Bioadsorption of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens from Contaminated Wastewater: Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies

Abstract

In the present study we reported the feasibility of the Anethum graveolens as biosorbent to remove Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. Anethum graveolens was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis. The ability of Anethum graveolens to adsorb Pb(II) was investigated by using batch adsorption procedure. The effects such as pH, contact time, adsorbate concentration and biosorbent dosage on the adsorption capacity were studied. The experimental data were analysed using various adsorption kinetic models viz., the pseudo-first and second-order equations, Bangham’s equation, intraparticle diffusion and Elovich models. Results show that the pseudo-second-order equation provides the best correlation for the biosorption process. The equilibrium nature of Pb(II) adsorption at 30 has been described by the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Redlich-Peterson isotherm models. The equilibrium data fit well on Langmuir isotherm. The monolayer adsorption capacity of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens as obtained from Langmuir isotherm at 30 was found to be 303 mg/g. This high adsorption capacity of Anethum graveolens places this biosorbent as one of the best adsorbents for removal of Pb(II) from aqueous effluents.


Share and Cite:

A. Hashem and K. El-Khiraigy, "Bioadsorption of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens from Contaminated Wastewater: Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies," Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2013, pp. 108-119. doi: 10.4236/jep.2013.41012.

1. Introduction

Developments in technology have led to the release of heavy metals such as lead, copper, chromium, nickel and zinc, which are hazardous to the environment and their toxicity and presence in the ecosystem poses a possible human health risk [1].

Lead is one of these heavy metals, and can be introduced to liquid wastes from the manufacturing processes of storage batteries, smelting and refining of lead and from the processes of mining. In water, lead tends to accumulate in aquatic organisms through the food chain and by direct uptake [2]. Lead is believed to cause hypertension, reproductive disorders and neurological and metabolic problems in humans [2].

Among the many methods available to reduce heavy metals concentrations from wastewater, the most common are chemical precipitation, ion-exchange, and reverse osmosis. Precipitation methods are particularly reliable but require large settling tanks for the precipitation of alkalines sludges and a subsequent treatment is needed [3,4]. Ion-exchange has the advantage of allowing the recovery of metallic ions, but it is expensive and sophisticated.

The adsorption process [5] is one of the most effective methods used to remove heavy metals from aqueous solution. Activated carbon is the most widely used adsorbent for this purpose because of its extended surface area, microporous structure, high adsorption capacity and high degree of surface reactivity. The commercial activated carbons are very expensive [6], this led to search for cheaper adsorbent. Consequently, numerous low-cost alternative adsorbent have been proposed including lingocellulosic wastes [7-11].

The agricultural wastes were considered as low-cost since they 1) require little processing and 2) are abundant in nature. Commonly, it concerns vegetal materials, then the term of biosorption is used to designate the fixation of contaminants onto biomaterials.

The main focus of this study was to evaluate the biosorption aptitude of a novel, low cost, and renewable biomass, Anethum graveolens for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. The effects of pH, contact time, initial metal concentration and biomass dosage on the biosorption capacity were investigated. Moreover, various kinetic models were used to examine the experimental data. Experimental equilibrium data were fitted to the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Redlich-Peterson isotherm equations to determine the best-fit isotherm equation.

2. Experimental

Materials

Bio-dsorbent, Anethum graveolens, a desert plant is widely spread in Libya and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. There is no previous report used Anethum graveolens as adsorbent material for removal of heavy metals. The roots were separated from the stems and leaves, washed with distilled water several times to remove the surface adhered particles and water soluble particles and dried at 80˚C in an electric oven for 24 h and ground using a mixer, and sieved to pass through a 150 - 200 mm. The roots were chosen because they contain the highest percentage of the cellulose content.

Reagents

Lead acetate, EDTA, ethanol, sodium carbonate and acetic acid were of analytical reagent grade supplied by Merck Company, Germany.

3. Methods

Bioadsorption Studies

The adsorbate solutions of 100 - 800 mg/l were prepared by dissolving certain weights of lead acetate in certain volumes of distilled water. The pH (2 - 4.5) of the solutions was adjusted with acetic acid or sodium carbonate solution. Equal volumes (100 ml of each) of the previously prepared metal ion solutions were placed in the corresponding number of 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks each of which containing 0.05 g of the adsorbent and the whole flasks were shaken at 30˚C in a thermostatic water-bath at 150 rpm for 2 h. At the end of agitation time, the metal ion solutions were separated by filtration. The blank experiments were simultaneously carried out without the adsorbent. The extent of metal ion adsorption onto adsorbent was calculated mathematically by measuring the metal ion concentration before and after the adsorption through direct titration against standard EDTA solution. The amount of lead adsorbed, qe (mg/g) and percent removal of Pb(II) on Anethum graveolens were calculated according to the following equations:

(1)

Percent Removal =       (2)

where Co and Ce are the initial and final concentrations of metal ion, mg/V is the volume of metal ion (l), W is the weight of bioadsorbent (g).

Analyses

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

To carry out an SEM analysis of Anethum graveolens biomass, the sample was first mounted on a standard microscope stub and coating with a thin layer of gold using a Polaron Diode Sputter unit. The analysis was performed using a JEOL JSM-15 scanning electron microscope.

Error analysis

In the single-component isotherm studies, the optimization procedure requires an error function to be defined to evaluate the fit of the isotherm to the experimental equilibrium data. The common error functions for determining the optimum isotherm parameters were, average relative error (ARE), sum of the squares of the errors (ERRSQ), hybrid fractional error function (HYBRID), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) and sum of absolute errors (EABS) [12]. In the present study, the average relative error (ARE) was used to determine the best fit in isotherm model as:

(3)

4. Results and Discussion

SEM of bioadsorbent

The SEM image (Figure 1) clearly shows that the sample of Anethum graveolens L is mainly composed of irregular and porous particles which indicated high surface area. It is clear from this figure that, Anethum graveolens has considerable numbers of pores where there is a good possibility of Pb(II) ions to be trapped and adsorbed into these pores.

Elemental analysis

The C, H, N contents of Anethum graveolens were analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer 240 CHN elemental analyzer. The element contents are as follows: C, 37.03%, H, 4.9%, N, 2.2%.

Factors affecting bio adsorption of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens

(Effect of initial pH)

The pH of the aqueous solution is an important controlling parameter in the adsorption process [13,14]. In the present work, adsorption of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens adsorbent was studied over the pH range of 2.0 - 4.5 for a constant adsorbent dose and constant concentration of adsorbate at 30˚C. As the acidity of the medium decreased, the extent of adsorption capacity, qe decreased (Figure 2). At high acidity, the Anethum graveolens particle surface will be completely covered with H3O+ ions and Pb(II) ions can hardly compete with

Figure 1. Scan Electron Microscope (SEM) of Anethum graveolens.

Figure 2. Effect of pH on adsorption capacity of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens at 30˚C.

them for adsorption sites. With the increase in pH, the competing effect of hydronium ions decreases and the positively charged Pb(II) ions adsorb on the free binding sites of the adsorbents. This is a common observation for all cases of adsorption of metal cations on solid surface in media of different acidity-basicity [15]. It is also significant that the active sites on the Anethum graveolens surface are weakly acidic in nature and with increase in pH, they are gradually deprotonated making available more and more sites for metal ion uptake [16]. At pH value higher than 4.5, the adsorption studied could not be carried out because metal ion will precipitate as lead hydroxide in this range.

Effect of adsorbent concentration (Adsorbent dose)

The effect of adsorbent concentration on both adsorption capacity and percent removal of lead are shown in Figure 3. It is clear from this figure that the percent removal of lead increases from 11% to 64% by increasing the concentration of adsorbent from 0.5 to 8 g/l and then remained at approximately the same level at higher adsorbent concentration. The increase in percent removal of Pb(II) with increasing adsorbent concentration in the first range could be attributed to the greater availability of the exchangeable sites of the adsorbent. The leveling of the percent removal at higher adsorbent concentration could be attributed to the blocking of the available active sites on the adsorbent surface. On the other hand, the adsorption capacity (qe), or the amount of Pb(II) adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent (mg/g), decreases by increasing the concentration of adsorbent (Figure 3). The decrease in adsorption capacity with increasing the adsorbent concentration is mainly due to overlapping of the adsorption sites as a result of overcrowding of the adsorbent particles and is also due to the competition among Pb(II) ions for the surface sites [11].

Effect of contact time

Figure 4 shows the effect of contact time on the adsorption capacity, qe (mg/g) of Pb(II) onto Anethum graveolens at 30˚C using adsorbate concentration of 330 mg/l at fixed pH and at adsorbent concentration. Equilibrium adsorption was established after 15 min within the concentration range studied indicating that the adsorption rate is very fast. It is further observed that the adsorption curve is smooth and continuous, which indicate the possibility of the formation of monolayer coverage of Pb(II) ions onto Anethum graveolens This data is important because equilibrium time is one of the parameters for economical wastewater treatment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] D. O. Zer and A. O. Zer, “Investigation of Zinc (II) Adsorption on Cladophora crispata in a Two-Staged Reactor,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Vol. 75, No. 5, 2000, pp. 410-416.
[2] M. N. Rashed, “Lead Removal from Contaminated Water Using Mineral Adsorbents,” The Environmentalist, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2001, pp. 187-195. doi:10.1023/A:1017931404249
[3] C. S. Brooks, “Metal Recovery from Industrial Waste,” Lewis Publishers, Michigan, 1991.
[4] R. Roberto, F. R. Laura, M. G. C. Rosa and M. B. J. Jovita, “Adsorption of Trivalent Chromium from Aqueous Solutions onto Activated Carbon,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Vol. 62, No. 1, 1995, pp. 64-67. doi:10.1002/jctb.280620110
[5] M. M. Nassar and M. S. El-Geundi, “Comparative Cost of Color Removal from Textile Effluents Using Natural Adsorbents,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Bio technology, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1991, pp. 257-264. doi:10.1002/jctb.280500210
[6] G. McKay, “Adsorption of Dyestuffs from Aqueous Solutions with Activated Carbon, Part I: Equilibrium and Batch Contact-Time Studies,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Vol. 32, No. 7-12, 1982, pp. 773-780 doi:10.1002/jctb.5030320713
[7] A. Hashem, A. M. Azzeer, and A. Ayoub, “Removal of Hg (II) Ions from Laboratory ?Wastewater onto Phosphorylated Haloxylon ammodendron: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies,” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1395-1404.
[8] A. A. Khalil, H. H. Sokker and A. Al-Anwar, A. Abd El-Zaher and A. Hashem, “Preparation, Characterization and Utilization of Amidoximated Poly (AN/MAA) Grafted Alhagi Residues for the Removal of Zn (II) from Aqueous Solution,” Adsorption Science & Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2009, pp. 363-383. doi:10.1260/026361709790252669
[9] A. Hashem, A. Abdel-Lateff, S. Farag and D. M. Hussein, “Treatment of Alhagi Residues with Tartaric Acid for the Removal of Zn(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution,” Adsorption Science & Technology, Vol. 26, No. 9, 2008, pp. 661-678.
[10] A. Hashem, E. Abdel-Halim, H. A. Maauof, M. A. Rama dan and A. Abo-Okeil, “Treatment of Sawdust with Polyamine for Wastewater Treatment,” Energy Education Science and Technology, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 45-58.
[11] A. Hashem, A. Abou-Okeil, A. El-Shafie, M. El-Sakhawy, “Grafting of High α-Cellulose Pulp Extracted from Sunflower Stalks for Removal of Hg (II) from Aqueous Solution,” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, Vol. 45, 2006, pp. 135-141.
[12] S. C. Tsai and K. W. Juang, “Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Forms of Isotherm Models for Strontium Sorption on a Sodium Bentonite,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Vol. 243, No. 3, 2000, pp. 741 746. doi:10.1023/A:1010694910170
[13] Y. Nuhoglu and E. Oguz, “Removal of Copper (II) from Aqueous Solutions by Biosorption on the Cone Biomass of Thuja orientalis,” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 38, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1627-1631. doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00055-4
[14] P. X. Sheng, Y. P. Ting, J. P. Chen, Hong, “Sorption of Lead, Copper, Cadmium, Zinc, and Nickel by Marine Algal Biomass: Characterization of Biosorptive Capacity and Investigation of Mechanisms,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 275, No. 1, 2004, pp. 131-141. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.036
[15] V. Padmavathy, P. Vasudevan and S. C. Dhingra, “Biosorption of Nickel(II) Ions on Baker’s Yeast,” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 38, No.10, 2003, pp. 1389-1395. doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00168-1
[16] S. V. Dimitrova, “Metal Sorption on Blast Furnace Slag,” Water Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1996, pp. 228-232. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(95)00104-S
[17] H. C. Trivedi, V. M. Patel and R. D. Patel, “Adsorption of Cellulose Triacetate on Calcium Silicate,” European Polymer Journal, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1973, pp. 525-533. doi:10.1016/0014-3057(73)90036-0
[18] Y. S. Ho and G. McKeay, “The Kinetics of Sorption of Divalent Metal Ions onto Sphagnum Moss Peat,” Water Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2000, pp. 735-742. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00232-8
[19] A. K. Bhattacharya and C. Venkobachar, “Removal of Cadmium(II) by Low Cost Adsorbent,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 110, No. 1, 1984, pp. 110 122. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:1(110)
[20] E. Tutem, R. Apak and C. F. Unal, “Adsorptive Removal of Chlorophenols from Water by Bituminous Shale,” Water Research, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1998, pp. 2315-2324. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00476-4
[21] W. J. Weber and C. J. Morris, “Advances in Water Pollution Research,” Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Water Pollution Research, Vol. 2, Pregamon Press, Oxford, 1962, p. 231.
[22] V. J. P. Poots, G. McKay and J. J. Healy, “Removal of Basic Dye from Effluent Using Wood as an Adsorbent,” Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 50, No. 5, 1978, pp. 926-939.
[23] K. Nagarethinam, M. S. Mariappan, “Kinetics and Mechanism of Removal of Methylene Blue by Adsorption on Various Carbons—A Comparative Study,” Dyes and Pigments, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2001, pp. 25-40. doi:10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00056-0
[24] S. H. Chien and W. R. Clayton, “Application of Elovich Equation to the Kinetics of Phosphate Release and Sorption on Soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, 1980, pp. 265-268. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x
[25] I. Langmuir, “The Constitution and Fundamental Proper ties of Solids and Liquids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 38, No. 11, 1916, pp. 2221-2295. doi:10.1021/ja02268a002
[26] K. R. Hall, C. Eagleton, A. Acrivos and T. Vermevlem, “Pore and Solid Diffusion Kinetics in Fixed Bed Adsorption under Constant Pattern Conditions,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1966, pp. 212-223. doi:10.1021/i160018a011
[27] H. Freundlish, “Over the Adsorption in Solution,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 57, 1906, pp. 385 470.
[28] M. J. Tempkin and V. Pyzhev, “Kinetics of Ammonia Synthesis on Promoted Iron Catalysts,” Acta Physiochim, URSS, Vol. 12, 1940, pp. 217-222.
[29] O. Redlich and D. Peterson, “A Useful Adsorption Isotherm,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 63, No. 6, 1959, pp. 1024-1026. doi:10.1021/j150576a611

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.