Postoperative Outcomes of Type 2-3 Trochanteric Fractures Treated with Double-Screw Intramedullary Nails: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of femoral trochanteric fractures with fracture lines extending to the base of the femoral neck (Type 2-3 fractures), treated with intramedullary nails featuring double screws into the femoral head. Methods: A multicenter prospective study enrolled 225 patients with proximal femoral fractures. Type 2-3 fractures were classified based on the Area classification using 3D-CT. We compared surgical outcomes among three types of short femoral nails with double lag screws. Results: Type 2-3 fractures accounted for 28.4% of cases. Among them, 79.7% were treated with nails incorporating double lag screws. No significant differences were found in failure rate, reduction quality, or operative parameters among different implant types. Conclusion: Good postoperative outcomes were achieved in Type 2-3 fractures using intramedullary nails with double screws into the femoral head, regardless of implant brand.

Share and Cite:

Kawano, T., Kijima, H., Tani, T., Suzuki, N., Iwamoto, Y. and Miyakoshi, N. (2025) Postoperative Outcomes of Type 2-3 Trochanteric Fractures Treated with Double-Screw Intramedullary Nails: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Surgical Science, 16, 208-213. doi: 10.4236/ss.2025.164022.

1. Introduction

Proximal femoral fractures are common among the elderly and are expected to become increasingly prevalent due to global population aging. In Japan, proximal femoral fractures are predicted to occur in approximately 300,000 people by 2030 and 320,000 people by 2040 [1].

Traditionally, these fractures are categorized as femoral neck or trochanteric fractures. However, certain patterns, such as fractures extending from the trochanteric region to the base of the femoral neck, represent unique biomechanical challenges due to increased rotational instability [2]. Another postoperative complication of femoral trochanteric fractures is cut-out of the lag screw. Since cut-out is reportedly caused by excessive sliding of the proximal fragment after surgery, especially in intramedullary type (where the anterior cortex of the proximal fragment is located at the rear of the anterior cortex of the distal fragment in lateral X-ray views), it is important to obtain good reduction [3]. However, even if the fracture line is repaired to an extramedullary type (anterior cortex of the proximal fragment located in front of the anterior cortex of the distal fragment in lateral X-ray views), fractures extending to the base of the neck require more than one lag screw to maintain the reduction due to the fracture at the base of the neck. Multiple screws are also required to restore gait in the early postoperative period.

Although implants allowing multiple lag screws are now available, few prospective studies have evaluated their clinical outcomes in these specific fracture patterns. Our study focuses on Type 2-3 fractures, defined using the Area classification, to assess surgical outcomes when treated with intramedullary nails incorporating double lag screws.

2. Materials and Methods (Figure 1)

Figure 1. Study design and participants.

This prospective multicenter study was conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2019. A total of 225 consecutive patients with proximal femoral fractures treated surgically at four institutions in Japan were enrolled.

Inclusion criteria: patients aged 60 years or older with proximal femoral fractures confirmed by CT.

Exclusion criteria: pathological fractures and periprosthetic fractures.

Fracture Classification

Fractures were classified using the Area classification based on 3D-CT [4]. This system divides the proximal femur into four areas using three anatomical planes. Type 2-3 fractures involve the base of the femoral neck (Area 2) and the trochanteric region (Area 3).

Surgical Procedure

Patients were treated with short femoral nails that allow the insertion of two lag screws: InterTAN (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee), IPT Nail (Homs Engineering Inc., Chino-shi, Nagano, Japan), and Unicorn Plus (Omic Corporation Ltd., Ritto, Shiga, Japan).

Outcome Measures

Outcomes included operative time, blood loss, quality of reduction (categorized on AP and lateral views), failure rate (defined as screw cut-out or telescoping ≥10 mm), and bone union rate were recorded [5].

Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA and chi-squared tests were used to compare outcomes between implants. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by ethics committees at all participating sites and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

3. Results

Of the 225 patients, 64 (28.4%) had Type 2-3 fractures (Table 1). The mean age was 84.8 years. Among these, 51 patients (79.7%) were treated with double-screw intramedullary nails (23 InterTAN, 17 IPT, 11 Unicorn Plus).

No significant differences were found between implant types regarding gender distribution, age, operative time, blood loss, or quality of reduction (Table 2). Only one failure was recorded (telescoping >10 mm), and all cases achieved bone union with independent ambulation.

Table 1. The number of fractures according to the Area classification.

Type

n

1

73

2

1

3

38

4

2

1-2

6

2-3

64

3-4

39

1-2-3

0

2-3-4

0

1-2-3-4

2

Table 2. Patient demographic and intraoperative characteristics, and operative outcomes, in cases of implants with two lag screws.

InterTAN

(n = 23)

IPT nail

(n = 17)

UNICORN plus

(n = 11)

P value

Women (n, %)

15, 65.2

15, 88.2

9, 81.8

0.212

Age

85.7 ± 7.9

87.5 ± 5.4

82.8 ± 9.3

0.280

Operative time (minutes)

75.1 ± 34.9

67.4 ± 15.8

60.1 ± 14.0

0.286

Intraoperative

blood loss (ml)

60.0 ± 55.5

66.7 ± 51.3

60.8 ± 63.7

0.928

Poor reduction in frontal view

(n, %)

2, 8.7

0

0

0.282

Poor reduction in lateral view

(n, %)

5, 21.7

2, 11.8

1, 9.1

0.550

Failure

(n, %)

0

1

0

0.361

4. Discussion

This prospective analysis revealed that Type 2-3 fractures accounted for a substantial proportion (28.4%) of proximal femoral fractures. Our findings align with prior biomechanical and retrospective studies suggesting that these fractures require rotational stability to avoid fixation failure.

Previous cadaver and clinical studies have shown higher failure rates with single-screw implants in basicervical or similar fractures due to rotational instability. Our findings support the use of double-screw intramedullary nails to improve fixation outcomes in such fractures [6]-[10].

It was previously reported that the postoperative position of the reduction is important for the clinical outcomes of femoral trochanteric fractures, and that anatomical or medial type reductions on AP X-ray views are recommended [11]. Furthermore, intramedullary type fractures seen in lateral views are associated with the risk of excessive postoperative slides, which is considered a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes [12] [13]. The reason for excessive sliding in intramedullary type fractures on lateral views of femoral trochanteric fractures is that the posterolateral cortical bone of the greater trochanter is thinner and weaker than the anterior cortical bone, and stability of the fracture site depends on contact between the proximal fragment and the anterior cortical bone [14]. Despite a 12.5% poor reduction rate, all patients achieved union, suggesting that implant design plays a critical role. However, achieving optimal reduction is still essential for early weight-bearing and rehabilitation.

Limitations of this study include the small sample size, absence of long-term functional follow-up, and lack of comparison with Type 2-3-4 fractures. Future multicenter studies should address these gaps and further explore the impact of reduction quality and implant design.

5. Conclusion

Type 2-3 proximal femoral fractures are relatively common and present significant biomechanical challenges. This study demonstrates that intramedullary nails with double lag screws provide reliable fixation and favorable short-term outcomes, regardless of implant brand. Despite the lack of consensus on implant selection and postoperative protocols, our results suggest that using double-screw nails offers consistent outcomes. Further research should investigate long-term function and compare different reduction strategies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Natsuo Konishi, Hitoshi Kubota, Shin Yamada, Hiroshi Tazawa, Keiji Kamo, Yoshihiko Okudera, Masashi Fujii, Ken Sasaki, Itsuki Nagahata, Takanori Miura and Shun Igarashi for their advices.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

[1] Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) (2021) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis. Treatment of Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures. 3rd Edition, Nankodo, 22. (In Japanese)
[2] Kijima, H., Yamada, S., Konishi, N., Kubota, H., Tazawa, H., Tani, T., et al. (2016) The Choice of Internal Fixator for Fractures around the Femoral Trochanter Depends on Area Classification. SpringerPlus, 5, Article No. 1512.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3206-1
[3] Ito, J., Takakubo, Y., Sasaki, K., Sasaki, J., Owashi, K. and Takagi, M. (2015) Prevention of Excessive Postoperative Sliding of the Short Femoral Nail in Femoral Trochanteric Fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 135, 651-657.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2200-3
[4] Kijima, H., Yamada, S., Konishi, N., Kubota, H., Tazawa, H., Tani, T., et al. (2014) The Reliability of Classifications of Proximal Femoral Fractures with 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: The New Concept of Comprehensive Classification. Advances in Orthopedics, 2014, Article ID: 359689.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/359689
[5] Kijima, H., Yamada, S., Konishi, N., Kubota, H., Miyakoshi, N. and Shimada, Y. (2021) Clinical Outcomes of Fractures Affecting Both the Femoral Neck and Femoral Trochanter. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 87, 27-35.
[6] Saarenpää, I., Partanen, J. and Jalovaara, P. (2002) Basicervical Fracture—A Rare Type of Hip Fracture. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 122, 69-72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020100306
[7] Lee, Y., Yoon, B., Hwang, J.S., Cha, Y., Kim, K. and Koo, K. (2018) Risk Factors of Fixation Failure in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Which Device Is Optimal for Fixation? Injury, 49, 691-696.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.02.009
[8] Kweon, S.H., Lee, S.H., Kook, S.H. and Choi, Y.C. (2017) Outcomes of Cephalomedullary Nailing in Basicervical Fracture. Hip & Pelvis, 29, 270-276.
https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.270
[9] Johnson, J., Deren, M., Chambers, A., Cassidy, D., Koruprolu, S. and Born, C. (2019) Biomechanical Analysis of Fixation Devices for Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 27, e41-e48.
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00155
[10] Guo, J., Dong, W., Jin, L., Yin, Y., Zhang, R., Hou, Z., et al. (2019) Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation. Journal of International Medical Research, 47, 4333-4343.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519862957
[11] Larsson, S., Friberg, S. and Hansson, L. (1990) Trochanteric Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 259, 130-139.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199010000-00019
[12] Tsukada, S., Okumura, G. and Matsueda, M. (2012) Postoperative Stability on Lateral Radiographs in the Surgical Treatment of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132, 839-846.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1484-9
[13] Kozono, N., Ikemura, S., Yamashita, A., Harada, T., Watanabe, T. and Shirasawa, K. (2014) Direct Reduction May Need to Be Considered to Avoid Postoperative Subtype P in Patients with an Unstable Trochanteric Fracture: A Retrospective Study Using a Multivariate Analysis. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 134, 1649-1654.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2089-2
[14] Carr, J.B. (2007) The Anterior and Medial Reduction of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Simple Method to Obtain a Stable Reduction. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 21, 485-489.
https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e31804797cf

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.