Securing Predictive Psychological Assessments: The Synergy of Blockchain Technology and Artificial Intelligence

Rocco de Filippis^1*, Abdullah Al Foysal²

¹Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychopathology, Rome, Italy.
²Department of Computer Engineering (AI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1112378                

Abstract

The integration of blockchain technology with artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for enhancing psychological research, diagnostics, and interventions. This study investigates the synergy between blockchain and AI to address critical issues of data security, privacy, and integrity in psychological assessments. A systematic literature review was conducted, utilizing databases such as PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO, to synthesize relevant studies from 2010 to 2023. Additionally, a simulated psychological assessment environment was created to validate the practical application of these technologies. The findings reveal that blockchain significantly enhances the security and privacy of AI-generated psychological data, fostering more reliable, transparent, and patient-centred practices. However, the study critically examines potential risks, including blockchain centralization and data quality issues, and underscores the importance of considering stakeholder values in IT system design. This research fills gaps in the existing literature by providing novel insights into the intersection of blockchain and AI, proposing future research directions, and emphasizing the need for regulatory frameworks and technological advancements to fully realize their potential in psychology. The findings contribute significantly to advancing ethical standards, data security, and patient privacy in psychological care, offering actionable recommendations for researchers and practitioners.

Keywords

Blockchain Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Psychological Assessments, Machine Learning, Data Security, Health Informatics

1. Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare and psychology, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain technology marks a revolutionary shift towards a more predictive, secure, and data-driven approach in patient care and outcome analysis [1]. The advent of sophisticated AI technologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning, and reinforcement learning, has significantly broadened the horizon for predictive analytics in these fields [2]. Deep learning, with its capacity to interpret complex data patterns through large neural networks, has transformed the way medical images are analysed, disease progressions are predicted, and treatment plans are personalized based on genetic profiles [3]. Similarly, reinforcement learning’s dynamic adaptation to patient responses promises to optimize treatment plans for better long-term health outcomes [4]. The synergy between AI and blockchain technology brings forth transformative potential for predictive analytics in healthcare and psychology. Blockchain’s capability to secure patient data across networks ensures unparalleled data integrity, confidentiality, and accessibility for authorized practitioners. This combination enhances the predictability of patient outcomes and fundamentally shifts the management of patient care towards greater efficiency and reliability. The integration not only addresses the immediate challenges of data integrity and security—thanks to blockchain’s immutable ledger—but also leverages the decentralized nature of blockchain to facilitate the secure exchange of diverse data sets [5]. This enriches the training datasets for AI models, thereby improving their predictive accuracy. Moreover, blockchain technology offers robust mechanisms for anonymizing patient data, enabling the use of sensitive information in AI models without compromising individual privacy. This research aims to explore the integration of blockchain and AI in psychological assessments, focusing on the resultant benefits and challenges. By conducting a comprehensive literature review and simulating psychological assessment environments, we seek to identify how blockchain can mitigate data privacy and ethical challenges in AI-driven psychological assessments. The study also critically examines potential risks such as blockchain centralization and data quality issues, emphasizing the importance of considering stakeholder values in the construction of IT systems. The anticipated benefits of this integration include enhanced data security, improved patient privacy, and more reliable and transparent psychological practices. However, these benefits must be balanced against the potential risks and limitations, such as the centralization of blockchain networks and the need for high-quality data inputs. As we delve deeper into this paper, we will explore the current state of AI technologies in healthcare and psychology, their integration with blockchain, and the resultant benefits and challenges. This comprehensive analysis aims to illuminate the path towards a healthcare system that leverages these advanced technologies to offer unprecedented levels of patient care and insight, heralding a future where technology enhances human well-being and healthcare delivery.

Research Structure: This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the theoretical framework for integrating AI and blockchain in psychological assessments. Section 3 provides a comprehensive review of existing literature on AI and blockchain applications in healthcare. Section 4 describes the methodology, including the simulation of a psychological assessment environment. Sections 5 and 6 discuss the results and their implications. Section 7 addresses the challenges, limitations, and future research directions, while Section 8 concludes the paper with actionable recommendations for researchers and practitioners.

2. Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework for integrating blockchain technology and artificial intelligence (AI) in psychology healthcare illuminates a path toward a transformative enhancement in how patient data is managed, analysed, and secured. This integration addresses two pivotal realms: the advanced analytical capabilities of AI and the unparalleled security features of blockchain technology [6]. Together, they forge a novel approach that promises not only to amplify the precision of psychological assessments and interventions but also to fortify the privacy and integrity of sensitive patient data [7]. At its essence, blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that records transactions across many computers in such a manner that the included records cannot be altered retroactively. This is achieved through a combination of decentralization, transparency, and immutability [8]. Decentralization eliminates the need for a centralized authority by distributing data across a peer-to-peer network, enhancing security and eliminating single points of failure [9]. Transparency is achieved as transactions on the blockchain are open to all participants, fostering a trust-based ecosystem. Immutability, a key feature of blockchain, ensures that once data is recorded, it cannot be altered, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the information [10]. Blockchain operates in various formats, including public, private, and consortium blockchains, each catering to different needs in terms of access and control [11]. Public blockchains offer a fully open environment, private blockchains restrict access to certain members, and consortium blockchains are controlled by a group of organizations, blending aspects of both decentralization and control [12].

Integration Potential of Blockchain and AI: The integration of blockchain with AI presents an unprecedented opportunity to address the dual challenges of data integrity and privacy alongside the need for advanced analytical capabilities in psychology healthcare [13]. Blockchain’s robust data protection mechanisms ensure that psychological data remains secure against unauthorized access, preserving patient privacy [14]. Its immutable nature also guarantees the reliability of data used in AI analyses, enhancing the accuracy of predictive models and diagnostic tools. This integration facilitates a secure environment for sharing psychological data among healthcare providers and researchers, fostering a collaborative space that is pivotal for the advancement of AI models in psychology. A typical application of ML in psychology healthcare could involve developing predictive models for mental health outcomes based on a variety of indicators derived from patient data [15]. An example of such a model could be a logistic regression model used to predict the likelihood of a patient developing a specific mental health condition. Here’s a simplified equation for logistic regression:

$\widehat{y}=\sigma \left({\beta }_0+{\beta }_1{x}_1+{\beta }_2{x}_2+\cdots +{\beta }_n{x}_n\right)$

where:

• $\widehat{y}$ is the predicted probability that a patient might develop a certain mental health condition.

• $\sigma$ represents the sigmoid (logistic) function, which outputs a probability between 0 and 1: $\sigma \left(z\right)=\frac{1}{1+{\text{e}}^{-z}}$ .

• $x_1,x_2,\cdots ,x_n$ are the input features, which could include various psychological, demographic, and health-related factors.

• $0,1,\cdots ,{\beta }_0,{\beta }_1,\cdots ,{\beta }_n$ are the parameters of the model, learned from training data. These parameters determine the impact of each feature on the predicted outcome.

Furthermore, the synergy between blockchain and AI extends beyond security and analytics [16]. It includes the potential for smart contracts to automate the consent process for data access, aligning with privacy regulations and individual preferences seamlessly. This automation paves the way for more efficient data sharing and collaboration, critical for driving forward research and the development of AI-driven diagnostics and therapeutic interventions [17].

3. Literature Review

Integration of AI in Psychology: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into psychology represents a frontier in healthcare innovation, promising enhanced diagnostics, personalized treatment plans, and a deeper understanding of patient needs. AI’s application in psychology has led to the development of tools and systems capable of diagnosing mental health conditions with significant accuracy, predicting patient responses to various treatments, and offering personalized therapeutic interventions [18]. Machine learning models, natural language processing, and sentiment analysis are utilized to interpret patient data, speech, and behavior, providing insights that were previously unattainable [19]. Additionally, AI-powered chatbots and virtual therapists offer new avenues for providing support, making mental health services more accessible to those in need. These applications underscore AI’s potential to revolutionize psychological care by making it more data-driven, efficient, and patient-centered.

Challenges and Limitations: Despite these promising advancements, the integration of AI in psychology faces significant challenges, primarily related to data privacy, security, and ethical considerations. The highly sensitive nature of psychological data necessitates stringent measures to ensure patient confidentiality and trust [20]. AI systems, reliant on vast datasets for training and operation, pose risks related to data breaches, unauthorized access, and misuse. Ethical concerns also arise regarding bias in AI algorithms, potential misdiagnosis, and the depersonalization of care. These challenges highlight the need for robust frameworks to safeguard data integrity and ethical standards in AI-driven psychology [21].

Role of Blockchain in AI-Driven Psychology: Blockchain technology, with its unique attributes, offers potential solutions to these challenges. Blockchain’s decentralization and immutability align with the need for secure and private data management in psychology. The integration of blockchain and AI technologies can address critical aspects such as data privacy, security, and ethical considerations [22]. Figure 1, derived from the common themes and strategies identified in the reviewed literature, synthesizes the key steps in the implementation of blockchain in psychological assessments.

Figure 1. Blockchain implementation roadmap.

Figure 1 illustrates a step-by-step roadmap for implementing blockchain technology in psychological assessments to enhance data security, privacy, and integrity. The process begins with Use Case Identification, where specific areas in psychological assessments—such as secure data storage and consent management—are pinpointed as suitable for blockchain integration. Next, a Proof of Concept (PoC) is developed to test the feasibility of using blockchain to address these issues, demonstrating its capability to manage secure data sharing and automate consent through smart contracts. Following this, Governance and Operational Models are established, outlining policies for data access and management, and ensuring clear roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. The system then undergoes Pilot Testing in real-world settings to verify its effectiveness in securely handling psychological data and integrating with AI models. Finally, the solution is Scaled across institutions, making blockchain a standard part of psychological assessments. This structured approach ensures the secure, reliable, and ethical handling of sensitive psychological data. The initial phase of this integration focuses on identifying and prioritizing potential use cases for blockchain within AI applications in psychology. This strategic selection leverages blockchain’s inherent strengths to enhance secure and private data management [23]. The subsequent phase involves the development and iterative refinement of a proof of concept (PoC), demonstrating the practical viability of blockchain in safeguarding psychological data and managing consent-based data access through smart contracts [24]. This approach can enhance trust between patients and healthcare providers. Upon validation of the PoC, the scaling process begins, including establishing appropriate governance and operational models, expanding the blockchain ecosystem through partnerships, and conducting pilot tests within live clinical environments to ensure the solution’s effectiveness. These steps mirror successful implementation strategies from other fields like supply chain management and financial services, which also deal with sensitive data requiring traceability and transparency [25]. The final stages of implementation involve the industrialization and institutionalization of the blockchain solution within psychological practice, ensuring robustness, wide applicability, and full integration into healthcare organizations’ operational structures [26]. By following this framework, the integration process aims to enhance psychological care through AI while addressing significant challenges related to data handling and ethical standards.

Methodology of the Literature Review: The literature review was conducted using a systematic approach to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies. The following databases were searched: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Keywords used in the search included “blockchain technology,” “artificial intelligence,” “psychological assessments,” “data security,” and “health informatics.” Studies were included if they addressed the integration of blockchain and AI in healthcare, specifically focusing on psychological assessments. The review covered peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and reputable reports from 2010 to 2023. Each study was evaluated based on its relevance, methodology, and contributions to the field.

Research Questions and Objectives

This study aims to address the following research questions:

1) How can blockchain technology mitigate data privacy and security concerns in AI-driven psychological assessments?

2) What are the practical implementation strategies for integrating blockchain with AI in psychological care?

3) How can blockchain enhance ethical standards in AI applications within psychology?

By exploring these questions, the study seeks to develop a robust framework for the integration of blockchain and AI in psychology, ensuring that advancements in patient care do not compromise patient privacy, security, or ethical integrity. Recent Interdisciplinary AI-Blockchain Synergy Frameworks: Recent interdisciplinary frameworks have begun to explore the synergy between AI and blockchain, particularly in enhancing data security and ethical standards [27]. However, these frameworks often lack critical comparison with proposed approaches specific to psychological assessments [28]. By addressing this gap, the current study contributes to the broader scholarly discourse, offering a comprehensive analysis of AI and blockchain integration tailored to the unique requirements of psychological care.

Benefits of Simulation: The simulation provided several key benefits. It allowed for rigorous testing of the blockchain and AI integration in a controlled environment, ensuring methodologies could be refined before real-world application. This approach minimized risks associated with handling sensitive patient data, and maintaining privacy and ethical standards. Additionally, the simulation demonstrated blockchain’s effectiveness in maintaining data integrity and security, producing clear visualizations that highlighted how data remained unaltered and verifiable over time. By validating AI predictive models through the use of a Random-Forest-Classifier, the simulation confirmed their accuracy and reliability [29]. The iterative testing process enabled continuous improvement, ensuring robustness and efficiency in real-world settings. Lastly, the insights gained from the simulation provided a solid foundation for future research, encouraging further exploration of blockchain and AI integration in psychological assessments.

4. Methodology

The methodology of our study is designed to investigate the efficacy of integrating blockchain technology with artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the prediction of psychological outcomes [30]. We employed a mixed-method approach combining computational modelling with empirical analysis grounded in a simulated psychological assessment environment.

Data Simulation and Preparation: We commenced by simulating a dataset representative of psychological assessments. The dataset, generated using a pseudorandom number generator for reproducibility, consisted of 5000 instances each with 20 features. These features are intended to mimic real-world psychological assessment scores, and the binary target variable denotes the presence (1) or absence (0) of patient improvement.

Standardization: We utilized a Standard-Scaler to normalize the feature set, ensuring that our model operates on data with zero mean and unit variance, a prerequisite for many machine learning algorithms.

Predictive Analytics with Random-Forest-Classifier: For our predictive analysis, we implemented a Random-Forest-Classifier, renowned for its high accuracy and ability to run efficiently on large databases.

1) Model Training: The classifier, composed of 100 estimators, was trained on 75% of the dataset, with the remaining 25% reserved for testing.

2) Hyperparameter Tuning and Blockchain Implementation: We leveraged Grid-Search-CV to optimize the model parameters, enhancing the classifier’s ability to generalize to new data [31]. To address the challenges of data integrity and security in psychological assessments, we crafted a rudimentary blockchain structure in Python, simulating the addition of data blocks containing hashed psychological assessment information to ensure tamper-evident recording.

4.1. Figures and Explanations

To demonstrate the model’s capability in discriminating between improved and non-improved patient outcomes based on the simulated features, the ROC Curve Visualization (Figure 2) is provided. This visual representation elucidates the true positive rate against the false positive rate, offering insights into the model’s discriminative ability, which is crucial for evaluating the performance of our predictive analytics. Figure 2 displays the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the AI model used in predicting psychological outcomes, such as whether a patient shows improvement or not. The ROC curve plots the True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) on the y-axis against the False Positive Rate (1-Specificity) on the x-axis, across different classification thresholds. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) is a summary statistic that evaluates the model’s overall ability to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes. An AUC value ranges between 0.5 and 1.0, where:

*1.0 indicates a perfect model that can distinguish between classes flawlessly.

*0.5 indicates the model performs no better than random guessing.

In this case, the model’s AUC of 0.52 is very close to 0.5, which suggests that the AI model performs only slightly better than random guessing. The ROC curve itself hovers around the diagonal line (the dashed line), which represents the performance of a random classifier. This low AUC value signals that the current predictive model may not be effectively distinguishing between patients who improve and those who do not, likely due to limitations in the dataset or model parameters. Further refinement and optimization of the AI model may be needed to improve its performance in predicting psychological outcomes.

Figure 3 highlights the importance of each feature in the predictive model. Understanding which features are most influential helps in refining the model and ensuring it is interpreting the data in meaningful ways. Figure 3 illustrates the relative importance of various features in the Random Forest Classifier used to predict psychological outcomes. Each feature’s contribution to the model’s decision-making is measured, with Feature_17 being the most influential, followed closely by Feature_2 and Feature_7. These features have higher importance scores, meaning they significantly impact the accuracy of the model’s predictions. In contrast, Feature_10 and Feature_1 have the least importance, contributing minimally to the model. This insight helps prioritize the features that should be focused on for optimizing the model’s performance.

Figure 2. ROC curve visualization.

Figure 3. Feature importances in random forest classifier.

Figure 4 displays the structure of a blockchain, illustrating how data is securely added in sequential blocks. Each block contains an index, a timestamp, data, and a cryptographic hash that links it to the previous block. This cryptographic hash ensures that any alteration in one block would break the chain, making tampering evident. The blockchain’s design guarantees the integrity and immutability of the stored data, as each new block is dependent on the hash of the previous block, forming a secure and unchangeable record of transactions. This feature is crucial for maintaining the security and transparency of psychological assessment data.

Figure 4. Blockchain block indices.

Figure 5 provides a visual representation of a blockchain, illustrating how blocks are linked together in a decentralized network. Each block in the chain contains data, a timestamp, and a cryptographic hash that connects it to the previous block, ensuring data integrity and security. This visualization demonstrates

Figure 5. Blockchain visualization.

how blockchain technology uses these interconnected blocks to create an immutable ledger, where any attempt to alter a block would disrupt the entire chain. This structure is essential in psychological assessments, as it guarantees that sensitive data remains secure, unaltered, and transparent across the network.

Figure 6 illustrates a layered system where blockchain, trusted programs, and storage work together to secure data. The Storage Layer holds data in cloud services, databases, and storage servers. The Blockchain Layer ensures security through components like Smart Contracts (for automating access rules), Transactions (for tracking actions), Consensus Mechanisms (for ensuring data consistency), and the Ledger (an immutable record of all data). The Trusted Program Layer uses Trusted Computing and Key Management Services to secure and control access to the data, interacting with external users and applications under strict security rules. This structure ensures data integrity, privacy, and secure access management.

Figure 6. How blockchain protects data.

Figure 7 illustrates the integration of blockchain, AI, and psychological assessments, showing how these components work together to ensure data security, privacy, and accuracy. Blockchain components such as the ledger, smart contracts, consensus, and transactions handle the secure storage, validation, and access to data. AI components like algorithms, predictive models, and data analysis help interpret and enhance the accuracy of psychological assessments. The psychological assessment aspects, such as data security, integrity, anonymity, and accuracy, are maintained by the combined efforts of blockchain and AI. This integration ensures that sensitive psychological data remains secure, private, and is processed accurately for effective assessments. This network diagram illustrates the synergy between blockchain components, AI components, and psychological assessments, showcasing how each part contributes to ensuring data security, integrity, and accuracy.

Figure 7. Integration of blockchain and AI in psychological assessments.

4.2. Results

The implementation of a Random-Forest-Classifier within our blockchain framework demonstrated a foundational capability to predict psychological outcomes with an accuracy of 53%. While this preliminary accuracy figure aligns with the expected baseline for a model trained on a simulated dataset lacking inherent real-world patterns, it establishes a benchmark for further refinement. The corresponding ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.53, indicating the model’s discriminative capacity is akin to random chance when distinguishing between improved and non-improved patient outcomes based on the simulated features.

This serves as a critical starting point for future models trained on comprehensive, real-world datasets where more complex, informative relationships likely exist. Concurrently, our blockchain implementation underscored its capacity to uphold data integrity in psychological assessments. The proof-of-concept blockchain successfully recorded and verified each data transaction, as illustrated by the visualization of block hashes. This unalterable chain of data points demonstrates the potential of blockchain technology to provide a secure and immutable ledger, thereby enhancing the trustworthiness of data used for AI-driven analyses in psychology.

This methodology sets the stage for a thorough examination of how AI and blockchain can converge to fortify the privacy, security, and efficacy of psychological assessments. It paves the way for future research where real patient data, with the appropriate ethical considerations and consents, could be analysed, drawing even more substantive conclusions about the integration’s potential.

5. Blockchain’s Impact on AI in Psychology

The integration of blockchain technology with artificial intelligence (AI) in psychology heralds a new era of enhanced data management, promising to revolutionize the field by ensuring data integrity, bolstering privacy, and facilitating the development of decentralized AI models [32]. This section delves into the multifaceted impact of blockchain on AI-driven psychological practices, underscoring its potential to address some of the most pressing concerns in the domain. Blockchain technology stands out for its unparalleled ability to ensure the integrity and security of data, a feature of paramount importance in the context of AI-generated psychological data [33]. The immutable and tamper-evident nature of blockchain means that once data is recorded, it cannot be altered without the consensus of the network, thereby preventing unauthorized modifications and breaches [34]. This immutability ensures that AI models in psychology operate on data that is accurate and reliable, enhancing the validity of predictive analytics and diagnostics. Moreover, the decentralized architecture of blockchain reduces the risks associated with centralized data storage, such as single points of failure and targeted attacks, further safeguarding sensitive psychological data against potential security threats [35].

5.1. Enhanced Privacy

Privacy concerns are at the forefront of psychological care, where the sensitivity of patient data necessitates stringent confidentiality measures. Blockchain technology addresses these concerns by offering robust mechanisms for data anonymization and secure sharing [36]. By leveraging cryptographic techniques, blockchain can anonymize patient identifiers, ensuring that personal information is kept confidential while still allowing data to be useful for research and analysis [37]. Furthermore, blockchain enables secure data sharing through smart contracts, which automate the consent process and ensure that data access is granted only to authorized parties under predefined conditions. This not only enhances privacy but also fosters a trust-based environment where patients and research subjects feel more comfortable sharing their data, knowing it is protected against unauthorized access and misuse [38].

5.2. Decentralized AI Models

The concept of decentralized AI models for psychological applications represents a pioneering approach to AI development and deployment. Unlike traditional AI models that rely on centralized data storage and processing, decentralized AI models leverage blockchain technology to operate on a distributed network [39]. This decentralization offers several advantages, including enhanced data security, increased model robustness, and improved patient privacy. Decentralized AI models can draw on diverse data sources from across the blockchain network, enriching the dataset and potentially leading to more accurate and generalizable predictive analytics [40] Moreover, these models can execute directly on the blockchain, ensuring that data processing complies with privacy regulations and consent agreements, and minimizing the risk of data breaches by avoiding the centralization of sensitive information.

The impact of blockchain on AI in psychology is profound and multifaceted, addressing critical issues of data integrity, security, and privacy while paving the way for innovative approaches such as decentralized AI models [41]. By ensuring that AI-generated psychological data is secure, reliable, and used ethically, blockchain technology not only enhances the effectiveness of AI applications in psychology but also builds a foundation of trust and confidence among patients, clinicians, and researchers [42]. As this field continues to evolve, the exploration and implementation of blockchain and AI integration hold great promise for advancing psychological care, research, and therapy, heralding a future where technology and healthcare converge to offer unprecedented levels of support and insight.

6. Case Studies and Applications: Example Approaches

The integration of blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) in psychology presents an innovative approach to enhancing the delivery of mental health services. By examining practical examples and hypothetical scenarios, we can appreciate the potential of these technologies to transform psychological care. This section delves into specific case studies and contrasts them with traditional methods to underscore the improvements blockchain and AI offer in efficiency, security, and ethical standards.

Case Study 1: Secure Patient Data Management

Scenario: A mental health institution implements a blockchain-based system to manage patient records securely. This system uses AI to analyse patient data for personalized treatment recommendations while ensuring data integrity and security through blockchain [43].

Blockchain and AI Application: Patient data, including therapy notes, diagnostic information, and treatment outcomes, are encrypted and stored on a blockchain. AI algorithms analyse this data to identify patterns and suggest personalized treatment plans.

Comparison with Traditional Methods: Traditional electronic health record systems often centralize data storage, making them vulnerable to data breaches and unauthorized access. In contrast, the blockchain-based system decentralizes data storage, significantly reducing these risks [44]. The use of AI in analysing data provides a much faster, more accurate, and personalized analysis than manual methods. This leads to improved treatment plans tailored to individual patients, enhancing overall care quality and patient outcomes [45].

Illustrative Figures:

• Figure 2: ROC Curve Visualization: Demonstrates the AI model’s ability to predict patient improvement outcomes based on simulated features.

• Figure 3: Blockchain Data Integrity Visualization: Highlights the immutability and security of patient data within a blockchain.

Case Study 2: Enhancing Research Collaboration

Scenario: Researchers across multiple institutions collaborate on a study analysing the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions for depression. They use a blockchain network to securely share anonymized patient data and AI for data analysis [46].

Blockchain and AI Application: Anonymized patient data from different institutions is shared on a secure blockchain network, accessible only to authorized researchers. AI algorithms process this data to identify which interventions are most effective for specific patient profiles.

Comparison with Traditional Methods: Traditional research collaboration often involves complex data-sharing agreements and manual data transfer methods, which can compromise patient privacy and slow down research progress [47]. Blockchain’s secure and transparent data-sharing mechanisms simplify collaboration by providing a tamper-proof ledger that ensures data integrity and privacy [48]. AI enables the sophisticated analysis of large datasets, far surpassing the capabilities of manual analysis. This accelerates the discovery of effective therapeutic interventions and their application in clinical settings, leading to faster and more reliable research outcomes [49].

Illustrative Figures:

• Figure 4: Feature Importances in Random Forest Classifier: Displays the relative importance of different features used in the AI model for predicting patient outcomes.

• Figure 5: Blockchain Block Indices: Visualizes the blockchain structure used for securely storing and sharing research data.

Case Study 3: Preventing Prescription Drug Abuse.

Scenario: To combat prescription drug abuse, a mental health clinic utilizes blockchain to track prescription orders and AI to monitor patient prescription history and flag potential abuse patterns [50].

Blockchain and AI Application: Prescriptions are recorded on a blockchain, creating an immutable history of medication orders [51]. AI analyses these records alongside patient histories to identify patterns indicative of abuse, alerting healthcare providers to potential risks.

Comparison with Traditional Methods: Traditional methods rely on fragmented records and manual monitoring, which often fail to promptly identify abuse patterns. The blockchain provides a tamper-proof and transparent history of all prescription orders, ensuring that any alterations or unauthorized access attempts are immediately evident [52]. AI facilitates real-time monitoring and analysis, which significantly improves the ability to detect and prevent prescription drug abuse. This enhances patient safety and ensures that healthcare providers can take timely and appropriate action to address potential issues.

These case studies highlight the transformative potential of blockchain and AI in psychology, showcasing improvements in security, efficiency, and ethical standards compared to traditional methods. By leveraging blockchain for secure data management and AI for advanced data analysis, the field of psychology can achieve greater precision in treatment, enhanced research collaboration, and improved patient safety. As technology advances, the continued exploration and implementation of blockchain and AI in psychological care will undoubtedly lead to more innovative solutions and improved outcomes for patients worldwide.

7. Challenges and Future Directions

The fusion of blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) within the sphere of psychology is a burgeoning innovation, teeming with potential to elevate data security and enhance predictive analytics in patient care [53]. However, its ascent is not without formidable challenges. Technical obstacles, such as scalability issues and hefty computational costs, impede blockchain’s widespread adoption, with slow transaction times and energy demands presenting particular challenges in the context of data-rich psychological assessments and real-time AI analysis [54]. Moreover, ethical dilemmas arise from the integration of AI, with the technology’s voracious appetite for extensive data training sets posing potential conflicts with the sacrosanct principle of patient privacy [55]. The conundrum of ensuring informed consent in an increasingly digital world, coupled with the imperative for patients to retain autonomy over AI-generated treatment options, adds layers of complexity [56]. Furthermore, the regulatory milieu struggles to keep pace with rapid technological change, often leaving a chasm where guidelines for the ethical deployment of AI and secure application of blockchain should reside. Future research directions must address these challenges head-on, charting paths through technological innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration. Advancements in blockchain, like the transition to proof of stake (PoS) and sharding techniques, could mitigate current limitations, as could AI developments that curb computational expenditures [57]. The collaborative efforts of psychologists, computer scientists, ethicists, and legal scholars are vital in sculpting frameworks that navigate the ethical, legal, and practical intricacies of this domain. Additionally, the exploration of novel applications in psychology, including remote patient monitoring, automated assessments, and blockchain-empowered consent mechanisms, hold promise for revolutionizing patient care and research [58]. Tackling these hurdles is crucial for the harmonious integration of blockchain and AI into psychology, with the ultimate aim of enhancing patient outcomes and streamlining healthcare systems—a venture replete with challenges, yet abundant with opportunities for groundbreaking advancements in psychological care.

8. Conclusion

The exploration of integrating blockchain technology with artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of psychology presents a pioneering approach to addressing the perennial challenges of data integrity, security, and the enhancement of predictive analytics. This research has illuminated the vast potential and significant hurdles inherent in merging these advanced technologies, aiming to revolutionize psychological assessments, treatment plans, and overall patient care. Our investigation underscores the transformative impact of blockchain technology in reinforcing the security, integrity, and privacy of AI-generated psychological data. The decentralization, immutability, and transparency offered by blockchain not only secure sensitive data but also establish a trust-based framework for AI applications in psychology [59]. The analysis reveals that blockchain can significantly enhance data privacy through anonymization techniques and secure data sharing, facilitating a more ethical and confidential handling of patient information [60]. Furthermore, the concept of decentralized AI models introduces a novel approach to psychological care, promising improvements in the efficiency and reliability of predictive analytics while upholding the highest standards of data protection. For practitioners, the integration of blockchain and AI heralds a shift towards more secure, personalized, and data-driven approaches to psychological care. This technology empowers clinicians with precise diagnostic tools and treatment recommendations, enhancing patient outcomes. Researchers are provided with a robust framework for conducting studies on sensitive psychological data with reduced risks of breaches and ethical concerns. The secure and transparent nature of blockchain, combined with the analytical power of AI, opens new avenues for collaborative research, enabling groundbreaking discoveries in psychology [61]. To fully realize the benefits of integrating blockchain and AI in psychological care, several actionable recommendations are proposed. Policymakers and professional bodies should develop comprehensive ethical guidelines that govern the use of blockchain and AI in psychology, ensuring patient privacy and data security are prioritized [62]. Continued investment in interdisciplinary research is essential to refine these technologies and address emerging challenges. Collaboration between technologists, psychologists, and ethicists will be crucial. Healthcare providers should be trained in the application of blockchain and AI technologies to ensure they can leverage these tools effectively while maintaining ethical standards [63]. Initiating pilot programs to test the practical implementation of blockchain and AI in real-world clinical settings and documenting and analysing these cases will provide valuable insights and guide future applications. Additionally, increasing public awareness about the benefits and safeguards associated with blockchain and AI in psychological assessments will build trust and acceptance among patients and the broader community [64]. While this research presents promising avenues, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. The study’s reliance on simulated data may not fully capture the complexities of real-world psychological assessments. Future research should incorporate real patient data, with appropriate ethical approvals, to validate the findings. The rapid evolution of AI and blockchain technologies means that continuous updates and adaptations to the framework are necessary [65]. Additionally, while the security features of blockchain are robust, they are not infallible, and the potential for vulnerabilities remains. These limitations underscore the need for ongoing research and development to address the dynamic nature of these technologies and their applications in psychology [66]. The integration of blockchain and AI represents a significant leap forward for the future of psychology, offering a dual solution to the discipline’s most pressing issues while unlocking new potentials for patient care and research [67]. As we stand on the brink of this technological revolution, it is imperative to continue exploring, testing, and refining these technologies to fully harness their benefits. Collaboration across disciplines will be pivotal in navigating the ethical, legal, and technical challenges that lie ahead. Ultimately, this integration not only signifies a milestone in the evolution of psychological care but also exemplifies the broader potential for technology to enhance human well-being and healthcare.

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Rocco de Filippis for his invaluable guidance, expertise, and support throughout the course of this research. His insights have been instrumental in shaping the direction and success of this study. I also extend my appreciation to the Neuroscience Institute of Psychopathology, Rome, Italy, and the University of Genova, Italy, for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Pablo, R.J., Roberto, D., Victor, S., Isabel, G., Paul, C. and Elizabeth, O. (2021) Big Data in the Healthcare System: A Synergy with Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, 19, Article ID: 20200035. https://doi.org/10.1515/jib-2020-0035
[2]	Li, Y.X. (2017) Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview. arXiv: 1701.07274.
[3]	Zhang, S., Bamakan, S.M.H., Qu, Q. and Li, S. (2019) Learning for Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review from a Deep Learning Perspective. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 12, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2018.2864254
[4]	Yu, C., Liu, J., Nemati, S. and Yin, G. (2021) Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477600
[5]	Farouk, A., Alahmadi, A., Ghose, S. and Mashatan, A. (2020) Blockchain Platform for Industrial Healthcare: Vision and Future Opportunities. Computer Communications, 154, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.058
[6]	Rabah, K. (2018) Convergence of AI, IoT, Big Data and Blockchain: A Review. The Lake Institute Journal, 1, 1-18.
[7]	Firoozjaei, M.D., Lu, R. and Ghorbani, A.A. (2020) An Evaluation Framework for Privacy-Preserving Solutions Applicable for Blockchain-Based Internet-of-Things Platforms. Security and Privacy, 3, e131. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.131
[8]	Di Francesco Maesa, D. and Mori, P. (2020) Blockchain 3.0 Applications Survey. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 138, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.12.019
[9]	Zarrin, J., Wen Phang, H., Babu Saheer, L. and Zarrin, B. (2021) Blockchain for Decentralization of Internet: Prospects, Trends, and Challenges. Cluster Computing, 24, 2841-2866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03301-8
[10]	Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J.L., Hernandez-Ramos, J.L., Torres Moreno, R. and Skarmeta, A. (2019) Privacy-preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges. IEEE Access, 7, 164908-164940. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2950872
[11]	Bhutta, M.N.M., Khwaja, A.A., Nadeem, A., Ahmad, H.F., Khan, M.K., Hanif, M.A., et al. (2021) A Survey on Blockchain Technology: Evolution, Architecture and Security. IEEE Access, 9, 61048-61073. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3072849
[12]	Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Chen, X. and Wang, H. (2018) Blockchain Challenges and Opportunities: A Survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14, 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwgs.2018.095647
[13]	Firouzi, F., Farahani, B., Daneshmand, M., Grise, K., Song, J., Saracco, R., et al. (2021) Harnessing the Power of Smart and Connected Health to Tackle COVID-19: IoT, AI, Robotics, and Blockchain for a Better World. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, 12826-12846. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2021.3073904
[14]	Hassan, M.U., Rehmani, M.H. and Chen, J. (2019) Privacy Preservation in Blockchain Based IoT Systems: Integration Issues, Prospects, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 512-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.060
[15]	Thieme, A., Belgrave, D. and Doherty, G. (2020) Machine Learning in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the HCI Literature to Support the Development of Effective and Implementable ML Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27, 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3398069
[16]	Tyagi, A.K., Aswathy, S.U. and Abraham, A. (2020) Integrating Blockchain Technology and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies Perspectives Challenges and Research Directions. Journal of Information Assurance and Security, 15, 1554.
[17]	Xuan, T.R. and Ness, S. (2023) Integration of Blockchain and AI: Exploring Application in the Digital Business. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 25, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i8955
[18]	Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M. and Monahan, J. (2000) Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001
[19]	Wankhade, M., Rao, A.C.S. and Kulkarni, C. (2022) A Survey on Sentiment Analysis Methods, Applications, and Challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 5731-5780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10144-1
[20]	Mechanic, D. and Meyer, S. (2000) Concepts of Trust among Patients with Serious Illness. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00014-9
[21]	Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., Vidal, M., et al. (2020) Bias in Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Systems—An Introductory Survey. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10, e1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1356
[22]	Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V. and Kazancoglu, Y. (2021) Blockchain Technology and the Circular Economy: Implications for Sustainability and Social Responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, Article ID: 126130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130
[23]	Hussain, A.A. and Al-Turjman, F. (2021) Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: A Review. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32, e4268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4268
[24]	Ren, Y., Leng, Y., Zhu, F., Wang, J. and Kim, H. (2019) Data Storage Mechanism Based on Blockchain with Privacy Protection in Wireless Body Area Network. Sensors, 19, Article 2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102395
[25]	Taherdoost, H. (2022) Blockchain Technology and Artificial Intelligence Together: A Critical Review on Applications. Applied Sciences, 12, Article 12948. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412948
[26]	Lemieux, V.L. (2022) Searching for Trust: Blockchain Technology in an Age of Disinformation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108877350
[27]	Tang, Y., Xiong, J., Becerril-Arreola, R. and Iyer, L. (2019) Ethics of Blockchain: A Framework of Technology, Applications, Impacts, and Research Directions. Information Technology & People, 33, 602-632. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-10-2018-0491
[28]	Highhouse, S. (2002) Assessing the Candidate as a Whole: A Historical and Critical Analysis of Individual Psychological Assessment for Personnel Decision Making. Personnel Psychology, 55, 363-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00114.x
[29]	Ahangari, S., Jeihani, M., Ardeshiri, A., Rahman, M.M. and Dehzangi, A. (2021) Enhancing the Performance of a Model to Predict Driving Distraction with the Random Forest Classifier. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675, 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211018695
[30]	Olaronke, I. and Ojerinde, O. (2016) Big Data in Healthcare: Prospects, Challenges and Resolutions. 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC), San Francisco, 6-7 December 2016, 1152-1157. IEEE,. https://doi.org/10.1109/FTC.2016.7821747
[31]	Oluchi Anyanwu, G., Nwakanma, C.I., Lee, J. and Kim, D. (2023) Optimization of RBF-SVM Kernel Using Grid Search Algorithm for DDoS Attack Detection in SDN-Based VANET. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10, 8477-8490. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3199712
[32]	Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Pratap Singh, R. and Suman, R. (2022) Medical 4.0 Technologies for Healthcare: Features, Capabilities, and Applications. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 2, 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001
[33]	Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2023) Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation. Information Fusion, 99, Article ID: 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896
[34]	Rao, U.P., Shukla, P.K., Trivedi, C., Gupta, S. and Shibeshi, Z.S. (2021) Blockchain for Information Security and Privacy. CRC Press.
[35]	Kshetri, N. (2017) Blockchain's Roles in Strengthening Cybersecurity and Protecting Privacy. Telecommunications Policy, 41, 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.003
[36]	Axon, L., Goldsmith, M. and Creese, S. (2018) Privacy Requirements in Cybersecurity Applications of Blockchain. Advances in Computers, 111, 229-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.03.004
[37]	Jin, H., Luo, Y., Li, P. and Mathew, J. (2019) A Review of Secure and Privacy-Preserving Medical Data Sharing. IEEE Access, 7, 61656-61669. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2916503
[38]	Makhdoom, I., Zhou, I., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J. and Ni, W. (2020) Privysharing: A Blockchain-Based Framework for Privacy-Preserving and Secure Data Sharing in Smart Cities. Computers & Security, 88, Article ID: 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101653
[39]	Salah, K., Rehman, M.H.U., Nizamuddin, N. and Al-Fuqaha, A. (2019) Blockchain for AI: Review and Open Research Challenges. IEEE Access, 7, 10127-10149. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2890507
[40]	Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K.N. and Hamouda, A.M. (2023) Re-thinking Data Strategy and Integration for Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, Opportunities, and Challenges. Applied Sciences, 13, Article 7082. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127082
[41]	Johnsen, M. (2020) Blockchain in Digital Marketing: A New Paradigm of Trust. Maria Johnsen.
[42]	Tiwari, A., Chugh, A. and Sharma, A. (2023) Uses of Artificial Intelligence with Human-Computer Interaction in Psychology. In: Khan, S.B., et al., Eds., Innovations in Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction in the Digital Era, Elsevier, 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-99891-8.00003-6
[43]	Jabarulla, M.Y. and Lee, H. (2021) A Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence-Based, Patient-Centric Healthcare System for Combating the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Applications. Healthcare, 9, Article 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081019
[44]	Zaabar, B., Cheikhrouhou, O., Jamil, F., Ammi, M. and Abid, M. (2021) Healthblock: A Secure Blockchain-Based Healthcare Data Management System. Computer Networks, 200, Article ID: 108500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108500
[45]	Johnson, K.B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M.E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., et al. (2020) Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clinical and Translational Science, 14, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12884
[46]	Tagde, P., Tagde, S., Bhattacharya, T., Tagde, P., Chopra, H., Akter, R., et al. (2021) Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 52810-52831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16223-0
[47]	McCourt, B., Harrington, R.A., Fox, K., Hamilton, C.D., Booher, K., Hammond, W.E., et al. (2007) Data Standards: At the Intersection of Sites, Clinical Research Networks, and Standards Development Initiatives. Drug Information Journal, 41, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150704100313
[48]	Zhang, D., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q. and Zhang, Y. (2022) A Secure and Privacy-Preserving Medical Data Sharing via Consortium Blockchain. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, Article ID: 2759787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2759787
[49]	Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O. and Topol, E.J. (2022) AI in Health and Medicine. Nature Medicine, 28, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0
[50]	American College of Legal Medicine and American Board of Legal Medicine (2024) Legal Medicine: Health Care Law and Medical Ethics-INK: Health Care Law and Medical Ethics. Elsevier.
[51]	Brandl, B., Dyer, C.B., Heisler, C.J., Otto, J.M., Stiegel, L.A. and Thomas, R.W. (2006) Elder Abuse Detection and Intervention: A Collaborative Approach. Springer.
[52]	Zhu, P., Hu, J., Zhang, Y. and Li, X. (2020) A Blockchain Based Solution for Medication Anti-Counterfeiting and Traceability. IEEE Access, 8, 184256-184272. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3029196
[53]	Elshenraki, H.N. (2023) Forecasting Cyber Crimes in the Age of the Metaverse. IGI Global.
[54]	Snavely, N., Simon, I., Goesele, M., Szeliski, R. and Seitz, S.M. (2010) Scene Reconstruction and Visualization from Community Photo Collections. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98, 1370-1390. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2049330
[55]	DeBrabander, F. (2020) Life after Privacy: Reclaiming Democracy in a Surveillance Society. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868280
[56]	Khan, F. (2023) Regulating the Revolution: A Legal Roadmap to Optimizing AI in Healthcare. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 25, 49.
[57]	Fahim, S., Katibur Rahman, S. and Mahmood, S. (2023) Blockchain: A Comparative Study of Consensus Algorithms Pow, Pos, Poa, Pov. International Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, 9, 46-57. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmsc.2023.03.04
[58]	Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Bulysheva, L. and Kataev, M.Y. (2022) Applications of Blockchain in Industry 4.0: A Review. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10248-7
[59]	Tan, T.M. and Saraniemi, S. (2022) Trust in Blockchain-Enabled Exchanges: Future Directions in Blockchain Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51, 914-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00889-0
[60]	Scheibner, J., Raisaro, J.L., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J.R., Ienca, M., Fellay, J., Vayena, E., et al. (2021) Revolutionizing Medical Data Sharing Using Advanced Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: Technical, Legal, and Ethical Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23, e25120. https://doi.org/10.2196/25120
[61]	Ducrée, J., Etzrodt, M., Bartling, S., Walshe, R., Harrington, T., Wittek, N., et al. (2021) Unchaining Collective Intelligence for Science, Research, and Technology Development by Blockchain-Boosted Community Participation. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4, Article 631648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.631648
[62]	Gabriel, O.T. (2023) Data Privacy and Ethical Issues in Collecting Health Care Data Using Artificial Intelligence among Health Workers. Master’s Thesis, Center for Bio-ethics and Research.
[63]	Baz, M., Khatri, S., Baz, A., Alhakami, H., Agrawal, A. and Ahmad Khan, R. (2022) Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Defeat COVID-19 Pandemic. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 40, 691-702. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2022.019079
[64]	Williamson, S.M. and Prybutok, V. (2024) Balancing Privacy and Progress: A Review of Privacy Challenges, Systemic Oversight, and Patient Perceptions in AI-Driven Healthcare. Applied Sciences, 14, Article 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020675
[65]	Gill, S.S., Tuli, S., Xu, M., Singh, I., Singh, K.V., Lindsay, D., et al. (2019) Transformative Effects of IoT, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence on Cloud Computing: Evolution, Vision, Trends and Open Challenges. Internet of Things, 8, Article ID: 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100118
[66]	Nawari, N.O. and Ravindran, S. (2019) Blockchain and the Built Environment: Potentials and Limitations. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, Article ID: 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100832
[67]	Mäki, N. (2020) Between Peace and Technology—A Case Study on Opportunities and Responsible Design of Artificial Intelligence in Peace Technology.