensive. On the other hand, the constant-current hot-wire anemometer (CCA) can be set up with a very simple and low-cost electric circuit for heating the hot-wire. Thus, if we improve the response characteristics of the CCA with the aid of digital signal processing, the CCA will have a great advantage over the CTA and will be a promising tool for multipoint turbulence measurement.

When a hot-wire is driven at a constant electric current, the wire temperature, which corresponds to the hot-wire output, does not respond correctly to high-frequency velocity fluctuations because of the thermal inertia of the wire. Thus, the CCA output needs to be compensated adequately for the response lag to reproduce high frequency components of the measurement data. In order to investigate the response characteristics of the hot-wire, Hinze [1] analyzed the dynamic behavior of the hot-wire with heat loss to the wire supports. As a result, it was shown that the aspect ratio of the hot-wire (the lengthto-diameter ratio) is an important parameter characterizing the response of the hot-wire. In our previous studies [6,7], we have successfully derived a precise theoretical solution for the frequency response of an actually-used hot-wire probe which consisted of a fine metal wire, stub parts (copper-plated ends/silver cladding of a Wollaston wire) and prongs (wire supports). As a result, we were able to find the geometrical conditions for the frequency response of the CCA to be approximated by the firstorder lag system, which can be characterized by a single system parameter called the thermal time-constant [5].

If the time-constant value is known in advance, we may apply the existing response compensation techniques for the first-order system [4,5] to recover the response delay in the CCA measurement. In reality, however, since the time-constant value of the CCA changes largely depending on flow velocity [8] and physical properties of the working fluid, it is very difficult to estimate the time-constant value of the hot-wire accurately. In our previous papers [6,7], we proposed a digital response compensation scheme based on the precise theoretical expression for the frequency response of the CCA. The results showed that the scheme worked successfully, reproducing high-frequency velocity fluctuations of a turbulent flow. However, this compensation scheme needs more information regarding the geometrical parameters of the hot-wire probe, i.e., the diameters and lengths of the wire and stub together with their physical properties.

In the present study, first, we thoroughly tested the theoretical expression for the frequency response of the CCA by applying it extensively to the digital response compensation of three different hot-wire probes consisting of tungsten wires 5 μm, 10 μm and 20 μm in diameter. Secondly, we have proposed a novel approach to the response compensation of the CCA output that will work without our knowing in advance the geometrical parameters of the hot-wire probe. This approach is based on a two-sensor probe technique for compensating the response delay of fine-wire thermocouples [9,10], and enables in-situ estimation of the time-constant values of the hot-wire probe, and will realize adaptive response compensation of the CCA outputs. Specifically, in the twosensor probe technique, two hot-wires of unequal diameters—having different response speeds—are used simultaneously, and the time-constant values of the two hotwires can be obtained from the measurement data itself without carrying out any dynamic calibration of the hotwire probe.

Finally, in order to demonstrate the usefulness of the CCA, we have applied the above response compensation schemes to multipoint velocity measurement of turbulent flows e.g., [11-13]. In the present multipoint measurement, we have simultaneously used 16 hot-wires driven by the CCA to measure a turbulent wake flow formed behind a cylinder. In these verification experiments, we have measured turbulence intensities (r.m.s. values), power spectra and instantaneous signal traces of the velocity fluctuations, and have compared them with those obtained by a hot-wire probe driven by a commercially available constant-temperature hot-wire anemometer.

2. Time Constant of Hot-Wire for CCA Mode

Figure 1 shows the geometrical features and coordinate system of the CCA probe used in the theoretical analysis (see Appendix A). As shown in Figure 1, the hot-wire is a fine tungsten wire (sensing part) with copper-plated ends (stubs) which are soldered to the prongs (wire supports). By applying electric current I to the fine-wire element (length: dx, diameter d1), the generated Joule heat should balance with the sum of the following heat losses: heat convection, heat conduction, heat accumulation and thermal radiation. Since the heated wire is very fine, we can assume that the amount of heat radiation is negligible and the cross-sectional temperature distribution is uniform [14]. Therefore, the energy balance equation for the hot-wire can be written as (in this section, the subscript 1 for wire or 2 for stub is omitted for simplicity):

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] J. O. Hinze, “Turbulence,” 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
[2] G. Comte-Bellot, “Hot-Wire Anemometry,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 8, 1976, pp. 209-231. doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.08.010176.001233
[3] G. Comte-Bellot, “Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics,” In: C. Tropea, A. L. Yarin and J. F. Foss, Eds., Sec 5.2.1-5.2.7, Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 229-283.
[4] A. E. Perry, “Hot-wire Anemometry,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1982.
[5] H. H. Bruun, “Hot-Wire Anemometry-Principles and Signal Analysis,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
[6] K. Kaifuku, S. M. Khine, T. Houra and M. Tagawa, “Response Compensation of Constant-Current Hot-Wire Anemometer,” Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Transport Phenomena, Kaohsiung, 2-5 November 2010, pp. 816-822.
[7] K. Kaifuku, S. M. Khine, T. Houra and M. Tagawa, “Response Compensation for Constant-Current Hot-Wire Anemometry Based on Frequency Response Analysis,” Proceedings of ASME/JSME 2011, 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference, Honolulu, 13-17 March 2011, Article ID: T10164.
[8] I. Kidron, “Measurement of the Transfer Function Hot-Wire and Hot-Film Turbulence Transducers,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1966, pp. 76-81. doi:10.1109/TIM.1966.4313512
[9] M. Tagawa and Y. Ohta, “Two-Thermocouple Probe for Fluctuating Temperature Measurement in Combustion— Rational Estimation of Mean and Fluctuating Time Constants,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 109, No. 4, 1997, pp. 549-560. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00044-8
[10] M. Tagawa, T. Shimoji and Y. Ohta, “A Two-Thermocouple Technique for Estimating Thermocouple Time Constants in Flows with Combustion: In Situ Parameter Identification of a First-Order Lag System,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 69, No. 9, 1998, pp. 3370-3378. doi:10.1063/1.1149103
[11] R. F. Blackwelder and R. E. Kaplan, “On the Wall Structure of the Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 76, No. 1, 1976, pp. 89-112. doi:10.1017/S0022112076003145
[12] M. N. Glauser and W. K. George, “Application of Multipoint Measurements for Flow Characterization,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1992, pp. 617-632. doi:10.1016/0894-1777(92)90018-Z
[13] T. Houra and Y. Nagano, “Spatio-Temporal Turbulent Structures of Thermal Boundary Layer Subjected to Non-Equilibrium Adverse Pressure Gradient,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2008, pp. 591-601. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.03.004
[14] K. Kato, K. Kaifuku and M. Tagawa, “Fluctuating Temperature Measurement by a Fine-Wire Thermocouple Probe: Influences of Physical Properties and Insulation Coating on the Frequency Response,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007, pp. 779-789. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/18/3/030
[15] J. D. Li, “Dynamic Response of Constant Temperature Hot-Wire System in Turbulence Velocity Measurements,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1835-1847. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/15/9/022
[16] A. Berson, G. Poignand and P. Blanc-Benon and G. Comte-Bellot, “Capture of Instantaneous Temperature in Oscillating Flows: Use of Constant-Voltage Anemometry to Correct the Thermal Lag of Cold Wires Operated by Constant-Current Anemometry,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2010, Article ID: 015102. doi:10.1063/1.3274155
[17] D. C. Collis and M. J. Williams, “Two-Dimensional Convection from Heated Wires at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1959, pp. 357-384. doi:10.1017/S0022112059000696
[18] M. Tagawa, S. Nagaya and Y. Ohta, “Simultaneous Measurement of Velocity and Temperature in High-Temperature Turbulent Flows: A Combination of LDV and Three-Wire Temperature Probe,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2001, pp. 143-152. doi:10.1007/s003480000149
[19] T. Tsuji, Y. Nagano and M. Tagawa, “Frequency Response and Instantaneous Temperature Profile of Cold-Wire Sensor for Fluid Temperature Fluctuation Measurements,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 13, 1992, pp. 171-178. doi:10.1007/BF00218164
[20] M. Tagawa, K. Kato and Y. Ohta, “Response Compensation of Fine-Wire Temperature Sensor,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 76, No. 9, 2005, Article ID: 094904.
[21] M. Tagawa, K. Kato and Y. Ohta, “Response Compensation of Thermistors: Frequency Response and Identification of Thermal Time Constant,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 74, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1350-1358. doi:10.1063/1.1542668

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.