[1]
|
Austin, J. (1832). The province of jurisprudence determined. London: John Murray
|
[2]
|
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press
|
[3]
|
Béland, J. P., Patenaude, J., Legault, G. A., Boissy, P., & Parent, M. (2011). The social and ethical acceptability of NBICs for purposes of human enhancement: Why does the debate continue to be mired in impasse? NanoEthics, 5, 295-307. doi:10.1007/s11569-011-0133-z
|
[4]
|
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Stilwell, KS: Digireads.com Books
|
[5]
|
Dewey, J. (1892). Green’s theory of the moral motive. Philosophical Review, 1, 593-612. doi:10.2307/2175919
|
[6]
|
Dewey, J. (1986). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
|
[7]
|
Dupuy, J. P. (2007). Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundation of nanoethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32, 237-261.
doi:10.1080/03605310701396992
|
[8]
|
Fenton, E. (2006). Liberal eugenics and human nature: Against Habermas. Hastings Center Report, 6, 35-42.
|
[9]
|
Gouvernement du Québec, & Commission de L’éthique de la Science et de la Technologie (2006). Position statement: Ethics and nanotechnology: A basis for action. URL (last checked 18 November 2011).
http://www.ethique.gouv.qc.ca/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=23&lang=fr
|
[10]
|
Fletcher, J. (1966). Situation ethics: The new morality. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.
|
[11]
|
Hunyadi, M. (2003). Pourquoi avons nous besoin du raisonnement de précaution? Esprit, 297, 139-162.
|
[12]
|
Habermas, J. (2002). Vers un eugénisme liberal ? Esprit, 126-137.
|
[13]
|
Legault, G. A. (1999). Professionnalisme et déliberation éthique. Québec: Presses de L’Université du Québec.
|
[14]
|
Legault, G. A., Bernier, L., Daniel, C. E., Fontaine, C., & Patenaude, J. (2012). Nanotechnologies et principe de précaution: Forces et limites de l’appel au principe. Québec: P.U.L.
|
[15]
|
Patenaude, J., Legault, G. A., Parent, M., & Béland, J. P. (2011). Moral arguments in the debate over nanotechnologies: Are we talking past each other? NanoEthics, 5, 285-293. doi:10.1007/s11569-011-0132-0
|
[16]
|
Putnam, H. (1992). Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
[17]
|
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press MIT.
|
[18]
|
Quine, W. V. O. (1961). From a logical point of view. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
[19]
|
Quine, W. V. O. (1978). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
|
[20]
|
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press.
|
[21]
|
Swierstra, T., & Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics, 1, 3-20. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
|
[22]
|
Toulmin, S. (1981). The tyranny of principles. Hastings Center Report, 11, 31-39. doi:10.2307/3560542
|
[23]
|
Toulmin, S. (1988). The recovery of practical philosophy. American Scholar, 57, 337-352.
|