Tuffnell, D.J., Wilkinson, K. and Beresford, N. (2001) Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section—Are current standards achievable? British Medical Journal, 322, 1330-1333. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1330

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Five-year impact of a new departmental protocol on emergency cesarean target times

  AUTHORS: Visnja Korda, Roland Zimmermann

  KEYWORDS: Emergency Cesarean Delivery; Decision-to-Delivery Interval; Neonatal Outcome; Maternal Outcome

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.3 No.1A, February 4, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the impact of an emergency cesarean standard operating procedure (SOP) on the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and to determine whether a shorter DDI improves neonatal outcome. Methods: Retrospective analysis of emergency cesareans from 2004 (introduction of the new SOP) to 2009 in a Swiss Level 3 perinatal center. Primary endpoints were the DDI, the pathology-to-decision interval (PDI), the 5 year learning curve, and neonatal and maternal outcome. Results: In the emergency cesarean group (175 women and 188 infants), mean DDI decreased over the observation period from 15 to 9 minutes (mean 10 minutes 41 seconds), and mean PDI from 11 to 6 minutes (mean 8 minutes). Not only did the DDI not exceed 15 minutes in over 90% of cases during the 5 years, but it fell consistently below 10 minutes in the latter stages of the learning curve. Only 2/188 infants had an umbilical artery pH