Whitaker, R., Hendry, M., Aslam, R., Booth, A., Carter, B., Charles, J.M., Craine, N., Tudor Edwards, R., Noyes, J., Ives Ntambwe, L., Pasterfield, D., Rycroft-Malone, J. and Williams, N. (2016) Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): A Systematic Review of Intervention Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, and Qualitative and Realist Synthesis of Implementation Factors and User Engagement. Health Technology Assessment, 20, 1-214.
https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20160

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Direct Interventional Discussion Effectively Improves Awareness and Knowledge about Modern Contraceptive Methods

  AUTHORS: Abdelhaseib S. Saad, Amr Sharafeldeen

  KEYWORDS: Knowledge, Contraception, Modern Methods, Primiparas, Intrauterine Device

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Reproductive Sciences, Vol.8 No.1, December 18, 2019

  ABSTRACT: Objectives: Determination of influence of direct interview of postpartum women about their awareness and knowledge regarding contraception and modern contraceptive methods. Patients & Methods: 1437 women joined the intervention and underwent evaluation of their knowledge about the concept and methods of contraception. Then, an interview was conducted with each woman to clarify advantages and appropriateness of various contraceptives and the proper time for initiation of contraception. All women were asked to discuss these data with their families and return to give their decision. Study outcomes included evaluation of women’s knowledge about contraception and its modalities, frequency of non-users who accepted to use contraception and is considered as success of the intervention and frequency of requesting each modality of contraception. Results: TV programs and discussion with local health provider, relatives or friends are the main sources of knowledge of primiparas. 182 primiparas had good knowledge and chose the appropriate method of contraception during the 1st session of discussion, and 81 primiparas required >2 sessions to choose the method appropriate for them, while 21 primiparas insisted not to use contraception for an acceptance rate of 92.6% among primipara. Among multiparas, 222 multiparas were non-users, but after discussion 133 couples accepted to use contraception. Thus, 396 non-users had accepted to use contraception for an intervention success rate of 78.3%. Collectively 692 women (52.1%) received IUD and 635 women (47.9%) received hormonal contraception; 432 orally (32.6%) and 203 parenterally (15.3%). Conclusion: Ignorance, low financial status and cultural beliefs deleteriously affect knowledge about contraception options and its methods, so direct interview is mandatory. The applied intervention succeeded to replenish women’s knowledge about benefits of using contraception. Primiparas had knowledge about contraception but their knowledge about methods is deficient or hazy. Contraception using IUD is the most acceptable method especially for primiparas.