Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Particularities in Chad

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic profile of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the CHU-RN of N’Djaména in order to define its particularities. Patients and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study of patients seen in the internal medicine and gastroenterology department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire la Référence Nationale de N’Djaména during the period January 2021 to December 2022 (2 years). All patients aged 16 and over meeting at least the 4 ACR (1997) criteria were included. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic data were analyzed. Results: During the study period, 1094 patients were admitted to internal medicine consultations, among whom 14 cases of lupus were diagnosed, representing a prevalence of 1.27%. The sex ratio was 3.6%. All patients were black, with a mean age of 30.32 years [16 - 68]. The mean time to diagnosis was 22.32 months [1 - 120 months]. All patients had general manifestations (100%), followed by joint manifestations (51.1%). Renal, digestive and cutaneous-mucosal manifestations were present in 42.9% each. All patients had undergone immunological testing. Conclusion: SLE is unusual in Chad in terms of its clinical polymorphism, the frequency of anti-DNA natives, the low frequency of anti-phospholipids and, finally, the very high efficacy of synthetic antimalarials and corticoids.

Share and Cite:

Ahmed Ngare, A., Ibrahim, H., Daibangar, T., Ali, M.H., Hassan Elefi, M., Youssouf Seid, H., Mahamat Djibrine, D., Kossou, A., Dehainsala, M., Hachim, M.A., Habkreo, M. and Mahamat Moussa, A. (2025) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Particularities in Chad. Open Journal of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, 15, 126-132. doi: 10.4236/ojra.2025.153015.

1. Introduction

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory disease of unknown cause, characterized biologically by the production of multiple autoantibodies, the most characteristic of which are directed against certain components of the nucleus, such as native deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and nucleosomes [1].

Many advances have been made in treatment, making lupus a benign disease whose prognosis is, however, clouded by cerebral damage and, above all, the severity of renal impairment [2].

Worldwide, the prevalence of SLE varies from 4 to 178 per 100,000 inhabitants and its incidence from 0.3 to 23.7 per 100,000 per year [3]. While prevalence in the West ranges from 15 to 60/100,000 inhabitants/year [4]-[6], the number of cases reported in African series remains low: 49 cases in 15 years in Côte d’Ivoire (2004) [7], 16 cases in 13 years in Togo (2008) [8], 30 cases in 10 years in Senegal (1998) [9]. In the West African country of Chad, no prevalence or hospital frequency studies have been carried out on lupus.

The present study focuses on the epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic features of Lupus in hospitals in N’Djaména.

2. Patients and Methods

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted over a two-year period (January 2021 to December 2022) at the national referral university hospital. All patients diagnosed with LES according to the EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria (ACR) or the ACR 1982 Classification Criteria, updated in 1997, were included. Patients aged 16 and over and meeting at least the 4 ACR criteria (1997); SLE increasingly occurs in young women during ovarian activity. Patients suffering from another connective tissue disease and who did not consent were not included in this study.

Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus to the American College of Rheumatology, 1971.

1) Butterfly wing malar rash

2) Discoid lupus rash

3) Photosensitivity

4) Oral or nasopharyngeal ulcerations

5) Non-erosive polyarthritis

6) Pleurisy or pericarditis

7) Renal impairment (proteinuria > 0.5 g/24h and/or urinary cylinders)

8) Neurological impairment (convulsions or psychosis)

9) Hematological abnormalities (hemolytic anemia or leukopenia < 4000/mm3 or lymphopenia < 4500/mm3 or thrombocytopenia < 100,000/mm3)

10) Immunological disorders (presence of LE cells or anti-native DNA antibodies or anti-Smith antibodies or false syphilitic serology)

11) Anti-nuclear antibodies at abnormal levels (in the absence of inducing drugs)

The concomitant or successive occurrence of 4 criteria confirms the diagnosis. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic data were collected using a pre-established survey form. We analyzed our data using Epi-Info 6.0 software. Results were tabulated. Variables were expressed as means, standard deviations and variances, and qualitative results as percentages.

3. Results

3.1. Socio-Economic Characteristics

During the study period, 1094 patients were admitted to internal medicine consultations. Among them, 14 cases of lupus have been diagnosed, representing a hospital prevalence of 1.27%. The sex ratio is 3.6 in favor of women.

All patients were black. The mean age of the patients was 30.32 years [16 - 68 years old].

3.2. Clinical Features

The mean time to diagnosis was 22.32 [1 - 120] months. All patients had general manifestations (fever, alteration of general condition, anorexia, weight loss). Articular manifestations were predominant in 51.1%. Joint involvement was dominated by bilateral, symmetrical, non-erosive polyarthritis.

Mucocutaneous manifestations were present in 42.9% of cases. The mucocutaneous signs were alopecia and photosensitivity. Renal and digestive manifestations were present in 42.9% respectively. Neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular manifestations were present in 14% and 7% respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Clinical features of lupus in Chad.

Clinical features

%

General symptoms

100

Joint manifestations

51.1

Mucocutaneous manifestations

42.9

Digestive disorders

42.9

Renal manifestations

42.9

Neuropsychiatric manifestations

14

Cardiovascular manifestations

7

3.3. Immunological Data

All patients underwent immunological testing. DNA natives were positive in all 14 patients, anti-SM in 9 and anti-SS-B antibodies in 6.

Anti-phospholipids and lupus anticoagulants were positive in one patient each (Table 2).

Table 2. Immunological data.

Antibodies tested

%

Antinuclear factors present

50

Anti-DNA Natives present

100

Anti-SM present

64.3

Anti-SSA present

42.9

Anti-SSA present

0

Anti-Phospholipids present

7.1

Lupus anticoagulants

7.1

3.4. Therapeutic and Evolutionary Data

Treatment consisted of general corticosteroid therapy (100%) combined with synthetic antimalarials (78.6%) and methotrexate (28.6%). Patients with lupus nephropathy (proteinuria) were referred and managed in nephrology.

Progression after 6 months of treatment was satisfactory. Six (6) patients developed complications: 14% of ophthalmological complications, 21% of urinary tract infections, 7% of gynaecological, 7% deaths and 7% patients were lost to follow-up.

4. Discussion

Lupus erythematosus is a protean, spontaneously severe systemic disease characterized by the production of antinuclear antibodies directed in particular against native DNA [10].

It is an underdiagnosed disease in Chad, with a hospital prevalence of 1.04%. Our data are similar to those of Cavedraogo et al. in Burkina Faso and Adelovo et al. in Nigeria, who respectively obtained a hospital frequency ranging from 1.5 to 10 cases per year [11] [12].

The long delay in diagnosing the disease (22.32 months) could be explained by a lack of awareness of the pathology, and the polymorphous presentation of these conditions could sometimes delay referral to a specialist service.

Daou et al. in Niger [13] and Hounssounou et al. in Côte d’Ivoire [14] found a delay of 43.5 months and 26.4 months respectively.

Indeed, due to clinical polymorphism and the preponderance of general signs, notably fever, most patients are treated as malaria or typhoid fever by medical practitioners [15] [16].

The mean age of our patients was 30.32 years. Our results are similar to those reported by Bouatba et al. in Morocco [17], Diallo et al. in Senegal [18] and Yahia et al. in Tunisia [19], who found a mean age of 32, 33 and 34 respectively. These results are in line with the literature, which describes the female prevalence of the disease and its peak in the genital activity period, particularly in the 20 to 40 age bracket [6].

Clinically, published data reveal the preponderance of joint signs at 57.34%. This result is similar to those reported in the series by Eloundou et al. in Cameroon [20] and Daou et al. in Niger [13], where polyarthralgia was noted in 66.7% of cases. This may be explained by the fact that rheumatological manifestations are often revelatory of lupus disease.

Cutaneous-mucosal manifestations were present in 42.9% of cases, and were dominated by malar erythema. The malar erythema characteristic of systemic lupus erythematosus was the most common in the study by Marie et al. in Cameroon [21], and Hounssounou et al. in Côte d’Ivoire [14], who reported 20.5% and 31.5% respectively.

Renal involvement was noted in 42.9% of cases. It should be noted that renal biopsy was not performed due to the unavailability of technical facilities, the crucial lack of equipment in the anatomopathology laboratory and the lack of doctors specializing in this field.

Renal involvement appears to be frequent in our series and is represented by massive proteinuria. Renal involvement may reveal lupus disease in 25% to 70% of cases [22].

In terms of treatment, corticosteroid therapy plays an important role, given the size of our sample. For the moment, background treatment is dominated by hydroxychloroquine, which seems to control the disease well, which explains the low rate of death and loss of sight.

Generally speaking, in Chad, the diagnosis of SLE remains difficult due to clinical polymorphism and the difficulty of access to immunological testing, which is not performed in Chad. Treatment is dominated by corticosteroid therapy. Background treatment is essentially based on hydroxychloroquine.

5. Conclusion

SLE has its own particularities in Chad. These include clinical polymorphism, the frequency of anti-DNA natives, the low frequency of antiphospholipids and, last but not least, the very high efficacy of hydroxychloroquine treatment. Depending on the study, its prevalence ranges from 7 to 159 cases per 100,000 population. It runs in families in 5% to 10% of cases.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

[1] Meyer, O. and Kahn, M.F. (2000) Lupus érythémateux disséminé. In: Kahn, M.F., Peltier, A.P., Meyer, O. and Piette, J.C., Eds., Les maladies systémiques, Flammarion-Médecine Sciences, 131-368.
[2] Hajji, M., Harzallah, A., Kaaroud, H., Ben Hamida, F., Barbouch, S. and Kheder, A. (2014) Les facteurs prédictifs de mortalité au cours du lupus. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Arnaud, L. (2022) Épidémiologie du lupus systémique: Des approches traditionnelles aux méga-données. Bulletin de lAcadémie Nationale de Médecine, 206, 17-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] López, P., Mozo, L., Gutiérrez, C. and Suárez, A. (2003) Epidemiology of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Northern Spanish Population: Gender and Age Influence on Immunological Features. Lupus, 12, 860-865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Mok, C.C. and Lau, C.S. (2003) Lupus in Hong Kong Chinese. Lupus, 12, 717-722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Meyer, O. (2005) Lupus érythémateux systémique. EMC-Rhumatologie-Orthopédie, 2, 1-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kombaté, K., Saka, B., Oniankitan, O., Sodonougbo, P., Mouhare-Touré, A., Tchangai-Walla, K. and Pitché, P. (2008) Systematic Lupus Erythematosus in Lomé, Togo. Médecine Tropicale, 68, 283-286.
[8] Ka, M.M., Diallo, S., Kane, A., Wade, B., Diouf, B., et al. (1998) Lupus Érythémateux systémique et syndromes lupiques au Sénégal. Etude Rétrospective de trente observations en dix ans. Revue du Rhumatisme, 65, 517-523.
[9] Daboiko, J.C., Gueret, M., Eti, E., Ouali, B., Ouattara, B., Gbané, M. and Kouakou, N.M. (2004) Profil clinique et évolutif du lupus érythémateux systémique à Abidjan: A propos de 49 cas colligés au CHU de Cocody. Médecine Afrique Noire, 51, 143-146.
[10] Lipsker, D. and Sibilia, J. (2023) Physiopathologie du lupus érythemateux systemique, livre lupus érythemateux. Elsevier SAS 7-31.
[11] Ouedrago, D.D., Niamba, P., Korsaga-Some, N., Ouedrago, S.M., Kanfando, H. Barro-Traore, F., Traore, A. and Drabo, Y.J. (2010) Le lupus erythémateux systemique à Ouagadougou. Burkina Medical, 14, 13-18.
[12] Adelowo, O.O. and Oguntona, S.A. (2009) Pattern of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus among Nigerians. Clinical Rheumatology, 28, 699-703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Daou, M., Moussa, Y.S., Brah, S., Hamadou, A., Ousmane, M.K.L., Beidou, S.S., et al. (2022) Aspect epydemiologique clinique, therapeutique et evolutif du lupus erythémateux systemique a Niamey. Revue Africaine de Medecine Interne, 9, 22-29.
[14] Hounssounou, M., Gbane, M., Kouassi Jean-Mermoze, D., Bamba, A., Gbandama, K.K.P., Coulibaly, M.M., et al. (2022) Maladies auto-immunes systemiques en milieu hospitalier à Abidjan; Étude multicentrique à propos de 227 Cas. Revue Africaine de Médecine Interne, 9, 14-21.
[15] George, A. and Ogunbiyi, A. (2005) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Rarity in West Africa, or a Yet to Be Investigated Entity. Lupus, 14, 924-925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Adelowo, O.O., Ojo, O. and Oduenyi, I. (2012) Auto-Intibodies in Nigerian Lupus Patients. African Journal of Medical Sciences, 41, 177-181.
[17] Bouatba, L., Bachir, H., Ammouri, W., Maamar, M., Harmouche, H., Adnaoui, M., et al. (2014) Lupus érythémateux systémique au Maroc: Étude analytique monocentrique de 440 patients. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 35, A142-A143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Diallo, M.S., Mbengue, B., Seck, A., Ndao, A.C., Niang, M.S., Cissoko, Y., et al. (2014) Evolution of Autoantibodies Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Age and Clinical Manifestations. Annales de Biologie Clinique, 72, 351-358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ben Yahia, W., Romdhane, W., Naija, S., Guiga, A., Amira, A. and Ghannouchi, N. (2022) Étude des associations clinico-immunologiques au cours du lupus érythémateux systémique. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 43, A145-A146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Eloundou, P., Kamissoko, A.B., Ngueleu, A., Bebey, F.S., Nguekouo, W. and Diallo, A. (2022) Profil clinque et biologique du lupus erythémateux systemique a Niamey. Revue Africaine de Médecine Interne, 9, 22-29.
[21] Bija, M.D., et al. (2014) Clinical Presentation, Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Seen at a Rheumatology Clinic in Douala, Cameroon. Health Sciences and Disease, 15, 1-5.
[22] Tektonidou, M.G., Dasgupta, A. and Ward, M.M. (2016) Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients with Lupus Nephritis, 1971-2015: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 68, 1432-1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.