Merriam (2023, December 14). The True Nature of Fine Structure Constant. In Cantor’s Paradise.
https://www.cantorsparadise.com/the-true-nature-of-fine-structure-constant-69ab1c1709c6

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Is the Mathematics of the Universe—Quantum, Classical, Both or Neither? A Geometric Model

  AUTHORS: Douglas Chesley Gill

  KEYWORDS: Hardy’s Paradox, Fine Structure Constant, Coupling Constant (e), EPR Phenomena, Bell’s Theorem, Universal State, Paradox, Russell’s Paradox

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Philosophy, Vol.14 No.2, May 15, 2024

  ABSTRACT: Is the mathematical description of the Universe quantum, classical, both or neither? The mandated assumption of rationalism is that if an argument is inconsistent, it is flawed for a conclusion. However, suppose the structural basis of the Universe is fundamentally inconsistent. In that case, paradoxes in the frameworks of logic and mathematics would not be anomalies. A geometric model with a counter-rational framework of inconsistent relationships is applied to analyze Hardy’s paradox, the fine structure constant, and the general relationship between the correlated quantum and classical EPR-type structures. The model conjectures that the well-studied paradoxes found in theoretical arguments and empirically in EPR phenomena are not anomalies and instead point to a new framework for modelling universal structures that incorporates inconsistency.