Zhang, X., van den Bos, C., Sloof, W.G., Hovestad, A., Terryn, H. and de Wit, J.H.W. (2005) Comparison of the Morphology and Corrosion Performance of Cr(VI) and Cr(III)-Based Conversion Coating on Zinc. Surface and Coatings Technology, 199, 92-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.12.002

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Corrosion Performance of Conversion Treatments for Electrogalvanised Steel Sheet

  AUTHORS: A. R. Di Sarli, C. I. Elsner, L. E. M. Palomino, C. R. Tomachuk

  KEYWORDS: Pre-Treatments, Conversion Coatings, Corrosion, EIS, Electrogalvanised Steel

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Vol.7 No.5, September 25, 2019

  ABSTRACT: Chromate conversion treatments have been widely used due to their excellent corrosion resistance properties; however, their use is increasingly restricted because of the highly toxic chromic acid solutions required, with consequent effluent disposal and ecological problems. The removal of these toxic chemicals is considered a priority within most of the developed countries. In this work, the corrosion resistance of different alternative pretreatments applied on electrogalvanised steel sheet: 1) Cr(III) and Zr complexes layer, 2) Ce(III) layer, 3) Ce(III)/Ce(IV) double layer, 4) Cr(VI) chromating was investigated, and its results compared with those from the tests performed using bare electrogalvanized steel sheets as a substrate. These samples were exposed to aerated 0.05 mol/L NaCl or 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 solutions. The electrochemical behavior of samples was studied by electrochemical techniques. For three days of immersion in the solution test, the experimental results have shown that, compared with the Cr(VI) protective properties, the Cr(III) + Zr complex layer presented similar performance. Even though the initial corrosion resistance was offered by the Ce(III) and Ce(VI)/Ce(III) conversion coatings was relatively good, it quickly decreased as a function of the exposure time.