[1]
|
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R., (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1945-1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305
|
[2]
|
Becu-Robinault, K. (2002). Modelling activities of students during a traditional labwork. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 51-64). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[3]
|
Berland, L., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55. doi:10.1002/sce.20286
|
[4]
|
Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Gunstone, R. F., & Loughran, J. J., (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45, 27-31.
|
[5]
|
Bisdikian, G., & Psillos, D. (2002). Enhancing the Linking of theoretical Knowledge to physical phenomena by real-time graphing. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 193-204). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[6]
|
Blalock, H. M. (1987). Social statistics, Singapore City: McGraw-Hill.
|
[7]
|
Buty, C., Tiberghien, A., & Le Maréchal, J.-F. (2004): Learning hypotheses and an associated tool to design and to analyse teachinglearning sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 579-604. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614735
|
[8]
|
Buty, C. (2002). Modelling in geometrical optics using a microcomputer. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 231-242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[9]
|
Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perez, J. A. (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 77-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[10]
|
Driver, R. H., Asoko, J., Leach, E., Mortimer, P., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom, Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
|
[11]
|
Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
doi:10.1080/03057260208560187
|
[12]
|
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
|
[13]
|
Erickson, B., & Nosanchuk, T. (1985). Understanding data. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
|
[14]
|
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teacher Journal, 41, 26-32.
|
[15]
|
Giddings, G. J., Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1991). Assessment and evaluation in the science laboratory. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.). Practical science (pp. 167-178). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
|
[16]
|
Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In B. E. Woolnough, (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 67-77). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
|
[17]
|
Hodson, D. (1991) Practical work in science: Time for a reappraisal. Studies in Science Education, 19, 175-184.
doi:10.1080/03057269108559998
|
[18]
|
H?gstr?m, P., Ottander, C. & Benckert, S. (2010). Labwork and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40, 505-523.
doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3
|
[19]
|
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217.
|
[20]
|
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V, N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
doi:10.1002/sce.10106
|
[21]
|
Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory—A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47-62. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070342
|
[22]
|
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Naaman-Mamlok, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791-806. doi:10.1002/tea.20072
|
[23]
|
Hucke, L. & Fischer, H. E. (2002). The link of theory and practice in traditional and in computer-based university laboratory experiments. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 205-218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[24]
|
Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94-130). New York: Macmillan.
|
[25]
|
Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B, & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.003101
|
[26]
|
Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In K. Tobin, & B. Fraser (Eds.). International handbook of science education (pp. 249-264). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_16
|
[27]
|
Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007), Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman, & S. Abel (Eds,), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
[28]
|
McComas, W. E. (1997). The nature of the laboratory experience: A guide for describing, classifying and enhancing hands-on activities. CSTA Journal (spring), 6-9.
|
[29]
|
Millar, R., Tiberghien, A. & Le Maréchal, J. F. (2002). Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 9-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[30]
|
Nakhleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, E. (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. In J. K. Gilbert et al., (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 69-94). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[31]
|
Niedderer, H., Tiberghien, A., Buty, C., Haller, K., Hucke, L., Sander, F., Fischer, H. E., Schecker, H. V., Aufschnaiter, S., & Welzel, M. (1998). Category Based Analysis of Videotapes from labwork (CBAV)—the method and results from four case studies. Working paper 9 from the European project labwork in science education (Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme, Project PL 95-2005).
|
[32]
|
Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Interactive patterns and convergence of meaning during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 634-658.
doi:10.1002/tea.20211
|
[33]
|
Osborne, J. (1993). Alternatives to practical work. School Science Review, 75, 117-123.
|
[34]
|
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035
|
[35]
|
Pickering, M. (1980). Are lab courses a waste of time? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19, 80.
|
[36]
|
Psillos, D., & Niedderer, H. (2002). Issues and questions regarding the effectiveness of labwork. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 21-30), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[37]
|
Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning science: A singular plural perspective. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
|
[38]
|
Rop, C. J. (1998). Student perspectives on success in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 221-237.
|
[39]
|
Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W.-M. (1996). Interactional processes in a constructivist physics lab. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 423-445. doi:10.1080/0950069960180403
|
[40]
|
Sampson, V. (2009). The impact of argument-driven inquiry on three scientific practices. The Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Garden Grove, CA: National Association of Research in Science Teaching.
|
[41]
|
Sander, F., Schecker, H., & Niedderer, H. (2002). Computer tools in the lab—Effects linking theory and experiment. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 219-230). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[42]
|
Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. Schwab, & P. Brandwein (Eds.). The Teaching of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
[43]
|
Skoumios, M. (2009). The effect of sociocognitive conflict on students’ dialogic argumentation about floating and sinking. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 381-399.
|
[44]
|
Skoumios, M., & Hatzinikita, V. (2008). Investigating the structure and the content of pupils’ written explanations during science teaching sequences focused on conceptual obstacles. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1, 135-155.
|
[45]
|
Skoumios, M., & Passalis, N. (2010). Chemistry laboratory activities: The link between practice and theory. The International Journal of Learning, 17, 101-114.
|
[46]
|
They?en, H. V., Aufschnaiter, S., & Schumacher, D. (2002). Development and evaluation of a laboratory course in physics for medical students. In D. Psillos, & H. Niederrer (Eds.). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 91-104). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
[47]
|
Tiberghien, A. (2000) Designing teaching situations in the secondary school. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds). Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 27-47). Buckingham: Open University Press.
|
[48]
|
Tiberghien, A., Veillard, L., Le Maréchal, J. F., Buty, C., & Millar, R. (2001). An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries. Science Education, 85, 483-508. doi:10.1002/sce.1020
|
[49]
|
Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418.
doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb17229.x
|
[50]
|
Toothacker, W. S. (1983). A critical look at introductory laboratory instruction. American Journal of Physics, 51, 516-520.
doi:10.1119/1.13220
|
[51]
|
Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science. Time for a reappraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.). Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3-15). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203267059
|