Open Journal of Stomatology

Volume 2, Issue 1 (March 2012)

ISSN Print: 2160-8709   ISSN Online: 2160-8717

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.49  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

A comparative evaluation of dentin caries removal with polymer bur and conventional burs—An in vitro study

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 63KB)  PP. 12-15  
DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2012.21002    6,171 Downloads   11,067 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of Polymer bur (Smartprep) and Conventional burs (Carbide bur & Diamond Points) in selective Dentin caries removal. Materials and method: 15 freshly extracted carious human premolars and molars were selected for this study. These teeth were split in the center of carious lesion, in order to obtain two corresponding half. Thus 30 samples were prepared in this way. These were randomly divided in to 3 groups of 10 samples each. Group 1: The carious portion of these samples was excavated with the help of polymer bur Smartprep (SS White). Group 3: Prepared with Tungsten carbide round bur (No. 018). Group 3: Prepared with the help of Diamond points (No. 018). The period of time involved in this process is measured. After excavation of all carious lesions, a longitudinal section from mid most part of lesion was obtain with the help of diamond disc at slow speed. After staining with caries detector dye “Seek”, the sections were subjected to histological evaluation under stereomicro-scope. The thickness of remaining caries is measured in more or less than 1 mm. Results: The difference in grading of remaining carious dentin between Polymer bur and Conventional burs were statistically non- significant, but Polymer bur taken more time in comparison to Conventional burs. Conclusion: Smartprep bur is more conservative in selectively dentin caries removal than Conventional burs but same time it is more time consuming than Conventional burs.

Share and Cite:

Shakya, V. , Chandra, A. , Tikku, A. , Verma, P. and Yadav, R. (2012) A comparative evaluation of dentin caries removal with polymer bur and conventional burs—An in vitro study. Open Journal of Stomatology, 2, 12-15. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2012.21002.

Cited by

[1] Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two minimally invasive caries removal techniques on fracture resistance of the teeth restored with composite: An SEM …
Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 2021
[2] Evaluation of Caries Excavation Efficacy with Ceramic Bur and Hand Excavation in Primary Teeth: An Experimental Study
2020
[3] Comparative Microbiological Evaluation after Caries Removal by Various Burs
2019
[4] L'éviction carieuse par moyens mécaniques: données actuelles
2019
[5] Clinical Evaluation of Caries Removal in Primary Teeth Using Carie-care and SmartPrep Burs: An In vivo Study
2016
[6] Prise en charge des lésions carieuses de classe II en micro-dentisterie
2016
[7] EVALUATION OF POLYMER BUR FOR CARIOUS DENTIN REMOVAL IN PRIMARY TEETH
Alexandria Dental Journal, 2015
[8] Микроинвазивен подход при лечение на кариес при деца–съвременни аспекти
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА ДЕНТАЛНАТА МЕДИЦИНА PROBLEMS OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.