Share This Article:

Methodology and Equations of Mineral Production Forecast
—Part I. Crude Oil in the UK and Gold in Nevada, USA. Prediction of Late Stages of Production

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:1049KB) PP. 352-360
DOI: 10.4236/ojg.2013.35040    4,866 Downloads   6,795 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The equations of mineral production forecast link the change in time of mineral reserves with the production and the ratio of reserves to production. These equations allow us to model the development of the mineral resources evaluated at any scale. Probabilistic bidimensional charts made from montecarlo simulations provide intervals of confidence for the forecasts. The set of equations is devised and presented for a variety of applications to the oil and gas industry, as well to the production of any other mineral resource, either metals or non metals, whose ore deposit volumes and production might be quantified. The cases studied in the UK and USA are at late stages of production, periods for what the equations are most suitable to be applied without further adjustments. Experimental design allows the diagnosis of the likely values of the variables pertaining to the equations, in order to achieve the results provided by conventional production forecasts or to explore other scenarios of investigation. The method can be practical to evaluate commitments of production of mineral resources with time, to support strategic plans for companies, corporations, countries or regions based on those evaluations, for the screening and ranking of mineral assets based on their production potential and many other tasks where the prediction of future volumes of mineral production is required.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

S. Rodríguez, "Methodology and Equations of Mineral Production Forecast
—Part I. Crude Oil in the UK and Gold in Nevada, USA. Prediction of Late Stages of Production," Open Journal of Geology, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2013, pp. 352-360. doi: 10.4236/ojg.2013.35040.

References

[1] K. Deffeyes, “Beyond Oil. The VIew from Hubbert’s Peak,” Hill and Wang, New York, 2006.
[2] S. Pérez Rodríguez, R. Soto and B. D. Soto, “The Development of a New Methodology to Reduce Uncertainty in Implementing a New EOR Project,” IPTC-17017-MS, 2013
[3] Office for National Statistics of the United Kingdom, 2013. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/environmental/environmental-accounts/2011/sum-oil-gas-reserves.html
[4] M. Earp, “UKCS Oil and Gas Production Projections,” Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), 2013.
[5] Nevada Commission on Mineral Resources, 2011. http://minerals.state.nv.us/forms/mining/MajorMinesOfNevada/
[6] M. Namakforoosh, “Metodología de la Investigación,” 2nd Edition, Limusa, Mexico, 2011.
[7] R. Hernández, C. Fernández and P. Baptista, “Metodología de la Investigación,” 5th Edition, McGraw Hill, 2010.
[8] I. Hayhow and G. J. Lemee, “Reserves to Production Ratios and Present Value Relationships,” 2000 SPE/CERI Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, 3-5 April 2000. doi:10.2118/59783-MS
[9] I. Sominsky, “Method of Mathematical Induction,” D C Heath & Co., 2000.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.