Activation of cannabinoid receptor CB2 regulates LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and osteoclastogenic gene expression in human periodontal ligament cells ()
1. INTRODUCTION
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by periodontal inflammation and alveolar bone resorption. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) play a key role in the destruction of periodontal tissues, including the gingiva, periodontal ligament (PDL), and alveolar bone, through the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and prostaglandin (PG) [1]. The PDL is a highly vascularized and cellularized connective tissue that attaches the tooth root to the surrounding alveolar bone [2]. The PDL cells not only function as support cells for periodontal tissues, but also produce various inflammatory mediators to recognize somatic components, including LPS [3]. In addition, the PDL cells modulate osteoclastogenesis by expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) [4,5]. OPG and RANKL, both expressed in osteoblasts, have been shown to play a key role in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis. RANKL binds its receptor RANK on the osteoclast precursor surface, determining their activation and differentiation into mature osteoclasts [6-8]. OPG exerts its effect by acting as a RANKL decoy receptor, thus preventing its binding to osteoclasts and inhibiting osteoclast activation [6,9]. Therefore, the PDL cells participate in the regulation of inflammatory responses and alveolar bone resorption of periodontitis.
Cannabinoids refer to a heterogeneous group of molecules that bind to cannabinoid receptors. They can be divided into three groups: endogenous (endocannabinoids), synthetic, and phytocannabinoids [10]. The endocannabinoid system consists of endogenous ligands and receptors being subject to modulation by natural and synthetic cannabinoid agonists, and plays important modulatory functions in the brain and also in the periphery [11]. There is an abundance of evidence demonstrating the anti-inflammatory actions of cannabinoids [12,13]. It is widely assumed that the majority of such effects are mediated by the cannabinoid receptor CB2, which is expressed by a wide range of immune cells [14]. Moreover, CB2 has been found to play a crucial role in the regulation of bone metabolism [15-17]. Animal experiments have demonstrated that CB2-deficient mice display a markedly accelerated age-related bone loss and activation of CB2 attenuates ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice by enhancing bone formation and restraining bone resorption [16]. However, the molecular mechanisms of CB2 in inflammatory responses and bone metabolism have not been fully elucidated.
It has been found that hPDL cells express CB2, and activation of CB2 is able to enhance osteogenic differentiation of hPDL cells and potentially create a favorable osteogenic microenvironment [14]. However, the functional importance of CB2 in hPDL cells exposed to the inflammation promoter LPS is not known. We hypothesized that LPS might affect CB2 expression and activation of CB2 might regulate LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and osteoclastogenic gene expression in hPDL cells. Thus, we undertook the present study to verify this hypothesis.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Cell Culture
Healthy hPDL tissue was obtained from the extracted (for orthodontic reasons) premolars of two females (13 and 14 years old) and one male (12 years old). All patients gave written informed consent before tooth extraction. Ethical approval had been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China. As described previously [18], the PDL tissue attached to the mid-third of the root surface was scraped off, cut into small pieces and placed into tissue culture flasks. The explants were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma, St LouisMO, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 100 U/mL of penicillin and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere of air enriched with 5% CO2. When the hPDL cells growing from the tissue fragments reached confluence, the cell layer was rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the cells were released with 0.25% trypsin—0.1% EDTA solution. The hPDL cells used in this study were from passage 3 - 5.
2.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of CB2
The hPDL cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 per well and were allowed to attach for 12 h. The cells were then silenced with serum-free DMEM overnight. The cells were stimulated with or without 100 ng/ml Escherichia coli 0111:B4 LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 12 h and 24 h. To quantify the mRNA expression of CB2, we performed quantitative real-time PCR using Prime-ScriptTM RT Reagent Kit Perfect RealTime with a SYBR Green Reagent (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd) in the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primer sequences and product sizes of each gene [CB2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)] were adapted from Reference 18. The cycling conditions for each gene were as follows: CB2, 94˚C for 3 min, followed by 94˚C for 30 s, 65˚C for 30 s and 72˚C for 40 s for 35 cycles, and 72˚C for 5 min; and GAPDH, 94˚C for 3 min, followed by 94˚C for 30 s, 60˚C for 30 s and 72˚C for 30 s for 35 cycles, and 72˚C for 5 min. Reaction product of CB2 gene was normalized to GAPDH.
2.3. ELISA
The hPDL cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 per well and were allowed to attach for 12 h. The cells were then silenced with serum-free DMEM overnight. The cells were incubated with or without CB2-specific agonist HU-308 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 M) for 6 h before further stimulation with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 h. In some experiments, the cells were pre-treated with CB2- specific antagonist SR144528 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (1 µM) for 2 h. At the end of the treatment, the levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in the culture media were measured using ELISA Kits (R & D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of OPG and RANKL
The hPDL cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 per well and were allowed to attach for 12 h. The cells were then silenced with serum-free DMEM overnight. The cells were incubated with or without HU-308 (10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 M) for 6 h before further stimulation with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 h. In some experiments, the cells were pre-treated with SR144528 (1 µM) for 2 h. To quantify the mRNA expression of OPG and RANKL, we performed quantitative real-time PCR using Prime-ScriptTM RT Reagent Kit Perfect Real-Time with a SYBR Green Reagent (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd.) in the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System. The primer sequences and product sizes of each gene were adapted from Reference [18]. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95˚C for 30 s, followed by 95˚C for 5 s and 60˚C for 30 s for 40 cycles. Reaction products of both genes were normalized to GAPDH.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments. All data were subjected to ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction for post hoc t-test. p-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Expression of CB2 in hPDL Cells Exposed to LPS
Expression of CB2 in hPDL cells exposed to LPS was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Exposure to LPS significantly increased CB2 mRNA expression after 12 h of treatment (p < 0.05; Figure 1). At 24 h, the level of CB2 mRNA expression in the LPS-stimu-

Figure 1. CB2 expression exposed to LPS in hPDL cells using quantitative real-time PCR analysis. The cells were stimulated with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) for 12 h and 24 h. The data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs the control group.
lated group was slightly reduced, but was still higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05; Figure 1).
3.2. Effects of CB2 Activation and Inhibition on LPS-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production in hPDL Cells
The effects of CB2 activation and inhibition on LPSinduced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were assessed in hPDL cells by ELISA. Exposure to LPS for 24 h significantly increased the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (p < 0.01; Figure 2). The addition of HU-308 to activate CB2 at concentrations of 10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 M to the culture media dosedependently inhibited the stimulatory effects of LPS on pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. At 10−9 M, HU-308 only slightly suppressed the stimulatory effects of LPS, whereas 10−7 M of HU-308 significantly suppressed these effects (p < 0.05; Figure 2). Pre-treatment of hPDL cells with SR144528 to inhibit CB2 attenuated the effects of HU-308 on cytokine production (p < 0.05; Figure 2).
3.3. Effects of CB2 Activation and Inhibition on LPS-Induced OPG and RANKL Gene Expression in hPDL Cells
The effects of CB2 activation and inhibition on the mRNA expression of osteoclastogenic genes, OPG and RANKL, were investigated in hPDL cells. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis indicated that exposure to LPS for 24 h only slightly promoted OPG mRNA expression, however significantly increased RANKL mRNA expression (p < 0.05; Figures 3(a) and (b)). The addition of 10−7 M HU-308 to activate CB2 greatly enhanced the effect of LPS on OPG mRNA expression (p < 0.05; Figure 3(a)), whereas pre-treatment of hPDL cells with SR144528 to inhibit CB2 slightly attenuated this effect. The addition of HU-308 at concentrations of 10−9 to 10−7 M to the culture media dose-dependently inhibited the stimulatory effects of LPS on RANKL mRNA expression. 10−7 M HU-308 significantly decreased the stimulatory effect of LPS on RANKL mRNA expression (p < 0.05; Figure 3(b)). Pre-treatment of hPDL cells with SR144528 slightly attenuated this effect. As a consequence, the OPG/RANKL ratio, which is a predictor of osteoclastogenesis, decreased when exposed to LPS, furthermore increased significantly with the addition of 10−7 M HU-308 and finally decreased markedly after pre-treatment with SR144528 (p < 0.05; Figure 3(c)).
4. DISCUSSION
In the present study, we explored CB2 expression exposed to LPS and the regulatory effects of activation of CB2 on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine pro-
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 2. Effects of CB2 activation and inhibition on LPS-induced production of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in hPDL cells by ELISA. The cells were incubated with or without HU-308 (10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 M) for 6 h before further stimulation with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 h. In some experiments, the cells were pretreated with SR144528 (1 µM) for 2 h. (a) IL-1β; (b) IL-6; (c) TNF-α. The data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 vs the control group. #p < 0.05 vs the LPS-treated group. ◆p < 0.05 vs the LPS+HU-308 group.
duction and osteoclastogenic gene expression in hPDL cells (Figure 4) for the first time.
The periodontium includes two kinds of fibroblasts: gingival fibroblasts and PDL cells [19]. Although the two cell types may exhibit distinct phenotypic characteristics [20,21], they both establish a dynamic balance between tissue formation and degradation at the tooth-bone inter face. Studies have suggested that PDL cells as well as gingival fibroblasts are involved in the inflammatory responses by producing cytokines and chemokines [22- 24]. Nakajima Y. et al. have found that human gingival fibroblasts exposed to LPS show significant up-regulation of CB2 expression [25]. Kozono S. et al. have observed up-regulation of the expression of CB2 localized
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3. Effects of CB2 activation and inhibition on LPS-induced gene expression of OPG and RANKL in hPDL cells by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. The cells were incubated with or without HU-308 (10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 M) for 6 h before further stimulation with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 h. In some experiments, the cells were pretreated with SR144528 (1 µM) for 2 h. (a) OPG mRNA; (b) RANKL mRNA; (c) Ratio of OPG/RANKL. The data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs the control group. #p < 0.05 vs the LPS-treated group. ◆p < 0.05 vs the LPS+HU-308 group.
on fibroblasts and macrophage-like cells in granulation tissue during wound healing in a periodontal woundhealing model in rats [26]. In our previous study, we found that hPDL cells express CB2 [18]. Here we discovered that the inflammation promoter LPS markedly enhanced CB2 expression in hPDL cells. Since CB2 plays a crucial role in inflammatory responses and bone metabolism [12-17], we further explored the regulatory effects of activation of CB2 on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and osteoclastogenic gene expression in hPDL cells.
HU-308 is a synthetic, highly specific cannabinoid ligand for CB2 [27]. It has been reported that activation of CB2 by HU-308 stimulates osteogenic activity of osteoblasts and restrains osteoclast formation [16]. Our results showed that LPS significantly increased the production of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in hPDL cells, whereas HU-308 markedly suppressed LPS-induced cytokine

Figure 4. Schematic diagram: activation of CB2 regulates LPSinduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and osteoclastogenic gene expression in hPDL cells.
production. These pro-inflammatory cytokines are thought to cause inflammation in periodontitis [28,29]. IL-1β and TNF-α are pivotal cytokines in the context of periodontal disease [30,31], since they are expressed in higher levels in the gingival crevicular fluid and inflamed periodontal tissues of patients with a clinical disease compared with healthy people, and cause alveolar bone resorption [32, 33]. IL-6 promotes bone resorption and acts as a potent inducer of osteoclast formation in vitro [34]. Our study has suggested that activation of CB2 by cannibinoids, such as synthetic cannabinoids, may exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-resorptive effects on LPS-stimulated hPDL cells.
Several studies have reported the effects of cannabinoids on inflammatory periodontal tissues. Nakajima Y. et al. have discovered that human gingival crevical fluid contains a detectable level of endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA). AEA significantly reduces the production of pro-inflammatory mediators IL-6, interleukin-8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS in human gingival fibroblasts [25]. Napimoga M.H. et al. have indicated that cannabidiol, a cannabinoid component from cannabis sativa, decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β expression during experimental periodontitis in rats. [35] Recently, Ossola C.A. et al. have found that long-term treatment with topical synthetic cannabinoid methanandamide (Meth-AEA), applied daliy to gingival tissue of rats induced with periodontitis, reduced the production of some biological mediators of periodontal disease augmented by LPS, such as TNF-α, and significantly diminished the alveolar bone loss [36]. These reports and our study have indicated that cannabinoids have anti-inflammatory and anti-resorptive effects on inflammatory periodontal tissues.
It is accepted that OPG and RANKL are two essential osteoclastogenic genes in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis, and the ratio of OPG/RANKL determines the osteoclast differentiation and activation [37,38]. The hPDL cells express OPG and RANKL [4,5], suggesting that they may regulate osteoclastogenesis through the OPG/ RANKL system. Low ratios were observed in hPDL cells from resorbing deciduous teeth [39] and in periodontal tissue from patients with advanced periodontitis [40]. The OPG/RANKL system is involved in the regulation of bone metabolism in periodontitis. Interference with the system has a protective effect on osteoclastogenesis and bone loss in periodontitis [41,42]. Such interference may form the basis for rational drug therapy in periodontitis. Napimoga et al. have reported that cannabidiol, a cannabinoid component from cannabis sativa, decreases alveolar bone resorption by inhibiting RANK/ RANKL during experimental periodontitis in rats [35]. The inflammatory promoter LPS has been found to influence the expresson of OPG and RANKL in hPDL cells [43,44]. In our study, The OPG/RANKL ratio, which is a predictor of osteoclastogenesis, decreased when exposed to LPS, furthermore increased significantly with the addition of HU-308 and finally decreased markedly after pre-treatment with SR144528. Since the ratio of OPG/RANKL can be indicative for the role of hPDL cells in bone resorption or prevention of bone resorption [39,40], our results indicated the anti-resorptive effect of activation of CB2 on LPS-stimulated hPDL cells.
5. CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that activation of CB2 had antiinflammatory and anti-resorptive effects on LPS-stimulated hPDL cells. These findings suggest that activation of CB2 might be an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of inflammation and alveolar bone resorption in periodontitis. Our study provides a potential rationale for the use of exogenous factors such as CB2-specific agonists as drugs in the treatment of periodontitis. Further studies are required to corroborate the effect of CB2 activation on periodontitis in vivo.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30900285).

NOTES
#These authors contributed equally to this work.