Test-retest strength reliability of the Electronic Push/Pull Dynamometer (EPPD) in the measurement of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles on a new chair
Mikhled F. Maayah, Mohammad D. Al-Jarrah, Saad S. El Zahrani, Ali H. Alzahrani, Emad T. Ahmedv, Amr A. Abdel-Aziem, Gopichandran Lakshmanan, Nabeel A. Almawajdeh, Muhsen B. Alsufiany, Yaser O. M. Abu Asi
Department of Family Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Department of Preparatory Year, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
DOI: 10.4236/ojim.2012.22022   PDF    HTML   XML   8,360 Downloads   14,901 Views   Citations

Abstract

Background: Test-retest strength reliability of the Electronic Push/Pull Dynamometer (EPPD) in the measurement of the extensor and flexor muscles on a new constructed chair. The objective of the study was to assess reliability of Electronic Push/Pull Dynamometer in the measurement of the knee flexion and extension at 90° and 60° on a new constructed chair. The aims of the author: To assess reliability of Electronic Push/Pull Dynamometer in the measurement of the knee flexion and extension at 90° and 60° on a new constructed chair. Design: A test-retest reliability study. Subjects: One hundred healthy students male and female (mean age, 21y). Methods: Maximum isometric strength of the quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups was measured using the EPPD were recorded at 60° and 90° for 3 trials on 2 occasions. Reliability was assessed with the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean and standard deviation (SD) of measurements, and smallest real differences were calculated for the maximum and for the mean and work of the 3 repetitions. Results: Mean strength ranged from 50.44 kg for knee flexion to 55.76 kg for knee extension 50.44 kg to 61.98 kg at 90° hip flexion. Test-retest reliability Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.85 to 0.99. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.780 to 0.998. Conclusions: The results of the reliability study indicate that the EPPD in reliable dynamometer to use in determining lower limb muscle force production. It can be used to measure disease progression and to evaluate changes in knee extension and flexion strength at the individual patient level.

Share and Cite:

Maayah, M. , Al-Jarrah, M. , El Zahrani, S. , Alzahrani, A. , Ahmedv, E. , Abdel-Aziem, A. , Lakshmanan, G. , Almawajdeh, N. , Alsufiany, M. and Abu Asi, Y. (2012) Test-retest strength reliability of the Electronic Push/Pull Dynamometer (EPPD) in the measurement of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles on a new chair. Open Journal of Internal Medicine, 2, 123-128. doi: 10.4236/ojim.2012.22022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Bohannon, R.W. (1986) Manual muscle test scores and dynamometer test scores of knee extension strength. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 390-392.
[2] Wadsworth, C.T., Krishnan, R., Sear, M., et al. (1987) Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and handheld dynamometric muscle testing. Physical Therapy Reviews, 67, 1342-1347.
[3] Noreau, L. and Vachon, J. (1998) Comparison of three methods to assess muscular strength in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 36, 716-723. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100646
[4] Schwatz, S., Cohan, M.E., Herbison, G.J., et al. (1992) Relationship between two measures of upper extremity strength: Manual muscle test compared to hand-held myometry. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 1063-1068.
[5] Arnold, C., Warkentin, K.D., Chilibeck, P.D. and Magnus, C.R. (2009) The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24, 815-824.
[6] Tan, K.H., Balci, N., Sepsi, V. and Gender, F.A. (1995) Isokinetic and isometric strength in osteoarthritis of the knee: A comparative study with healthy women. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 364-369.
[7] Al-Arfaj, A. and Al-Boukai, A. (2002) Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hands in Saudi Arabia. Rheumatology Internal, 22, 208-212. doi:10.1007/s00296-002-0228-5
[8] Reed, R.L., Den Hartog, R., Yochum, K., et al. (1993) A comparison of hand-held isometric strength measurement with isokinetic muscle strength measurement in the elderly. Journal of America and Geriatric Society, 41, 53-56.
[9] Cheryl, D., Ford-Smith, P.T., et al. (2001) Reliability of stationary dynamometer muscle strength testing in community dwelling older adults. Archives Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82, 1128-1132. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24291
[10] Brosseau, L., Tousignant, M., Budd, J., Chartier, N., Duciaume, L., Plamondon, S., O’Sullivan, J.P., O’Donoghue, S. and Balmar, S. (1997) Intratester and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometer for active knee flexion in healthy subjects. Physiotherapy Research International, 2, 150-166. doi:10.1002/pri.97
[11] Brosseau, L., Casimiro, L., et al. (2001) Therapeutic ultrasound for treating petellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrance Data base Systmatic Review, 4, Article ID: CD003375.
[12] Brazier, J.E., Harper, R., Munro, J., Walters, S.J. and Snaith, M.L. (1999) Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford), 38, 870-877. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/38.9.870
[13] Faucher, M., Lefevre-Colau, M.M., Rannou, F., Fermanian, J. and Revel, M. (2003) Assessment of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a modified Lequesne index in knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine, 70, 521-525. doi:10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00070-8
[14] Salaffi, F., Carotti, M., Stancati, A. and Grassi, W. (2003) Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: Analysis of disease progression. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 15, 391-404.
[15] Bohannon, R. (1997) Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 - 79 years. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 26-32. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90005-8
[16] Andrews, A., Thomas, M.W. and Bohannon, R.W. (1996) Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Physical Therapy, 76, 248-259.
[17] Brinkmann, J. (1994) Comparison of hand-held and fixed dynamometer in measuring strength of patients with neuromuscular disease. The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 19, 100-104.
[18] Agre, J., Magness, J.L., Hull, S.Z., et al. (1987) Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: Reliability for upper and lower extremities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 454-458.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.