D. Cheng, et al., “Endovascular Aortic Repair versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology,” Vol. 55, No. 10, 2010, pp. 986-1001. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.047

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Experience with Thoracic Aortic Stent-Grafting at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital: Outcomes from the First Decade

  AUTHORS: Michel R Hoenig, Jason Jenkins, Nicholas Boyne, Allan Kruger, Philip J Walker

  KEYWORDS: Aorta; Stents; Surgery

  JOURNAL NAME: World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol.2 No.3, September 21, 2012

  ABSTRACT: Objectives: To describe thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital between 2001-2010. Design: Prospective cohort study. Results: We successfully treated 95 of 97 patients for a 98% procedural success rate. Of the treated patients, 68 (72%) were males and mean age was 61 ± 17 years. Average follow up was 3.6 ± 2.0 years. Pathologies treated were: dissection (n = 35), aneurysmal disease (n = 32), traumatic disease (n = 19), coarctation (n = 5) and miscellaneous (n = 4). There was one peri-procedural myocardial infarction. Renal complications occurred in 7 patients (3 with doubling creatinine and 4 requiring temporary renal replacement therapy). Stroke occurred in 2 patients and paresis in 2 patients (permanent in one). Six patients died during index hospitalization and 17 deaths occurred during follow-up, 2 of which were confirmed secondary to aortic pathology. Age (HR 1.08 per year, p