Heroism and Risk of Harm

Douglas M. Stenstrom, Mathew Curtis

Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Department of Psychology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A160                

Abstract

Although the positive traits and qualities that compose heroism such as courage, bravery and empathy have received research support, little experimental research has directly investigated the perception of heroic acts. The primary purpose of the current research was to address this gap in the literature by investigating a basic question about a central defining feature of heroism, namely the risk of potential harm. A related objective was investigating how implicit theories of personality and moral character influence perceptions of heroism, particularly as it relates to risk of harm. Results revealed how incrementally escalating the level of risk to the actor can transform an otherwise prosocial behavior into heroism through separating altruism from heroism. Implicit theories impacted perceptions of heroism consistent with the theorizing behind entity/incremental orientations, and produced an interactive effect with the situational manipulation through information about the particular level of risk differentially affecting entity and incremental belief systems.

Keywords

Risk; Implicit Theories; Positive Traits; Moral Character

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Becker, S. W., & Eagly, A. H. (2004). The heroism of women and men. American Psychologist, 59, 163-178. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.3.163
[2]	Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s me chanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
[3]	Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y., & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theo ries and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.923
[4]	Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
[5]	Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
[6]	Dweck, C. S., & Leggett E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
[7]	Erdley, C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863-878. doi:10.2307/1131223
[8]	Franco, Z. E., Blau, K., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Heroism: A conceptual analysis and differentiation between heroic action and altru ism. Review of General Psychology, 15, 99-113. doi:10.1037/a0022672
[9]	Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
[10]	Gaster, T. (1987). Heroes. In M. Eliade, & C. J. Adams (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion (pp. 302-305). New York: Macmillan.
[11]	Gervey, B. M., Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 17-27. doi:10.1177/0146167299025001002
[12]	Getty Images (2012). Art inside a cave depicts the hero twins of Mayan legend. URL (last checked 9 September 2012). http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/naj-tunich-cave-guatemala-high-res-stock-photography/80249083
[13]	Hero Etymology (2012). Etymology of Hero. URL (last checked 9 September 2012) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero#Etymology
[14]	Hong, Y., Chiu, C, Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
[15]	Hong, Y., Levy, S. R., & Chiu, C. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 98-106. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_1
[16]	Jayawickreme, E., & Di Stefano, P. (2012). How can we study heroism? Integrating persons, situations, and communities. Political Psychology, 33, 165-178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00861.x
[17]	Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Trait versus process-focused social judgment. Social Cognition, 16, 151-172. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.151
[18]	Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Modes of social thought: Person theories and social understanding. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
[19]	Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156-168. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_6
[20]	Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
[21]	Maloney, A. (1999). Preference ratings of images representing archetypal themes: An empirical study of the concept of archetypes. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44, 101-116. doi:10.1111/1465-5922.00070
[22]	Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 111-134). New York: Guilford.
[23]	Shoda, Y (2004). Individual differences in social psychology: Understanding situations to understand people, understanding people to understand situations. In C. Sanson, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 117-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[24]	Staats, S., Hupp, J. M., & Hagley, A. M. (2008). Honesty and heroes: A positive psychology view of heroism and academic honesty. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 357-372. doi:10.3200/JRLP.142.4.357-372
[25]	Staats, S., Wallace, H., Anderson, T., Gresley, J., Hupp, J. M., & Weiss, E. (2009). The hero concept: Self, family, and friends who are brave, honest, and hopeful. Psychological Reports, 104, 820-832. doi:10.2466/pr0.104.3.820-832
[26]	Tong, Y., & Chiu, C. (2002). Lay theories and evaluation-based or ganization of impressions: An application of the memory search paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1518 1527. doi:10.1177/014616702237579
[27]	White, S., & O’Brien, J. (1999). What is a hero? An exploratory study of students’ conceptions of heroes. Journal of Moral Education, 28, 81-95. doi:10.1080/030572499103322