Simulating Coupled Longitudinal, Pitch and Bounce Dynamics of Trucks with Flexible Frames

D. Geoff Rideout

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John’s, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/mme.2012.24023                

Abstract

Simulating the dynamic response of trucks requires that a model be constructed and subjected to road inputs. Inclusion or omission of flexible frame effects is often based on intuition or assumption. If frame vibration is assumed to be significant, it is typically incorporated in one of two ways. Either a complex finite element model of the frame is used, or a simplified linear modal expansion model (which assumes small motions) is employed. The typical low-order modal expansion model, while computationally efficient and easier to use, is limited by the fact that 1) large rigid body motions and road grade changes are not supported, and 2) longitudinal dynamics are not coupled to vertical and bounce dynamics. In this paper, a bond graph model is presented which includes coupled pitch and bounce motions, longitudinal dynamics, and transverse frame vibration. Large rigid body motions are allowed, onto which small flexible vibrations are superimposed. Frame flexibility is incorporated using modal expansion of a free-free beam. The model allows for a complete pitch-plane representation in which motive forces can propel the truck forward over varying terrain, including hills. The effect of frame flexibility on vehicle dynamics can then be studied. This is an extension of the typical half-car model in which suspension motion is assumed vertical, pitch angles are small, and longitudinal dynamics are completely decoupled or omitted. Model output shows the effect of frame flexibility on vehicle responses such as forward velocity, pitch angle, and payload acceleration. Participation of individual modes can be seen to increase as road input approaches their natural frequency. The bond graph formalism allows for any or all flexible frame modes to be easily removed from the model if their effects are negligible, and for inclusion of more complex submodels for components such as suspension and engine if desired.

Keywords

Truck Model; Vehicle Dynamics; Pitch Plane; Frame Flexibility; Bond Graphs

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. V. Field, et al., “Structural Dynamics Modeling and Testing of the Department of Energy Tractor/Trailer Combination,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND—96-2576C; CONF-970233, International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, 1997.
[2]	R. V. Field, et al., “Analytical and Experimental Assessment of Heavy Truck Ride,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND—97-2667C; CONF-980224, International Modal Analysis Conference, Santa Barbara, 1998.
[3]	M. Ahmadian and P. Patricio, “Dynamic Influence of Frame Stiffness on Heavy Truck Ride Evaluation,” SAE Paper 2004-01-2623, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 2004. doi:10.4271/2004-01-2623
[4]	D. Margolis and D. Edeal, “Modeling and Control of Large Flexible Frame Vehicles Using Bond Graphs,” SAE Paper 892488, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 1989. doi:10.4271/892488
[5]	A. Dhir, “Nonlinear Ride Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Using Local Equivalent Linearization Technique,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1992, pp. 580-606.
[6]	D. Margolis and D. Edeal, “Towards an Understanding of ‘Beaming’ in Large Trucks,” SAE Paper 902285, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 1990.
[7]	A. Costa Neto, et al., “A Study of Vibrational Behavior of a Medium Sized Truck Considering Frame Flexibility with the Use of ADAMS,” Proceedings of 1998 International ADAMS User Conference, Ann Arbor, 1998.
[8]	A. Goodarzi and A. Jalali, “An Investigation of Body Flexibility Effects on the Ride Comfort of Long Vehicles,” Proceedings of CSME Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics, CANCAM 2006, 2006.
[9]	I. M. Ibrahim, et al., “Effect of Frame Flexibility on the Ride Vibration of Heavy Trucks,” Computers and Structures, Vol. 58, No. 4, 1996, pp. 709-713. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(95)00198-P
[10]	I. M. Ibrahim, “A Generally Applicable 3D Truck Ride Simulation with Coupled Rigid Bodies and Finite Element Models,” International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, pp. 67-85. doi:10.1504/IJHVS.2004.004032
[11]	D. G. Rideout, J. L. Stein and L. S. Louca, “System Partitioning and Improved Bond Graph Model Reduction Using Junction Structure Power Flow,” Proceedings of ICBGM’05, International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling, New Orleans, 2005, pp. 43-50.
[12]	D. G. Rideout and J. L. Stein, “Breaking Subgraph Loops for Bond Graph Model Partitioning,” Proceedings of ICBGM’07, International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling, San Diego, 2007, pp. 241-249.
[13]	D. G. Rideout, J. L. Stein and L. S. Louca, “Extension and Application of an Algorithm for Systematic Identification of Weak Coupling and Partitions in Dynamic System Models,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 271-292. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.10.004
[14]	P. Michelberger, et al. “Dynamic Modelling of Commercial Road Vehicle Structures from Test Data,” SAE Paper 845120, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 1984. doi:10.4271/845120
[15]	T. Y. Yi, “Vehicle Dynamic Simulations Based on Flexible and Rigid Multibody Models,” SAE Paper 2000- 01-0114, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 2000.
[16]	C. Cao, “Approaches to Reduce Truck Beaming,” SAE Paper 2005-01-0829. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 2005. doi:10.4271/2005-01-0829
[17]	J. Aurell, “The Influence of Warp Compliance on the Handling and Stability of Heavy Commercial Vehicles,” Proceedings of AVEC 2002, Hiroshima, 2002.
[18]	D. Karnopp, et al. “System Dynamics—Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems,” 4th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2006.
[19]	20sim v.4.1.3.8 (2011), Controllab Products b.v., Enschede, 2011.
[20]	L. S. Louca, et al., “Generating Proper Dynamic Models for Truck Mobility and Handling,” International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 209-236. doi:10.1504/IJHVS.2004.005449
[21]	D. Karnopp and D. Margolis, “Analysis and Simulation of Planar Mechanism Systems Using Bond Graphs,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 101, No. 2, 1979, pp. 187-191.
[22]	S. S. Rao, “Mechanical Vibrations,” 4th Edition, Pearson-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004.
[23]	H. Lee, “New Dynamic Modeling of Flexible-Link Ro- bots,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 127, No. 2, 2005, pp. 307-309. doi:10.1115/1.1902843
[24]	A. Yigit, et al. “Flexural Motion of a Radially Rotating Beam Attached to a Rigid Body,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1988, pp. 201-210. doi:10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80024-5
[25]	L. S. Louca, J. L. Stein and D. G. Rideout, “Generating Proper Integrated Dynamic Models for Vehicle Mobility Using a Bond Graph Formulation,” Proceedings of International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling ICBGM’01, Phoenix, 2001, pp. 339-345.