The Impact of Digital Financial Services on Financial Inclusion in Kenya

Abstract

This research paper explores the impact of digital financial services on financial inclusion in Kenya. The study utilizes secondary data analysis to examine the expansion of digital financial services in Kenya, their usage patterns, and the resulting impact on financial inclusion. The paper reviews relevant literature on financial inclusion, digital financial services, and their interplay in the Kenyan context. The methodology involves analyzing existing data from sources such as the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Financial Sector Deepening (FSD) Kenya, Safaricom, and other relevant institutions. The findings indicate significant progress in financial inclusion, with increased banked individuals and a shift towards digital channels. The adoption rates of digital financial services, particularly mobile money platforms like M-Pesa, have grown substantially, increasing access to banking services, formal savings, and credit facilities. The research also highlights the empowerment and economic outcomes associated with digital financial services, including improved financial resilience, livelihoods, and reduced poverty and inequality. However, several challenges and limitations exist, such as infrastructural constraints, limited financial literacy, security concerns, and regulatory considerations. The paper concludes by offering policy implications and recommendations, including strengthening regulatory frameworks, enhancing financial literacy programs, promoting collaboration among stakeholders, and addressing infrastructure gaps for more comprehensive financial inclusion. This research contributes to the existing knowledge of the impact of digital financial services in Kenya. It provides valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in financial inclusion and digital finance.

Share and Cite:

Tiony, O. K., & Yin, Y. K. (2023). The Impact of Digital Financial Services on Financial Inclusion in Kenya. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13, 593-628. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2023.136035.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background on FI and Its Significance

Financial inclusion has risen to prominence as a crucial policy goal in the past few years, both at the global and national levels. According to the World Bank, financial inclusion is “access to useful and inexpensive financial services and products that satisfy the needs of people and companies” (World Bank, 2018a). Inadequate financial services access has been cited as a critical impediment to economic growth, particularly in developing nations. Individuals and communities who are financially excluded frequently face severe barriers to credit, deposits, insurance, and various other financial products and services. Hence, in turn, can stifle economic progress, perpetuate poverty, and increase inequality (Honohan & Beck, 2007; World Bank, 2018b).

1.2. Overview of DFS and their Emergence in Kenya

Financial goods and services offered through digital channels such as smartphones, the World Wide Web, and electronic payment systems are called digital financial services (DFS). The growing proliferation of handheld devices, particularly smartphones, has aided the rise of DFS in Kenya. M-Pesa, an electronic money platform created in 2007 by Safaricom, Kenya’s largest mobile network provider, is the nation’s most visible example of DFS. With approximately 29 million subscribers and roughly eighty percent of the population utilizing the platform to make financial transactions, M-Pesa has become a key driver of monetary inclusion in Kenya (GSMA, 2020).

1.3. Statement of the Research Problem and Objectives

While there is an expanding corpus of academic research on the influence of DFS on monetary inclusion, more empirical data is needed, especially in the African setting. This study aims to add to the current knowledge by investigating the influence of DFS on monetary inclusion in Kenya. The study question is whether DFS has enhanced access to and use of financial products and services among Kenya’s underprivileged people. Specific objectives of the study are:

1) To assess the extent to which DFS has expanded access to financial services in Kenya;

2) To examine the patterns and determinants of DFS adoption and usage among different segments of the population;

3) To evaluate the impact of DFS on financial inclusion outcomes, such as savings, credit, and insurance uptake;

4) To identify the key challenges and opportunities for promoting financial inclusion through DFS in Kenya.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Definition and Measures of FI

Researchers, institutions, and organizations have defined financial inclusion in various ways. According to the World Bank, financial inclusion is “gaining access to useful and inexpensive financial services and products that meet the needs of people, including companies” (World Bank, 2018a). The United Nations defines it as “the availability of financial services, products, and instruments to individuals and businesses that satisfy their requirements for transactions, savings, credit, and risk control” (United Nations, 2018). Similarly, the organization Alliance for the Inclusion of Financial Services (AFI) defines monetary inclusion as “the state wherein there has been successful access to an extensive array of financial offerings accessible through formal financial organizations at accessible prices” (AFI, 2018a).

Financial inclusion may be quantified using a variety of metrics, including account ownership, use of financial products and services, and credit availability. The World Bank’s Global Findex Database, constructed from nationally representative polls in over 140 countries, provides a comprehensive indicator of financial inclusion (World Bank, 2017). The Global Findex Dataset assesses financial access using three metrics: 1) ownership of accounts, 2) financial service use, and 3) financial service quality.

2.2. Previous Studies on the Impact of DFS on FI

The literature on the influence of digital financial services, also known as DFS, on monetary inclusion is expanding, particularly in developing nations. Several studies have found that DFS can help marginalized people access financial services. For example, Suri and Jack (2016) discovered that the launch of M-Pesa in Kenya resulted in a rise in financial inclusion, especially among women and rural people. Similarly, Demirgüç-Kunt et al. (2018) discovered that DFS adoption is connected with increasing account ownership and financial service use in developing countries.

Other research has examined how DFS affects particular financial inclusion outcomes, including savings, credit, and even healthcare. Mas and Radcliffe (2010) discovered, for example, that M-Pesa users from Kenya were more inclined to hold a formal account for savings than non-users. Mbiti and Weil (2011) discovered that M-Pesa users within Kenya are significantly more likely to take down loans and use official credit sources than those who did not use Milazzo and Ng’ang’a (2018) discovered that M-Pesa members in Kenya are more inclined than non-users to have insurance coverage.

2.3. Examination of Relevant Theories and Frameworks

To explain the influence of DFS on monetary inclusion, numerous concepts and structures have been presented. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is one such concept, which proposes that an individual’s behavior is impacted by their mindsets, subjective standards, and perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991). This approach has been used to research DFS adoption, with studies revealing that views regarding DFS, perceived cultural standards, and perceived behavioral control are all critical determinants of DFS acceptance (Aker et al., 2016; Fink et al., 2017).

The Technology Acceptance Model, also known as the TAM, is another important concept that proposes that an individual’s desire to use technology is impacted by its perceived utility and perceived simplicity of use (Davis, 1989). Several studies using the TAM paradigm to analyze DFS adoption have found that perceived utility and convenience of use are significant drivers of DFS adoption (Aker et al., 2016; Boateng et al., 2017).

3. Methodology

3.1. Research Design and Approach

This study’s research approach is based on the analysis of secondary data, which uses existing data sources to investigate the influence of digital financial services, or DFS, on financial inclusion in Kenya. Secondary data analysis entails using data obtained by outsiders besides the present research, providing a more cost-effective and efficient strategy to answer the research’s questions (Bryman, 2016). In this scenario, the research will examine data gathered by recognized organizations and institutions in Kenya that have undertaken surveys and studies on monetary inclusion, including DFS.

3.2. Data Collection Methods

Secondary data analysis was used to acquire data for this investigation. Secondary data is information gathered for reasons other than the current research project. Existing information gathered from surveys indicates, and datasets will be utilized to analyze the effect of DFS on monetary inclusion in Kenya for this study. These resources may include the World Bank’s Global Findex Database, Central Bank of Kenya papers, and research papers from respectable organizations, including the Alliance for Economic Inclusion and the Consultative Group on Banking to Assist the Poor.

3.3. Sample Selection and Size Determination

As this study utilizes secondary data, sample selection, and size determination are not directly applicable. Instead, the focus will be on selecting relevant and representative data sources that capture a comprehensive view of financial inclusion and the impact of DFS in Kenya. Data sources with large sample sizes and nationally representative surveys will be prioritized to ensure the findings are generalizable to the population of interest.

3.4. Variables and Indicators Used for Measuring FI and the Impact of DFS

Various characteristics and metrics will be used to assess financial inclusion. Examples include account ownership, use of financial services, credit availability, savings behaviour, insurance coverage, and knowledge of finances. These indicators are routinely used in financial inclusion assessment and have been widely utilized in prior research (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018; World Bank, 2018a). In addition, DFS-related factors such as mobile money service uptake and usage will be added to examine the influence of DFS on economic integration outcomes.

3.5. Data Analysis Techniques

This study’s data analysis will include a variety of methodologies, including descriptive statistical methods and regression analysis. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise financial inclusion, and DFS features in Kenya, providing an overview of the ownership of accounts, usage trends, and other essential factors. In order to Control any confounding factors, regression techniques such as logistic regression, logistic regression, or simple least-squares regression may be used to investigate the association between DFS and monetary inclusion outcomes. The investigation will seek to uncover the determinants associated with money inclusion and to evaluate the particular impact of DFS on crucial financial inclusion metrics.

4. Overview of DFS in Kenya

4.1. Evolution and Growth of DFS in Kenya

Digital financial services (DFS) have experienced significant growth and evolution in Kenya over the past decade. The development of DFS can be attributed to various factors, including advancements in mobile technology, regulatory support, and the need to provide financial services to underserved populations. Kenya has emerged as a global leader in DFS, with its flagship mobile money platform, M-Pesa, gaining international recognition.

The evolution of DFS in Kenya can be traced back to the launch of M-Pesa by Safaricom in 2007. M-Pesa revolutionized the financial landscape by offering mobile-based financial services. It allows users to send and receive money, make payments, and access other financial products and services through their mobile phones. The success of M-Pesa paved the way for the rapid growth of DFS in Kenya and served as a model for other countries.

Table 1 presents an overview of the digital financial services landscape in Kenya, focusing on the number of digital financial service providers, the total value of transactions, and the number of registered users over a period of 16 years from 2007 to 2023. This data provides insights into the growth and adoption of digital financial services in Kenya, which is relevant to the research topic of mobile money adoption and usage trends, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The table demonstrates the remarkable growth and development of digital financial services in Kenya over the years. In 2007, there was only one digital financial service provider, with a total transaction value of 4.4 billion Kenyan Shillings (KSh) and 1.4 million registered users. By 2010, the number of providers had increased to four, accompanied by a significant increase in the total transaction

Table 1. Background overview—digital financial services in Kenya.

Year

Number of Digital Financial Service Providers

Total Value of Transactions (KSh billion)

Number of Registered Users (million)

2007

1

4.4

1.4

2010

4

76.7

11.2

2015

12

252.1

23.6

2020

31

561.2

40.5

2023

32

1151.3

48

Source: Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) and Communications Authority of Kenya (CA).

value to 76.7 billion KSh and a surge in registered users to 11.2 million.

The growth trend continued, as indicated by the data for 2015, which showed a further rise in the number of providers to 12, with the total transaction value reaching 252.1 billion KSh and the number of registered users expanding to 23.6 million. By 2020, the digital financial services sector in Kenya had experienced substantial expansion, with 31 providers operating in the market. The total value of transactions surged to 561.2 billion KSh, while the number of registered users reached 40.5 million.

Looking ahead to 2023, the data predicts a continuation of this growth trajectory. The number of digital financial service providers is expected to reach 32, showcasing the ongoing market competitiveness. The total value of transactions is projected to increase significantly to 1151.3 billion Ksh, indicating the rising popularity and adoption of digital financial services in Kenya. The number of registered users is also expected to witness a substantial growth, reaching 48 million, emphasizing the increasing financial inclusion through digital platforms.

These findings align with the research topic of mobile money adoption and usage trends, highlighting the progress and significance of digital financial services in Kenya. The consistent growth in the number of providers, total transaction value, and registered users signifies the positive impact of mobile money on the Kenyan financial landscape, contributing to enhanced financial inclusion, convenience, and efficiency in conducting financial transactions.

4.2. Key Stakeholders and Players in the DFS Ecosystem

Kenya’s digital financial services ecosystem involves various stakeholders, including mobile network operators, financial institutions, fintech companies, regulators, and consumers. Safaricom, Kenya’s largest mobile network operator plays a central role as the provider of M-Pesa. Other mobile network operators, such as Airtel and Telkom, also offer mobile money services in the country. Financial institutions, including banks and microfinance institutions, have also embraced DFS by integrating mobile money platforms into their operations.

Fintech companies have emerged as critical players in the DFS ecosystem, offering innovative solutions and expanding the range of digital financial services available to consumers. These companies provide services such as digital lending, insurance, savings, and investment platforms. Additionally, regulatory bodies, such as the Central Bank of Kenya and the Communications Authority of Kenya, have played a crucial role in creating an enabling environment for DFS by developing regulations and guidelines to ensure consumer protection and promote competition.

4.3. Overview of Digital Payment Systems and Mobile Money Platforms (e.g., M-Pesa)

Digital payment systems and mobile money platforms have enhanced financial inclusion in Kenya. As the dominant mobile money platform, M-Pesa has played a transformative role in the country’s financial landscape. With M-Pesa, users can store money in a mobile wallet, send and receive money, make payments for goods and services, and access various financial products. M-Pesa has simplified financial transactions, especially for individuals in remote areas who previously had limited access to formal financial services.

In addition to M-Pesa, other digital payment systems have gained traction in Kenya. These include Equitel, provided by Equity Bank, which offers mobile banking services, and various mobile banking apps offered by traditional banks. These platforms provide consumers convenient and secure ways to manage their finances, make payments, and access other financial services.

4.4. Adoption Rates and Usage Patterns of DFS in Kenya

The adoption of digital financial services in Kenya has witnessed remarkable growth. According to the Global Findex Database (2017), 73% of Kenyan adults have a mobile money account, making Kenya one of the most digitally inclusive countries in the world (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018). The adoption rates have been exceptionally high among rural populations and low-income individuals with limited access to formal financial services.

Usage patterns of digital financial services in Kenya also demonstrate the impact and popularity of DFS. Mobile money transactions have become a preferred payment method for various goods and services, including utility bills, transportation fares, and retail purchases. Additionally, digital lending platforms have gained prominence, providing quick and accessible credit to individuals and small businesses.

5. Impact of DFS on FI in Kenya

5.1. Access to Financial Services

Digital financial services (DFS) have significantly expanded access to financial services in Kenya, particularly among underserved populations. The impact of DFS on financial inclusion can be observed through various dimensions:

5.1.1. Expansion of Financial Services Infrastructure

The introduction of DFS has led to developing an extensive network of digital financial services providers, such as mobile network operators and fintech companies. This expansion of financial services infrastructure has facilitated greater access to financial services, especially in areas with limited traditional banking infrastructure. Through mobile money platforms like M-Pesa, individuals can perform various financial transactions, including money transfers, payments, savings, and access to credit, using their mobile phones. And it effectively bridged the geographical gap between financial institutions and individuals, providing access to financial services even in remote areas (Mbiti & Weil, 2011).

5.1.2. Factors Affecting Financial Inclusion

Table 2 presents the factors affecting financial inclusion in Kenya and their correlation with financial inclusion percentage. The data is derived from the World Bank’s FinAccess Surveys, and it provides valuable insights into the relationship between various factors and the level of financial inclusion in the country. These findings are relevant to the research topic of mobile money adoption and usage trends, as they shed light on the key determinants of financial inclusion in Kenya.

According to the data, several factors have a significant correlation with financial inclusion in Kenya. Economic growth shows a positive correlation of +30%, indicating that as the economy grows, there is a higher likelihood of increased financial inclusion. This suggests that a thriving economy can contribute to a more favorable environment for financial services and access.

Mobile subscription penetration exhibits a strong positive correlation of +45% with financial inclusion. This highlights the crucial role of mobile technology and its widespread availability in driving financial inclusion in Kenya. The higher the mobile subscription penetration is, the greater it is to access mobile-based financial services will be, including mobile money platforms, which can significantly enhance financial inclusion.

The literacy rate also shows a positive correlation of +20% with financial inclusion. This implies that as literacy rates improve, individuals are better equipped to understand and engage with financial services. Literacy plays a vital role in empowering individuals to navigate financial systems, make informed decisions, and access a wider range of financial products and services.

Table 2. Correlation of factors affecting financial inclusion in Kenya.

Factors

Correlation with Financial Inclusion (%)

Economic Growth

+30

Mobile Subscription Penetration

+45

Literacy Rate

+20

Gender Gap

−15

Source: World Bank, FinAccess Surveys.

On the other hand, the gender gap exhibits a negative correlation of −15% with financial inclusion. This suggests that gender disparities and inequalities hinder the level of financial inclusion in Kenya. Women may face various socio-economic barriers that limit their access to financial services, such as limited financial education, social norms, and cultural practices. Addressing gender gaps and promoting gender equality in financial services can contribute to improving financial inclusion rates.

In conclusion, the data in Table 2 highlights the factors that significantly influence financial inclusion in Kenya. Economic growth, mobile subscription penetration, and literacy rates demonstrate positive correlations, indicating their importance in driving financial inclusion. Conversely, the gender gap exhibits a negative correlation, suggesting the need for targeted interventions to address gender disparities in financial inclusion. These findings provide valuable insights into the factors that policymakers, financial institutions, and mobile money providers should consider when developing strategies to promote and enhance financial inclusion in Kenya.

5.1.3. Increased Availability of Banking Services in Remote Areas

DFS has facilitated the establishment of virtual branches, enabling individuals in remote areas to access banking services without needing physical bank branches. With mobile money platforms, individuals can deposit and withdraw money, access savings accounts, and even apply for loans through their mobile phones. This increased availability of banking services has overcome the challenges associated with distance and transportation, making financial services more accessible to previously underserved populations (Boateng, Molla, & Heeks, 2017).

The data and Figure 1 represents the evolution of mobile money services in Kenya over the past few years. Mobile money has been instrumental in increasing access to banking services, particularly in remote areas where traditional banking infrastructure is limited. Let’s examine the trends and patterns within the dataset. From 2010 to 2023, the number of active agents steadily increased, reaching a peak of 323,613 in February 2023. This indicates a growing network of individuals and organizations providing mobile money services, which contributes

Source: World bank data, GSM World Report.

Figure 1. Increased volume of Mobile Transactions since 2008 to 2023.

to the increased availability of banking services. The total registered mobile money accounts also saw a consistent rise, with the highest number recorded in March 2023 at 73.72 million. This demonstrates the increased adoption of mobile money as a preferred banking method among Kenyan citizens. The significant growth in registered accounts reflects the expanded accessibility of financial services, enabling more people, including those in remote areas, to participate in the formal economy.

Moreover, the volume and value of agent cash in cash-out transactions provide insights into the scale of financial transactions facilitated through mobile money. Over time, both the volume and value of cash-in and cash-out transactions have increased, indicating a growing acceptance of mobile money services for various financial activities. For example, in March 2023, the total volume of cash-in and cash-out transactions reached 204.83 million, while the value of these transactions amounted to KSh 645.8 billion. These upward trends in mobile money adoption, active agents, registered accounts, and transaction volume and value suggest that the increased availability of banking services in remote areas of Kenya has been effective. Mobile money has bridged the gap between underserved populations and formal financial services, allowing individuals to make transactions, access credit, save money, and participate in the digital economy. Overall, the data supports the notion that mobile money services have played a vital role in extending banking services to remote areas, empowering individuals and communities by providing them with financial tools and resources.

5.1.4. Reduction in Barriers to Entry for Underserved Populations

DFS has also contributed to reducing the barriers to entry faced by underserved populations in accessing financial services. Traditionally, these populations may have encountered obstacles such as a lack of identification documents, high account opening fees, or stringent loan eligibility criteria. With DFS, the registration process is often simplified, requiring only a mobile phone and essential identification, making it easier for individuals to open accounts and access financial services. Also empowered previously excluded individuals, including people with low incomes, women, and rural populations, to engage in formal financial transactions and benefit from the associated services (Suri & Jack, 2016).

5.2. Usage and Utilization of Financial Services

Digital financial services (DFS) have significantly influenced the usage and utilization of financial services in Kenya, bringing about notable changes in transaction patterns, access to savings and credit facilities, and digital platforms for insurance and investment purposes. The detailed data for a further and wider understanding is presented below in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Table 3 in following section.

5.2.1. Increased Frequency and Volume of Transactions

DFS, particularly mobile money platforms like M-Pesa, have facilitated a substantial

Figure 2.Growth of Mobile Money Agents vs Mobile Money Transaction in Kenya since 2007.

Figure 3. Growth of Mobile Money Agents vs Mobile Money Transaction in Kenya since 2007.

increase in the frequency and volume of financial transactions in Kenya. Individuals can now conveniently transfer money, pay for goods and services, and conduct other financial transactions using mobile phones. In addition led to a shift from cash-based to digital transactions, contributing to increased efficiency and transparency in financial dealings (CGAP, 2018). The ease and convenience of using DFS have encouraged individuals to engage in more frequent financial transactions, thereby promoting financial inclusion.

Table 4 presents the performance of mobile payments in terms of various indicators from 2020 to 2023. The table includes data on mobile money agents,

Table 3. Mobile Money Transaction and Mobile Registered Money accounts.

Year

Month

Active Agents

Total Registered Mobile Money Accounts (Millions)

Total Agent Cash in Cash Out (Volume Million)

Total Agent Cash in Cash Out (Value KSh billions)

2023

March

321,149

73.72

204.83

645.8

2023

February

323,613

74.04

184.82

578.09

2023

January

319,079

74.41

198.31

589.3

2022

December

317,983

73.12

207.01

708.06

2022

November

315,240

73.22

190.46

639.84

2022

October

311,957

73.22

196.93

646.5

2022

September

308,799

71.67

189.7

674.47

2022

August

310,450

70.06

184.81

677.36

2022

July

309,856

71.58

194.77

722.52

2022

June

304,693

70.33

186.2

665.09

2022

May

305,830

70.03

192.95

692.62

2022

April

295,237

68.72

188.24

663.53

2022

March

302,837

68.62

195.82

664.31

2022

February

301,108

67.94

171.39

568.71

2022

January

299,860

68.28

181.85

585.82

2021

December

298,272

68.03

189.8

622.14

2021

November

299,053

67.15

185.98

600.97

2021

October

295,105

66.88

190.06

618.14

2021

September

305,831

67.7

180.85

585.38

2021

August

304,822

68.09

184.51

586.52

2021

July

303,718

68.54

184

587.98

2021

June

301,457

67.78

175.83

532.63

2021

May

298,883

67.77

180.76

536.69

2021

April

294,706

67.11

173.35

502.22

2021

March

293,403

65.93

182.29

537.75

2021

February

294,111

67.16

164.2

567.99

2021

January

287,410

66.59

173.91

590.36

2020

December

282,929

66.01

181.37

605.69

2020

November

275,960

65.7662

170.028

526.806

2020

October

273,531

65.255

174.106

528.904

2020

September

263,200

64.0304

163.342

483.215

2020

August

252,703

62.7834

163.207

473.522

2020

July

234,747

62.0651

157.755

450.981

2020

June

237,637

61.7261

143.14

392.172

2020

May

243,118

60.2432

135.932

357.37

2020

April

242,275

59.4282

124.994

307.991

2020

March

240,261

58.7131

150.687

364.511

2020

February

235,543

58.6665

148.53

350.481

2020

January

231,292

59.1672

150.204

371.9

2019

December

224,108

58.3613

154.99

382.93

2019

November

222,211

58.039

153.056

359.261

2019

October

223,176

56.293

156.11

366.901

2019

September

224,959

55.7004

151.224

365.908

2019

August

222,479

54.7751

151.828

368.504

2019

July

222,087

53.887

152.979

366.386

2019

June

222,484

46.8005

149.727

346.847

2019

May

224,825

52.1958

153.257

364.254

2019

April

230,220

52.0478

155.796

360.216

2019

March

226,957

50.36

161.38

368.39

2019

February

212,252

50.04

144.49

328.15

2019

January

201,336

40.2953

154.243

368.017

2018

December

205,745

47.6943

155.774

367.766

2018

November

206,312

46.2334

153.15

343.866

2018

October

211,961

45.4371

155.16

343.225

2018

September

203,359

44.2723

145.988

327.663

2018

August

202,627

43.5588

149.517

348.912

2018

July

200,227

42.613

143.087

332.352

2018

June

197,286

42.581

137.412

317.671

2018

May

202,387

41.729

140.954

328.97

2018

April

201,795

40.2881

142.056

312.999

2018

March

196,002

39.34

147.52

337.11

2018

February

192,117

38.4185

132.297

300.852

2018

January

188,029

37.8418

136.658

322.984

2017

December

182,472

37.3868

139.934

332.622

2017

November

176,986

36.3906

131.738

298.957

2017

October

170,389

36.0008

134.198

299.018

2017

September

167,775

35.537

128.457

300.917

2017

August

167,353

35.333

120.645

286.341

2017

July

169,480

34.578

128.105

308.893

2017

June

165,109

34.178

125.897

299.789

2017

May

164,674

34.205

132.455

315.448

2017

April

160,076

34.286

128.885

297.437

2017

March

157,855

33.919

133.336

320.18

2017

February

154,908

33.291

117.495

279.386

2017

January

152,547

33.343

122.03

299.486

2016

December

165,908

34.957

126.349

316.773

2016

November

162,441

34.281

120.932

291.227

2016

October

181,456

34.037

122.45

292.092

2016

September

173,731

33.435

112.586

284.055

2016

August

173,774

32.757

114.156

297.229

2016

July

167,072

32.336

110.514

281.854

2016

June

162,465

31.386

106.342

270.973

2016

May

156,349

31.296

107.821

277.94

2016

April

153,762

31.438

105.506

269.82

2016

March

150,987

30.696

107.855

273.585

2016

February

148,982

29.489

100.983

257.185

2016

January

146,710

29.0976

95.52

242.372

2015

December

143,946

28.6447

107.44

267.068

2015

November

142,386

28.064

101.33

236.372

2015

October

140,612

27.537

102.75

255.808

2015

September

138,131

27.312

96.32

247.506

2015

August

136,042

27.0497

94.12

248.154

2015

July

133,989

26.7382

93.9985

238.864

2015

June

131,761

26.5028

90.6686

227.921

2015

May

129,735

26.4645

89.9024

230.152

2015

April

129,218

26.1392

84.9056

213.746

2015

March

128,591

25.6902

90.3477

231.836

2015

February

127,187

25.4556

80.7405

208.132

2015

January

125,826

25.3972

81.6534

210.54

2014

December

123,703

25.2492

85.6071

225.549

2014

November

121,419

24.9465

80.9984

203.239

2014

October

128,706

25.996

82.8925

210.277

2014

September

124,179

26.2995

78.1748

206.341

2014

August

124,708

26.333

78.8987

206.72

2014

July

122,462

26.2265

77.4651

200.992

2014

June

120,781

25.9284

74.0288

189.911

2014

May

117,807

25.8152

74.5472

198.131

2014

April

116,581

26.1399

72.0955

186.664

2014

March

116,196

26.208

73.9817

192.695

2014

February

115,015

26.1164

65.5934

172.797

2014

January

114,107

25.7568

67.0519

178.478

2013

December

113,130

25.3263

69.1378

182.495

2013

November

112,947

24.9

68.7

175.22

2013

October

111,697

24.43

68.27

175.29

2013

September

110,432

23.97

63.43

165.59

2013

August

108,559

23.87

64.71

168.1

2013

July

105,669

24.27

62.71

162.76

2013

June

103,165

23.75

60.03

152.5

2013

May

100,584

23.47

60.34

158.77

2013

April

96,319

23.0185

55.9993

142.609

2013

March

93,211

22.3292

52.3949

134.446

2013

February

88,393

21.8024

53.4683

141.126

2013

January

85,548

21.4181

53.4068

142.653

2012

December

76,912

21.06

55.96

150.16

2012

November

75,226

20.25

53.56

138.99

2012

October

70,972

20.02

51.89

137.68

2012

September

67,301

19.71

48.94

130.69

2012

August

64,439

19.38

49.7

131.38

2012

July

63,165

19.58

49.35

129.28

2012

June

61,313

19.7956

47.8763

124.02

2012

May

59,057

19.6943

47.9655

128.403

2012

April

56,717

19.53

44.35

117.36

2012

March

55,726

19.2393

45.757

126.093

2012

February

53,685

18.7921

41.7805

116.691

2012

January

52,315

18.834

40.2449

114.06

2011

December

50,471

19.191

41.7075

118.08

2011

November

49,091

19.46

41.1769

112.332

2011

October

47,874

19.2097

40.55

109.119

2011

September

46,234

18.8916

39.2139

108.615

2011

August

44,762

18.6128

39.2993

107.424

2011

July

43,577

18.3082

37.9763

99.7104

2011

June

42,840

18.1469

35.8222

92.6437

2011

May

38,485

17.9239

35.3457

94.3724

2011

April

37,309

17.7573

32.4254

86.0877

2011

March

36,198

17.4653

32.7301

88.9966

2011

February

34,572

16.8928

28.5462

76.3366

2011

January

33,968

16.6901

28.2047

75.4328

2010

December

39,449

16.4463

29.1183

75.8654

2010

November

38,201

16.075

30.0386

70.2727

2010

October

37,009

15.7346

31.3186

71.7947

2010

September

35,373

15.2239

29.4457

68.5062

2010

August

33,864

14.5893

26.8233

61.531

2010

July

32,974

13.4701

26.915

61.7728

2010

June

31,902

10.9147

25.0338

58.0993

2010

May

31,036

10.4928

24.6984

58.0795

2010

April

29,570

10.2026

22.6933

51.8136

2010

March

27,622

9.97211

24.0758

56.1167

2010

February

25,394

9.67495

20.8087

49.9055

2010

January

24,850

9.4767

20.0767

48.4625

2009

December

23,012

8.88258

21.6891

52.3417

2009

November

22,476

8.61529

19.975

47.4656

2009

October

20,631

8.36803

19.92

48.6365

2009

September

19,803

8.01624

18.3703

45.3683

2009

August

18,780

7.7141

17.0104

40.6787

2009

July

18,504

7.42641

16.8986

40.3374

2009

June

16,641

7.19062

15.9846

38.1756

2009

May

16,029

6.8427

15.0488

36.8062

2009

April

14,790

6.53192

13.7796

34.0201

2009

March

13,358

6.28952

13.5541

33.8202

2009

February

7512

5.81602

11.0793

28.6863

2009

January

7304

5.47828

10.1906

27.0749

2008

December

6104

5.08247

10.2051

26.99

2008

November

5399

4.75139

8.56681

21.7

2008

October

4781

4.42028

8.30365

21.6007

2008

September

4230

4.14304

7.15191

19.2699

2008

August

3761

3.72618

6.34241

16.7563

2008

July

3378

3.36719

5.39108

14.0171

2008

June

3011

3.03852

4.20144

10.9172

2008

May

2770

2.71813

4.02127

10.9042

2008

April

2606

2.37346

3.07289

8.38964

2008

March

2329

2.07553

2.3975

6.74745

2008

February

2067

1.82153

1.7399

5.21979

2008

January

1812

1.5891

1.34683

4.05904

2007

December

1582

1.34527

1.2741

3.77027

2007

November

1379

1.1332

1.22174

3.51495

2007

October

1196

0.875962

0.958908

2.82955

2007

September

960

0.635761

0.669689

2.06969

2007

August

819

0.432555

0.516239

1.57991

2007

July

681

0.268499

0.354298

1.06537

2007

June

527

0.175652

0.233661

0.720102

2007

May

447

0.107733

0.15

0.483709

2007

April

362

0.054944

0.07

0.220896

2007

March

307

0.020992

0.021714

0.0643905

Source: Worldbank, Central Bank of Kenya.

Table 4. Mobile payments performace.

Mobile payments performance 2020-2023

Mobile money agents

30 Day active customers Mn

Person to Person (P2P) Transfers

Pay Bill Payments

Till number Payments

Transfer from bank accounts to Mobile wallets

Transfers from Mobile wallets to bank accounts

Volumn Mn

Value, Ksh Bn

Volumn Mn

Value, Ksh Bn

Volumn Mn

Value, Ksh Bn

Volumn Mn

Value, Ksh Bn

Volumn Mn

Value, Ksh Bn

Jan-20

231292

22.1

141

221

100

106

32

58

13

102

4

39

Dec-23

317983

33.0

221

436

371

623

187

166

61

389

66

507

Source: Central Bank of Kenya.

30-day active customers, person-to-person (P2P) transfers, Pay Bill payments, Till number payments, transfers from bank accounts to mobile wallets, and transfers from mobile wallets to bank accounts. In January 2020, there were 231,292 mobile money agents. The table also provides the volume and value of transactions for each category. For example, there were 141 million P2P transfers with a value of Ksh billion. Pay Bill payments amounted to 100 million transactions valued at Ksh billion. Till number payments accounted for 32 million transactions with a value of Ksh billion. Transfer from bank accounts to mobile wallets had a volume of 13 million transactions worth Ksh billion, while transfers from mobile wallets to bank accounts totaled 102 million transactions valued at Ksh billion.

By December 2023, the number of mobile money agents increased to 317,983. The table shows the growth in all transaction categories over this period. For instance, the volume and value of P2P transfers, Pay Bill payments, Till number payments, and transfers between mobile wallets and bank accounts all increased significantly. This table provides an overview of the performance and growth of mobile payments in terms of transaction volume and value over the specified period. The data is also illustrated in Figure 4.

Source: Central Bank of Kenya.

Figure 4. Transactions Value in USD (Bn).

5.2.2. Access to Formal Savings and Credit Facilities

Digital financial services have expanded access to formal savings and credit facilities for individuals previously excluded from the traditional banking system. Through mobile money platforms, individuals can now open and manage savings accounts digitally, providing a secure and accessible avenue to save their money (McKenna & McKay, 2015). Additionally, DFS has facilitated the emergence of digital lending platforms, enabling individuals and small businesses to access credit quickly and conveniently. Also allowed previously unbanked or underbanked individuals to overcome financial constraints and invest in income-generating activities (Ng’weno, 2018).

5.2.3. Use of DFS for Insurance and Investment Purposes

DFS has also facilitated using digital platforms for insurance and investment purposes. Individuals can now access insurance products, such as microinsurance, through mobile money platforms, providing a safety net against unexpected events (Mas, 2014). Furthermore, digital investment platforms have emerged, allowing individuals to invest in various financial instruments, such as mutual funds or stocks, through mobile phones. These platforms offer affordable and accessible investment opportunities, enabling individuals to grow their wealth and participate in the formal financial sector (Bouhdaoui & Asongu, 2019).

5.3. Empowerment and Economic Outcomes

Digital financial services (DFS) have had a transformative impact on the empowerment and economic outcomes of individuals and communities in Kenya. Through improved financial resilience, increased livelihood opportunities, and reduced poverty and inequality, DFS have played a vital role in fostering inclusive economic growth.

5.3.1. Enhanced Financial Resilience and Risk Management

DFS has enabled individuals to build and maintain greater financial resilience by providing access to tools for risk management. Mobile money platforms, for instance, offer convenient and secure ways to save money, allowing individuals to accumulate funds for unforeseen emergencies or future expenses (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018). This access to formal financial services enhances the ability to plan for and respond to financial shocks, ultimately contributing to improved financial well-being and stability.

5.3.2. Improved Livelihoods and Income Generation Opportunities

DFS has opened up new avenues for income generation and entrepreneurship, particularly for individuals previously excluded from formal financial systems. With access to digital financial services, individuals can receive and make payments for goods and services more efficiently, expanding their business networks and markets (CGAP, 2017). Additionally, DFS has facilitated access to credit, allowing individuals to invest in income-generating activities and expand their businesses (Mas, 2016). This increased access to financial resources has led to improved livelihoods and more significant economic opportunities for individuals and communities.

5.3.3. Reduction in Poverty and Inequality

The adoption of DFS has been associated with a reduction in poverty and inequality in Kenya. Access to digital financial services has empowered individuals to move away from informal and cash-based economies, enabling them to participate more fully in formal financial systems (Mbiti & Weil, 2011). Formalizing financial activities promotes economic inclusion and helps bridge the gap between the rich and the poor. Moreover, DFS has been particularly impactful for marginalized groups, such as women and rural populations, who have historically faced barriers to financial inclusion (Suri & Jack, 2016). By providing them with equal access to financial services and opportunities, DFS contributes to a more equitable society. The increased number of transactions is presented in Table 5. Similarly, the contribution to Kenyan economy via remittances inflows is presented in Table 6, which is also a major source to elevate the economy and in reduction of poverty in the country.

Table 5 provides information on mobile money transactions in Kenya for the years 2021 and 2022. It includes data on the total transaction value in Kenyan Shillings (KES trillion), the number of active agents, and the number of mobile money accounts in millions. In 2021, the total transaction value reached 6.4 trillion KES, with 298,272 active agents and 68.03 million mobile money accounts. The following year, in 2022, the total transaction value increased to 7.9 trillion KES, with 317,983 active agents and 73.12 million mobile money accounts. These figures indicate the growth and usage of mobile money services in Kenya, with an increase in both transaction value and the number of active agents and accounts.

Table 6 presents data on remittances inflows in Kenya, including actual, previous, highest, and lowest values, as well as the dates covered. The figures are measured in USD thousands on a monthly frequency. The actual remittances inflows in Kenya ranged from 25,154.00 USD thousand to 356,980.47 USD thousand between the years 2004 and 2023. The previous value recorded was 309,172.70 USD thousand, while the highest value reached 363,581.66 USD thousand. This table provides insights into the trends and fluctuations in remittances inflows to Kenya over time, showcasing the varying amounts received from abroad on a monthly basis.

The research aims to understand the growth and impact of mobile money services, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, and their role in facilitating cashless transactions and financial inclusion. The analysis encompasses various metrics, including transaction values, number of agents and accounts, use cases, remittances, interoperable transactions, savings accounts, revenue diversification, and global market trends.

Table 5. Mobile money transactions in Kenya.

Year

Total Transaction Value (KES trillion)

Number of Active Agents

Number of Mobile Money Accounts (million)

2021

6.4

298,272

68.03

2022

7.9

317,983

73.12

Source: Central Bank of Kenya.

Table 6. Remittances inflows in Kenya.

Actual

Previous

Highest

Lowest

Dates

Unit

Frequency

356,980.47

309,172.70

363,581.66

25,154.00

2004-2023

USD Thousand

Monthly

Source: Central Bank of Kenya.

Regional Insights: Sub-Saharan Africa emerges as a significant driver of mobile money growth, with active accounts and registered agents experiencing substantial increases. West Africa, in particular, has shown impressive adoption and usage rates, with active accounts growing by 25% and registered accounts growing by 21% between 2021 and 2022. Mobile money services in Latin America and the Caribbean have also seen a significant increase in activity, reflecting the region’s historically high activity rates.

Table 7 provides a comparison of access to financial services in Kenya between 2010 and 2020. The table presents the percentages of the population that fall into different categories based on their access to financial services. In 2010, only 23.3% of the population had a bank account, while in 2020, this percentage increased to 55.1%. This indicates a significant improvement in banking accessibility over the decade. The use of non-bank formal channels, such as Savings and Credit Cooperative Organizations (SACCOs) and Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), also saw an increase from 7.4% in 2010 to 27.4% in 2020, reflecting a growing reliance on these financial service providers. On the other hand, the use of informal channels, such as borrowing from friends or family, decreased from 30.6% in 2010 to 12.7% in 2020, suggesting a shift towards more formal financial services. The percentage of the population excluded from any financial services significantly dropped from 38.7% in 2010 to 4.8% in 2020, indicating a notable increase in financial inclusion within the country.

Table 8 focuses on the usage of digital financial services in Kenya, specifically highlighting the adoption of various mobile-based services. In 2015, there were 24 million M-PESA users in Kenya, representing approximately 53% of the population. By 2020, the number of M-PESA users increased to 38 million, accounting

Table 7. Access to financial services in Kenya (2010 vs. 2020).

Financial Service

2010 (%)

2020 (%)

Banked (have a bank account)

23.3

55.1

Use of non-bank formal channels (e.g., SACCOs, MFIs)

7.4

27.4

Use of informal channels (e.g., champs, friends/family)

30.6

12.7

Excluded (no access to any financial services)

38.7

4.8

Source: Financial Sector Deepening (FSD) Kenya, FinAccess Surveys 2010 and 2020.

Table 8. Digital financial services usage in Kenya.

Indicator

2015

2020

M-PESA Users (millions)

24

38

Percentage of population using M-PESA

53%

79%

M-Shwari Users (millions)

12

18

M-KOPA Users (millions)

-

10

Source: Safaricom, M-KOPA, and internal data analysis.

for around 79% of the population. This demonstrates a substantial growth in the utilization of M-PESA, a popular mobile money service in the country. The table also mentions the number of users for other digital financial services. In 2015, there were 12 million users of M-Shwari, a mobile banking platform, which increased to 18 million by 2020. Additionally, M-KOPA, a service that offers pay-as-you-go solar energy solutions, gained 10 million users during this period. These figures illustrate the significant expansion of digital financial services and their increasing popularity among Kenyan citizens.

6. Challenges and Limitations

6.1. Infrastructural and Technological Challenges

One of the significant challenges faced in implementing and utilizing digital financial services (DFS) in Kenya is the infrastructural and technological limitations. Despite substantial progress in expanding financial services infrastructure, areas still have limited access to reliable connectivity and electricity, particularly in rural and remote regions (GSMA, 2019). Insufficient network coverage and unstable internet connectivity can hinder the seamless operation of DFS platforms and limit their accessibility to the population (ITU, 2019). These infrastructural challenges pose obstacles to the widespread adoption and usage of digital financial services, particularly for individuals residing in underserved areas.

6.2. Limited Financial Literacy and Digital Skills

Another challenge in promoting financial inclusion through DFS in Kenya is the population’s limited financial literacy and digital skills. Many individuals, especially those from low-income and marginalized communities, may lack the necessary knowledge and understanding of digital financial services, making it difficult for them to utilize and benefit from these services fully. Studies have highlighted the importance of financial literacy in empowering individuals to make informed financial decisions and engage effectively with digital financial platforms (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018). Therefore, addressing the gaps in financial literacy and providing digital skills training programs are crucial to enhance the uptake and usage of DFS among all population segments.

6.3. Security and Privacy Concerns

The increasing reliance on digital financial services also brings forth concerns related to security and privacy. Users may worry about their personal and financial information safety when conducting transactions through digital platforms. Instances of fraud, identity theft, and cyber-attacks can erode trust and hinder the adoption of DFS. Therefore, ensuring robust security measures, data protection protocols, and building trust among users are essential for the sustainable growth of digital financial services (Hughes, Lonie, & Goldfajn, 2014).

6.4. Regulatory and Policy Considerations

Regulatory and policy considerations are crucial in shaping the landscape of digital financial services and financial inclusion in Kenya. While a supportive regulatory framework is necessary to encourage innovation and competition, it must also address consumer protection, risk management, and anti-money laundering measures (World Bank, 2019). Balancing the need for regulation with fostering an enabling environment for DFS providers is a crucial challenge policymakers face. Inadequate or unclear regulations can hinder the growth of DFS and pose risks to consumers. Therefore, policymakers must continuously review and update regulations to keep pace with the evolving digital financial landscape and ensure a balance between innovation and consumer protection.

7. Policy Implications and Recommendations

7.1. Strengthening Regulatory Frameworks for DFS

For improvement of the impact of digital financial services (DFS) on financial inclusion in Kenya, it is crucial to strengthen the regulatory frameworks that govern these services. And it involves ensuring clear and supportive regulations that promote innovation, protect consumers, and foster a competitive environment (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018). Regulators should collaborate with industry players to develop appropriate guidelines and standards, addressing customer protection, data privacy, and interoperability among different DFS platforms (CGAP, 2017). By creating an enabling regulatory environment, policymakers can promote the responsible growth of DFS and foster trust among users.

7.2. Enhancing Financial Literacy and Digital Skills Training Programs

To fully harness the benefits of DFS, the population needs to enhance financial literacy and digital skills. Many individuals, especially those from underserved communities, may lack the knowledge and skills to effectively use digital financial services (World Bank, 2019). Government and private sector stakeholders should invest in comprehensive financial literacy programs that educate individuals on the benefits, risks, and functionalities of DFS (Hughes et al., 2014). Additionally, providing training programs on digital skills and mobile technology usage will empower individuals to confidently navigate and utilize DFS platforms (FSD Kenya, 2019). By improving financial literacy and digital skills, individuals can make informed decisions, mitigate risks, and fully access the benefits of digital financial services.

7.3. Promoting Collaboration among Stakeholders

Collaboration among stakeholders is vital for successfully implementing and adopting digital financial services. Policymakers, regulators, financial institutions, mobile network operators, and other relevant stakeholders should collaborate to create an ecosystem supporting interoperability and innovation in DFS (CGAP, 2016). This collaboration can help address infrastructure, standardization, and interoperability challenges among different DFS platforms, ensuring seamless and affordable access to financial services for all (Demirgüç-Kunt et al., 2018). Moreover, partnerships between financial institutions and mobile network operators can facilitate the integration of DFS into existing banking systems, expanding the reach and impact of digital financial services (Suri & Jack, 2016).

7.4. Addressing Infrastructure Gaps and Promoting Affordable Connectivity

To fully leverage the potential of DFS, it is crucial to address infrastructure gaps and promote affordable connectivity in Kenya. Access to reliable and affordable internet connectivity is essential for individuals to access and utilize digital financial services (GSMA, 2019). Policymakers should prioritize investments in expanding internet coverage, particularly in rural and underserved areas (ITU, 2019). Additionally, efforts should be made to promote affordable mobile devices and data plans to ensure that individuals can afford to access and use DFS platforms (World Bank, 2020). By addressing infrastructure gaps and promoting affordable connectivity, policymakers can enable more individuals to benefit from the advantages of digital financial services and foster greater financial inclusion.

8. Conclusions

8.1. Summary of Key Findings

This research has explored the impact of digital financial services (DFS) on financial inclusion in Kenya through secondary data analysis. The findings reveal several significant outcomes of DFS adoption in the country. Firstly, DFS has expanded access to financial services by improving the infrastructure and making banking services available even in remote areas. Secondly, there has been an increase in the usage and utilization of financial services, with individuals conducting more frequent and higher volume transactions. Moreover, DFS has facilitated access to formal savings and credit facilities, enabling individuals to save, borrow, and invest through digital platforms. Lastly, DFS has contributed to empowerment and economic outcomes by enhancing financial resilience, improving livelihoods, and reducing poverty and inequality.

8.2. Contributions to the Existing Knowledge

This study has contributed to the existing knowledge on the impact of DFS on financial inclusion in Kenya. Analyzing secondary data, it has provided empirical evidence of the positive effects of DFS adoption. The findings support previous studies that highlight the role of DFS in expanding access to financial services, promoting usage and utilization, and empowering individuals economically. This research consolidates the understanding of the transformative potential of DFS and provides a comprehensive assessment of their impact on financial inclusion in Kenya.

8.3. Implications for Policymakers and Practitioners

The findings of this study have important implications for policymakers and practitioners in the field of financial inclusion. Firstly, policymakers should focus on strengthening regulatory frameworks for DFS, ensuring clear guidelines that balance innovation and consumer protection. Creating an enabling environment that fosters competition, trust, and interoperability among DFS providers is essential. Secondly, there is a need for enhanced financial literacy and digital skills training programs to enable individuals to benefit from DFS fully. Policymakers and practitioners should invest in educational initiatives that promote financial literacy and empower individuals to navigate and utilize digital financial services effectively. Additionally, collaboration among stakeholders, including regulators, financial institutions, and mobile network operators, is crucial to address challenges and promote the interoperability of DFS platforms.

8.4. Recommendations for Future Research

While this study provides valuable insights into the impact of DFS on financial inclusion in Kenya, several areas warrant further research. Firstly, future studies can delve deeper into how DFS contributes to financial resilience and risk management. Understanding the factors that enable individuals to leverage DFS for financial security effectively would provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners. Additionally, more research is needed to explore the long-term effects of DFS adoption on livelihoods and income generation. Also would involve examining the sustainability of income-generating activities facilitated by DFS and their contribution to poverty reduction. Furthermore, future research can investigate the potential challenges and opportunities associated with adopting emerging digital financial technologies, such as blockchain and digital currencies, in promoting financial inclusion in Kenya.

List of Terminologies and Abbreviations

Financial Inclusion—The extent to which individuals and businesses have access to and can effectively use financial services to meet their needs.

Digital Financial Services (DFS)—Financial services delivered through digital channels such as mobile phones, the internet, and other electronic devices.

M-Pesa—A mobile money platform widely used in Kenya, allowing users to deposit, withdraw, transfer money, and make payments using their mobile phones.

SACCOs—Savings and Credit Cooperative Organizations, which are member-owned financial cooperatives that provide savings and credit services.

MFIs—Microfinance Institutions, organizations that provide financial services, including small loans, to low-income individuals and entrepreneurs.

Chamas—Informal savings and investment groups in Kenya, where members contribute regular amounts and take turns receiving lump sum payouts.

Financial Literacy—The knowledge and understanding of financial concepts, products, and services that enables individuals to make informed financial decisions.

GDP—Gross Domestic Product, a measure of the total value of goods and services produced in a country over a specific period.

Poverty Line—The income threshold below which individuals or households are considered to be living in poverty.

Gender Gap—The disparity between males and females in terms of access to and usage of financial services and opportunities.

CBK—Central Bank of Kenya, the central bank responsible for formulating and implementing monetary policy in Kenya.

CA—Communications Authority of Kenya, the regulatory authority for the communications sector in Kenya.

FSD Kenya—Financial Sector Deepening Kenya, an organization that promotes financial inclusion and development in Kenya.

World Bank—An international financial institution that provides loans and grants to the governments of developing countries for development projects.

FinAccess Surveys—Surveys conducted in Kenya to assess and measure financial inclusion and usage of financial services among the population.

Appendix

Table A1. Background overview—digital financial services in Kenya.

Year

Number of Digital Financial Service Providers

Total Value of Transactions (KSh billion)

Number of Registered Users (million)

2007

1

4.4

1.4

2010

4

76.7

11.2

2015

12

252.1

23.6

2020

31

561.2

40.5

2023

32

1151.3

48

Source: Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) and Communications Authority of Kenya (CA).

Table A2. Factors affecting financial inclusion in Kenya.

Factors

Correlation with Financial Inclusion (%)

Economic Growth

+30

Mobile Subscription Penetration

+45

Literacy Rate

+20

Gender Gap

−15

Source: World Bank, FinAccess Surveys.

Table A3. Comparison of financial inclusion (% of adults) in Kenya and neighboring countries.

Country

Year: 2010

Year: 2015

Year: 2020

Kenya

41

65

82

Uganda

34

49

59

Tanzania

37

56

68

Rwanda

29

52

72

Source: FinAccess Surveys and World Bank.

Table A4. User demographics of digital financial services in Kenya.

% PopulationAge Group

% Usage

21 - 30

25%

31 - 40

35%

41 - 50

17%

51 - 60

10%

Above 60

3%

Source: Safaricom, M-KOPA, and internal data analysis.

Table A5. Demographic overview of Kenya.

Age Group

Population (%)

0 - 14

39.0

15 - 24

20.0

25 - 54

34.0

55 - 64

4.0

65+

3.0

Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS).

Table A6. Access to financial services in Kenya (2010 vs. 2020).

Financial Service

2010 (%)

2020 (%)

Banked (have a bank account)

23.3

55.1

Use of non-bank formal channels (e.g., SACCOs, MFIs)

7.4

27.4

Use of informal channels (e.g., champs, friends/family)

30.6

12.7

Excluded (no access to any financial services)

38.7

4.8

Source: Financial Sector Deepening (FSD) Kenya, FinAccess Surveys 2010 and 2020.

Table A7. Digital financial services usage in Kenya.

Indicator

2015

2020

M-PESA Users (millions)

24

38

Percentage of population using M-PESA

53%

79%

M-Shwari Users (millions)

12

18

M-KOPA Users (millions)

-

10

Source: Safaricom, M-KOPA, and internal data analysis.

Table A8. Mobile payments 2007-2023.

Year

Month

Active Agents

Total Registered Mobile Money Accounts (Millions)

Total Agent Cash in Cash Out (Volume Million)

Total Agent Cash in Cash Out (Value KSh billions)

2023

March

321,149

73.72

204.83

645.8

2023

February

323,613

74.04

184.82

578.09

2023

January

319,079

74.41

198.31

589.3

2022

December

317,983

73.12

207.01

708.06

2022

November

315,240

73.22

190.46

639.84

2022

October

311,957

73.22

196.93

646.5

2022

September

308,799

71.67

189.7

674.47

2022

August

310,450

70.06

184.81

677.36

2022

July

309,856

71.58

194.77

722.52

2022

June

304,693

70.33

186.2

665.09

2022

May

305,830

70.03

192.95

692.62

2022

April

295,237

68.72

188.24

663.53

2022

March

302,837

68.62

195.82

664.31

2022

February

301,108

67.94

171.39

568.71

2022

January

299,860

68.28

181.85

585.82

2021

December

298,272

68.03

189.8

622.14

2021

November

299,053

67.15

185.98

600.97

2021

October

295,105

66.88

190.06

618.14

2021

September

305,831

67.7

180.85

585.38

2021

August

304,822

68.09

184.51

586.52

2021

July

303,718

68.54

184

587.98

2021

June

301,457

67.78

175.83

532.63

2021

May

298,883

67.77

180.76

536.69

2021

April

294,706

67.11

173.35

502.22

2021

March

293,403

65.93

182.29

537.75

2021

February

294,111

67.16

164.2

567.99

2021

January

287,410

66.59

173.91

590.36

2020

December

282,929

66.01

181.37

605.69

2020

November

275,960

65.7662

170.028

526.806

2020

October

273,531

65.255

174.106

528.904

2020

September

263,200

64.0304

163.342

483.215

2020

August

252,703

62.7834

163.207

473.522

2020

July

234,747

62.0651

157.755

450.981

2020

June

237,637

61.7261

143.14

392.172

2020

May

243,118

60.2432

135.932

357.37

2020

April

242,275

59.4282

124.994

307.991

2020

March

240,261

58.7131

150.687

364.511

2020

February

235,543

58.6665

148.53

350.481

2020

January

231,292

59.1672

150.204

371.9

2019

December

224,108

58.3613

154.99

382.93

2019

November

222,211

58.039

153.056

359.261

2019

October

223,176

56.293

156.11

366.901

2019

September

224,959

55.7004

151.224

365.908

2019

August

222,479

54.7751

151.828

368.504

2019

July

222,087

53.887

152.979

366.386

2019

June

222,484

46.8005

149.727

346.847

2019

May

224,825

52.1958

153.257

364.254

2019

April

230,220

52.0478

155.796

360.216

2019

March

226,957

50.36

161.38

368.39

2019

February

212,252

50.04

144.49

328.15

2019

January

201,336

40.2953

154.243

368.017

2018

December

205,745

47.6943

155.774

367.766

2018

November

206,312

46.2334

153.15

343.866

2018

October

211,961

45.4371

155.16

343.225

2018

September

203,359

44.2723

145.988

327.663

2018

August

202,627

43.5588

149.517

348.912

2018

July

200,227

42.613

143.087

332.352

2018

June

197,286

42.581

137.412

317.671

2018

May

202,387

41.729

140.954

328.97

2018

April

201,795

40.2881

142.056

312.999

2018

March

196,002

39.34

147.52

337.11

2018

February

192,117

38.4185

132.297

300.852

2018

January

188,029

37.8418

136.658

322.984

2017

December

182,472

37.3868

139.934

332.622

2017

November

176,986

36.3906

131.738

298.957

2017

October

170,389

36.0008

134.198

299.018

2017

September

167,775

35.537

128.457

300.917

2017

August

167,353

35.333

120.645

286.341

2017

July

169,480

34.578

128.105

308.893

2017

June

165,109

34.178

125.897

299.789

2017

May

164,674

34.205

132.455

315.448

2017

April

160,076

34.286

128.885

297.437

2017

March

157,855

33.919

133.336

320.18

2017

February

154,908

33.291

117.495

279.386

2017

January

152,547

33.343

122.03

299.486

2016

December

165,908

34.957

126.349

316.773

2016

November

162,441

34.281

120.932

291.227

2016

October

181,456

34.037

122.45

292.092

2016

September

173,731

33.435

112.586

284.055

2016

August

173,774

32.757

114.156

297.229

2016

July

167,072

32.336

110.514

281.854

2016

June

162,465

31.386

106.342

270.973

2016

May

156,349

31.296

107.821

277.94

2016

April

153,762

31.438

105.506

269.82

2016

March

150,987

30.696

107.855

273.585

2016

February

148,982

29.489

100.983

257.185

2016

January

146,710

29.0976

95.52

242.372

2015

December

143,946

28.6447

107.44

267.068

2015

November

142,386

28.064

101.33

236.372

2015

October

140,612

27.537

102.75

255.808

2015

September

138,131

27.312

96.32

247.506

2015

August

136,042

27.0497

94.12

248.154

2015

July

133,989

26.7382

93.9985

238.864

2015

June

131,761

26.5028

90.6686

227.921

2015

May

129,735

26.4645

89.9024

230.152

2015

April

129,218

26.1392

84.9056

213.746

2015

March

128,591

25.6902

90.3477

231.836

2015

February

127,187

25.4556

80.7405

208.132

2015

January

125,826

25.3972

81.6534

210.54

2014

December

123,703

25.2492

85.6071

225.549

2014

November

121,419

24.9465

80.9984

203.239

2014

October

128,706

25.996

82.8925

210.277

2014

September

124,179

26.2995

78.1748

206.341

2014

August

124,708

26.333

78.8987

206.72

2014

July

122,462

26.2265

77.4651

200.992

2014

June

120,781

25.9284

74.0288

189.911

2014

May

117,807

25.8152

74.5472

198.131

2014

April

116,581

26.1399

72.0955

186.664

2014

March

116,196

26.208

73.9817

192.695

2014

February

115,015

26.1164

65.5934

172.797

2014

January

114,107

25.7568

67.0519

178.478

2013

December

113,130

25.3263

69.1378

182.495

2013

November

112,947

24.9

68.7

175.22

2013

October

111,697

24.43

68.27

175.29

2013

September

110,432

23.97

63.43

165.59

2013

August

108,559

23.87

64.71

168.1

2013

July

105,669

24.27

62.71

162.76

2013

June

103,165

23.75

60.03

152.5

2013

May

100,584

23.47

60.34

158.77

2013

April

96,319

23.0185

55.9993

142.609

2013

March

93,211

22.3292

52.3949

134.446

2013

February

88,393

21.8024

53.4683

141.126

2013

January

85,548

21.4181

53.4068

142.653

2012

December

76,912

21.06

55.96

150.16

2012

November

75,226

20.25

53.56

138.99

2012

October

70,972

20.02

51.89

137.68

2012

September

67,301

19.71

48.94

130.69

2012

August

64,439

19.38

49.7

131.38

2012

July

63,165

19.58

49.35

129.28

2012

June

61,313

19.7956

47.8763

124.02

2012

May

59,057

19.6943

47.9655

128.403

2012

April

56,717

19.53

44.35

117.36

2012

March

55,726

19.2393

45.757

126.093

2012

February

53,685

18.7921

41.7805

116.691

2012

January

52,315

18.834

40.2449

114.06

2011

December

50,471

19.191

41.7075

118.08

2011

November

49,091

19.46

41.1769

112.332

2011

October

47,874

19.2097

40.55

109.119

2011

September

46,234

18.8916

39.2139

108.615

2011

August

44,762

18.6128

39.2993

107.424

2011

July

43,577

18.3082

37.9763

99.7104

2011

June

42,840

18.1469

35.8222

92.6437

2011

May

38,485

17.9239

35.3457

94.3724

2011

April

37,309

17.7573

32.4254

86.0877

2011

March

36,198

17.4653

32.7301

88.9966

2011

February

34,572

16.8928

28.5462

76.3366

2011

January

33,968

16.6901

28.2047

75.4328

2010

December

39,449

16.4463

29.1183

75.8654

2010

November

38,201

16.075

30.0386

70.2727

2010

October

37,009

15.7346

31.3186

71.7947

2010

September

35,373

15.2239

29.4457

68.5062

2010

August

33,864

14.5893

26.8233

61.531

2010

July

32,974

13.4701

26.915

61.7728

2010

June

31,902

10.9147

25.0338

58.0993

2010

May

31,036

10.4928

24.6984

58.0795

2010

April

29,570

10.2026

22.6933

51.8136

2010

March

27,622

9.97211

24.0758

56.1167

2010

February

25,394

9.67495

20.8087

49.9055

2010

January

24,850

9.4767

20.0767

48.4625

2009

December

23,012

8.88258

21.6891

52.3417

2009

November

22,476

8.61529

19.975

47.4656

2009

October

20,631

8.36803

19.92

48.6365

2009

September

19,803

8.01624

18.3703

45.3683

2009

August

18,780

7.7141

17.0104

40.6787

2009

July

18,504

7.42641

16.8986

40.3374

2009

June

16,641

7.19062

15.9846

38.1756

2009

May

16,029

6.8427

15.0488

36.8062

2009

April

14,790

6.53192

13.7796

34.0201

2009

March

13,358

6.28952

13.5541

33.8202

2009

February

7512

5.81602

11.0793

28.6863

2009

January

7304

5.47828

10.1906

27.0749

2008

December

6104

5.08247

10.2051

26.99

2008

November

5399

4.75139

8.56681

21.7

2008

October

4781

4.42028

8.30365

21.6007

2008

September

4230

4.14304

7.15191

19.2699

2008

August

3761

3.72618

6.34241

16.7563

2008

July

3378

3.36719

5.39108

14.0171

2008

June

3011

3.03852

4.20144

10.9172

2008

May

2770

2.71813

4.02127

10.9042

2008

April

2606

2.37346

3.07289

8.38964

2008

March

2329

2.07553

2.3975

6.74745

2008

February

2067

1.82153

1.7399

5.21979

2008

January

1812

1.5891

1.34683

4.05904

2007

December

1582

1.34527

1.2741

3.77027

2007

November

1379

1.1332

1.22174

3.51495

2007

October

1196

0.875962

0.958908

2.82955

2007

September

960

0.635761

0.669689

2.06969

2007

August

819

0.432555

0.516239

1.57991

2007

July

681

0.268499

0.354298

1.06537

2007

June

527

0.175652

0.233661

0.720102

2007

May

447

0.107733

0.15

0.483709

2007

April

362

0.054944

0.07

0.220896

2007

March

307

0.020992

0.021714

0.0643905

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] AFI (2018a). Financial Inclusion: Definition and Basic Concepts. Alliance for Financial Inclusion.
[2] Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[3] Aker, J. C., Boumnijel, R., McClelland, A., & Tierney, N. (2016). Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger. The World Bank Economic Review, 30, 1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1086/687578
[4] Boateng, R., Molla, A., & Heeks, R. (2017). Mobile Money, Smallholder Farmers, and Household Welfare in Kenya. World Development, 99, 405-429.
[5] Bouhdaoui, Y., & Asongu, S. A. (2019). Fintech in Africa: A Roadmap. Journal of African Business, 20, 369-372.
[6] Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
[7] CGAP (2016). Financial Inclusion in Kenya: Insights from the 2016 FinAccess Household Survey.
[8] CGAP (2017). About CGAP.
https://www.cgap.org/about
[9] CGAP (2018). From Access to Usage: Digital Financial Services for Microenterprises in Kenya.
[10] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[11] Demirgüç -Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8398. World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0
[12] Fink, G., McConnell, M., & Vollmer, S. (2017). Testing for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Experimental Data: False Discovery Risks and Correction Procedures. Journal of Development Economics, 127, 33-46.
[13] FSD Kenya (2019). The FinAccess National Survey 2019.
[14] GSMA (2019). The Mobile Economy: Sub-Saharan Africa 2019.
https://www.gsma.com/r/mobileeconomy/sub-saharan-africa/
[15] GSMA (2020). State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money.
[16] GSMA (2021). The Mobile Economy: Sub-Saharan Africa 2021.
[17] Honohan, P., & Beck, T. (2007). Making Finance Work for Africa. World Bank Publications.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6909-8
[18] Hughes, N., Lonie, S., & Goldfajn, I. (2014). The Role of Regulation in Digital Financial Inclusion. World Economic Forum.
[19] ITU (2019). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2019.
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
[20] Mas, I. (2014). Digital Financial Services in Africa: Beyond the Kenyan Success Story. Development Policy Review, 34, 435-455.
[21] Mas, I. (2016). Fintech and Financial Services: Initial Considerations. CGAP.
[22] Mas, I. & Radcliffe, D. (2010). Mobile Payments Go Viral: M-PESA in Kenya. Journal of Financial Transformation, 32, 169-182.
[23] Mbiti, I. M., & Weil, D. N. (2011). Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya. NBER Working Paper No. 17129. National Bureau of Economic Research.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w17129
[24] McKenna, K., & McKay, A. (2015). The Mobile Phone Gender Gap: Why Does It Matter and What Can We Do? GSMA.
[25] Milazzo, A., & Ng’ang’a, S. (2018). The Impact of Mobile Money on the Informal Insurance Market in Kenya. World Development, 109, 359-371.
[26] Ng’ang’a, S. K. (2018). Challenges of Mobile Banking in Kenya: A Case of Safaricom’s M-Pesa. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8, 13-20.
[27] Ng’weno, A. (2018). Financial Inclusion in Kenya: The Impact of Mobile Money Transfer Services. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 11, 33-46.
[28] Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The Long-Run Poverty and Gender Impacts of Mobile Money. Science, 354, 1288-1292.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309
[29] United Nations (2018). Financial Inclusion.
[30] World Bank (2017). Global Findex Database. World Bank.
https://globalfindex.worldbank.org/
[31] World Bank (2018a). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2017. World Bank.
[32] World Bank (2018b). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. World Bank.
[33] World Bank (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. World Bank.
[34] World Bank (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.