Characterisation of Municipal Solid Waste Compost (MSWC) from Selected Indian Cities—A Case Study for Its Sustainable Utilisation ()
1. Introduction
In India, composting of bio-degradable municipal solid wastes has been made mandatory by the Supreme Court (SC) following the recommendations made by the Burman Committee report in 1999. Subsequently, the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 2000, also encourage this [1,2]. In May 2007, the Supreme Court of India laid down that compost and biomethanation technologies were appropriate in view of the quality of MSW generated. Such as MSW had high organic waste (40% - 60%), high moisture contents and therefore low calorific values around 800 - 1200 kcal/kg [3]. Indian Government is also encouraging MSW management by the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Rural Mission (JNNURM) scheme, where a part of budget could be shared by state government for running waste processing plant in states and districts. On the other way as organic components is high in MSW from Indian cities, thus it is not suitable for waste to energy generation or for refuse derived fuel (RDF), incineration, pyrolysis etc.
The Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) generation has increased in India from 100 g/day/person to 450 g/day/ person after Independence (1947). The total MSW generation in India is around 48 million tons per annum and this would increase to 300 million tons by the year 2047 (Table 1). Municipal solid waste in Indian mega-cities is mainly disposed in landfills by means of open dumping however; a small fraction from that is used for composting in Delhi (National Capital Territory of India) and Mumbai, while in Chennai and Kolkata composting facility is being implemented and is presently, in pilot stage [4]. In other cities like Bangalore and Ahmedabad is being taken up on an experimental basis by either Non-Government Organisation (NGO’s) or Private Companies. Jha et al. [4], had also tabulated data of physical characterisation of meteropolitan cities of India for two decades (1971-2002) and that shows that there is not much difference in physical characteristics though MSW generation has increased to great extent.
Domestic and commercial wastes are commonly termed as MSW and both these account for bulk of the waste in developing countries [6]. For beneficial management, wastes should be regarded as “a resource in the
Table 1. MSW generation for 100 years in India.
Source: *Census of India 2001, **Singla and Pandey [5].
wrong place”, as botanist regards weed as “a plant in the wrong place”, waste generally refers useless remains with lack of value. A basic way to deal with waste is to restore value from it. But in most of the developing countries, in major cities MSW is made to compost. Generally, manual segregation has been done for MSW, but if segregation is not done properly, there is possibility of heavy metals to enter in our food chain. Therefore, need arises to inventories the metal in MSW.
Composting is a simplest way to restore value in MSW. Aerobic composting with windrows method after proper segregation of MSW is recognized as a cost-effective method that results in an end product that can be used as soil amendment. Several authors [7,8] have reported beneficial effects of compost on soil productivity. These developments can be examined from the perspectives of waste management, agriculture and climate change. The technology to be used for this purpose is relatively simple and affordable, while the end-product is beneficial for soil and ensures significant saving of scarce land (required for land-filling). However, public-private partnership efforts are constrained due to quality requirements, marketing, pricing issues and ways to make it sustainable on a long-term basis [9]. The reducing, reusing, recycling and rebuying—the 4 R’s is key of diverting organic materials from landfill and prevents greenhouse gases (GHG’s) emissions, reduces pollutants, conserves resources and reduces the need for new disposal facilities [10].
In this paper, chemical characterization for macronutrients (C, N and P) and heavy metals (Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Cd) of MSW compost had been done for three Indian mega cities i.e., Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Bangalore (Karnataka) and Delhi (Capital of India) to assess its quality for applying as soil conditioner and fertilisers. There are limited works reported in India on the impact of MSWC on vegetative crops. Begum [11], reported application of MSWC of Bangalore city on tomato plant that on application of MSW compost around 192 g/pot, the Zn, Cu, Ni and Pb contents of tomato plant were found in high levels. Many other authors have reported metals uptake by the application of Industrial solid waste on plant in India [12].
The population of the studied cities is, Ahmedabad 5.8 millions, Bangalore 6.5 millions and Delhi 13.8 million (Census 2001). The physical characterisation of MSW in metropolitan’s cities of India is given in Table 2. Around 100 - 300 tones of segregated MSW per day are collected to make compost in Delhi, Bangalore and Ahmedabad. In Delhi and Ahmedabad MSW is collected by municipal authorities and given to private companies to make compost. In Bangalore, Karnataka Compost Development Corporation (KCDC) Limited is collecting MSW and making compost. The compost collected for present study is being made by aerobic composting by windrows methods with mechanically or manual segregation. A regular monitoring of quantification of heavy metals should be necessary as excessive application of compost may lead to the accumulation of heavy metals in soil surface [13,14]. Not only are these heavy metals non-biodegradable and become toxic at some levels, but also they tend to accumulate along the food chain, where human is the last link [15,16]. Beside that, for heavy metals distribution and transportation to soil and ground water was studied by sequential extraction [17,18]. In this paper, regulatory compliance has given more focused then agricultural productivity to study the quality of compost.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Processing
The ten representative samples of municipal solid waste compost was collected from three metropolitans cities of India, i.e., from Pirana landfill compost, Ahmedabad; KCDC sites, Bangalore; Okhla MSWC, Delhi. These samples were collected by stainless steel auger in airtight polythene bags after proper mixing and then labeled carefully. The samples were carried to laboratory and stored in a cold room at a temperature of 4˚C for further analysis. Samples were dried at room temperature, homogenised and sub-sampled by quartering and ground to pass through 2 mm sieve. These processed samples were sub sampled for further analysis.
2.2. Methodology Used for Analysis of Samples
The pH and Electrical Conductivity (EC) of samples were measured immediately after bringing them to the laboratory, using 1:10 ratio of w/v with deionised distilled water by pH meter and EC meter respectively. Other parameters Moisture Contents (MC), Kjeldhal’s Nitrogen and Phosphorus (by Olsen and Bray method) in samples were measured according to methodology given
Table 2. Physical characteristics of MSW in Indian metrocities.
Source: Central Pollution Control Board [3], Jha et al. [4]*.
in Okalebo et al. [19]. Samples were analysed for the total and Inorganic carbon and sulphur (against suitable salt standard) using the LS-1000, Eltra, auto CS analyser.The organic carbon and sulphur contents were computed as the difference between the total and inorganic fractions.
For bulk analysis of heavy metals, 0.1 g of finely grounded solid waste samples and soil samples were digested with triple acid using standard method given by Loring and Rantala [20], and analysed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS), Shimadzu AA 1600. The Canadian soil standards SO1, SO2, SO3 and SO4 were digested in same manner and used for calibration. Precision and atomic absorption analysis on replicated samples was estimated against standards. A deviation of ±5% - 10% was observed for heavy metals values of standards from their certified values. The detection limits of instrument for heavy metals were as Fe 0.05, Mn 0.02, Zn 0.01, Cu 0.03, Cd 0.01, Cr 0.05, Pb 0.02 and Ni 0.04 mg/kg. All chemicals used for this analysis were from MERCK of high purity. Stock solutions were prepared by using ultra pure deionizer MilliQ water.
Sequential extraction of heavy metals was carried out according to the procedure of Ma and Rao [18], and Tessier et al. [21], with five representative samples, which is widely applied in various studies done on compost [16,22-24]. Six operationally defined chemical fractions separated, viz. water-soluble, exchangeable, carbonate-bound, Fe-Mn oxides, organic-bound and residual fractions. Each of the chemical fractions of Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Cd in the MSWC is operationally fractionated in six fractions as Water soluble fraction (F1), Exchangeable fraction of metals (F2), Carbonate bound fraction (F3), Metals from reducible iron and manganese bound fraction (F4), Organic fraction bound metals (F5), Residual fraction of metals (F6) and blanks were also run at the same time to take care of all precision during analysis [25].
3. Result and Discussion
All the result gathered from analyses of samples collected from the study areas were given in Tables 3 and 4 and in Figure 1.
3.1. pH and Electrical Conductivity (EC), Organic Matter (OM) and Moisture Contents (MC)
The average value of pH for Ahmedabad city was 8.06, for Bangalore as 8.19 and for Delhi as 7.82. The pH value was observed for compost samples as slightly alkaline in nature and was well within the standard limits of 5.5 - 8.5 (Table 4). Mkhabeta and Warman [26], had stated that the major advantage of application of MSWC
Table 3. Physio-chemical properties of municipal solid waste compost.
OM—Organic Matter, MC—Moisture Contents, C—Total Carbon, N—Kjeldhal’s Nitrogen, P—total Phosphorus, C/N—Carbon/ Nitrogen ratio. *Indian Census 2001.
Table 4. Average concentration (mg/kg) of heavy metals in municipal solid waste compost (MSWC).
EC—Electrical Conductivity.
is soil pH increase to some extend. This increase in pH is due to the mineralisation of C and subsequent production of OH− ions by ligand exchange as well as introduction of basic cations, such as K+, Ca++ and Mg++. Brady and Weil [27], had reported that micronutrients and metalcations are most soluble and available for plant uptake under acidic conditions so MSWC would help in mitigating the heavy metals availability.
EC is an important parameter to determine the compost quality as high salt concentration can inhibit the seed germination [28] so it is essential to measure the EC of compost before its application as a soil conditioner. The samples collected from Ahmedabad showed EC value as 0.71 mS/cm, Bangalore as 0.58 mS/cm and Delhi as 0.83 mS/cm (Table 4). Manios [29], analysed that pressed grape skins should be considered as the ideal raw material, producing high quality compost, with the lowest EC value (1.57 mS/cm). Therefore, a salt content in the MSWC was in the limits of its application to the field. Brady and Weil [27], were reported EC levels ranges from 0.369 - 0.749 mS/cm in MSWC. However, some studies had showed that high EC values in MSWC inhabit the plant growth [28]. In the present study the pH and EC values are within the limits to be used as green compost.
Organic matter was found as 37% - 47% in the samples collected from studied metro-cities. This indicates that OM is in subsequent quantity to make compost out of it. The OM can be further improved by adding sewage sludge or garden waste in MSW. He et al. [28], had mentioned that MSWC increase the buffering capacity of soil and also improve water holding capacity of soil. The MC was found between 24% - 29% in the sample; this is not enough for decomposition of organic waste but during aerobic composting water and air supply is periodically supplied to fasten the composting.
3.2. Total Carbon (C), Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P)
Carbon, Sulphur, Nitrogen and Phosphorus were estimated in the collected compost samples to access their fertility on agricultural use. The average value for total C was 21.56%, total N 0.85% and total phosphorus was 2.82% for Ahmedabad city, Bangalore compost was found with total C as 26.61%, total N as 1.13% and total phosphorus as 2.92%, whereas Delhi’s compost samples had total C concentration as 19.56 %, total N 1.03% and total phosphorus as 2.52% (Table 3). These parameters are essential to understand the compost characterisation which is to be effectively used as fertilizer. The ratio of C/N was also analysed and found with in the acceptable range 19 - 25, as 20 - 40 C/N ratio is considered best to be used. Many authors reported that this ratio can be further improved by adding common waste materials as animal waste, bagasse or garden waste etc. The concentration of N in MSWC has been seen to increase with composting time as C is utilized by microorganism [30]. Immature compost can cause N immobilization due to a high compost C/N ratio [31]. In this study Ahmedabad and Bangalore has C/N ratio as 25.36 and 23.55 respectively, whereas, in Delhi as 19. Zhang et al. [32], had been reported that MSWC effectively supply P to soil with soil P concentration increasing with increasing application rates. Thus, MSWC from studied sites could enhance macronutrients concentration in the soil.
3.3. Bulk Concentration of Heavy Metals in Compost
Table 4 showed the average heavy metal concentration in MSWC samples from three studied Indian cities. The bulk concentration of heavy metals was found highest for Delhi as Cu 48.47, Cr 36.42, Ni 34.52, Pb 21.76 and Cd 2.61 mg/kg, followed by Ahmedabad city as Cu 36.68, Cr 21.14, Ni 26.04, Pb 8.18 and Cd 3.69 and the least concentration was reported in Bangalore city. The average of bulk heavy metals concentration of Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Cd were reported below the Indian standards for compost according to Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 2000. This shows that this compost can be used as soil fertilizer as its negative impact seems to be less. Heckman et al. [13], and McBride [14], reported that excessive application of compost may lead to the accumulation of heavy metals in soil surface. Hargreaves et al. [33], had reported that though total and extractable soil Cu concentration increased when soil was amended with MSWC but in most cases concentration remained below toxic levels to impact plant growth. The risks to the environment, human health, crop quality, yield and soil fertility from source-segregated MSW are minimal [34]. Similarly, other author’s world-wide had worked on heavy metals in MSWC and found that heavy metals in compost were within the prescribed limits of their countries and values are given in Table 5.
3.4. Fractionation of Heavy Metals
The determination of total concentration of heavy metals could not provide useful information about the risk of bioavailability, transport, toxicity and the capacity for remobilization of heavy metals in the environment [18,35-40]. However, the chemical speciation or fractionation of the heavy metal allows the prediction of its bioavailability and is related to its different natures including the bonding strength, either in free ionic form or complexed by organic matter, or incorporated in the mineral fraction of the sample [16].
Fractionation data to know the bioavailability of metals is more important when a municipal solid waste compost to be used as organic fertilizer, as each fraction would provide the leaching probability of studied metals and subsequently its toxicity. Six fractions had been studied for this paper (F1 to F6) (Figure 1). These fractions are Water-soluble fraction (F1), Exchangeable fraction (F2), Carbonate bound fraction (F3), Fe-Mn oxide fraction (F4), Organic bound fraction (F5) are also called mobile fractions and Residual fraction (F6). Fractions F1 to F5 are mobile or leachable fraction and F6 is not a mobile fraction or residual fraction. The water soluble
Table 5. Showing heavy metals (mg/kg) values in MSWC and in bracket (numbers) their prescribed limits in same countries.
1Soumaré et al. [8], 2Alvarenga et al. [41], 3Veeken et al. [42], 4Madrid et al. [43], 5Lasaridi et al. [44], 6Moturi et al. [45].
fraction has loosely bound heavy metals and this is easily available fraction and can enter in life-cycle or food web of plants and animals. Higher concentration of heavy metals in mobile fractions could cause more hazards to the environment.
Copper—The non-residual fraction had 9% of copper in Ahmedabad city, 6% in Bangalore city and 16% in Delhi. The major fraction of Cu was reported in residual fraction (Figure 1). This has got good agreement with the study done by Moturi et al. [45], in Delhi. They found approximately 5% - 10% of Cu fraction in nonresidual fraction of small-scale industrial solid waste and said that Cu source in Delhi could be untreated solid waste from small-scale industrial areas generally disposed with MSW in landfill areas. Higher the percentage of heavy metals in non-residual fraction, higher the chances of ground water contamination if MSWC is used for agriculture purpose.
Chromium—Cr was found in higher percentage in residual fraction (87% for Ahmedabad city, 93% for Bangalore and 82% for Delhi). This shows that Cr fraction was higher in residual or non-leachable fraction of these cities (Figure 1). Therefore, leaching threat from Cr metal in municipal solid waste compost samples is low.
Nickel—Ni was reported as 9% and 91%, 4% and 96% and 9% and 91% in non-residual and residual fraction for Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Delhi respectively. Nickel was also found higher in residual fraction of MSWC samples so the chances of leaching from it low.
Lead—This metal was reported as 7%, 5% and 12% respectively in mobile fractions or non-residual fraction of Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Delhi, MSWC samples. Delhi has higher Pb fraction in MSWC samples then the other cities the reason could be the presence of leachate from un-segregated lead battery in the collected sample. Similar finding was reported by Moturi et al. [45].
Cadmium—Cadmium is one of the toxic metals, toxicity of cadmium is well reported by many authors. Higher percentage of Cd was reported in residual fraction (93% in Ahmedabad city, 93% in Bangalore and 90% in Delhi). As the leachable or non-residual fraction has only 7% - 10% of Cd, therefore the contamination chances from Cd metals would be low. Soumaré et al. [8] also found that Malian and Belgian solid waste compost samples had higher Cd in residual fraction.
Delhi had higher concentration of total metals in the MSWC subsequently, metals were found high in leachable fractions too [46].
All the metals studied for fractionation studies had highest fraction in residual fractions and this fraction makes little contribution to the heavy metal availability [8,47]. Thus, the MSW compost from studied sites is suitable to be used in agricultural purposes. Deportes et al. [48] had reported that availability of metals are less in mature compost as it has more humic acid, thus binds more metals and decrease availability of metals. Similarly, Hargreaves et al. [33] had recommended that a good quality MSWC fully decomposed mature compost, low in metal and salt contents. Therefore, mature MSW compost should be used as mature.
4. Conclusion
This study indicates that compost characteristics from studied metropolitan cities of India were found suitable to be used as green compost. As the MSWC studied had C/N ratio around 19 - 25 (recommended range 20 - 40) and metal concentration were observed well within acceptable range of the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 of India and with insignificant leachable fraction of heavy metals. The MSWC from Delhi was found with slightly higher concentration of metals then other cities, which could be easily controlled by proper segregation of metallic components from MSW. There is need for periodic monitoring of heavy metals in MSWC so that quality could be insured and contamination could be prevented. The quality of compost could be further improved by adding cowdung, bagasse, garden waste etc. The utilisation of MSWC would not only help in recycling of MSW but also increase the fertility of soil and decrease the volume of waste. Also, there is a need to make compost popular among the farmers for its sustainable utilisation.
5. Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to University Grant Commission (UGC) and Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for providing support to carry out this research work.
NOTES