A Study on Mechanical Properties of PMMA/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite
S. M. Zebarjad, S. A Sajjadi, T. Ebrahimi Sdrabadi, S. A Sajjadi, A Yaghmaei, B Naderi
.
DOI: 10.4236/eng.2011.38096   PDF    HTML     13,823 Downloads   24,380 Views   Citations

Abstract

This study is focused on the role of nano hydroxyapatite particles on the mechanical properties of PMMA/HA nanocomposites. In order to achieve a proper and homogeneous distribution of HA particles in the polymer matrix, mixer milling process was applied. Wear, compression and three-point bending tests were conducted. It was observed that wear rate decreased by increasing in HA content in both atmosphere and artificial saliva. The results of compression tests showed that the addition of 2.5 percent HA to PMMA promoted ultimate compressive strength, yield strength and modulus while caused to decrease elongation at break. Also it was elucidated that addition of HA more than 2.5 wt.% caused a decrease in both ultimate compressive strength and compression yield strength and an increase in elongation at break. The results of three-point bending tests on the PMMA cements containing 2.5 percent HA demonstrated the maximum bending strength value and modulus among all the HA containing formulations. However there was no direct proportionality between the results of bending tests and the HA content and the addition of HA to PMMA (up to 10 wt.%) did not change the bending properties significantly.

Share and Cite:

Zebarjad, S. , Sajjadi, S. , Sdrabadi, T. , Sajjadi, S. , Yaghmaei, A. and Naderi, B. (2011) A Study on Mechanical Properties of PMMA/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite. Engineering, 3, 795-801. doi: 10.4236/eng.2011.38096.

1. Introduction

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is widely used as bone cement to secure orthopedic implants to the skeleton [1]. Because of its limited mechanical properties and poor compatibility with bone, the clinical use of this cement is accompanied by complications. Some examples of these limitations are brittleness and shrinkage of PMMA, void production in processing [2-4], lack of adherence to the bone [5,6] and exothermic reaction of polymerization which can damage bone tissue [7,8]. To improve the noted deficiencies several investigators have studied bioceramic-reinforced polymer composite materials [9-12]. Hydroxyapatite (HA)-reinforced polymer composites are instances of these materials that can be used as bone cement, filling bone defects, coating of joint replacement prosthesis and dental implants [13]. Several investigators have studied HA-reinforced PMMA (PM-MA/HA) as a potential bone cement [10,14-16]. In fact addition of HA to the bone cement can improve biocompatibility and also enhance the mechanical properties of the cement because of its both biocompatibility and osteoconductivity [17-20]. Depending on HA amount added, mechanical and thermal properties of the cement can differ [21]. It is also reported that size and surface properties of the particles can increase or decrease the mechanical properties of the bone cement [12,22]. Vallo et al. [23] indicated that addition of up to 15 wt% HA to a commercially available PMMA-based bone cement can improve the flexural modulus but with this amount of HA, the tensile and compressive strengths have been observed to remain constant in PMMA base cement. The fracture toughness of HA-reinforced PMMA has been observed to be increased by addition of 40 wt% HA [24]. Moursi et al. [25] have used three point bending test to investigate the effect of addition of HA on mechanical properties of PMMA cement. It is indicated that the presence of HA can increase the ultimate stress of PMMA from 4-44 MPa to 11 - 83 MPa. Kim et al. [11] produced a new bioactive bone cement that consists of HA, PMMA and chitosan. It was indicated that compressive strength of the cement was lower than the pure PMMA. Mechanical properties of acrylic base cements reinforced with HA have been studied by Serbetci et al. [12]. It was found that addition of HA caused to increase both compressive strength and fatigue life unlike tensile strength of the cement.

Wang et al. [26] and Roeder et al. [27] studied the effects of particle size and shape, and found that smaller particle size and larger aspect ratio increased the composite mechanical properties. Because there are few papers that study about addition of nano hydroxyapatite in PMMA, this study tries to fill this gap. In this research, mechanical properties of nano HA-reinforced PMMA cement were investigated by using three point bending, compressive and wear test.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials

Cold-cure Acrylic powder (Acropars, Marlic) and Methyl Methacrylate (Acropars, Marlic) were used to produce Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as the polymeric base of composite. Hydroxyapatite nano powders (catalogue No. 2196, Merck) were used as reinforcement phase (Figure 1).

2.2. Sample Preparation

For the preparation of samples, weighed amounts of PMMA and HA powders were mixed by a mixer mill (Retsich MM400, Germany) for 10 min with a vibration frequency of 20 s−1. The weight ratio of balls to powders was kept constant 8 (60 gram balls and 7.5 gram powders). After mixer milling, the same ratio of the solid/ liquid components were used in the preparation of compositions. The solid part was consisted of the mixed PMMA and HA powders and the liquid part was consisted of the PMMA monomer, the inhibitor and the catalyst. The weight ratio of the solid/liquid components was kept 5/3.5 in all samples. For the cement dough preparation, the powder and the liquid parts were manually mixed together for 30 sec at temperature of 25˚C ± 1˚C and the homogeneous dough obtained was kept for 2 - 4 min (depended on the sample) to reach the sticky state. In this step the dough was molded using compression molding method. After passing about 15 min the dough was hardened and the sample was ejected from the mold. The compositions of the samples are shown in Table 1.

To observe both size and shape of nano size hydroxyapatite powders, a transmission electron microscope, LEO 919 AB, was used. Figure 1 shows transmission electron microscope micrograph from nano size hydroxyapatite. These nano powders are flake in shape and their average size is about 50 nm. The purity of hydroxyapatite nano powders that are used in this research was 99%.

2.3. Mechanical Evaluation

Three kind of mechanical tests have been utilized to evaluate the properties of PMMA/nano-hydroxyapatite composites. Three-point bending, compression and wear tests were used. In three-point bending test, for each formulation 5 samples were tested with the strain rate of 5 mm/min. The dimensions of the samples were 3.3 × 10 × 64 mm and the. 5 samples were also used for each formulation in compressive strength test. The load rate was 2 mm/min and the dimensions of the samples were 4 × 4 × 8 mm. In both tests universal tensile machine Zwick model was utilized. For each run, 3 samples were tested and the average values were tabulated.

In this research, the wear test method of pin on disc was utilized. 5 samples were tested for each formulation (according to Table 1). Each sample prepared with base area of 4 mm2 and 10 mm height which was attached to a

Figure 1. TEM micrograph of nano sized hydroxyapatite.

Table 1. The details of the composition of each composite sample.

removable sample holder with cyanoacrylate glue. In the current study a special wear device was developed. The device was consisted of an aluminum holder that can freely move up and down to allow specimens to be under a certain force at all times during the tests. The device rotated one orbit per second and number of turns recorded digitally for each run. A brass cup with interior diameter of 26 mm was utilized as container of artificial saliva and as holder of abrasive plate (Al2O3 abrasive plate with diameter of 25 mm, Dedeco, #309-0009). The device is shown in Figure 2. Each specimen was abraded by 5000 and 10,000 orbits. Samples were weighted with the accuracy of ±0.00001 g before and after testing. Two conditions were used for this test: 5 cc Fusayama Meyer artificial saliva [28] and atmosphere. After each 5000 and 10,000 orbits, both saliva and abrasive plates were replaced, samples weights were measured and wear rate was calculated by the following formula

Wear Rate =

where is the difference of weight measurement before and after each 5000 and 10,000 orbits and L (in meter) is the distance for each 5000 and 10,000 rotations  can be calculated as follows,

Chewing stress on occlusal surface of teeth is varying between 0.8 - 1.75 MPa [29]. Thus in this research we used the force of 4 N to obtain 1 MPa stress on specimens.

Figure 2. Wear device which was used in this investigation.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Compression Test

Surgical PMMA cement is brittle in nature. Like all other brittle materials, it is weak under tension but quite strong in compression, and is capable of yielding under uniaxial compression. The main direction of load on bone cement in a total hip implant is compression, and therefore the measurements of compression yield strength values of the prepared cements are very important [30].

The average values of ultimate compressive strength (σC), elongation at break (εfC), compressive elastic modulus (EC) and compression yield strength (σy) of the cement samples are given in Table 2. The schematic figure of these values is shown in Figure 3.

According to the results, PMMA cements containing 2.5 percent HA had the maximum value of ultimate compressive strength, elastic modulus of compression and compression yield strength among all other formulations. Also the minimum value of elongation at break was also in this sample. It was observed that HA addition more than 2.5 wt% caused a decrease of ultimate compressive strength and compression yield strength. In elongation at break results, it was observed that HA addition more than 2.5 wt% caused an increase in these values. Although the results of elongation at break were

Table 2. The results of the compression test of each composite sample.

Figure 3. The values of ultimate compressive strength (σC), elongation at break (εfC), compressive elastic modulus (EC) and compression yield strength (σy) of the cement samples.

very close to each other, and there was no direct proportionality between the results of elastic modulus of compression and the HA content.

In most, but not all, composites, ultimate compressive strength decreases with increasing filler content and average particle size. The decrease in ultimate compressive strength and compression yield strength can be explained as follows. During the setting and cooling stage of PMMA, since the shrinkage of PMMA matrix is more than the shrinkage of HA particles, HA particles would be firmly entrapped and squeezed in the PMMA matrix. As a result of this, a circumferential tensile stress forms in the bone cement matrix that is adjacent to HA particles. This stress is a hoop stress and it simulates the case of weak bonding between HA particles and PMMA matrix (Figure 4) [30]. In the case of load application, the HA particles in the continuous phase of PMMA constitute a second phase, and the interface between the two phases acts like a grain boundary resisting propagation of a crack. A friction force that is opposite to the direction of the crack initiating force will be present at the edges of the crack. The hoop stress is still present at that site, but the magnitude of the friction force is probably higher than the circumferential force. The hoop stress helps the crack edges to be separated (Figure 5) [30]. The weak bonding area produced between these two phases may cause a decrease in ultimate compressive strength and compression yield strength.

Figure 4. Mechanism of the formation of mechanical bonding between bone cement matrix and HA particle [30].

Figure 5. Effect of loading direction on crack propagation in compressive loading [30].

In addition, this is in accordance with the reports that addition of HA without any chemical treatment decreased the mechanical strength of the bone cement. The observed compressive behavior can be explained by the degree of adhesion between the HA articles and the matrix. Poor adhesion between the components causes a decrease in yield stress as if the system is filled with voids. HA nanoparticles behave as load carriers leading to good mechanical properties if they are present in small amounts and distributed homogeneously in the cement dough (like PMMA-2.5HA sample). If the proportion of the HA particles increases, this could lead to non-homogeneous distribution and, therefore, aggregation of particles may occur. This may cause phase segregation and non-homogeneity in the structure and poor adhesion to the matrix leading to a decrease in the compressive strength [30].

Except elastic modulus of compression that it’s values were very close to each other, all the other values (σC, εfC and σy) decreased by applying the mixer milling process (PMMA-neat and PMMA samples). It can be inferred that the changes take place in polymer structure through milling cause the changes of compression parameters significantly.

3.2. Three-Point Bending Test

The average values of ultimate bending strength (σb), elongation at break (εfb) and elastic modulus of bending (Eb) are given in Table 3. The schematic figure of these values is shown in Figure 6.

Table 3. The results of the three-point bending test of each composite sample.

Figure 6. The values of ultimate bending strength (σb), elongation at break (εfb) and elastic modulus of bending (Eb) of the cement samples.

PMMA cements containing 2.5 and 10 percents HA demonstrated the maximum bending strength value (67 MPa) among all the HA containing formulations. However there was no direct proportionality between the results of bending strength and the HA content. Furthermore increasing the HA content caused the slight increased of elongation at break. Also the result showed that elastic modulus of bending in PMMA cements containing 2.5 percent HA had the maximum value between the samples. But, there was no direct proportionality between the results of these values and the HA content totally. However the results of ultimate bending strength, elongation at break and elastic modulus of bending were very close to each other. So it can be inferred that the addition of HA to PMMA (up to 10 wt%) did not change the bending properties significantly. But, it can be said that the mixer milling process had the significant effect on increasing of bending strength and elongation at break in PMMA samples (PMMA-neat and PMMA samples). So similar to compression results tests the milling process causes the changes of bending parameters significantly.

3.3. Wear Test

Figure 7 shows the results of wear tests in atmosphere. It can be observed that wear rate decreases by increasing in HA content. This is because of presence of ceramic powders of HA which have high hardness that can improve sliding wear rate [31]. For PMMA/2.5% HA comparing to pure PMMA, this improvement in wear rates is more obvious which emphasis the role of HA in improvement of wear rate. For both 5000 and 10,000 orbit this trend can be observed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] S. Santavirta, M. Takagi, E. Gomez-Barren, J. Nevalainen, J. Lassus, J. Salo and Y. T. Konttinen, “Studies of Host Response to Orthopedic Implants and Biomaterials,” Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol. 9, 1999, pp. 67-76.
[2] G. Lewis, “Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement: State of the Art Review,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1997, pp. 155-182. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<155::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-C
[3] E. J. Harper and W. Bonfield, “Tensile Characteristics of Ten Commercial, Acrylic Bone Cements,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2000, pp. 605-616. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<605::AID-JBM22>3.0.CO;2-5
[4] J. E. Barralet, T. Gaunt, A. J. Wright, I. R. Gibson and J. C. Knowles, “Effect of Porosity by Compaction on Com-pressive Strength and Microstructure of Calcium Phosphate Cement,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1002/jbm.1074
[5] G. Zambonin, S. Colucci, F. Can-tatore and M. Grano, “Response of Human Osteoblasts to Po-lymethylmetacrylate in Vitro,” Calcified Tissue International, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1998, pp. 362-365. doi:10.1007/s002239900445
[6] G. Cunin, H. Boissonnet, H. Petite, C. Blanchat and G. Guillemin, “Experimental Vertebro-plasty Using Osteoconductive Granular Material,” Spine, Vol. 25, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1070-1076. doi:10.1097/00007632-200005010-00006
[7] J. X. Lu, Z. W. Huang and P. Tropiano, “Human Biological Reactions at the Interface between Bone Tissue and Polymethylmethacrylate Cement,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2002, pp. 803-809. doi:10.1023/A:1016135410934
[8] P. F. Heini, B. Walchli and U. Berlemann, “Percutaneous Transpedicular Vertebro-plasty with PMMA: Operative Technique and Early Results,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2000, pp. 445-450. doi:10.1007/s005860000182
[9] S. Shinzato, T. Nakamura, T. Kokubo and Y. Kitamura, “Bioactive Bone Cement: Effect of Silane Treatment on Mechanical Properties and Osteoconduc-tivity,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2001, pp. 277-284. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<277::AID-JBM1015>3.0.CO;2-5
[10] W. R. Walsh, M. J. Svehla, J. Russell, M. Saito, T. Nakashimac, R. M. Gilliesa, W. Brucea and R. Hori, “Cemented Fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA Resin Hy-droxyapatite Cement: Effect of Implant Surface Roughness,” Biomaterials, Vol. 25, No. 20, 2004, pp. 4929- 4934. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.020
[11] K. S. Bong, K. Y. Jick, Y. T. Lim nd A. P. Su, “The Characteristics of a Hy-droxyapatite-Chitosan-PMMA Bone Cement,” Biomaterials, Vol. 25, No. 26, 2004, pp. 5715-5723.
[12] K. Serbetci, F. Korkusuz and N. Hasirci, “Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Acrylic Bone Cements,” Poly-mer Testing, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2004, pp. 145-155. doi:10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00073-4
[13] S. Morita, K. Fu-ruya, K. Ishihara and N. Nakabayashi, “Performance of Adhe-sive Bone Cement Containing Hydroxyapatite Particles,” Bio-materials, Vol. 19, No. 17, 1998, pp. 1601-1606. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00120-8
[14] T. W. Bauer and J. Schils, “The Pathology of Total Joint Arthroplasty.I. Mecha-nisms of Implant Fixation,” Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1999, pp. 423-432. doi:10.1007/s002560050541
[15] S. Shinzato, M. Kobayashi, W. F. Mousa, M. Kamimura, M. Neo, Y. Kitamura, T. Kokubo and T. Nakamura, “Bioactive Polymethyl Methacrylate-Based Bone Cement: Comparison of Glass Beads, Apatite- and Wol-lastonite-Containing Glassceramic, and Hydroxyapatite Fillers on Mechanical and Biological Properties,” Journal of Bio-medical Materials Research, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2000, pp. 258-272. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200008)51:2<258::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-S
[16] H. Itokawaa, T. Hiraideb, M. Moriyaa, M. Fujimotoa, G. Nagashimaa, R. Suzukia and T. Fujimoto, “A 12 Month in Vivo Study on the Response of Bone to a Hydroxya-patite Polymethylmethacrylate Cranioplasty Composite,” Bio-materials, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2007, pp. 4922-4927. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.001
[17] M. J. Dalby, L. Di Silvio, E. J. Harper and W. Bonfield, “Initial Interaction of Osteoblasts with the Surface of Hydroxyapa-tite-Poly(Methylmethacrylate) Cement,” Biomaterials, Vol. 22, No. 13, 2001, pp. 1739-1747. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00334-3
[18] M. J. Dalby, S. L. Di, E. J. Harper and W. Bonfield, “Increasing Hydroxyapatite Incorporation into Poly (Methylmethacrylate) Cement In-creases Osteoblast Adhesion and Response,” Biomaterials, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2002, pp. 569-576. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00139-9
[19] T. Saito, Y. Kin and T. Koshino, “Osteogenic Response of Hydroxyapatite Cement Implanted into the Femur of Rats with Experimentally Induced Osteoporosis,” Biomaterials, Vol. 23, No. 13, 2002, pp. 2711-2716. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00003-0
[20] R. D. Welch, B. H. Berry, K. Crawford, H. Zhang, M. Zobitz, D. Bronson and S. Krishnan, “Subchondral Defects in Caprine Femora Aug-mented with in Situ Setting Hydroxyapatite Cement, Poly-methylmethacrylate, or Autogenous Bone Graft: Biomechani-cal and Histomorphological Analysis after Two-Years,” Jour-nal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2002, pp. 464-472. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00124-3
[21] K. S. Erbetc, F. Korkusuz and N. Has?rc?, “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Hydroxyapatite-Impregnated Bone Cement,” Turkish Jour-nal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2000, pp. 543-549.
[22] S. Y. Kwon, Y. S. Kim, Y. K. Woo, S. S. Kim and J. B. Park, “Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Bone Cement: In Vitro and in Vivo Studies,” Bio-Medical Materials and Engi-neering, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1997, pp. 129-140.
[23] C. I. Vallo, P. E. Montemartini and M. A. Fanovich, “Polymethylmethacry-late-Based Bone Cement Modified with Hydroxyapatite,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1999, pp. 150-158. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:2<150::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-D
[24] K. Ishihara, H. Arai and N. Nakabayashi, “Ad-hesive Bone Cement Containing Hydroxyapatite Particle as Bone Compatible Filler,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 26, No. 8, 1992, pp. 937-945. doi:10.1002/jbm.820260708
[25] M. M. Amr, A. V. Winnarda, P. L. Winnarda, J. J. Lannuttib and R. R. Seghi, “Enhanced Osteoblast Response to a Polymethylmethacry-late-Hydrox-Yapatite Composite,” Biomaterials, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2002, pp. 133-144. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00088-6
[26] M. Wang, R. Jo-seph and W. Bonfield, “Hydroxyapatite- polyethylene Com-posites for Bone Substitution: Effects of Ceramic Particle Size and Morphology,” Biomaterials, Vol. 19, No. 24, 1998, pp. 2357-2366. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00154-9
[27] R. K. Roeder, M. M. Sproul and C. H. Turner, “Hydroxyapatite Whiskers Provide Improved Mechanical Properties in Reinforced Polymer Com-posites,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Vol. 67A, No. 3, 2003, pp. 801-812. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10140
[28] J. M. Meyer and J. N. Nally, “Influence of Artificial Salivas on the Corrosion of Dental Al-loys,” Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 54, 1975, pp. 678-681.
[29] X. Q. Hu, P. M. Marquis and A. C. Shortall, “Two Body in Vitro Wear Study of Some Current Dental Composites and Amalgam,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 82, No. 2, 1999, pp. 214-220. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70159-9
[30] K. Serbetci, F. Korkusuz and N. Hasirci, “Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Acrylic Bone Cements,” Poly-mer Testing, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2004, pp. 145-155. doi:10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00073-4
[31] A. Dasari, Z. Z. Yu and Y. W. Mai, “Fundamental Aspect and Recent Progress on Wear/Scratch Damage in Polymer Nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering: Reports, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2009, pp. 31-80. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2008.10.001
[32] A. Dasari, “On Toughen-ing and Wear/Scratch Damage in Polymer Nanocomposites,” PhD Thesis, the University of Sydney, Sydney, 2007.
[33] Q. B. Guo, M. Z. Rong, G. L. Jia, K. T. Lau and M. Q. Zhang, “Sliding Wear Performance of Nano-SiO2/Short Carbon Fi-ber/Epoxy Hybrid Composites,” Wear, Vol. 266, No. 7-8, 2009, pp. 658-665. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2008.08.005
[34] L. H. Mair, “Wear in the Mouth: The Tribological Dimension,” M. Addy, Martin Dunitz Ltd., London, 2000, pp. 181-188.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.