Synthesis of Polymer Blend Ferrite Composite for Microwave Absorption at X-Band Frequency ()
1. Introduction
Electromagnetic interference became very serious problem in the modern day microwaves communication. Microwave affects the neuron electrical conductivity leading to long term neurological disorder in humans [1]. In order to minimize these problems new materials are synthesized having the potential to absorb or shield the microwave. Microwave absorbing materials (MAM) also play an important role in the military defence system in application to RADAR. Various techniques are used for synthesizing the materials. These materials are magnetic, non-magnetic or composite of both with conducting polymer magnetic. Conducting polymer polyaniline can be synthesized by chemically or by electrochemical polymerization [2]. Ferrites based materials have high coercive force, reliable magnetization, large magneto-crystalline anisotropy, chemical stability and low cost [3] [4] [5]. They are used in various devices like core of the transformer, microwave and magnetic memories, noise filter [6] and photodegradation [7] [8] [9] [10]. Nickel Ferrite is considered to be n-types semiconductor. The complex part of the permittivity (ε") and permeability (µ") are directly associated with the microwave absorption. Microwave absorbing materials should be light weight, chemically and environmentally stable and low density. Jin et al. synthesized PPy/MMT polymer composite, which has the microwave absorbing power of −10 dB at X-band frequency [11]. Tiwari [12] et al. developed a simple differential bridge technique to measure the dielectric constant of thin polymer film of PPy and polystyrene at microwave range. The results are in good agreement with the reported data. PPy/TiO2(np)/CNT and PANI/TiO2(np)-Fe3+ polymer nanocomposite have the microwave absorption of 99.99% [13] [14]. Composite of conducting polymer and magnetic material will give better absorption.
The synthesized polymer nanocomposite material has the minimum reflection loss of −28 dB which is 99% adsorption at 10.2 GHz. The magnetic loss inside the material was responsible for the microwave adsorption by the material.
2. Experimental Method
Nickel ferrite material is synthesized by using a modified sol gel method. Analytical grade Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O and Ni(NO3)3∙6H2O are taken in a 2:1 molar ratio, dissolved in ethylene glycol at room temperature and is sonicated for 30 min. 3 M of citric acid is added to homogenize the metal ions present in the solution. The solution is heated at 60˚C for 2 hr to form a wet gel and this is further calcinited at 600˚C leading to auto-ignition to produce fluffy nickel ferrite. H2SO4 (0.1 M) and aniline (ANI) 0.1 M is dissolved in 50 ml of de-ionize water (DI). Pre-prepared polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) 1.4 mM solution and nickel ferrite is added to ANI/H2SO4 solution and stirrered for 1 hr. Ammonium peroxydisulfate (APS) 0.1 M dissolve in water is added drop wise to the solution. And finally it is left for chemical polymerization at 10˚C. The polymer nanocomposite is filtered and washed with DI water several times and dried at 60˚C. The polymer composite is palletized by hydraulic press for different thickness of 2 mm, 2.25 mm, 2.5 mm and 2.95 mm respectively. Finally, we tested for microwave absorption at X-band frequency for the samples.
3. Characterization
The synthesized polymer nanocomposite is characterized by the SEM-EDX, FITR and XRD. The electromagnetic parameters such as permittivity, permeability and reflection loss are measured by using vector network analyzer (Agilent ENA 50 GHz) between frequencies 8 - 12 GHz.
4. Result and Discussion
4.1. SEM-EDX, FTIR and XRD Study
The SEM image of the polymer nanocomposite in Figure 1(a) shows the formation of NiFe2O3 crystal and polyaniline/PVA flake like structures. The elemental composition of PANI/PVA/NiFe2O3 is shown in Figure 1(d) by EDX. The elemental compositions are given in Table 1. The FTIR spectrum of polymer composite is shown in Figure 1(c). The characteristic peak at the 1540 cm−1, 985 cm−1, 1050 cm−1, 1290 cm−1 are due to the C=C stretching, N=Q=N (Q = quionoid ring), C=C stretching mode in benzenoid ring and C-N stretching. The peak at the 600 cm−1 shows the interaction between the PANI/PVA and NiFe2O3 [15].
Figure 1(b) shows the powder XRD of the PANI/PVA/NiFe2O3, to investigate the crystallinity of the sample. We have found the three peaks at 18.96˚, 30˚,
Figure 1. (a) SEM, (b) XRD (c) FTIR, and (d) EDX of PANI/PVA/NiFe2O3.
Table 1. Elemental analysis of PANI/PVA/NiFe2O3.
36.01˚ which correspond to the crystal planes of [1, 1, 1], [2, 2, 0] and [3, 1, 1] [14] [16]. This confirmed the crystallinity of the sample which also confirmed by the SEM image in Figure 1(a). The crystallite size of the NiFe2O3 can be calculated using the Scherrer formula [12] :
(1)
where, τ is the mean size of the ordered (crystalline) domains, K is a dimensionless shape factor with a value close to unity, λ is the wavelength and β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM). The average crystallite size is found to be 5.33 nm.
4.2. Electromagnetic Parameter
For the passive medium permittivity and permeability is given by:
(2)
(3)
The real part of the permittivity and permeability shows the capacity of storing electric and magnetic energy inside the medium, whereas the imaginary part shows loss inside the material. The microwave absorbing property by the material depends on the dielectric and magnetic loss. Figure 2(a) shows frequency dependent of real part and imaginary part of the permittivity. The real part of the permittivity
, has the maximum value of 5.7 (8.2 GHz). As the frequency increases the
value decreases to 4.95 (12 GHz). The decrease in
(real part) is due to the decrease in relaxation time of the electric dipole. As PANI is a conducting polymer, electrons can travel freely and accumulate at the interface between NiFe2O3 and PANI/PVA. Creating a structure similar to a boundary-layer capacitor and generating interfacial dipole polarization. It is found that many hectero-junctions are formed within the polymer composite. In case of the imaginary part of the permittivity the curve is almost linear in the entire frequency. The electrical resonance in the polymer composite may due to space charge polarization and interfacial polarization [17].
Figure 2. Frequency dependence of (a) permittivity and (b) permeability.
Figure 2(b) shows the frequency dependent of permeability. The value of real part of the permeability increases from 1.14 (8 GHz) to 1.25 (12 GHz) with the increase in frequency. In imaginary part of the permeability decreases from 0.16 (8 GHz) to 0.12 (8.8 GHz) and increases up to maximum of 0.17 (9.45 GHz). The magnetic resonance inside the polymer composite may be due to natural and exchange resonance [11].
Figure 3(a) shows the graph for dielectric and magnetic loss. In our study it is found that the magnetic loss (tanδM) is dominating over the dielectric loss (tanδE). The magnetic loss in the material may be due to the gyromagnetic spin resonance [18]. The dielectric loss inside the material can be explained by the Debye dipole relaxation mechanism. If the plot between the
and
is semi-circle then it is known as Cole-Cole semi-circle given by the relation [19].
(4)
Figure 3(b) shows semi circles representing the two Debye relaxation process. The large number of charge is accumulated at the interface between the NiFe2O3 and PANI/PVA, which acts like a large electric dipoles which increase the polarization loss [20] [21]. Figure 3(c) shows the frequency dependent of impedance. Naturally NiFe2O3 alone has the high value of the impedance but due to the presence of conducting polymer it has low value of impedance. It has the
Figure 3. Frequency dependence of (a) dielectric and magnetic loss, (b) between
and
, (c) impedance and (d) reflection loss.
maximum value of 0.84 Ω in the lower frequency.
4.3. Reflection Loss Measurement
Reflection loss by the polymer composite is measured by rectangular wave guide method in X-band frequency. The reflection loss measurement with metal back of the material is calculated by using the transmission line theory [22].
(5)
(6)
Here Zin is impedance of the material, Z0 is the impedance of the free space, μr relative permeability, ϵr relative permittivity, f frequency, d is the thickness of the sample and RL is the reflection loss (absorption) by the medium. Figure 3(d) shows the microwave reflection losses by the polymer composite. It is found that minimum reflection loss by the polymer composite of thickness 2 mm is −22 dB at the frequency 8.9 GHz which corresponds to 90% absorption of the incident microwave. The minimum reflection for thickness of 2.25 mm, 2.5 mm, 2.95 mm are −27.5 dB (99% at 12 GHz), −25.3 dB (99% at 10.1 GHz), −28 dB (99% at 10.2 GHz) respectively. The absorption is due to the magnetic loss inside the polymer nanocomposite and is confirmed in Figure 3(a). The reflection loss also depends on the surface morphology of the material. The flakes like structure have the minimum reflection loss as compare to the spherical and tube like structure. Table 2 shows the comparison of reflection loss of our composite along with other reported work.
5. Conclusion
The polymer composite is synthesized by the chemical oxidative polymerization method using APS as the oxidizing agent. The SEM image of the polymer nickel ferrite shows the formation of crystalline structure as supported by the XRD data. The PANI/PVA shows the formation of flake-like structure. The minimum reflection loss (metal back) by the polymer composite is found to be −28 dB with 99% absorbance by the material. Thus this polymer nanocomposite can be used as coating material for adsorbing the microwave frequency between 8 GHz to 12 GHz.
Table 2. Comparison of reflection loss of our polymer composite along with other reported work of same thickness.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to MPCST, Bhopal (Project No. A/RD/RP-2/2013-14/214), Jiwaji University (S. No. /Dev/2016/214) and Post Doctoral Fellowship, Jiwaji University (S. No. F/Dev./2019/611, 2019) for providing research grant, DMSRDE Kanpur for microwave studies, CEERI-Pilani and Central Facility Lab, Jiwaji University, Gwalior for characterization of samples.