Generalization of the Pecaric-Rajic Inequality in a Quasi-Banach Space ()
1. Introduction
Let us first recall some basic facts concerning quasi-Banach spaces and some preliminary results. For more information about quasi-Banach spaces, the readers can refer to [1] .
Definition 1 Let
be a linear space. A quasi-norm is a real-valued function on
satisfying the following:
1.
for all
and
if and only if
;
2.
for all
and all
;
3. There is a constant
such that
for all
.
The pair
is called a quasi-normed space if
is a quasi-norm on
.
A quasi-Banach space is a complete quasi-normed space.
A quasi-norm
is called a p-norm
if

for all
. In this case, a quasi-Banach space is called a p-Banach space.
Let
be a normed linear space. The following is the well known Dunkl- Williams inequality (see [2] ), which states that the for any two nonzero elements
,
(1)
Many authors have studied this inequality over the years, and various refinements of this inequality (1) have been obtained (see e.g [3] [4] [5] ). Pecaric and Rajic [6] got the following inequality in a normed linear space.
(2)
(3)
Furthermore, the authors [6] also showed that these inequalities imply some refinements of the generalized triangle inequalities obtained by some authors. For generalized triangle inequalities, note that, some authors have also got many related results (see [7] [8] ). In this paper, we shall discuss some extensions of the inequalities (2) and (3) for an arbitrary number of finitely many nonzero elements of a quasi-Banach space.
2. Main Results
Note that, given a p-norm, the formula
gives us a translation invariant metric on
. By the Aoki-Rolewicz theorem [9] (see also [1] ), each quasi-norm is equivalent to some p-norm. Henceforth we can get similar results with p-norm. In the following, we first generalize the inequalities (2) and (3) with p-norm a p-Banach space.
Theorem 2 Let
be a p-Banach space and
nonzero elements of
. Then we have
(4)
(5)
Proof. First, let us prove the inequality (4): for a fixed
, we have
![]()
from this it follows that
![]()
which is the inequality (4). The second inequality (5) follows likewise and the details are omitted.
Now, we generalize the inequalities (2) and (3) with quasi-norm in a quasi- Banach space.
Theorem 3 Let
be a quasi-Banach space and
nonzero elements of
. Then we have
(6)
(7)
where
is a constant and
.
Proof. First, let us prove the inequality (6): for a fixed
, we have
![]()
where
. Hence, in order to get the inequality (6), let us set
, where
for all
. Thus, from the above inequality it
follows that
![]()
From this it follows that
![]()
which is the inequality (6).
In order to proof the second inequality (7), we proceed in a similar way. For a fixed
, we get,
![]()
where
. From this it follows that
![]()
where
. Hence, in order to proof the inequality (7), let us set
, where
for all
. Thus, from the above inequality it
follows that
![]()
Thus, from the above inequality we can get
![]()
This completes the proof.
3. Conclusion
In this paper we establish a generalisation of the so-called Pecaric-Rajic inequality by providing upper and lower bounds for the norm of the linear
combination
, where
nonzero elements of
. Further-
more, we also obtain the corresponding inequalities in a p-Banach space with p- norm. We should also indicate that when
in Theorem 3, the inequalities (2) and (3) can be obtained as a particular case of the results established in Theorem 3. Thus, we get some more general inequalities.
Acknowledgements
The author is partly supported by the Science and Technology Research Key Project of Education Department of Henan Province (No. 18A110018).