Share This Article:

Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2740KB) PP. 260-273
DOI: 10.4236/ijaa.2013.33031    5,586 Downloads   14,066 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment


Detailed solar Angular Momentum (AM) graphs produced from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) DE405 ephemeris display cyclic perturbations that show a very strong correlation with prior solar activity slowdowns. These same AM perturbations also occur simultaneously with known solar path changes about the Solar System Barycentre (SSB). The AM perturbations can be measured and quantified allowing analysis of past solar cycle modulations along with the 11,500 year solar proxy records (14C & 10Be). The detailed AM information also displays a recurring wave of modulation that aligns very closely with the observed sunspot record since 1650. The AM perturbation and modulation is a direct product of the outer gas giants (Uranus & Neptune). This information gives the opportunity to predict future grand minima along with normal solar cycle strength with some confidence. A proposed mechanical link between solar activity and planetary influence via a discrepancy found in solar/planet AM along with current AM perturbations indicate solar cycle 24 & 25 will be heavily reduced in sunspot activity resembling a similar pattern to solar cycles 5 & 6 during the Dalton Minimum (1790-1830).

Cite this paper

G. Sharp, "Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?," International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 260-273. doi: 10.4236/ijaa.2013.33031.


[1] P. Jose, “Sun’s Motion and Sunspots,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 70, 1965, pp. 193-200. doi:10.1086/109714
[2] T. Landscheidt, “New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming,” Energy and Environment, Vol. 14, No. 2-3, 2003, pp. 327-350.
[3] I. Charvàtovà, “Can Origin of the 2400-Year Cycle of Solar Activity Be Caused by Solar Inertial Motion?” Geophysical Institute AS CR, Bocn? II, Czech Republic, 2000.
[4] C. Smith, “Angular Momentum Graph,” 2007.
[5] F. Steinhilber, J. Beer and C. Frohlich, “Total Solar Irradiance during the Holocene,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, No. 19, 2009, p. L19704. doi:10.1029/2009GL040142
[6] M. Stuiver, P. J. Reimer, E. Bard, J. W. Beck, G. S. Burr, K. A. Hughen, B. Kromer, G. McCormac, J. van der Plicht and M. Spurk, “INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24,000#0 cal BP,” Radiocarbon, Vol. 40, 1998, p. 1041#83.
[7] S. K. Solanki, I. G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, M. Schussler and J. Beer, “Unusual Activity of the Sun during Recent Decades Compared to the Previous 11,000 Years,” Nature, Vol. 431, No. 7012, 2004, pp. 1084-1087.
[8] I. Usoskin, S. Solanki and G. Kovaltsov, “Grand Minima and Maxima of Solar Activity: New Observational Constraints,” Astronomy & Astrophysics Manuscript No. 7704, 2007.
[9] I. Wilson, B. Carter and I. A. Waite, “Does a Spin-Orbit Coupling between the Sun and the Jovian Planets Govern the Solar Cycle?” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2008, pp. 85-93. doi:10.1071/ AS06018
[10] N. Scafetta, “Empirical Evidence for a Celestial Origin of the Climate Oscillations and Its Implications,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 72, No. 13, 2010, pp. 951-970. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2010.04.015
[11] D. Callebaut, V. Makarov and A. Tlatov, “Monopolar Structure of the Sun in between Polar Reversals and in Maunder Minimum,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 40, No. 12, 2007, pp. 1917-1920.
[12] J. Javaraiah, SoPh, Vol. 212, 2003, p. 23.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.