[1]
|
Anderson, A. (2005). Victorian studies and the two modernities. Victorian Studies, 47, 195-203.
|
[2]
|
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
|
[3]
|
Beer, G. (1965). Charles Kingsley and the literary image of the countryside. Victorian Studies, 43-54.
|
[4]
|
Cazamian, L. (1973). The social novel in England 1830-1850. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
|
[5]
|
Clark, P. (1991). Two hundred flowers on China’s screens. In C. Berry (Ed.), Perspective on Chinese cinema (pp. 40-61). London: BFI Publishing.
|
[6]
|
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
|
[7]
|
Foucault, M. (1998). On the ways of writing history. Robert Hurley and others, Translated. Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane, Penguin, 284.
|
[8]
|
Gagnier, R. (2008). Literary alternatives to rational choice: Historical psychology and semi-detached marriages. English Literature in Transition, 51, 23-43.
|
[9]
|
Gagnier, R., & Delveaux, M. (2006). Towards a global ecology of the Fin de Siècle. Literature Compass, 3, 572-587.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00333.x
|
[10]
|
Guo, T. Dickens on chinese screen. Literature Compass, 8, 795-810.
|
[11]
|
Hawley, J. C. (1989). The water-babies as catechetical paradigm. Children's Literature Association Quarterly, 14, 19-21.
|
[12]
|
Herman, D. (2007). Dialogue in a discourse context: Scenes of talk inn fictional narrative. In B. Michael (Ed.), Narrative-state of the art (p. 208). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
|
[13]
|
Hu, H.-L. (1999). On the paradigm shifting and reconstruction of modern China’s cultural policies. Journal of Shanghai JiaoTong Unive sity (Social Science), 7, 110-115.
|
[14]
|
John, J. (2012). Global Dickens: A response to John Jordan. Literature Compass, 9, 502-507. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2012.00895.x
|
[15]
|
Jordan, J. O. (2009). Global Dickens. Literature Compass, 6, 1211- 1223. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00664.x
|
[16]
|
Kijinski, J. L. (1985).Charles Kingsley’s yeast: Brotherhood and the condition of England. Victorian Institute Journal, 97-109.
|
[17]
|
Kingsley, C. (1851). Yeast: A problem. London: Parker.
|
[18]
|
Llewellyn, M. (2008). What is Neo-Victorian studies? Neo-Victorian Studies, 1, 164-185.
|
[19]
|
Maynard, M., & Purvis, J. (1994). Researching women's loves from a feminist perspective. London: Taylor & Frances.
|
[20]
|
Murfin, R., & Ray, S. (1998). The bedford glossary of critical and literary terms. St Martins: Bedford Books.
|
[21]
|
Sanders, V. (2007). Where next in victorian literary studies? Historicism, collaboration and digital editing. Literature Compass, 4, 1292- 1302.
|
[22]
|
Scott, P. (1983) Charles Kingsley. In I. B. Nadel, & W. E. Fredeman (Eds.), Victorian novelists before 1885. Dictionary of Literary Biography (pp. 195-207). Detroit: Gale Research.
|
[23]
|
Sherry, S. (2010). Censorship in translation in the Soviet Union: The manipulative rewriting of howard fast’s novel. The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti, Slavonica, 16, 1-14.
|
[24]
|
Simpson, G. (1982). Origins and growth of sociological theory. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
|
[25]
|
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. New York: Routledge.
|
[26]
|
Stanzel, F. K. (1984). A theory of narrative. Goedsche, G., Translated. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[27]
|
Yin, Q. P. (2007).The artistic form of Yeast. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanity and Social Sciences), 37, 186-192.
|