1. Introduction
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are immensely powerful stellar explosions with an equivalent isotropic energy, Eiso, that can exceed 1054 erg [1]. They exhibit a nonthermal spectrum and their light curves consist of erratic, complex, and intense pulses. Current theoretical models suggest that GRBs emanate from jets, but the precise physical mechanism behind the formation of these jets remains elusive [2].
Several GRB energy and luminosity correlations have been discovered for long GRBs, which are bursts whose observed duration equals or exceeds 2 s. Some of these correlations were discovered through the analysis of the light curves [3] [4], while others were obtained from spectral analysis and currently include the Amati relation [5] [6] [7] [8], the Ghirlanda relation [9], the Yonetoku relation [10] [11], and the Liang-Zhang relation [12]. These correlations are important because they can be utilized as tools to probe cosmological models [12] - [18], and because they provide insight into the physics of GRBs [19] [20].
In this paper, we compare and examine the degree to which the Amati relation and the Yonetoku relation apply to both long and short bursts. We also explore and compare the Eiso-Liso plane for both types of GRBs. Section 2 provides important background regarding the Amati and Yonetoku correlations. Our data sample, results, and analysis are presented in Section 3, and our conclusion is provided in Section 4.
2. The Amati and Yonetoku Correlations
The study by Amati et al. [5] in 2002 was the first examination of a correlation in the burst’s rest frame. The study found that there is a positive correlation between the intrinsic peak energy, Ep,i, and the equivalent isotropic energy, Eiso. The study by [5] was based on 12 bursts with known redshifts, z, detected by BeppoSAX. The intrinsic peak energy is calculated from the observed peak energy, Ep,obs, by applying the z-correction as follows:
(1)
while Eiso can be calculated from the bolometric flux, Sbol, using:
(2)
where d is the luminosity distance, which can be calculated from z after adopting a certain cosmological model. In Amati’s original paper [5], a flat universe was assumed with ΩM = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7, and H0 = 65 km∙s-1∙Mpc-1. The Amati relation can be expressed logarithmically as [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]:
(3)
where the normalization, A, and the slope, B, are constants, and where áEp,iñ is the mean value of the intrinsic peak energy for the entire data sample. Early studies found that the approximate mean values for the fitting parameters are áAñ » 53 and áBñ ≈ 1.
Another important peak-energy correlation is the Yonetoku relation, which is a correlation between the intrinsic peak energy and the peak isotropic luminosity, Liso, and which can be expressed logarithmically as [26] [27] [28]:
(4)
where, like before, the normalization, A, and the slope, B, are constant fitting parameters.
3. Data, Analysis, and Results
The data sample that we use in this study is taken from Table 1 and Table 2 of [26] and consists of 49 long bursts and 19 short bursts. First, we calculated the intrinsic peak energies for all the bursts using Equation (1), then a maximum-likelihood fit of the form expressed in Equation (3) was applied to obtain the Amati relation. For the long bursts, the best-fit parameters that we obtained were A = 53.41 and B = 0.85, with a mean intrinsic peak energy of 2151.8 keV and a linear regression coefficient r = 0.67, while for the short bursts, the best-fit parameters that we obtained were A = 51.69 and B = 2.03, with a mean intrinsic peak energy of 1929.3 keV and a linear regression coefficient r = 0.86, as shown in Figure 1.
A similar procedure was applied to obtain the best-fit parameters for the Yonetoku relation. For the long bursts, the best-fit parameters that we obtained were A = 53.07 and B = 1.50, with a linear regression coefficient r = 0.86, while for the short bursts, the best-fit parameters that we obtained were A = 52.47 and B = 1.60, with a linear regression coefficient r = 0.92, as shown in Figure 2.
The values of the linear regression coefficient that we obtained indicate that the fits are statistically significant and that the correlations are strong. For long GRBs this is not surprising, but for short GRBs it is somewhat unexpected. However, it is important to keep in mind that the normalization parameter, A, is significantly smaller for short GRBs for both correlations, so it would be more accurate to say that the short bursts follow an Amati-like relation and a Yonetoku-like relation rather than following these relations in the strict sense.
We also investigated the Eiso-Liso plane for the two types of bursts to explore whether there are any significant differences. As Figure 3 shows, both types of bursts display a similar trend with a strong positive correlation between Eiso and
![]()
Figure 1. The best-fit Amati relation applied to a sample of 49 long bursts and 19 short bursts.
![]()
Figure 2. The best-fit Yonetoku relation applied to a sample of 49 long bursts and 19 short bursts.
![]()
Figure 3. The Eiso-Liso plane for the sample of 49 long bursts and 19 short bursts.
Liso, as indicated by the values of the linear regression coefficient, r = 0.71 for long GRBs and r = 0.83 for short GRBs. However, it is important to note that in the case of the short GRBs, the correlation is shifted appreciably to lower values of Eiso, which is not surprising since the energy budget involved in the formation mechanism of short bursts is less than that for long bursts.
4. Conclusion
The peak energy correlations of GRBs are important relations that provide insight into the physics of GRBs. The Amati relation is an important correlation between the intrinsic peak energy and Eiso. Our results indicate that it applies to both long and short bursts, albeit with different fitting parameters. Another important peak energy correlation is the Yonetoku relation, which correlates the intrinsic peak energy and Liso, and our results confirm that this correlation applies to both short and long bursts but with different normalizations. Our study also finds evidence that there is a significant correlation between Eiso and Liso for both types of bursts. As more data become available, it is important to confirm these results because they have important implications regarding the underlying physics of both long and short gamma-ray bursts.