Dynamical Analysis of a Stochastic Predator-Prey System with Lévy Noise and Impulsive Toxicant Input ()
1. Introduction
With the development of modernization, pollution is also being produced. Air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution and other pollution affect the stability of the ecosystem. At the same time, environmental pollution affects the survival of the natural population and human life [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. For example, the use of chemical pesticides has effectively controlled the pest problem in agriculture, but it is also widely regarded as one of the problems that have a negative impact on the environment and food safety [5]. The ecotoxicity produced by microplastics will be transferred and diffused to the entire aquatic environment, which affects the stability of the ecological environment [6]. These examples show that uncontrolled input of toxicant affects the balance of the ecosystem, and even leads to the extinction of populations. Therefore, environmental pollution will inevitably attract people’s great attention. Research on the survival of populations in polluted environments has become a hot spot [7] [8] [9] [10].
Zhang and Tan [11] considered a stochastic predator-prey system in a polluted environment with impulsive toxicant input and impulsive perturbations. They obtained a set of sufficient conditions for extinction, weak persistence in the mean and global attraction to any positive solution of the system. Lv, Meng and Wang [12] investigated an impulsive stochastic chemostat model with nonlinear perturbation in a polluted environment. They showed that both stochastic and impulsive toxicant inputs have great effects on the survival and extinction of the microorganism. Liu, Du and Deng [13] established a stochastic modified Leslie-Gower Holling-type II predator-prey model with impulsive toxicant input. They got the threshold between persistence in the mean and extinction for each population; then they concluded that the white noise is harmful to the sustainable growth of species.
Ecosystems may suffer sudden and catastrophic environmental disturbances, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, hurricanes or epidemics, etc. To explain these phenomena, Bao et al. [14] [15] considered a jump process into the stochastic Lotka-Volterra population systems and studied population dynamics of their systems at the first time. Zhao, Yuan and Zhang [16] established a stochastic competitive model with Lévy noise in an impulsive polluted environment. They showed that Lévy noise can significantly affect the persistence and extinction of each species. In this paper, we consider adding Lévy noise to the stochastic modified Leslie-Gower and Holling-type IV predator-prey system proposed by Xu et al. [17]. Then we get
(1)
where
and
are the left limit of prey populations
and predator populations
respectively.
represents the intrinsic growth rate of the
population in a non-polluting environment.
is the intensity of competition among individuals of
.
is the modified Leslie-Gower term, which states that the number of predators has fallen due to the shortage of the most important food.
is Holling-type IV functional response, which refers to the change in the density of the prey that each predator is attached to per unit time.
, and
are positive constants, where
indicates the maximum endurance of the environment without predators. N is a real-valued Poisson counting measure with characteristic measure
on a measurable subset
of
with
,
.
is the jump-diffusion coefficient.
According to the actual situation, we consider the impact of environmental pollution on the system (1). Let
and
be the concentration of toxicant in the prey organism and predator organism at time t respectively. Suppose that the growth rate
is an affine function of
[13], the parameter
represents the dose response rate of the ith population to the concentration of the organismal toxicant:
(2)
Suppose
denotes the concentration of toxicant in the environment at time t.
is the organism’s net uptake rate of environmental toxicant.
and
represent the net ingestion rate and the depuration rate respectively. h represents the rate of toxin loss in the environment due to evaporation or other reasons. Assuming that external toxins affect the entire predator-prey system by impulsive toxicant input, let
and q represent the period and the amount of impulsive toxicant input each time respectively. So we can get a stochastic modified Leslie-Gower Holling-type IV predator-prey model with Lévy noise in impulsive toxicant input environments:
(3)
Toxicants affect the system (3) by impulsive input, and the system also contains Lévy noise. There are few studies on the impact of this type of model on system dynamics, so it is of great significance. We first turn the system (3) into an impulseless system through approximate solving methods. Then we can use the ergodic method to prove the distribution stability of the system. We also get the extinction and persistence of the population by use of the comparison theorem and some inequality techniques.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we provide preparations for the proof and calculation of the system (3). Section 3 discusses the stability of the distribution of the impulseless system (6). Then in Section 4, the threshold between persistence in the mean and extinction for each species is established. We introduce some numerical simulations to support the theory in Section 5. The final section concludes this paper.
2. Preliminaries
For the sake of convenience, we define the following notations:
Moreover, as a standing hypothesis throughout this paper, we assume that
and N are independent. We also suppose that
. In order to facilitate the search when using the formula later, we suppose
Assumption 1. There is a constant
such that
Then we put forward some necessary lemmas to prepare for the main results later.
Lemma 1 [18]. Consider the following subsystem of the system (3),
(4)
Subsystem (4) has a unique
-periodic solution
, which satisfies
(5)
Remark.
and
denote the concentrations of toxicant. According to their practical significance, we get
must hold for all
. From Lemma 1, it requires the following constraints [19]:
In the following, we apply Lemma 1 to the system (3). Therefore, we only need to consider the following system
(6)
with initial value
.
Lemma 2 [20]. Suppose that
, is a local martingale vanishing at time zero. Then
(7)
where
(8)
and
is Meyer’s angle bracket process.
Lemma 3 [21]. Suppose that population
.
(i) If there exist some constants
,
,
,
, and
such that, for all
,
then
(ii) If there exist some constants
,
,
,
, and
such that, for all
,
then
Definition 1 [16] [21] [22] [23]. Let
be a solution of system (6). Then
(a) the population
is said to go to extinction if
;
(b) the population
is said to be stable in mean if
a.s., where K is a constant;
(c) the population
is said to be stochastic strong persistence in mean if
a.s.;
(d) the population
is said to be stochastic weak persistence in mean if
a.s..
Lemma 4. For any given initial value
, system (6) has a unique global positive solution
on
and the solution will remain in
almost surely.
Proof. To begin with, let us consider the following equations
(9)
with initial value
. Clearly, the coefficient of system (6) satisfy the local Lipschitz condition, then there is a unique local solution
on
, where
is the explosion time. According to Itô’s formula,
is the unique positive local solution to system (6) with initial value
. Now let us prove
to show this solution is global. Consider the following four auxiliary equations
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
By the comparison theorem for stochastic differential equations [24], we have
(14)
where
. According to Lemma 4.2 in [15], we have
(15)
(15)
(17)
(18)
Noting that
and
are existent on
, then we obtain
(Theorem 2.1 in [15] ).
3. Stability in Distribution
Lemma 5. Suppose that
is the positive solution of system (6) with any initial value
, then for any
, there exists a positive constant K such that
Proof. The proofs are very standard. Detailed proofs can refer to [15] [25] and hence are omitted here.
Lemma 6. If
and
, then system (6) is asymptotically stable in distribution, i.e., when
, there is a unique probability measure
such that the transition density
of
converges weakly to
with any given initial value
.
Proof. Let
and
be two solutions of system (6) with the same initial value
and
respectively. Then we define
According to the Itô’s formula with noise, we have
Hence,
Therefore,
Note that
, we have
Hence,
According to the first equation of system (6), we get
Therefore,
is continuously differentiable function. By Lemma 5, it gives that
(19)
where
is a positive constant. Similarly, by the second equation of system (6), it can
(20)
where
is a positive constant.
Based on Lemma 5, we can get that
and
are uniformly continuous function through (19) and (20). By the Barbalat’s conclusion of [26], we can observe that
(21)
Suppose that
represents the transition probability density of the process
and
denotes the probability of
with initial value
. By Chebyshev’s inequality [27] and Lemma 5, the family of
is tight. So we can obtained that a compact subset
such that
for any given
.
Let
be the probability measures on
. For any given two measures
, we define the metric
where
For any
and
, we can get
where
,
is a complementary set of
. Because the family of
is tight, so there exists a sufficiently large K such that
for any given
. By (21), there exists a
such that
holds for
, which yields
.
It follows from the arbitrariness of
that for
, we have
Similarly, we get
Hence,
holds for
and
.
That is to say, for any
, the transition probability
is Cauchy in
with metric
. So
is Cauchy in
with metric
. In a word, there has a unique
such that
. From (21), we get
Using triangle inequalities, we have
This completes the proof of Lemma 6.
4. Extinction and Persistence
Lemma 7. If
and
, then
(22)
Proof. By Lemma 1, we have
(23)
Then for arbitrary
, there is a T such that for
,
(24)
Set
, therefore for
,
Consequently, for
, by (10), we have
Clearly,
Therefore,
where
Substituting the above inequality into (18), we can get
where
Thus
(25)
Note that
, under Assumptions 1,
Applying Lemma 2, we can obtain that
(26)
Then, it follows from
and for arbitrary
that
By substituting the above identities into (25) results in
And then let us prove
. Applying Itô’s formula to (12) gives
That is to say
(27)
For arbitrary
, there exists
such that for
,
Let
be sufficiently small such that
, then applying (i) and (ii) in Lemma 3 to the above two inequalities respectively, we have
According the arbitrariness of
gives that
Substituting this equation into (27), and then noting that
,
and
, we can derive that
. Thus by (14), we obtain
This completes the proof.
Next we will discuss the ecological dynamics of the system (3) or system (6).
Theorem 1. Consider system (6), we have the following valid statements
(i) If
and
, then both
and
are extinct, i.e.
(ii) If
and
, then
is extinct and
is stable in mean almost surely, i.e.
(iii) If
and
, then
is stable in mean almost surely and
is extinct, i.e.
(iv) If
and
then
and
are both stochastic strong persistence in mean almost surely.
Proof. According to Itô’s formula, we can obtain that
In other words, we have
(28)
(29)
Now let us prove (i). It follows from (24) and (28), for sufficiently large t, that
where
is sufficiently small such that
. Noting that
and
and, hence
. In the same way, if
, and according to (29),
.
(ii) Since
, thus (i) implies
. By (24) and (29), for sufficiently large t, we have
(30)
(31)
If
, then there exist arbitrarily sufficiently small
and
, for all
, by making use of (i) and (ii) in Lemma 3 to (30) and (31) respectively, we have
According to the arbitrariness of
, the above inequality gives
(iii) Since
, thus (i) implies
, By (24) and (28), for sufficiently large t, we have
(32)
(33)
If
, then there exist arbitrarily sufficiently small
and
, for all
, by making use of (i) and (ii) in Lemma 3 to (32) and (33) respectively, we have
According to the arbitrariness of
, the above inequality gives
(iv) From (29), we get
Then, we have
noting that
,
and
and (23), for sufficiently large t, we can derive that
(34)
Moreover, follows from (24) and (29), for sufficiently large t, we have
then there exist arbitrarily sufficiently small
and
, for all
, by making use of (ii) in Lemma 3, we get
According to the given condition
, we get
(35)
Integrating the both side of (35), then by (34) and for sufficiently large t, we have
(36)
There exist arbitrarily sufficiently small
and
, for all
, by making use of (i) and (ii) in Lemma 3 to (33) and (36) respectively, we get
5. Numerical Simulations
In this section, we apply Split-step Backward Euler method [28] [29] [30] to prove our theoretical results.
(1) We assume the parameters
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, then
,
.
We observe that two species will go to extinction from Figure 1, and the result of (i) in Theorem 1 are shown.
(2) Let
,
, then other conditions remain unchanged, we have
,
.
We observe that
will go to extinction, and
will be stable in mean from Figure 2, where
and then the result of (ii) in Theorem 1 are shown.
(3) We set
,
, then other conditions remain unchanged, we have
,
.
From Figure 3, we get that
will be stable in mean and
will be extinct, and then the result of (iii) in Theorem 1 are shown, where
(4) We set
,
, then other conditions remain unchanged, we have
,
, then
,
.
From Figure 4, we get that both
and
will be stochastic strong
Figure 1. This figure is time series graph of
and
. We choose
,
, step size
, initial value
,
,
,
, and
,
,
.
Figure 2. This figure is time series of
and
with
,
, step size
, initial value
,
,
,
, and
,
,
.
Figure 3. This figure is time series of
and
with
,
, step size
, initial value
,
,
,
, and
,
,
.
Figure 4. The above figure is time series graph of
and
. The under figure is the 2D phase diagram of
and
. We choose
,
, step size
, initial value
,
,
,
, and
,
,
.
persistent in mean. The 2D phase diagram of
and
mean that two species are in a predator-prey relationship. The result of (iv) in Theorem 1 are shown, where
6. Discussion and Conclusions
In this paper, we add Lévy noise to the stochastic modified Leslie-Gower and Holling-type IV predator-prey model, and assume that the toxicants are added in periodic pulses in the model. We show that the model has a unique global solution and study the stability in distribution of solutions. We get the thresholds
to determine extinction and persistent in mean of two species; thus sufficient and necessary conditions are established for the extinction and persistent in mean of two species.
From the Theorem 1 and the numerical simulation results in Figures 1-4, we can see that Lévy noise has a strong effect on the system (3). At the same time, through the expression of the thresholds
and changing the parameter value multiple times, it shows that the line shape in the numerical simulation is undulating, because white noise can reflect that the model is affected by the environment. We also know that the value of
and f will affect the survival dynamics of the species from (iv) in Theorem 1. The expression of
also reflects that the toxicants and population’s own performance also more or less affects the survival dynamics of the species.
Indeed, when the population encounters sudden environmental disturbances, such as tsunamis, earthquakes, etc., the survival environment of the population is threatened. Ecological stability is bound to be affected because they can’t adapt to this sudden environmental fluctuation in a short time. Lévy jump has a great impact on the survival of species. With the rapid development of modern industrial technology, pollution has been increased as well. Impulsive toxicant will inevitably have a certain impact to species’ living environment and their own growth.
This article has practical significance for the survival analysis of a stochastic modified Leslie-Gower and Holling-type IV predator-prey model with Lévy noise in impulsive toxicant input environments. But considering that some more complex systems will be more in line with the actual situation, for example, during the rainy season and the dry season, the growth rate and mortality rate of the species are different, so we can consider adding the regime switching to the system (3). In the next research work, we can try to consider the influence of continuous-time Markov chain on the system.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees for their useful suggestions which have significantly improved the paper.