Comparison of energy-related isoenzymes between production and racing Arabian camels ()
1. INTRODUCTION
The distribution of the Arabian camel extends in arid zones, from northwestern India and the lowlands of Afghanistan to the extremity of the Arabian Peninsula and Somalia to the south and westward across the African deserts [1,2]. The physiological characteristics of the dromedary are well known to be adapted to fit with such arid conditions. Of these adaptations are its wide range of body temperature, its water metabolism and its ability to travel over long distances with less effort [3]. It is expected to find differences in the physiological data of energy related enzymes between production and racing camels. So far there is no physiological study comparing both production and racing camel breeds.
Many communities throughout the world are depending on camels in the utilization of their meat, milk, leather and wool. Camel also can be used as an important sport and tourism resource, particularly, in the Arabian Gulf countries [4-7].
Malate dehydrogenase is considered as one of the most extensively studied isozyme systems [8]. This enzyme with lactate dehydrogenase, are very suitable systems for studying several metabolic, genetic, ecological features, and they are very useful in systematic studies [9-12]. MDH is a homodimeric enzyme and it is well known for the many cell compartment-specific isoenzymes that have been characterized from various organisms [13,14]. There is a mitochondrial MDH that functions in the tricarboxylic acid cycle which is usually NAD + -dependent. Most eukaryotes that have been studied also have a cytosolic MDH isoform. The cytosolic MDH, also known as NADP-malic enzyme (ME), catalyze the NADP dependent oxidative decarboxylation of malate into pyruvate and carbon dioxide to generate NADPH. ME is thought to be a key enzyme in lipid biosynthesis. Eukaryotic ME is found in both vertebrates and invertebrates as well as in plants [15]. Among other functions, these compartment-specific isoforms help to shuttle reducing equivalents in the form of malate/oxalacetate across membranes and into various cell compartments where they are needed [16].
Electrophoretic investigation of two enzymes (Mdh and ME) of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) has been conducted for the production and race camel breeds inhabiting Saudi Arabia. This investigation aimed to compare whether these enzymes differ between the studied breeds.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Sample Preparation and Isoenzyme Assay
Blood samples from 7 individuals from production breed and 5 individuals from racing breeds (all aging 2 - 3 years old) were freshly obtained from a private farm in Taif city, placed in tubes with an anticoagulant and immediately stored at 4˚C overnight. The specimens were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for approximately 3 - 5 minutes. The plasmatic supernatants were stored at –80˚C for further isoenzyme assay.
For electrophoresis, 30 μL of the plasma was mixed with 10 μL of treatment buffer and 35 μL of this mixture was loaded in the well. Isoenzymes were electrophorased in 10% native-polyacrylamide gel as described by Stegemann et al. [17]. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained according to their enzyme system with the appropriate substrate and chemical solutions then incubated at room temperature in dark for complete staining. In most cases, the incubation for about 1 to 2 hours is enough.
2.2. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in 100 ml of 50 mM Na-acetate buffer pH 5.0 containing 100 mg Fast blue BB salt, 100 mg a-naphthyl phosphate, 100 mg MgCl2 100 mg MnCl2 and 1 g NaCl in 100 ml of 0.1 M Tris HCl pH 8.5 [18].
2.3. Malate Dehydrogenase (Mdh)
After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in 100 ml of 0.05 M Tris HCl pH 8.5 containing 25 mg NBT, 25 mg EDTA, 25 mg NAD, 10 mg malic acid and 3 mg PMS [19]. 0.05 M Tris HCl pH 8.5 was prepared by dissolving 0.605 g Tris in 50 ml distilled water. The pH was adjusted to 8.5 by HCl. Then the solution was completed to 100 ml with distilled water.
2.4. Malic Enzyme (ME)
After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in 100 ml of 0.05 M Tris HCl pH 8.5 containing 25 mg NBT, 25 mg EDTA, 25 mg NADP, 10 mg malic acid, 100 MgCl2 and PMS [19].
2.5. Gel Fixation
After the appearance of the enzyme bands, the reaction was stopped by washing the gel two or three times with tap water. This was followed by adding the fixative solution, which consists of ethanol and 20% glacial acetic acid (9:11 v/v). The gel was kept in the fixative solution for 24 hours and then was photographed.
2.6. Statistics
All gels were scanned using Gel Doc-2001 Bio-Rad system. For isoenzymes, the bands of enzyme activity were designated using the known system of nomenclature [20]. An abbreviation which corresponds to the name of the enzyme designated each locus. When multiple loci were involved, the fastest anodal protein band was designated as locus one, the next as locus two and so on. Student t-test in the SPSS package v. 13 was used to calculate the significant differences of the percentage amounts for isoforms among the different studied tissues.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1 showed the mean and SE values for the total and fractional enzyme percentage amounts of the studied isoenzymes. The data indicated that there was no significant variation between racing and production camel breeds in all analyzed isoenzymes. Electrophoresis of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) isoenzyme showed very weak monomorphic fractions in the studied samples of both camel breeds (Figure 1). The fastest anodal fraction (ALP-1) was faint and broad while the second isoform (ALP-2) was very sharp and close to the origin of the gel. There was no remarkable difference in the pattern of this enzyme for both breeds. As abnormal alakaline phosphatase is an indicator for liver or bone abnormalities [21,22], the present results may indicate that the studied samples are healthy. On the other hand, since the activity of this enzyme differs by aging [23-26], the insignificance in the enzyme activity between the studied breeds may be attributed to that the selected camel samples are from the same age.
Malate dehydrogenase (Mdh) isoenzyme has recorded two monomeric isoforms: the cytosolic Mdh-1 showing faster mobility with high intensity in the gel (Figure 2) and the mitochondrial Mdh-2 acquiring sharp density at the top of the gel. Mdh-1 was recorded in all production and race samples while Mdh-2 was recorded commonly in the production breed (see the recoded phenotypes in Figure 2).
Table 1. Mean ± SE of the percentage amount for the studied isoenzymes in plasma of production and racing Arabian Camel.
Figure 1. Electrophoretic banding pattern (above) and the recorded phenotypes with relative mobility (RF) (below) of the ALP isoenzyme in production (1 - 7) and racing (8 - 12) Arabian camel.
Figure 2. Electrophoretic banding pattern (above) and the recorded phenotypes with relative mobility (RF) (below) of the Mdh isoenzyme in production (1 - 7) and racing (8 - 12) Arabian camel.
Malic enzyme (ME) showed two isoforms with the frist (ME-1) being common and highly active in the two studied breeds. The second isoform (ME-2) was located near the top of the gel and was common in the production samples and nearly absent in the race breed (Figure 3).
The present results revealed that the cytosolic (Mdh-1 and ME-1) were the only expressed isoenzymes in most samples of racing camel while both cytosolic and mitochondrial isoforms were expressed in production breed. The two essential malate dehydrogenases, Mdh-1 (cytosolic malate dehydrogenase) and Mdh-2 (mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase), play important roles in the Krebs cycle for energy production through aerobic respiration [27]. Mdh-1 and Mdh-2 are also involved in lipid synthesis by providing extramitochondrial reducing equivalents from the oxidation of malate [28,29].
ME-1 (malic enzyme), an NADP-dependent lipogenic enzyme, is involved in the conversion of L-malate to pyruvate. ME-1 is part of a shuttle that transfers acetyl groups from the mitochondria to the cytosol, forming a link between the glycolytic pathway and the citric acid cycle [30]. ME-1 promotes the release of acetyl-coezyme A and NADPH from the mitochondria into the cytosol for fatty acid biosynthesis. Furthermore, the cytosolic Mdh (L-malate: NADP+ oxaloacetate-decarboxylating oxidoreductase), also known as NADP-malic enzymes (ME) [15], catalyze the NADPdependent oxidative decarboxylation of malate into pyruvate and carbon dioxide to generate NADPH. Due to its ability to produce NADPH, ME is thought to be a key enzyme in lipid biosynthesis.
Wurochekke et al. [31] expected that intermediate of the TCA cycle inhibits mitochondrial malate dehydro-
Figure 3. Electrophoretic banding pattern (above) and the recorded phenotypes with relative mobility (RF) (below) of the ME isoenzyme in production (1 - 7) and racing (8 - 12) Arabian camel.
genase (Mdh-2). Aspartate which can readily cross the inner mitochondrial membrane is formed from oxaloacetate by transamination and it has significantly inhibited the activity of the enzyme. Mdh-1 as a cytosolic malate dehydrogenase catalyses the reduction of oxaloacetate to malate in the cytosol. As the racing camel consumes more energy during racing, this could accelerate the TCA cycle and increase the production of the intermediate metabolites which could be expected to reduce the activity of Mdh-2. This may be the reason why the second isoform has not been expressed in racing camel. Because the production camel has been adapted to use both energy and lipids, the two isoforms of these energetic and lipogenic enzymes have been clearly expressed. We therefore may assume that the appearance of both Mdh forms is necessary for both energy and lipid production in the production breeds while Mdh-1 was useful as bioenergtic enzyme necessary for racing.
4. CONCLUSION
MDH and ME isoenzymes showed different expressions in the plasma of the production and racing Arabian camels. These different expressions are indications of the difference in the physiological adaptations of both camel breeds and are not for a systematic value.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Dr. Shawkat Ahmed at Ain Shams University of Egypt for his technical support in conducting the practical part of this work.
NOTES