D. E. Patton, K. Duff, M. R. Schoenberg, J. Mold, J. G. Scott and R. L. Adams, "Base Rates of Longitudinal RBANS Discrepancies At One- And Two-Year Intervals In Community-Dwelling Older Adults," The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2005, pp. 27-44. doi:10.1080/13854040490888477.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Test-Retest Reliability, Convergent Validity and Practice Effects of the RBANS in a Memory Clinic Setting: A Pilot Study

  AUTHORS: Yanhong Dong, Claire L. Thompson, Shi Huey Joanne Tan, Leon Ben Swie Lim, Wanshin Pang, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen

  KEYWORDS: RBANS; Neuropsychological Tests; Test-retest Reliability; Validity; Practice Effect

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Medical Psychology, Vol.2 No.4B, October 21, 2013

  ABSTRACT: This pilot study examined the psychometric properties and clinical utility of a brief neuropsychological instrument (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The test-retest reliability, practice effects and convergent validity of RBANS were examined in participants without objective cognitive impairment. The tests were administered at two time points at approximately a two weeks’ interval, with 30 cognitively intact participants with a mean age of 63.3 ± 5.8 years. Adequate test-retest reliabilities were found for RBANS subtests, index and total scale scores with significant gain scores in immediate memory and visuospatial function. The RBANS showed good convergent validity and the RBANS supplemented with executive and language measures (Colour Trails Test and 30-item modified Boston Naming Test, respectively) demonstrated excellent convergent validity with a formal neuropsychological battery. This pilot study has provided the preliminary evidence of reliability and convergent validity of the RBANS. Additionally, it also provides insight on the practice effects so that clinicians may assess significant changes in RBANS subtests and domain indexes for clinical practice.