Stein, A.L. (2010) Climate Change under NEPA: Avoiding Cursory Consideration of Greenhouse Gases, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 473. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/503 Kass, M.J. (2009) A NEPA-Climate Paradox: Taking Greenhouse Gases Into Account in Threshold Significance Determinations. Indiana Law Review, 42, 47. Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 1380583. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1380583 Karkkainen, B.C. (2002) Toward a Smarter NEPA: Monitoring and Managing Government’s Environmental Perfor-mance. Columbia Law Review, 102, 903. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1123648

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Qualification of Soft Costs of the US Federal Guidance When Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews

  AUTHORS: Maria Angelica Deeb

  KEYWORDS: NEPA Documents, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Climate Change, Transportation, Roadway, Local Public Agencies

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, Vol.3 No.6, August 25, 2015

  ABSTRACT: A notice by the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) was published on December 14, 2014 regarding the revised “Draft Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews”. The review of this 2014 draft guidance suggested increased analysis, work, review and approvals required by the State Department of Transportation (DOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) working with and on behalf of local public agencies (LPAs) in order to authorize and obligate roadway projects funded with federal-aid money. All federal-aid-funded roadway projects require a NEPA analysis to be done on the action (project) and an environmental clearance document to be obtained prior to finalizing the design. The 2014 draft guidance may complicate an already lengthy and often critical path activity for roadway projects requiring NEPA documentation.