1. Introduction
Heavy metals are inorganic pollutants frequently found in the wastewaters of several industries such as electroplating, mining, metal processing, petroleum refining, textile, tanneries, paint manufacture, pesticides, battery manufacturing, pigment manufacture, photographic industries and printing [1] [2] [3] . These inorganic pollutants have a negative impact on the environment and modify the physical and chemical characteristics of water and soil [4] [5] , and the properties of aquatic fauna and flora [6] . Furthermore, the presence of heavy metal ions in industrial wastewater, irrigation and drinking water resources has also high negative impacts on human health due to their toxicity [7] . So the elimination of these heavy metals from wastewaters is one of the most important environmental problems for research, engineering and technology development on water management in environment [8] [9] .
The purification of heavy metals contaminated wastewaters can be realized by chemical precipitation [8] , ions exchanges membranes [10] , electrochemical systems [11] [12] , electrodialysis [13] , coagulation-flocculation [14] [15] and removal by materials adsorption [16] [17] . This last method is very economic and efficient to improve the water quality. In this aim, different materials have been used to adsorb heavy metals, such as activated sludge [18] , synthetic adsorbents [19] [20] , biosorbents [21] and clays [22] [23] . The adsorbent materials must be cheap, easy to operate and simple for design.
The objective of this study is to develop cheap and effective adsorbents from the biological wastes, such as cow bone, to replace the classical commercial adsorbents. So cow bone from which the bone charcoal was derived, is used as an adsorbent and investigated for its adsorption properties towards copper ions. The influences of different experimental parameters, such as the amount of BC and the contact time, have been investigated. Different kinetics models were also applied to fit the experimental data.
2. Materials
2.1. Adsorbate
A stock of copper solution (888.7 ppm) was prepared by dissolving CuSO4∙5H2O in distilled water.
2.2. Sample Preparation
Cortical bovines have been collected from the local slaughter houses in Sfax, Tunisia. The bone samples have been washed and cleaned using boiling method to eliminate organic substances and collagen, to avoid soot developing in the material during the pyrolysis process. Cow bones were boiled in water for 3 h at 99.5˚C. Then the water was eliminated and the bones were washed using fresh water [24] . At this moment, the bones were dried in an oven at 80˚C. The dried bones were crushed and milled into different particle sizes and after calcined for 2 h at 800˚C with a mixture of oxygen/nitrogen (25/75 vol%) [25] . The resulting material was denominated as Bone Charcoal (BC). The resulted BC was crushed again and refined to obtain a powder with particles sizes < 50 µm and finally stored in hermetic bottles for subsequent uses.
2.3. Instrumental
Carbonization was carried out in a vertical stainless-steel reactor (length = 170 mm, internal diameter = 22 mm), which was placed into a cylindrical electric furnace Nabertherm. Mineralogical analysis of the BC sample was realized by X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8) and showed the characteristic peaks of amorphous carbon [26] . An IR transmittance spectrum of the BC sample was carried out in the 500 - 2000 cm−1 range using a SHIMATZU IR 470 spectrometer. The specific surface area (m2/g) of BC was determined from nitrogen adsorption-de- sorption isotherm with the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The macroporous volume of BC was measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry (Joschek et al., 2000). The concentration of copper was carried out by atomic absorption spectrometry (HITACHI Z-6100).
3. Methods
3.1. Adsorption Experiments
The adsorption experiments were determined according to the batch experiments at room temperature (25˚C). 0.1 g of BC was mixed with a 50 mL of copper solution at different concentrations (0 - 500 mg/L). The deviation of the pH of the contaminated heavy metal solution during copper adsorption was measured for all experiments, with an experimental deviation = ±1. The initial pH was fixed <5.5 to avoid precipitation of Cu(OH)2.
The quantity of adsorbed copper, qt, on BC is calculated according to Equation (1):
(1)
where Co is the initial concentration of copper (mg/L), Ce is the residual concentration of copper (mg/L), m is the mass of BC (g) and V is the volume of the copper solution (L).
3.2. Adsorption Kinetics Modeling
In order to examine the mechanism of adsorption processes, the pseudo first- order adsorption, the pseudo second-order adsorption and the intraparticle diffusion models were used to adjust kinetic experimental data. The amount of BC sample (0.25 g) is mixed with a 50 mL of copper solution (10 mg/L) to carry out adsorption experiments in bath mode.
3.2.1. Pseudo First-Order Model
The pseudo first-order rate expression of Lagergren is usually described by the following Equations (2) and (3) [27] :
(2)
where qe is the amount of copper adsorbed on BC at the equilibrium time (mg/g), qt is the amount of copper adsorbed on BC at time t (mg/g) and K1 is the rate constant of pseudo first-order adsorption (1/min). Integrating and applying the boundary condition, for t = 0, qt = 0 and for t = t, qe = qt, Equation (2) takes the following form:
(3)
where K1 was determined from the slope of linear plot of 1/qt against 1/t.
3.2.2. Pseudo Second-Order Model
The pseudo second-order mechanism for adsorption is shown in Equation (4) [28] [29] :
(4)
where qt is the adsorption capacity at time t (mg/g), K2 is the rate constant of pseudo second-order adsorption (1/min). Integration and applying the boundary conditions, for t = 0, qt = 0 and for t = t, qe = qt, Equation (4) takes the following form:
(5)
If the second order kinetic model is applicable, the plot of t/qt against t of Equation (5) should give a linear relationship from which qe and K2 can be established.
3.2.3. Intraparticle Diffusion Model
The intraparticle diffusion model presented by Allen et al. [30] could be a rate- limiting step and is shown in Equation (6):
(6)
where qt is the adsorption capacity at time t (mg/g), K3 is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant (mg/(g∙min1/2)) and C is the intercept.
3.3. Copper Desorption
Desorption studies were performed in two phases [31] :
Phase 1: Adsorption. 0.25 g of BC was placed in contact with 50 mL of a 50 mg/L of copper solution. BC was then collected by filtration, washed with distilled water and placed in an oven for 12 h at 60˚C. The liquid phase was analyzed by AAS (HITACHI).
Phase 2: Desorption. The dry and saturated BC was placed in contact with 50 mL of 0.1 M HCl, NaOH, NaCl and distilled water for 2 h. The liquid phase was filtered and analyzed by AAS (HITACHI). The desorbed copper percentage was determined according to Equation (7):
(7)
where Qdes is the amount of desorbed copper from BC (mg/g) and Qads is the amount of copper adsorbed onto BC (mg/g).
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Characterization of Bone Charcoal (BC)
The bones are composed of inorganic (65 wt%) and organic (35 wt%) components. The principal inorganic component of bone is hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2(HA). Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectrum in the 500 - 2000 cm−1 range of BC. Only the bands characteristic of HA (554 - 960 cm−1) are presented [32] . The diffractogram of BC (not shown here) shows only the characteristic pattern of HA. These results confirm that the organic components are eliminated from the bone samples after calcination at 800˚C for 2 h [32] [33] .
The specific surface area of BC, SBET, is equal to 75 m2/g and the macroporous (pore size > 50 nm) volume of BC, determined by mercury porosimetry, is equal to 0.9 cm3/g.
Figure 1. FTIR spectrum of bone charcoal.
4.2. Kinetic Studies
Figure 2 shows the effect of contact time, t, on the removal of 50 mg/L of Cu by BC. The adsorption of Cu increases with time to reach an equilibrium after 10 min of mixing and agitation (red points in Figure 2).
The three kinetic models explained in paragraph 3.2 are used in this study and the results are shown in Figures 3-5. The values of coefficients for the three models are calculated. The correlation coefficient for the pseudo second-order kinetic model is higher (R2 = 1, Figure 4) than both other models. This result indicates that the copper adsorption is controlled by a chemisorption process at the surface of BC [34] . The rate constant of pseudo second-order adsorption, K2, represents the number of exchanges between Ca ions in BC and Cu ions present in aqueous solution [35] . Furthermore, the theoretical qe values acquired from the pseudo second-order kinetic model are in accordance with the experimental qe values.
4.3. Copper Desorption
Figure 6 shows the percentage of desorbed copper for the four different chemical agents used in this study. HCl shows the highest efficiency with approximately 2.521% of desorbed copper in 2 h. None of the used solutions provoke any apparent physical damages to the adsorbent. Nevertheless, the desorption level of copper with 3 types of aqueous solution (alkaline, neutral and acidic) remains very low. This confirms the strong covalent bonds established between BC and copper ions. So, to regenerate BC, treatments at high temperatures are necessary to break the bonds between BC and copper ions.
5. Conclusions
This study investigates heavy metal ions adsorption onto economical Bone Charcoal (BC) adsorbent originating from cow bones. This adsorbent seems to
Figure 2. Effect of contact time on copper adsorption onto BC.
Figure 3. Pseudo first-order kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.
Figure 4. Pseudo second-order kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.
Figure 5. Intraparticle diffusion kinetic model of copper adsorption onto BC.
Figure 6. Copper desorption from BC using different chemical desorption reagents.
be efficient to remove the maximum of copper pollution from water, with 0.1 g of BC amount after 10 min. The kinetic studies of copper adsorption on BC indicate that the pseudo second-order model is the most adequate. This result indicates that the copper adsorption is controlled by a chemisorption process at the surface of BC. Although it is potentially a new alternative for the elimination of heavy metals from polluted water, the desorption of copper ions is difficult by the existence of strong covalent bonds between BC and copper ions.
Acknowledgements
One of us (S. D. L) thanks to the Belgian “Fonds National de Recherche Scientifique” (FRS-FNRS) for her Associate Research position. Furthermore, one other of us (S. G.) thanks to the Laboratory of Water, Environment and Energy, Sfax, Tunisia for the financial funds.