Microbial Contents and Antibiotics Susceptibilities from Hand Washing Stations during COVID-19 Pandemic in Lagos, Nigeria

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic put every government in the globe on red alert; safety protocol and long-standing infection prevention and control (IPC) measures such as hand and oral hygiene, social/ physical distancing, use of face mask were rigorously enforced. This study evaluated microbial (bacterial, fungal) contents of rinsate, bowl water, water from tap, and the neighborhood drainage in selected hand washing stations in Agege, Alimosho, Mainland, Island and Shomolu local government areas (LGAs) in Lagos, Nigeria. The identities of bacterial isolates were confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing while the fungi were identified by colonial appearances. The antibiotics susceptibility testing (AST) of the bacteria against structurally unrelated antibiotics was performed and interpreted according to standard guidelines. Sixty-seven (67) bacterial and fifty-one (51) fungal isolates were recovered from mainly water bucket with tap and rinsates across all the LGAs. There were marked microbial loads (some too numerous to count at 10-3 dilution) across Alimosho, Lagos Island and Mainland. Forty (40) representative bacterial isolates were selected for 16S rRNA sequencing. The occurrence of microbial isolates in the samples was at varying degrees; Klebsiella spp. (37.5%), Bacillus spp. (32.5%), Enterobacter spp. (17.5%), were the predominant bacteria while Aspergillus spp. (46.2%), yeasts (34.6%), Sporothrix schenckii (11.5%) and Penicillium spp. (7.7%) constituted the fungal isolates. The biological weapon, B. anthracis was recovered from a water bucket with tap in Alimosho. The antibiotics susceptibility testing of the bacteria showed high degrees of resistance profile; 45 (69.2%) to ampicillin, 41.5% amoxicillin/clavulanate while 47.6% were resistant to two (2) or more antibiotics. This study demonstrated high microbial load during the pandemic at the study LGAs, presence of environmental commensals reputed for debilitating opportunistic infections in man and risk of passing heavy load of these potential pathogens to the public.

Share and Cite:

Bamidele, T. , Odumosu, B. , Adenola, P. , Ameh, J. , Anejo-Okopi, J. , Musa, A. , Osoba, B. , Ezechi, O. and Salako, B. (2023) Microbial Contents and Antibiotics Susceptibilities from Hand Washing Stations during COVID-19 Pandemic in Lagos, Nigeria. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 13, 54-65. doi: 10.4236/aid.2023.131007.

1. Introduction

The global hand washing day is celebrated on October 15, last year had the theme “hand hygiene for all” with its importance underscored in the prevention of COVID-19 pandemic. Hand washing is a sure way of preventing communicable diseases such as cholera, common cold, some foodborne diseases/gastrointestinal norovirus, Lassa fever and acute respiratory diseases [1] - [8] . This is more so because human hands harbor microorganisms that may both be transient or residents (normal flora) and constitute primary mode of transmission of many infectious agents [9] .

The removal of transient and/or resident flora from the skin is dependent on some factors (microbial load, efficacy of hand washing or for how long it was done, types of soap, organic matter), while certain spp. persist even with the use of antimicrobial soap with water, others are easily washed off [10] .

In the era of COVID-19 pandemic, with more emphasis on hand hygiene, more people tended to practice hand washing using various types/brands of antiseptics/disinfectant soaps and alcohol based hand rubs. This will wash off more of microorganisms from the hand and one way or the other find their way into community drainage system. These colonizing microorganisms which might not have been totally killed by the hand washing agents will constitute health hazards to the environment; this is because their removal from soiled hands and resultant killing are dependent on; microbial load, organic contents, hand washing time, soap used. It is also important to note that persistent washing by many people will increase the probability of reducing the killing ability of the soap in the rinsates.

Provision of improvised buckets with tap or a bowl of water for hand washing was commonplace in the era of COVID-19 pandemic in shopping malls, institutions, market place, healthcare facilities, schools, et cetera.

The practice of not changing rinse water in the bowl frequently as a result of lack of running tap water could increase the rate of exchange of microbes between various users and this constitutes ineffective hand washing [11] [12] .

This study, therefore, was designed to evaluate the microbial (bacterial, fungal) contents and antibiotics susceptibilities in water used in hand washing and in drainage systems within the neighborhood of selected stations in Lagos State.

This will help to determine the health hazard posed by the ubiquitous, sub-standard hand washing stations made during the pandemic.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sites

Selected hand washing stations in five LGAs in Lagos, Nigeria namely Agege (Ag), Alimosho (Al), Island (Is), Mainland (Mn), and Shomolu (Sh). These stations cut across shopping malls, churches, schools, health care facilities (hospitals, laboratories), pharmacy/cosmetic stores, eateries/restaurants, hotel/bar, factories, gas/fuel stations, tax office and residential buildings

2.2. Ethical/Social Consideration

The study did not involve any human participants. The approval (IRB/20/097) was obtained at the institutional review board of the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR-IRB).

The permission to conduct the study was granted by the Lagos State Primary Health Care Board (LS/PHCB/MS/1128/VOLVIII/093) while community entry was facilitated by the respective Medical Health Officer (MHO) in each local government.

2.3. Sampling/Microbiology

The rinsates, bowl water, taps and drainage water samples were collected in screw capped containers following standard aseptic procedures between 5th March 2021 to 6th May 2021 (9 weeks). The five LGAs were selected purposively while the water samples were collected by convenience and also based on the set-up at the stations.

They were transported (in ice packs) to the laboratory for processing; ten (10) fold serial dilutions of the samples were done in duplicates while 100 µl of the diluted sample was inoculated in petri dish for pour plating on bacteriological media (MacConkey, Mueller Hinton agar (MHA)) and spread plating on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) for fungi following all standard procedures. Incubation was done in air at 37˚C for 24 hr. for bacteria and room temperature for up to a week for fungi.

The microbial counting was done and recorded as from no growth to too numerous to count (TNTC).

2.4. Antibiotics Susceptibility Testing (AST)

This was performed by agar disc diffusion methods following the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Briefly, suspension of the distinct colonies (adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity) was made in sterile physiological saline and with the aid of sterile swab stick, lawns of the suspension were made on the surface of sterile MHA plates, before placing the antibiotic discs. This was incubated in air at 37˚C for 24 hr. after which the inhibition zone was measured in millimeter (mm). The antibiotics were selected based on the Gram stain reaction of the bacterial isolates.

2.5. Identification

The combination of colonial morphology, biochemical and molecular assays were performed on distinct (single, pure) colonies.

Forty bacterial isolates were selected and confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing using primers targeting the hyper variable regions V5-V6-V7 to amplify the target DNA after which sequencing was carried out on the amplicons. The representative bacteria were selected from isolates showing similar colonial and biochemical characteristics. All fungal isolates were identified with colonial morphology.

DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The extraction of DNA from the bacterial isolates was performed using in-house NIMR-BIOTECH kit and quantitation done by qubit fluorometer.

The PCR was performed in 20 µl reaction comprising the primer pair (799f-AACACGGATTAGATACCCG, 1193r-ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC), ready to load master mix (SolisBiodyne, Estonia), template DNA and distilled water. The amplification was done on thermocycler at specific cycling parameters as follows; initial denaturation at 94˚C for 3 mins, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94˚C for 1 min, annealing at 53˚C for 1 min and elongation at 72˚C for 1 min. The final elongation was carried out at 72˚C for 10 mins before holding the reaction at 4˚C till removal from the cycler.

The amplicons were later resolved alongside a 100 bp DNA ladder (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) on 1.5% agarose gel run at 100V for 1hr and viewed under UV trans-illuminator.

All amplicons corresponding to the expected gene size (394 bp) were sent out for commercial Sanger sequencing and the data subjected to basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) algorithm on National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank. All the sequence data (16S rRNA genes) were submitted to the GenBank and accession numbers allocated (Table 1).

3. Results

Sixty-seven (67) bacteria and fifty-one (51) fungal isolates were recovered from different samples collected across the five (5) LGAs while the fungi were identified with phenotypic characteristics, forty representative bacterial isolates were selected for 16S rRNA sequencing based on their different colonial appearances and Gram stain reaction. Most are environmental isolates while some are reputed for opportunistic infections in man.

The confirmed bacterial isolates and frequencies are as follows; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 32.5%, Enterobacter spp., 17.5%, Bacillus spp. 32.5%, K. aerogenes, 5.0%, others 12.5%.

Table 1. The identified bacterial species across the LGAs.

The agarose gel electrophoresis picture showed the 16S rRNA amplicons at the expected size of 394 bp (Figure 1). The 16S rRNA sequence data were submitted to the NCBI, GenBank and accession numbers allocated (OK316821-OK316860) Table 1.

Many of the fungal isolates were moulds (Aspergillus spp 46.2%, Yeasts 34.6%, Sporothrix schenckii 11.5%, Penicillium spp. 7.7%) and were recovered from water bucket with tap (bw) and the rinsates (rs) which constituted the largest number of samples collected (Table 2). Most of the organisms isolated from the rinsates were also present in the water bucket with tap.

The bacterial count (bc) in the 5 LGAs varied greatly, with Alimosho rs having between non to too numerous to count (TNTC). The highest microbial load was found in bw and rs at Alimosho, Lagos Island and Mainland LGAs while the tap water (tp) used for hand washing did not yield any significant microbial load (p < 0.05). Most of the fungal isolates (fc) were recovered from Island and Mainland (Table 3).

The antibiotics susceptibilities result indicates a range for 2 or more bacterial spp. of same genus. For instance, Klebsiella spp. include K. pneumoniae and K. aerogenes. Forty-five (69.2%) of the isolates were resistant to ampicillin while 41.5% were resistant to augmentin and 47.6% multidrug resistant (Table 4).

Figure 1. Gel picture of 16S rRNA genes. L-R-Lane 1 (upper/lower): 100 bp DNA ladder, lanes 2-35: amplicons.

Table 2. Fungal isolates across the LGAs.

Table 3. Total microbial load of the samples per locations (LGAs).

Ag-Agege, Al-Alimosho, Is-Island, Mn-Mainland, Sh-Shomolu, bw-water bucket with tap, dr-drainage, rs-rinsates, tp-tap. TNTC-Too numerous to count, bcbacterial count, fcfungal count, no samples.

Table 4. Antibiotics susceptibilities of the isolated bacteria.

AMP-Ampicillin, CAZ-Ceftazidime, IMP-Imipenem, GEN-Gentamicin, AZI-Azithromycin, AUG-Augmentin, CPR-Ciprofloxacin, CEF-Cefotaxime, TET-Tetracycline, CHL-Chloramphenicol.

4. Discussion

Handwashing, when performed effectively and frequently, has been demonstrated to reduce/eliminate carriage of pathogenic microorganisms and thus reduction in infections/illnesses whether in the community, hospitals settings or farmworkers with soiled hands [11] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] .

The awareness and rush for handwashing were intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic especially in Lagos, being the epicenter in Nigeria. It was not uncommon to see handwashing facilities of various designs in public institutions, where people were made to use before access. This was corroborated by the report of Moore et al. 2020 [18] that hand hygiene performance initially increased at the outset of the COVID-19 crisis although this was not sustained. It should be noted however that the investigation mentioned above (Moore et al. 2020) [18] was conducted in healthcare settings. Some studies investigated multiple handwashing per day (up to 10 times) and found out this significantly reduced the risk of acquiring seasonal coronavirus infections [19] [20] .

Our study conducted in five LGAs in Lagos State had the main objective of investigating bacterial/fungal morphotypes in the rinsates, bowl water, tap, and drainages in selected handwashing stations. This was motivated by paucity of data in Nigeria at the time and the potential hazard the “pressure” can cause to public health.

The work of Tetteh-Quarcoo et al. 2016 [21] in preschool children within Accra, Ghana, reported eight different bacterial and fungal isolates which were quite different from our findings may be due to the different situations (as ours was in the midst of pandemic) and the target population. Also, our bacterial isolates were confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing while theirs phenotypic.

Most of the bacterial organisms were isolated from water bucket with tap (bw) and rinsates (rs) with particularly loads too numerous to count (TNTC). The LGA where this was pronounced is the most populous and even the largest in size.

The bacterial isolates are mostly environmental/enteric commensals with abilities as opportunistic infectious agents in hospitalized or immunocompromised patients. Some have been implicated in debilitating infections with multidrug resistance [22] [23] [24] [25] . For instance, carbapenemase producing Atlantibacter hermannii was recently isolated from clinical sample [26] . Klebsiella spp. accounted for the highest occurrence in the hand washing stations and this is worrisome, as they are reportedly opportunistic infectious agents especially the K. pneumoniae. Although they colonize the mucosal surfaces without causing causing infections, there have been various reports of abilities to cause life threatening infections such as pneumonia, sepsis and other systemic infections as a result of their dissemination to tissues and their abilities to evade host immunity [27] [28] . The high case fatality of between 18% - 49% by especially the multi drug resistant isolates has been reported [29] [30] . In this study, all the isolates of K. pneumoniae were multi drug resistant including their resistance to imipenem. This is in tandem with various reports of the emergence of carbapenemase carrying Klebsiella spp. especially K. pneumoniae [31] [32] [33] . Most of the Bacillus spp. recovered from the samples in this study belong to the “cereus” group which has pathogenic potentials while B. anthracis causes anthrax, others either cause food poisoning or localized wound/eye infections and systemic disease.

The B. anthracis isolated in this study has 100% identity with the one in the GenBank; there is need to perform PCR detection for the important toxins (pagA, cap) of the anthrax bacillus to confirm their toxigenicity. This isolation is not surprising as the settlements in this LGA have predominantly popular markets for grazing animals living closely with the humans. There is need to urgently put surveillance systems in place to prevent possible outbreak of this important biological weapon. On the other hand, B. subtilis is a well reported safe and reliable human and animal probiotic, also with antimicrobial properties [34] while B. aerius is reputable for its biotechnological activities [35] [36] .

The fungal isolates in this study, also mainly from bw and rs were identified based on colonial morphology and most are Aspergillus spp. while the dimorphic fungus, S. schenckii the causative agent of sporotrichosis (a sub-acute and chronic infection) was also isolated. The recent study suggested the association of this organism with cutaneous mast cells (MCs) with marked increase in TNF and IL-6 in skin lesions and in the serum [37] .

This study was not able to collect samples from all the LGAs in Lagos due to restriction in movement. The fungal identification using phenotypic characteristics was necessitated by paucity of funds on one hand (as the funding support was quite lean) and difficulty (flight/shipment) in procuring some molecular consumables during the pandemic on the other.

5. Conclusion

Although handwashing has been variously demonstrated to prevent transmission of pathogenic microbes, the pressure during COVID-19 pandemic could cause a spike in pathogenic microorganisms which poses hazard to public health. In this study, the microbial load was heavy in the water bucket and rinsates and isolation of anthrax bacilli in particular is a red flag that should be treated seriously.

Acknowledgements

The staff members of the Molecular Biology & Biotechnology Department of NIMR are well appreciated for assisting in sample collection. We also acknowledged the help of all the LGA management staff members, Health Educators and community leaders who facilitated our entry into their respective communities.

Funding

This work was supported by the COVID-19 intervention grant by NIMR (number: NMG-CIF-07-0025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] WHO (2020) COVID-19 Pandemic Heightens the Importance of Hand Washing with Soap.
https://www.afro.who.int/
[2] Curtis, V. and Cairncross, S. (2003) Effect of Washing Hands with Soap on Diarrhoea Risk in the Community: A Systematic Review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 3, 275-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00606-6
[3] Khan, M.U. (1982) Interruption of Shigellosis by Hand Washing. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 76, 164-168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(82)90266-8
[4] Borghi, J., Guinness, L., Ouedraogo, J. and Curtis, V. (2002) Is Hygiene Promotion Cost-Effective? A Case Study in Burkina Faso. Tropical Med & International Health, 7, 960-969.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00954.x
[5] Burton, M., Cobb, E., Donachie, P., Judah, G., Curtis, V. and Schmidt, W.P. (2011) The Effect of Handwashing with Water or Soap on Bacterial Contamination of Hands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 97-104.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8010097
[6] Roberts, L., Smith, W., Jorm, L., Patel, M., Douglas, R.M. and McGilchrist, C. (2000) Effect of Infection Control Measures on the Frequency of Upper Respiratory Infection in Child Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics, 105, 738-742.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.4.738
[7] Ryan, K.J. and Ray, C.G., Eds. (2004) Sherris Medical Microbiology. 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
[8] Luby, S.P., Agboatwalla, M., Feikin, D.R., Painter, J., Billhimer, W., Altaf, A. and Hoekstra, R. (2005) Effect of Handwashing on Child Health: A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 366, 225-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66912-7
[9] Ogba, O.M., Selekeowei, T. and Otu-Bassey, I. (2016) Infection Transmission Potential of Reusable Phlebotomy Tourniquet in Selected Health Facilities in Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research, 3, 96-100.
[10] Perez-Garza, J., Garcia, S. and Heredia, H. (2017) Removal of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis after Hand Washing with Antimicrobial and Non-Antimicrobial Soap and Persistence of these Bacteria in Rinsates. Journal of Food Protection, 80, 1670-1675.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-088
[11] Aceituno, A.F., Bartz, F.E., Hodge, D.W., Shumaker, D.J., Grubb, J.E., Arbogast, J.W., Davila-Avina, J., Venegas, F., Heredia, N., Garcia, S. and Leon, J.S. (2015) Ability of Hand Hygiene Interventions Using Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers and Soap to Reduce Microbial Load on Farmworker Hands Soiled During Harvest. Journal of Food Protection, 78, 2024-2032.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-102
[12] Scott, B.E., Lawson, D.W. and Curtis, V. (2007) Hard to Handle: Understanding Mothers’ Handwashing Behaviour in Ghana. Health Policy and Planning, 22, 216-224.
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czm014
[13] World Health Organization (2020) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[14] Sickbert-Bennett, E.E., DiBiase, L.M., Willis, T.M., Wolak, E.S., Weber, D.J. and Rutala W.A. (2016) Reduction of Healthcare-Associated Infections by Exceeding High Compliance with Hand Hygiene Practices. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 22, 1628-1630.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2209.151440
[15] Aiello, A.E., Coulborn, R.M.B.S., Perez, V. and Larson, E. (2008) Effect of Hand Hygiene on Infectious Disease Risk in the Community Setting: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1372-1381.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.124610
[16] Boyce, J.M. and Pittet, D. (2002) Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 23, S3-S40.
https://doi.org/10.1086/503164
[17] Larson, E.L., Early, E., Cloonan, P., Sugrue, S. and Parides, M. (2000) An Organizational Climate Intervention Associated with Increased Handwashing and Decreased Nosocomial Infections. Behavioral Medicine, 26, 14-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280009595749
[18] Moore, L.D., Robbins, G., Quinn, J. and Arbogast, J.W. (2021) The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hand Hygiene Performance in Hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control, 49, 30-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.021
[19] Beale, S., Johnson, A.M., Zambon, M., Flu Watch Group, Hayward, A.C. and Fragaszy, E.B. (2021) Hand Hygiene Practices and the Risk of Human Coronavirus Infections in a UK Community Cohort. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 98.
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15796.2
[20] Dwipayanti, N.M.U., Lubis, D.S. and Harjana, N.P.A. (2021) Public Perception and Hygiene Behavior during COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 621800.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.621800
[21] Tetteh-Quarcoo, P.B., Anim-Baidoo, I., Attah, S.K., Baako, B.A., Opintan, J.A., Minamor, A.A., Abdul-Rahman, M. and Ayeh-Kumi, P.F. (2016) Microbial Content of (Bowl Water) Used for Communal Handwashing in Preschools within Accra Metropolis, Ghana. International Journal of Microbiology, 2016, Article ID: 2617473.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2617473
[22] Thompson, D.K. and Sharkady, S.M. (2020) Expanding Spectrum of Opportunistic Cedecea Infections: Current Clinical Status and Multidrug Resistance. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 100, 461-469.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.036
[23] Annavajhala, M.K., Gomez-Simmonds, A. and Uhlemann, A.C. (2019) Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacter cloacae Complex Emerging as a Global, Diversifying Threat. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article 44.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00044
[24] Liu, B. and Tong, S. (2019) An Investigation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia-Positive Culture Caused by Fiberoptic Bronchoscope Contamination. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19, Article No. 1072.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4670-3
[25] Yoshino, Y., Nakazawa, S., Otani, S., Sekizuka, E. and Ota, Y. (2016) Nosocomial Bacteremia Due to Kluyvera cryocrescens: Case Report and Literature Review. IDCases, 4, 24-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idcr.2016.02.007
[26] Girlich, D., Bonnin, R.A., Proust, A., Naas, T. and Dortet, L. (2021) Undetectable Production of the VIM-1 Carbapenemase in an Atlantibacter hermannii Clinical Isolate. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, Article 741972.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741972
[27] Paczosa, M.K. and Mecsas, J. (2016) Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 80, 629-661.
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00078-15
[28] Magill, S.S., Edwards, J.R., Bamberg, W., et al. (2014) Multistate Point Prevalence Survey of Health Care-Associated Infections. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 1198-1208.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306801
[29] Yinnon, A.M., Butnaru, A., Raveh, D., Jerassy, Z. and Rudensky, B. (1996) Klebsiella Bacteraemia: Community versus Nosocomial Infection. QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 89, 933-941.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/89.12.933
[30] Meatherall, B.L., Gregson, D., Ross, T., Pitout, J.D. and Laupland, K.B. (2009) Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia. American Journal of Medicine, 122, 866-873.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.034
[31] Band, V.I., Satola, S.W., Burd, E.M., Farley, M.M., Jacob, J.T. and Weiss, D.S. (2018) Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Exhibiting Clinically Undetected Colistin Heteroresistance Leads to Treatment Failure in a Murine Model of Infection. mBio, 9, e02448-17.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02448-17
[32] Escandón-Vargas, K., Reyes, S., Gutiérrez, S. and Villegas, M.V. (2017) The Epidemiology of Carbapenemases in Latin America and the Caribbean. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 15, 277-297.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2017.1268918
[33] Neuner, E.A., Yeh, J.Y., Hall, G.S., Sekeres, J., Endimiani, A., Bonomo, R.A. and van Duin, D. (2011) Treatment and Outcomes in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 69, 357-362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.013
[34] Caulier, S., Nannan, C., Gillis, A., Licciardi, F., Bragard, C. and Mahillon, J. (2019) Overview of the Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Members of the Bacillus subtilis Group. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article 302.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00302
[35] Meidong, R., Khotchanalekha, K., Doolgindachbaporn, S., Nagasawa, T., Nakao, M., Sakai, K. and Tongpim, S. (2018) Evaluation of Probiotic Bacillus aerius B81e Isolated from Healthy Hybrid Catfish on Growth, Disease Resistance and Innate Immunity of Pla-Mong Pangasius bocourti. Fish and Shellfish. Immunology, 73, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2017.11.032
[36] Umeaku, C.N., Emmy-Egbe, O.I., Ukoha, C.C., Ezenwa, S.E. and Chris-Umeaku, C.I. (2019) Biodegradation of Crude Oil-Polluted Soil by Bacterial Isolates from Nigeria. Frontiers of Environmental Microbiology, 5, 14-28.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20190501.13
[37] Jiao, Q., Luo, Y., Scheffel, J., Geng, P., Wang, Y., Frischbutter, S., Li, R., Maurer, M. and Zhao, Z. (2020) Skin Mast Cells Contribute to Sporothrix schenckii Infection. Frontiers of Immunology, 11, Article 469.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00469

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.